Influence of visual feedback on force–EMG curves from spinally innervated versus trigeminally innervated muscles
Abstract Objective We compared the influence of visual feedback between spinal and trigeminal muscle activity. Design Twelve subjects participated in two tasks: a finger pinch and a tooth clench task and performed a series of muscle activations with visual feedback as a training task and two series...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of oral biology 2013-03, Vol.58 (3), p.331-339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 339 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 331 |
container_title | Archives of oral biology |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Iida, Takashi Komiyama, Osamu Obara, Ryoko Baad-Hansen, Lene Kawara, Misao Svensson, Peter |
description | Abstract Objective We compared the influence of visual feedback between spinal and trigeminal muscle activity. Design Twelve subjects participated in two tasks: a finger pinch and a tooth clench task and performed a series of muscle activations with visual feedback as a training task and two series without visual feedback as pre- and post-training tasks. Five target force levels at 10%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% maximal voluntary contraction were performed in each series for both tasks. During all series electromyographic (EMG) activity and force were recorded. Target force–actual force and target force–EMG curves were compared with and without visual feedback for both tasks. The variability in each series was determined as the coefficient of variation (CV) from the EMG and force recordings. Results Although positive linear relationships were found between the target force level and the actual force value, and target force level and root mean square (RMS)-EMG amplitude from the tooth clenching task, the curves calculated from the finger pinch task were not completely linear. CVs of the actual force value and CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in both masseter and temporalis muscles were significantly influenced by visual feedback ( P < 0.001). However, the CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in right abductor pollicisbrevis and right first dorsal interosseous muscles were not significantly influenced by the three series. Conclusions The influence of visual feedback was different between spinally innervated and trigeminally innervated muscles, and the specific mechanism of force execution from muscle activity appears to be different between the tasks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1287885939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003996912004505</els_id><sourcerecordid>1287885939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-6c5cf82e2a075d321a63fd397b391be27807fd97fb7fdcee08c62c54acfae9573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQxy1ERbeFV0DmxiWL7Ww-fEFCq1IqFXFoe7acyRi8deLFjiPtre_AG_IkONoWIbggWRqN_P_Px28IecPZmjNev9utdYBvPmjXWb8WjIt1foxVz8iKt40seMXq52TFGCsLKWt5Ss5i3OW0qmv-gpyKUsicbVYkXI3GJRwBqTd0tjFpRw1i32m4p36kxgfAnw8_Lj5fUkhhxkhN8AONeztq5w7UjiOGWU_Y0xlDTJFOwX7F4d_vIUVwGF-SE6NdxFeP8Zzcfby43X4qrr9cXm0_XBewke1U1FCBaQUKzZqqLwXXdWn6UjZdKXmHomlZY3rZmC4HQGQt1AKqjQajUVZNeU7eHuvug_-eME5qsBHQOT2iT1Fx0TZtW8lSZqk8SiH4GAMatQ920OGgOFMLcrVTfyBXC_LsVxlo9r5-bJO6AfvfzifGWbA9CjAvO1sMKoJdiPc2IEyq9_a_2rz_qwo4O1rQ7h4PGHc-hQw8b6ViNqib5fbL6bnIM1S5wC_mc7E9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1287885939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of visual feedback on force–EMG curves from spinally innervated versus trigeminally innervated muscles</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Iida, Takashi ; Komiyama, Osamu ; Obara, Ryoko ; Baad-Hansen, Lene ; Kawara, Misao ; Svensson, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Iida, Takashi ; Komiyama, Osamu ; Obara, Ryoko ; Baad-Hansen, Lene ; Kawara, Misao ; Svensson, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective We compared the influence of visual feedback between spinal and trigeminal muscle activity. Design Twelve subjects participated in two tasks: a finger pinch and a tooth clench task and performed a series of muscle activations with visual feedback as a training task and two series without visual feedback as pre- and post-training tasks. Five target force levels at 10%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% maximal voluntary contraction were performed in each series for both tasks. During all series electromyographic (EMG) activity and force were recorded. Target force–actual force and target force–EMG curves were compared with and without visual feedback for both tasks. The variability in each series was determined as the coefficient of variation (CV) from the EMG and force recordings. Results Although positive linear relationships were found between the target force level and the actual force value, and target force level and root mean square (RMS)-EMG amplitude from the tooth clenching task, the curves calculated from the finger pinch task were not completely linear. CVs of the actual force value and CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in both masseter and temporalis muscles were significantly influenced by visual feedback ( P < 0.001). However, the CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in right abductor pollicisbrevis and right first dorsal interosseous muscles were not significantly influenced by the three series. Conclusions The influence of visual feedback was different between spinally innervated and trigeminally innervated muscles, and the specific mechanism of force execution from