Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy

Background Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality and morbidity principally by the detection and removal of colon polyps. It is important to retrieve resected polyps to be able to ascertain their histologic characteristics. Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the cause of polyp r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2013-03, Vol.77 (3), p.395-400
Hauptverfasser: Komeda, Yoriaki, MD, Suzuki, Noriko, MD, PhD, Sarah, Marshall, BA, Thomas-Gibson, Siwan, MD, FRCP, Vance, Margaret, MSc, Fraser, Chris, MD, MRCP, Patel, Kinesh, MD, MRCP, Saunders, Brian P., MD, FRCP
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 400
container_issue 3
container_start_page 395
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 77
creator Komeda, Yoriaki, MD
Suzuki, Noriko, MD, PhD
Sarah, Marshall, BA
Thomas-Gibson, Siwan, MD, FRCP
Vance, Margaret, MSc
Fraser, Chris, MD, MRCP
Patel, Kinesh, MD, MRCP
Saunders, Brian P., MD, FRCP
description Background Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality and morbidity principally by the detection and removal of colon polyps. It is important to retrieve resected polyps to be able to ascertain their histologic characteristics. Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the cause of polyp retrieval failure. Design Bowel cancer screening colonoscopy data were collected prospectively. Setting The Bowel Cancer Screening Program in the National Health Service. Patients Screening participants were referred to our screening center after a positive fecal occult blood test result. Intervention A total of 4383 polyps were endoscopically removed from 1495 patients from October 2006 to February 2011. Main Outcome Measurements The number, size, shape, and location of polyps; polyp removal method; quality of bowel preparation; total examination time; and insertion and withdrawal times in collected data were examined retrospectively. Results The polyp retrieval rate was 93.9%, and the failure rate was 6.1%, thus 267 polyps were not retrieved. In univariate analysis, factors affecting polyp retrieval failure were small polyp size, sessile polyps, and cold snare polypectomy ( P < .001). Polyp retrieval was less successful in the proximal colon ( P = .002). In multivariate analysis, polyp size and method of removal were independent risk factors for polyp retrieval failure ( P < .001). Limitations Retrospective study. Conclusion Small polyp size and cold snare removal were found to be significantly associated with polyp retrieval failure. It was difficult to retrieve small, sessile, and proximal colon polyps. Optical diagnosis could be an efficacious option as a surrogate for histologic diagnosis for these lesions in the near future.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1288309709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510712028015</els_id><sourcerecordid>1288309709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6fd14e1efa095cad5fcb1d0e4636e03a03123a99e6245542e3af28e6a48e35d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKBDEQRYMoOj4-wI300k2PVUk_EQQRXyC4UNchk67WjJlOm_SMzN-bZtSFC1d5cO6FOsXYMcIUAYuz-fTV0JQD8vieApRbbIJQl2lRlvU2m0CE0hyh3GP7IcwBoOICd9keFxyxzOoJu71RenA-JCoEp40aqEk-zfCWtMrYeO-dXfeJp8EbWimbqCEJ2hN1pntNtLOuc0G7fn3IdlplAx19nwfs5eb6-eoufXi8vb-6fEh1BtWQFm2DGSG1CupcqyZv9QwboKwQBYFQIJALVddU8CzPM05CtbyiQmUVibxBccBON729dx9LCoNcmKDJWtWRWwaJvKpEVAB1RHGDau9C8NTK3puF8muJIEd_ci6jPzn6G7-iv5g5-a5fzhbU_CZ-hEXgfANQHHJlyMugDXWaGuNJD7Jx5t_6iz9pbU1ntLLvtKYwd0vfRXsSZeAS5NO4wHF_yIFXgLn4AruBlUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1288309709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Komeda, Yoriaki, MD ; Suzuki, Noriko, MD, PhD ; Sarah, Marshall, BA ; Thomas-Gibson, Siwan, MD, FRCP ; Vance, Margaret, MSc ; Fraser, Chris, MD, MRCP ; Patel, Kinesh, MD, MRCP ; Saunders, Brian P., MD, FRCP</creator><creatorcontrib>Komeda, Yoriaki, MD ; Suzuki, Noriko, MD, PhD ; Sarah, Marshall, BA ; Thomas-Gibson, Siwan, MD, FRCP ; Vance, Margaret, MSc ; Fraser, Chris, MD, MRCP ; Patel, Kinesh, MD, MRCP ; Saunders, Brian P., MD, FRCP</creatorcontrib><description>Background Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality and morbidity principally by the detection and removal of colon polyps. It is important to retrieve resected polyps to be able to ascertain their histologic characteristics. Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the cause of polyp retrieval failure. Design Bowel cancer screening colonoscopy data were collected prospectively. Setting The Bowel Cancer Screening Program in the National Health Service. Patients Screening participants were referred to our screening center after a positive fecal occult blood test result. Intervention A total of 4383 polyps were endoscopically removed from 1495 patients from October 2006 to February 2011. Main Outcome Measurements The number, size, shape, and location of polyps; polyp removal method; quality of bowel preparation; total examination time; and insertion and withdrawal times in collected data were examined retrospectively. Results The polyp retrieval rate was 93.9%, and the failure rate was 6.1%, thus 267 polyps were not retrieved. In univariate analysis, factors affecting polyp retrieval failure were small polyp size, sessile polyps, and cold snare polypectomy ( P &lt; .001). Polyp retrieval was less successful in the proximal colon ( P = .002). In multivariate analysis, polyp size and method of removal were independent risk factors for polyp retrieval failure ( P &lt; .001). Limitations Retrospective study. Conclusion Small polyp size and cold snare removal were found to be significantly associated with polyp retrieval failure. It was difficult to retrieve small, sessile, and proximal colon polyps. Optical diagnosis could be an efficacious option as a surrogate for histologic diagnosis for these lesions in the near future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23211749</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Colon - pathology ; Colonic Polyps - pathology ; Colonic Polyps - surgery ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2013-03, Vol.77 (3), p.395-400</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6fd14e1efa095cad5fcb1d0e4636e03a03123a99e6245542e3af28e6a48e35d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6fd14e1efa095cad5fcb1d0e4636e03a03123a99e6245542e3af28e6a48e35d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510712028015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23211749$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Komeda, Yoriaki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Noriko, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarah, Marshall, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas-Gibson, Siwan, MD, FRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vance, Margaret, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Chris, MD, MRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Kinesh, MD, MRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Brian P., MD, FRCP</creatorcontrib><title>Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality and morbidity principally by the detection and removal of colon polyps. It is important to retrieve resected polyps to be able to ascertain their histologic characteristics. Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the cause of polyp retrieval failure. Design Bowel cancer screening colonoscopy data were collected prospectively. Setting The Bowel Cancer Screening Program in the National Health Service. Patients Screening participants were referred to our screening center after a positive fecal occult blood test result. Intervention A total of 4383 polyps were endoscopically removed from 1495 patients from October 2006 to February 2011. Main Outcome Measurements The number, size, shape, and location of polyps; polyp removal method; quality of bowel preparation; total examination time; and insertion and withdrawal times in collected data were examined retrospectively. Results The polyp retrieval rate was 93.9%, and the failure rate was 6.1%, thus 267 polyps were not retrieved. In univariate analysis, factors affecting polyp retrieval failure were small polyp size, sessile polyps, and cold snare polypectomy ( P &lt; .001). Polyp retrieval was less successful in the proximal colon ( P = .002). In multivariate analysis, polyp size and method of removal were independent risk factors for polyp retrieval failure ( P &lt; .001). Limitations Retrospective study. Conclusion Small polyp size and cold snare removal were found to be significantly associated with polyp retrieval failure. It was difficult to retrieve small, sessile, and proximal colon polyps. Optical diagnosis could be an efficacious option as a surrogate for histologic diagnosis for these lesions in the near future.