Enhancing Conservation, Ecosystem Services, and Local Livelihoods through a Wildlife Premium Mechanism
We propose the wildlife premium mechanism as an innovation to conserve endangered large vertebrates. The performance-based payment scheme would allow stakeholders in lower-income countries to generate revenue by recovering and maintaining threatened fauna that can also serve as umbrella species (i.e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2013-02, Vol.27 (1), p.14-23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 23 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 14 |
container_title | Conservation biology |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Dinerstein, Eric Varma, Keshav Wikramanayake, Eric Powell, George Lumpkin, Susan Naidoo, Robin Korchinsky, Mike Del Valle, Christian Lohani, Shubash Seidensticker, John Joldersma, Dirk Lovejoy, Thomas Kushlin, Andrey |
description | We propose the wildlife premium mechanism as an innovation to conserve endangered large vertebrates. The performance-based payment scheme would allow stakeholders in lower-income countries to generate revenue by recovering and maintaining threatened fauna that can also serve as umbrella species (i.e., species whose protection benefits other species with which they co-occur). There are 3 possible options for applying the premium: option 1, embed premiums in a carbon payment; option 2, link premiums to a related carbon payment, but as independent and legally separate transactions; option 3, link premiums to noncarbon payments for conserving ecosystem services (PES). Each option presents advantages, such as incentive payments to improve livelihoods of rural poor who reside in or near areas harboring umbrella species, and challenges, such as the establishment of a subnational carbon credit scheme. In Kenya, Peru, and Nepal pilot premium projects are now underway or being finalized that largely follow option 1. The Kasigau (Kenya) project is the first voluntary carbon credit project to win approval from the 2 leading groups sanctioning such protocols and has already sold carbon credits totaling over $1.2 million since June 2011. A portion of the earnings is divided among community landowners and projects that support community members and has added over 350 jobs to the local economy. All 3 projects involve extensive community management because they occur on lands where locals hold the title or have a long-term lease from the government. The monitoring, reporting, and verification required to make premium payments credible to investors include transparent methods for collecting data on key indices by trained community members and verification of their reporting by a biologist. A wildlife premium readiness fund would enable expansion of pilot programs needed to test options beyond those presented here. Proponemos un mecanismo de compensación de vida silvestre como una innovación para la conservación de vertebrados en peligro. El esquema de pagos basados en resultados permitiría que actores en países con bajo ingreso generen ganancias mediante la recuperación y mantenimiento de fauna amenazada que también puede servir como especies paraguas (i.e., especies cuya protección protege a otras). Hay tres mecanismos posibles para aplicar la compensación: opción 1, incluir las compensaciones en un pago por carbono; opción 2, asociar las compensaciones con un pago por car |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01959.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1285100423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23360329</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23360329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5219-dbb746029bab2d03e67d84b0baba1c8da9d405e907b6f5ecbb0a6ee2c942c2153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYt3gJ4AsIaRdLOXYjhP7ZhJUZQwVBlrRLi3HcVaXJB52M9p_j0NKQVzNN_54n3N8jl8nCcIwxXG8WU8xIzTFBRVTAphMAQsmpttHyeQgPE4mwDlPORfkKDkOYQ0AguHsaXJEKOY4I3SS1PNupTptu1s0c10w_l5trOvO0Fy7sAsb06LreGi1CWdIdRVaOK0atLD3prEr56qANivv-tsVUujGNlVja4O-eNPavkWfjI7ZbWifJU9q1QTzfD-fJN_ez5ezD-ni6uJy9naRakawSKuyLLIciChVSSqgJi8qnpUQtwprXilRZcCMgKLMa2Z0WYLKjSFaZEQTzOhJcjrmvfPuR2_CRrY2aNM0qjOuDxITzjBAbP0BaEGzLKMEIvrqP3Ttet_FRiKVc8zy-J6R4iOlvQvBm1reedsqv5MY5GCbXMvBHTm4Iwfb5G_b5DaGvtxf0JetqQ6Bf3yKwOs9oEJ8_9oPnoW_XAEFEYAjdz5yP21jdg8uQM6u3l0Oy5jgxZhgHTbO_1MIzYGSQU9H3ca_sT3oyn-XeUELJm8-X0ggH6-Xy69MLukvlbfLmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1268156318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing Conservation, Ecosystem Services, and Local Livelihoods through a Wildlife Premium Mechanism</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Dinerstein, Eric ; Varma, Keshav ; Wikramanayake, Eric ; Powell, George ; Lumpkin, Susan ; Naidoo, Robin ; Korchinsky, Mike ; Del Valle, Christian ; Lohani, Shubash ; Seidensticker, John ; Joldersma, Dirk ; Lovejoy, Thomas ; Kushlin, Andrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Dinerstein, Eric ; Varma, Keshav ; Wikramanayake, Eric ; Powell, George ; Lumpkin, Susan ; Naidoo, Robin ; Korchinsky, Mike ; Del Valle, Christian ; Lohani, Shubash ; Seidensticker, John ; Joldersma, Dirk ; Lovejoy, Thomas ; Kushlin, Andrey</creatorcontrib><description>We propose the wildlife premium mechanism as an innovation to conserve endangered large vertebrates. The performance-based payment scheme would allow stakeholders in lower-income countries to generate revenue by recovering and maintaining threatened fauna that can also serve as umbrella species (i.e., species whose protection benefits other species with which they co-occur). There are 3 possible options for applying the premium: option 1, embed premiums in a carbon payment; option 2, link premiums to a related carbon payment, but as independent and legally separate transactions; option 3, link premiums to noncarbon payments for conserving ecosystem services (PES). Each option presents advantages, such