Influence of visual feedback on force–EMG curves from spinally innervated versus trigeminally innervated muscles

Abstract Objective We compared the influence of visual feedback between spinal and trigeminal muscle activity. Design Twelve subjects participated in two tasks: a finger pinch and a tooth clench task and performed a series of muscle activations with visual feedback as a training task and two series...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of oral biology 2013-03, Vol.58 (3), p.331-339
Hauptverfasser: Iida, Takashi, Komiyama, Osamu, Obara, Ryoko, Baad-Hansen, Lene, Kawara, Misao, Svensson, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 339
container_issue 3
container_start_page 331
container_title Archives of oral biology
container_volume 58
creator Iida, Takashi
Komiyama, Osamu
Obara, Ryoko
Baad-Hansen, Lene
Kawara, Misao
Svensson, Peter
description Abstract Objective We compared the influence of visual feedback between spinal and trigeminal muscle activity. Design Twelve subjects participated in two tasks: a finger pinch and a tooth clench task and performed a series of muscle activations with visual feedback as a training task and two series without visual feedback as pre- and post-training tasks. Five target force levels at 10%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% maximal voluntary contraction were performed in each series for both tasks. During all series electromyographic (EMG) activity and force were recorded. Target force–actual force and target force–EMG curves were compared with and without visual feedback for both tasks. The variability in each series was determined as the coefficient of variation (CV) from the EMG and force recordings. Results Although positive linear relationships were found between the target force level and the actual force value, and target force level and root mean square (RMS)-EMG amplitude from the tooth clenching task, the curves calculated from the finger pinch task were not completely linear. CVs of the actual force value and CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in both masseter and temporalis muscles were significantly influenced by visual feedback ( P < 0.001). However, the CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in right abductor pollicisbrevis and right first dorsal interosseous muscles were not significantly influenced by the three series. Conclusions The influence of visual feedback was different between spinally innervated and trigeminally innervated muscles, and the specific mechanism of force execution from muscle activity appears to be different between the tasks.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1287885939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003996912004505</els_id><sourcerecordid>1287885939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-6c5cf82e2a075d321a63fd397b391be27807fd97fb7fdcee08c62c54acfae9573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQxy1ERbeFV0DmxiWL7Ww-fEFCq1IqFXFoe7acyRi8deLFjiPtre_AG_IkONoWIbggWRqN_P_Px28IecPZmjNev9utdYBvPmjXWb8WjIt1foxVz8iKt40seMXq52TFGCsLKWt5Ss5i3OW0qmv-gpyKUsicbVYkXI3GJRwBqTd0tjFpRw1i32m4p36kxgfAnw8_Lj5fUkhhxkhN8AONeztq5w7UjiOGWU_Y0xlDTJFOwX7F4d_vIUVwGF-SE6NdxFeP8Zzcfby43X4qrr9cXm0_XBewke1U1FCBaQUKzZqqLwXXdWn6UjZdKXmHomlZY3rZmC4HQGQt1AKqjQajUVZNeU7eHuvug_-eME5qsBHQOT2iT1Fx0TZtW8lSZqk8SiH4GAMatQ920OGgOFMLcrVTfyBXC_LsVxlo9r5-bJO6AfvfzifGWbA9CjAvO1sMKoJdiPc2IEyq9_a_2rz_qwo4O1rQ7h4PGHc-hQw8b6ViNqib5fbL6bnIM1S5wC_mc7E9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1287885939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of visual feedback on force–EMG curves from spinally innervated versus trigeminally innervated muscles</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Iida, Takashi ; Komiyama, Osamu ; Obara, Ryoko ; Baad-Hansen, Lene ; Kawara, Misao ; Svensson, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Iida, Takashi ; Komiyama, Osamu ; Obara, Ryoko ; Baad-Hansen, Lene ; Kawara, Misao ; Svensson, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective We compared the influence of visual feedback between spinal and trigeminal muscle activity. Design Twelve subjects participated in two tasks: a finger pinch and a tooth clench task and performed a series of muscle activations with visual feedback as a training task and two series without visual feedback as pre- and post-training tasks. Five target force levels at 10%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% maximal voluntary contraction were performed in each series for both tasks. During all series electromyographic (EMG) activity and force were recorded. Target force–actual force and target force–EMG curves were compared with and without visual feedback for both tasks. The variability in each series was determined as the coefficient of variation (CV) from the EMG and force recordings. Results Although positive linear relationships were found between the target force level and the actual force value, and target force level and root mean square (RMS)-EMG amplitude from the tooth clenching task, the curves calculated from the finger pinch task were not completely linear. CVs of the actual force value and CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in both masseter and temporalis muscles were significantly influenced by visual feedback ( P &lt; 0.001). However, the CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in right abductor pollicisbrevis and right first dorsal interosseous muscles were not significantly influenced by the three series. Conclusions The influence of visual feedback was different between spinally innervated and trigeminally innervated muscles, and the