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Colon - pathology</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - pathology</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - surgery</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKBDEQRYMoOj4-wI300k2PVUk_EQQRXyC4UNchk67WjJlOm_SMzN-bZtSFC1d5cO6FOsXYMcIUAYuz-fTV0JQD8vieApRbbIJQl2lRlvU2m0CE0hyh3GP7IcwBoOICd9keFxyxzOoJu71RenA-JCoEp40aqEk-zfCWtMrYeO-dXfeJp8EbWimbqCEJ2hN1pntNtLOuc0G7fn3IdlplAx19nwfs5eb6-eoufXi8vb-6fEh1BtWQFm2DGSG1CupcqyZv9QwboKwQBYFQIJALVddU8CzPM05CtbyiQmUVibxBccBON729dx9LCoNcmKDJWtWRWwaJvKpEVAB1RHGDau9C8NTK3puF8muJIEd_ci6jPzn6G7-iv5g5-a5fzhbU_CZ-hEXgfANQHHJlyMugDXWaGuNJD7Jx5t_6iz9pbU1ntLLvtKYwd0vfRXsSZeAS5NO4wHF_yIFXgLn4AruBlUc</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Komeda, Yoriaki, MD</creator><creator>Suzuki, Noriko, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Sarah, Marshall, BA</creator><creator>Thomas-Gibson, Siwan, MD, FRCP</creator><creator>Vance, Margaret, MSc</creator><creator>Fraser, Chris, MD, MRCP</creator><creator>Patel, Kinesh, MD, MRCP</creator><creator>Saunders, Brian P., MD, FRCP</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy</title><author>Komeda, Yoriaki, MD ; Suzuki, Noriko, MD, PhD ; Sarah, Marshall, BA ; Thomas-Gibson, Siwan, MD, FRCP ; Vance, Margaret, MSc ; Fraser, Chris, MD, MRCP ; Patel, Kinesh, MD, MRCP ; Saunders, Brian P., MD, FRCP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6fd14e1efa095cad5fcb1d0e4636e03a03123a99e6245542e3af28e6a48e35d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Colon - pathology</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - pathology</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - surgery</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Komeda, Yoriaki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Noriko, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarah, Marshall, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas-Gibson, Siwan, MD, FRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vance, Margaret, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Chris, MD, MRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Kinesh, MD, MRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Brian P., MD, FRCP</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Komeda, Yoriaki, MD</au><au>Suzuki, Noriko, MD, PhD</au><au>Sarah, Marshall, BA</au><au>Thomas-Gibson, Siwan, MD, FRCP</au><au>Vance, Margaret, MSc</au><au>Fraser, Chris, MD, MRCP</au><au>Patel, Kinesh, MD, MRCP</au><au>Saunders, Brian P., MD, FRCP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>395-400</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>Background Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality and morbidity principally by the detection and removal of colon polyps. It is important to retrieve resected polyps to be able to ascertain their histologic characteristics. Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the cause of polyp retrieval failure. Design Bowel cancer screening colonoscopy data were collected prospectively. Setting The Bowel Cancer Screening Program in the National Health Service. Patients Screening participants were referred to our screening center after a positive fecal occult blood test result. Intervention A total of 4383 polyps were endoscopically removed from 1495 patients from October 2006 to February 2011. Main Outcome Measurements The number, size, shape, and location of polyps; polyp removal method; quality of bowel preparation; total examination time; and insertion and withdrawal times in collected data were examined retrospectively. Results The polyp retrieval rate was 93.9%, and the failure rate was 6.1%, thus 267 polyps were not retrieved. In univariate analysis, factors affecting polyp retrieval failure were small polyp size, sessile polyps, and cold snare polypectomy ( P &lt; .001). Polyp retrieval was less successful in the proximal colon ( P = .002). In multivariate analysis, polyp size and method of removal were independent risk factors for polyp retrieval failure ( P &lt; .001). Limitations Retrospective study. Conclusion Small polyp size and cold snare removal were found to be significantly associated with polyp retrieval failure. It was difficult to retrieve small, sessile, and proximal colon polyps. Optical diagnosis could be an efficacious option as a surrogate for histologic diagnosis for these lesions in the near future.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>23211749</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.007</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2013-03, Vol.77 (3), p.395-400
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1288309709
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Colon - pathology
Colonic Polyps - pathology
Colonic Polyps - surgery
Colonoscopy - methods
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Humans
Logistic Models
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Failure
title Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A35%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20associated%20with%20failed%20polyp%20retrieval%20at%20screening%20colonoscopy&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Komeda,%20Yoriaki,%20MD&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=395-400&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1288309709%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1288309709&rft_id=info:pmid/23211749&rft_els_id=S0016510712028015&rfr_iscdi=true