muscle activity appears to be different between the tasks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1506</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23290004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Advanced Basic Science ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bite Force ; Dentistry ; Electromyography - methods ; Feedback, Sensory - physiology ; Female ; Finger pinch ; Fingers - innervation ; Humans ; Learning ; Male ; Masseter Muscle - innervation ; Masseter Muscle - physiology ; Motor control ; Motor learning ; Motor Skills - physiology ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - innervation ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Pinch Strength - physiology ; Spinal Nerves - physiology ; Temporal Muscle - innervation ; Temporal Muscle - physiology ; Tooth - innervation ; Tooth clenching ; Trigeminal Nerve - physiology ; Visual feedback</subject><ispartof>Archives of oral biology, 2013-03, Vol.58 (3), p.331-339</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-6c5cf82e2a075d321a63fd397b391be27807fd97fb7fdcee08c62c54acfae9573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-6c5cf82e2a075d321a63fd397b391be27807fd97fb7fdcee08c62c54acfae9573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003996912004505$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23290004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iida, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komiyama, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obara, Ryoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baad-Hansen, Lene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawara, Misao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svensson, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of visual feedback on force–EMG curves from spinally innervated versus trigeminally innervated muscles</title><title>Archives of oral biology</title><addtitle>Arch Oral Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective We compared the influence of visual feedback between spinal and trigeminal muscle activity. Design Twelve subjects participated in two tasks: a finger pinch and a tooth clench task and performed a series of muscle activations with visual feedback as a training task and two series without visual feedback as pre- and post-training tasks. Five target force levels at 10%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% maximal voluntary contraction were performed in each series for both tasks. During all series electromyographic (EMG) activity and force were recorded. Target force–actual force and target force–EMG curves were compared with and without visual feedback for both tasks. The variability in each series was determined as the coefficient of variation (CV) from the EMG and force recordings. Results Although positive linear relationships were found between the target force level and the actual force value, and target force level and root mean square (RMS)-EMG amplitude from the tooth clenching task, the curves calculated from the finger pinch task were not completely linear. CVs of the actual force value and CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in both masseter and temporalis muscles were significantly influenced by visual feedback ( P < 0.001). However, the CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in right abductor pollicisbrevis and right first dorsal interosseous muscles were not significantly influenced by the three series. Conclusions The influence of visual feedback was different between spinally innervated and trigeminally innervated muscles, and the specific mechanism of force execution from muscle activity appears to be different between the tasks.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bite Force</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Feedback, Sensory - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finger pinch</subject><subject>Fingers - innervation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Masseter Muscle - innervation</subject><subject>Masseter Muscle - physiology</subject><subject>Motor control</subject><subject>Motor learning</subject><subject>Motor Skills - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Pinch Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Spinal Nerves - physiology</subject><subject>Temporal Muscle - innervation</subject><subject>Temporal Muscle - physiology</subject><subject>Tooth - innervation</subject><subject>Tooth clenching</subject><subject>Trigeminal Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>Visual feedback</subject><issn>0003-9969</issn><issn>1879-1506</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQxy1ERbeFV0DmxiWL7Ww-fEFCq1IqFXFoe7acyRi8deLFjiPtre_AG_IkONoWIbggWRqN_P_Px28IecPZmjNev9utdYBvPmjXWb8WjIt1foxVz8iKt40seMXq52TFGCsLKWt5Ss5i3OW0qmv-gpyKUsicbVYkXI3GJRwBqTd0tjFpRw1i32m4p36kxgfAnw8_Lj5fUkhhxkhN8AONeztq5w7UjiOGWU_Y0xlDTJFOwX7F4d_vIUVwGF-SE6NdxFeP8Zzcfby43X4qrr9cXm0_XBewke1U1FCBaQUKzZqqLwXXdWn6UjZdKXmHomlZY3rZmC4HQGQt1AKqjQajUVZNeU7eHuvug_-eME5qsBHQOT2iT1Fx0TZtW8lSZqk8SiH4GAMatQ920OGgOFMLcrVTfyBXC_LsVxlo9r5-bJO6AfvfzifGWbA9CjAvO1sMKoJdiPc2IEyq9_a_2rz_qwo4O1rQ7h4PGHc-hQw8b6ViNqib5fbL6bnIM1S5wC_mc7E9</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Iida, Takashi</creator><creator>Komiyama, Osamu</creator><creator>Obara, Ryoko</creator><creator>Baad-Hansen, Lene</creator><creator>Kawara, Misao</creator><creator>Svensson, Peter</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Influence of visual feedback on force–EMG curves from spinally innervated versus trigeminally innervated muscles</title><author>Iida, Takashi ; Komiyama, Osamu ; Obara, Ryoko ; Baad-Hansen, Lene ; Kawara, Misao ; Svensson, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-6c5cf82e2a075d321a63fd397b391be27807fd97fb7fdcee08c62c54acfae9573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bite Force</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Feedback, Sensory - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finger pinch</topic><topic>Fingers - innervation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Masseter Muscle - innervation</topic><topic>Masseter Muscle - physiology</topic><topic>Motor control</topic><topic>Motor learning</topic><topic>Motor Skills - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Pinch Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Spinal Nerves - physiology</topic><topic>Temporal Muscle - innervation</topic><topic>Temporal Muscle - physiology</topic><topic>Tooth - innervation</topic><topic>Tooth clenching</topic><topic>Trigeminal Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>Visual feedback</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iida, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komiyama, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obara, Ryoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baad-Hansen, Lene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawara, Misao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svensson, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of oral biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iida, Takashi</au><au>Komiyama, Osamu</au><au>Obara, Ryoko</au><au>Baad-Hansen, Lene</au><au>Kawara, Misao</au><au>Svensson, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of visual feedback on force–EMG curves from spinally innervated versus trigeminally innervated muscles</atitle><jtitle>Archives of oral biology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Oral Biol</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>331</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>331-339</pages><issn>0003-9969</issn><eissn>1879-1506</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective We compared the influence of visual feedback between spinal and trigeminal muscle activity. Design Twelve subjects participated in two tasks: a finger pinch and a tooth clench task and performed a series of muscle activations with visual feedback as a training task and two series without visual feedback as pre- and post-training tasks. Five target force levels at 10%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% maximal voluntary contraction were performed in each series for both tasks. During all series electromyographic (EMG) activity and force were recorded. Target force–actual force and target force–EMG curves were compared with and without visual feedback for both tasks. The variability in each series was determined as the coefficient of variation (CV) from the EMG and force recordings. Results Although positive linear relationships were found between the target force level and the actual force value, and target force level and root mean square (RMS)-EMG amplitude from the tooth clenching task, the curves calculated from the finger pinch task were not completely linear. CVs of the actual force value and CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in both masseter and temporalis muscles were significantly influenced by visual feedback ( P < 0.001). However, the CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in right abductor pollicisbrevis and right first dorsal interosseous muscles were not significantly influenced by the three series. Conclusions The influence of visual feedback was different between spinally innervated and trigeminally innervated muscles, and the specific mechanism of force execution from muscle activity appears to be different between the tasks.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23290004</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.005</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9969 |
ispartof | Archives of oral biology, 2013-03, Vol.58 (3), p.331-339 |
issn | 0003-9969 1879-1506 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1287885939 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Advanced Basic Science Biomechanical Phenomena Bite Force Dentistry Electromyography - methods Feedback, Sensory - physiology Female Finger pinch Fingers - innervation Humans Learning Male Masseter Muscle - innervation Masseter Muscle - physiology Motor control Motor learning Motor Skills - physiology Muscle Contraction - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - innervation Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Pinch Strength - physiology Spinal Nerves - physiology Temporal Muscle - innervation Temporal Muscle - physiology Tooth - innervation Tooth clenching Trigeminal Nerve - physiology Visual feedback |
title | Influence of visual feedback on force–EMG curves from spinally innervated versus trigeminally innervated muscles |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T15%3A53%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20visual%20feedback%20on%20force%E2%80%93EMG%20curves%20from%20spinally%20innervated%20versus%20trigeminally%20innervated%20muscles&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20oral%20biology&rft.au=Iida,%20Takashi&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=331-339&rft.issn=0003-9969&rft.eissn=1879-1506&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1287885939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1287885939&rft_id=info:pmid/23290004&rft_els_id=S0003996912004505&rfr_iscdi=true |