specific mechanism of force execution from muscle activity appears to be different between the tasks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1506</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23290004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Advanced Basic Science ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bite Force ; Dentistry ; Electromyography - methods ; Feedback, Sensory - physiology ; Female ; Finger pinch ; Fingers - innervation ; Humans ; Learning ; Male ; Masseter Muscle - innervation ; Masseter Muscle - physiology ; Motor control ; Motor learning ; Motor Skills - physiology ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - innervation ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Pinch Strength - physiology ; Spinal Nerves - physiology ; Temporal Muscle - innervation ; Temporal Muscle - physiology ; Tooth - innervation ; Tooth clenching ; Trigeminal Nerve - physiology ; Visual feedback</subject><ispartof>Archives of oral biology, 2013-03, Vol.58 (3), p.331-339</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-6c5cf82e2a075d321a63fd397b391be27807fd97fb7fdcee08c62c54acfae9573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-6c5cf82e2a075d321a63fd397b391be27807fd97fb7fdcee08c62c54acfae9573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003996912004505$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23290004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iida, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komiyama, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obara, Ryoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baad-Hansen, Lene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawara, Misao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svensson, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of visual feedback on force–EMG curves from spinally innervated versus trigeminally innervated muscles</title><title>Archives of oral biology</title><addtitle>Arch Oral Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective We compared the influence of visual feedback between spinal and trigeminal muscle activity. Design Twelve subjects participated in two tasks: a finger pinch and a tooth clench task and performed a series of muscle activations with visual feedback as a training task and two series without visual feedback as pre- and post-training tasks. Five target force levels at 10%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% maximal voluntary contraction were performed in each series for both tasks. During all series electromyographic (EMG) activity and force were recorded. Target force–actual force and target force–EMG curves were compared with and without visual feedback for both tasks. The variability in each series was determined as the coefficient of variation (CV) from the EMG and force recordings. Results Although positive linear relationships were found between the target force level and the actual force value, and target force level and root mean square (RMS)-EMG amplitude from the tooth clenching task, the curves calculated from the finger pinch task were not completely linear. CVs of the actual force value and CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in both masseter and temporalis muscles were significantly influenced by visual feedback ( P &lt; 0.001). However, the CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in right abductor pollicisbrevis and right first dorsal interosseous muscles were not significantly influenced by the three series. Conclusions The influence of visual feedback was different between spinally innervated and trigeminally innervated muscles, and the specific mechanism of force execution from muscle activity appears to be different between the tasks.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bite Force</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Feedback, Sensory - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finger pinch</subject><subject>Fingers - innervation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Masseter Muscle - innervation</subject><subject>Masseter Muscle - physiology</subject><subject>Motor control</subject><subject>Motor learning</subject><subject>Motor Skills - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Pinch Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Spinal Nerves - physiology</subject><subject>Temporal Muscle - innervation</subject><subject>Temporal Muscle - physiology</subject><subject>Tooth - innervation</subject><subject>Tooth clenching</subject><subject>Trigeminal Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>Visual feedback</subject><issn>0003-9969</issn><issn>1879-1506</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQxy1ERbeFV0DmxiWL7Ww-fEFCq1IqFXFoe7acyRi8deLFjiPtre_AG_IkONoWIbggWRqN_P_Px28IecPZmjNev9utdYBvPmjXWb8WjIt1foxVz8iKt40seMXq52TFGCsLKWt5Ss5i3OW0qmv-gpyKUsicbVYkXI3GJRwBqTd0tjFpRw1i32m4p36kxgfAnw8_Lj5fUkhhxkhN8AONeztq5w7UjiOGWU_Y0xlDTJFOwX7F4d_vIUVwGF-SE6NdxFeP8Zzcfby43X4qrr9cXm0_XBewke1U1FCBaQUKzZqqLwXXdWn6UjZdKXmHomlZY3rZmC4HQGQt1AKqjQajUVZNeU7eHuvug_-eME5qsBHQOT2iT1Fx0TZtW8lSZqk8SiH4GAMatQ920OGgOFMLcrVTfyBXC_LsVxlo9r5-bJO6AfvfzifGWbA9CjAvO1sMKoJdiPc2IEyq9_a_2rz_qwo4O1rQ7h4PGHc-hQw8b6ViNqib5fbL6bnIM1S5wC_mc7E9</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Iida, Takashi</creator><creator>Komiyama, Osamu</creator><creator>Obara, Ryoko</creator><creator>Baad-Hansen, Lene</creator><creator>Kawara, Misao</creator><creator>Svensson, Peter</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Influence of visual feedback on force–EMG curves from spinally innervated versus trigeminally innervated muscles</title><author>Iida, Takashi ; Komiyama, Osamu ; Obara, Ryoko ; Baad-Hansen, Lene ; Kawara, Misao ; Svensson, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-6c5cf82e2a075d321a63fd397b391be27807fd97fb7fdcee08c62c54acfae9573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bite Force</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Feedback, Sensory - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finger pinch</topic><topic>Fingers - innervation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Masseter Muscle - innervation</topic><topic>Masseter Muscle - physiology</topic><topic>Motor control</topic><topic>Motor learning</topic><topic>Motor Skills - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Pinch Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Spinal Nerves - physiology</topic><topic>Temporal Muscle - innervation</topic><topic>Temporal Muscle - physiology</topic><topic>Tooth - innervation</topic><topic>Tooth clenching</topic><topic>Trigeminal Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>Visual feedback</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iida, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komiyama, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obara, Ryoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baad-Hansen, Lene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawara, Misao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svensson, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of oral biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iida, Takashi</au><au>Komiyama, Osamu</au><au>Obara, Ryoko</au><au>Baad-Hansen, Lene</au><au>Kawara, Misao</au><au>Svensson, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of visual feedback on force–EMG curves from spinally innervated versus trigeminally innervated muscles</atitle><jtitle>Archives of oral biology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Oral Biol</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>331</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>331-339</pages><issn>0003-9969</issn><eissn>1879-1506</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective We compared the influence of visual feedback between spinal and trigeminal muscle activity. Design Twelve subjects participated in two tasks: a finger pinch and a tooth clench task and performed a series of muscle activations with visual feedback as a training task and two series without visual feedback as pre- and post-training tasks. Five target force levels at 10%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% maximal voluntary contraction were performed in each series for both tasks. During all series electromyographic (EMG) activity and force were recorded. Target force–actual force and target force–EMG curves were compared with and without visual feedback for both tasks. The variability in each series was determined as the coefficient of variation (CV) from the EMG and force recordings. Results Although positive linear relationships were found between the target force level and the actual force value, and target force level and root mean square (RMS)-EMG amplitude from the tooth clenching task, the curves calculated from the finger pinch task were not completely linear. CVs of the actual force value and CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in both masseter and temporalis muscles were significantly influenced by visual feedback ( P &lt; 0.001). However, the CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in right abductor pollicisbrevis and right first dorsal interosseous muscles were not significantly influenced by the three series. Conclusions The influence of visual feedback was different between spinally innervated and trigeminally innervated muscles, and the specific mechanism of force execution from muscle activity appears to be different between the tasks.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23290004</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.005</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9969
ispartof Archives of oral biology, 2013-03, Vol.58 (3), p.331-339
issn 0003-9969
1879-1506
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1287885939
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Advanced Basic Science
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bite Force
Dentistry
Electromyography - methods
Feedback, Sensory - physiology
Female
Finger pinch
Fingers - innervation
Humans
Learning
Male
Masseter Muscle - innervation
Masseter Muscle - physiology
Motor control
Motor learning
Motor Skills - physiology
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - innervation
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Pinch Strength - physiology
Spinal Nerves - physiology
Temporal Muscle - innervation
Temporal Muscle - physiology
Tooth - innervation
Tooth clenching
Trigeminal Nerve - physiology
Visual feedback
title Influence of visual feedback on force–EMG curves from spinally innervated versus trigeminally innervated muscles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T15%3A53%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20visual%20feedback%20on%20force%E2%80%93EMG%20curves%20from%20spinally%20innervated%20versus%20trigeminally%20innervated%20muscles&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20oral%20biology&rft.au=Iida,%20Takashi&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=331-339&rft.issn=0003-9969&rft.eissn=1879-1506&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1287885939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1287885939&rft_id=info:pmid/23290004&rft_els_id=S0003996912004505&rfr_iscdi=true