as incentive payments to improve livelihoods of rural poor who reside in or near areas harboring umbrella species, and challenges, such as the establishment of a subnational carbon credit scheme. In Kenya, Peru, and Nepal pilot premium projects are now underway or being finalized that largely follow option 1. The Kasigau (Kenya) project is the first voluntary carbon credit project to win approval from the 2 leading groups sanctioning such protocols and has already sold carbon credits totaling over $1.2 million since June 2011. A portion of the earnings is divided among community landowners and projects that support community members and has added over 350 jobs to the local economy. All 3 projects involve extensive community management because they occur on lands where locals hold the title or have a long-term lease from the government. The monitoring, reporting, and verification required to make premium payments credible to investors include transparent methods for collecting data on key indices by trained community members and verification of their reporting by a biologist. A wildlife premium readiness fund would enable expansion of pilot programs needed to test options beyond those presented here. Proponemos un mecanismo de compensación de vida silvestre como una innovación para la conservación de vertebrados en peligro. El esquema de pagos basados en resultados permitiría que actores en países con bajo ingreso generen ganancias mediante la recuperación y mantenimiento de fauna amenazada que también puede servir como especies paraguas (i.e., especies cuya protección protege a otras). Hay tres mecanismos posibles para aplicar la compensación: opción 1, incluir las compensaciones en un pago por carbono; opción 2, asociar las compensaciones con un pago por carbono, pero como transacciones independientes y separadas legalmente; opción 3, asociar las compensaciones con pagos por la conservación de servicios del ecosistema (PSE) no relacionados con carbono. Cada opción tiene ventajas, como los incentivos para mejorar la calidad de vida de habitantes rurales que viven en o cerca de áreas con especies paragua, y retos, como el establecimiento de un esquema subnacional de crédito de carbono. El proyecto Kasigau (Kenia) es el primer proyecto de crédito de carbón voluntario que obtiene la aprobación de los dos grupos que aprueban tales protocolos y ha vendido créditos de carbón por más de $1.2 millones desde 2011. Una porción de las ganancias se divide entre propietarios y proyectos que apoyan a miembros de la comunidad y ha añadido más de 350 empleos a la economía local. Los tres proyectos implican manejo comunitario extensivo porque se llevan a cabo en tierras propiedad de habitantes locales o que están arrendados a largo plazo por el gobierno. El monitoreo, registro y verificación requeridos para que el pago de las compensaciones tenga credibilidad para los inversionistas incluye métodos transparentes para la recolección de datos de índices clave por miembros de la comunidad capacitados para ello y la verificación del reporte por un biólogo. Un fondo disponible para compensaciones de vida silvestre permitiría la expansión de programas piloto que se requieren para probar opciones distintas a las presentadas aquí.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01959.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23181423</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBIOEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Biodiversity conservation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbon Sequestration ; community based conservation ; conservación basada en comunidades ; Conservación de especies ; conservación del paisaje ; Conservation biology ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Conservation Practice and Policy ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Developing countries ; Ecosystem ; Endangered & extinct species ; Endangered Species ; financiación sostenible para la conservación ; Forest conservation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Investors ; Kenya ; landscape conservation ; large mammals ; LDCs ; Mammalia ; mamíferos mayores ; mecanismo de primas para la fauna ; Nepal ; Pago por Servicios Ambientales ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Payments ; Peru ; PES ; Premiums ; Protected areas ; REDD - Reduction of Emissions for Deforestation and Degradation ; Reducción de Emisiones por Deforestación y Degradación ; Species ; species conservation ; sustainable financing for conservation ; Tigers ; Vertebrates - physiology ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Wildlife conservation ; wildlife premium mechanism</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2013-02, Vol.27 (1), p.14-23</ispartof><rights>2013 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2012 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2012 Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2013, Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5219-dbb746029bab2d03e67d84b0baba1c8da9d405e907b6f5ecbb0a6ee2c942c2153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5219-dbb746029bab2d03e67d84b0baba1c8da9d405e907b6f5ecbb0a6ee2c942c2153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23360329$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23360329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27072901$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181423$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dinerstein, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varma, Keshav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wikramanayake, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumpkin, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naidoo, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korchinsky, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Valle, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohani, Shubash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidensticker, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joldersma, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushlin, Andrey</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing Conservation, Ecosystem Services, and Local Livelihoods through a Wildlife Premium Mechanism</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><description>We propose the wildlife premium mechanism as an innovation to conserve endangered large vertebrates. The performance-based payment scheme would allow stakeholders in lower-income countries to generate revenue by recovering and maintaining threatened fauna that can also serve as umbrella species (i.e., species whose protection benefits other species with which they co-occur). There are 3 possible options for applying the premium: option 1, embed premiums in a carbon payment; option 2, link premiums to a related carbon payment, but as independent and legally separate transactions; option 3, link premiums to noncarbon payments for conserving ecosystem services (PES). Each option presents advantages, such as incentive payments to improve livelihoods of rural poor who reside in or near areas harboring umbrella species, and challenges, such as the establishment of a subnational carbon credit scheme. In Kenya, Peru, and Nepal pilot premium projects are now underway or being finalized that largely follow option 1. The Kasigau (Kenya) project is the first voluntary carbon credit project to win approval from the 2 leading groups sanctioning such protocols and has already sold carbon credits totaling over $1.2 million since June 2011. A portion of the earnings is divided among community landowners and projects that support community members and has added over 350 jobs to the local economy. All 3 projects involve extensive community management because they occur on lands where locals hold the title or have a long-term lease from the government. The monitoring, reporting, and verification required to make premium payments credible to investors include transparent methods for collecting data on key indices by trained community members and verification of their reporting by a biologist. A wildlife premium readiness fund would enable expansion of pilot programs needed to test options beyond those presented here. Proponemos un mecanismo de compensación de vida silvestre como una innovación para la conservación de vertebrados en peligro. El esquema de pagos basados en resultados permitiría que actores en países con bajo ingreso generen ganancias mediante la recuperación y mantenimiento de fauna amenazada que también puede servir como especies paraguas (i.e., especies cuya protección protege a otras). Hay tres mecanismos posibles para aplicar la compensación: opción 1, incluir las compensaciones en un pago por carbono; opción 2, asociar las compensaciones con un pago por carbono, pero como transacciones independientes y separadas legalmente; opción 3, asociar las compensaciones con pagos por la conservación de servicios del ecosistema (PSE) no relacionados con carbono. Cada opción tiene ventajas, como los incentivos para mejorar la calidad de vida de habitantes rurales que viven en o cerca de áreas con especies paragua, y retos, como el establecimiento de un esquema subnacional de crédito de carbono. El proyecto Kasigau (Kenia) es el primer proyecto de crédito de carbón voluntario que obtiene la aprobación de los dos grupos que aprueban tales protocolos y ha vendido créditos de carbón por más de $1.2 millones desde 2011. Una porción de las ganancias se divide entre propietarios y proyectos que apoyan a miembros de la comunidad y ha añadido más de 350 empleos a la economía local. Los tres proyectos implican manejo comunitario extensivo porque se llevan a cabo en tierras propiedad de habitantes locales o que están arrendados a largo plazo por el gobierno. El monitoreo, registro y verificación requeridos para que el pago de las compensaciones tenga credibilidad para los inversionistas incluye métodos transparentes para la recolección de datos de índices clave por miembros de la comunidad capacitados para ello y la verificación del reporte por un biólogo. Un fondo disponible para compensaciones de vida silvestre permitiría la expansión de programas piloto que se requieren para probar opciones distintas a las presentadas aquí.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbon Sequestration</subject><subject>community based conservation</subject><subject>conservación basada en comunidades</subject><subject>Conservación de especies</subject><subject>conservación del paisaje</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Conservation Practice and Policy</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered Species</subject><subject>financiación sostenible para la conservación</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>landscape conservation</subject><subject>large mammals</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>mamíferos mayores</subject><subject>mecanismo de primas para la fauna</subject><subject>Nepal</subject><subject>Pago por Servicios Ambientales</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Peru</subject><subject>PES</subject><subject>Premiums</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>REDD - Reduction of Emissions for Deforestation and Degradation</subject><subject>Reducción de Emisiones por Deforestación y Degradación</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species conservation</subject><subject>sustainable financing for conservation</subject><subject>Tigers</subject><subject>Vertebrates - physiology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>wildlife premium mechanism</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYt3gJ4AsIaRdLOXYjhP7ZhJUZQwVBlrRLi3HcVaXJB52M9p_j0NKQVzNN_54n3N8jl8nCcIwxXG8WU8xIzTFBRVTAphMAQsmpttHyeQgPE4mwDlPORfkKDkOYQ0AguHsaXJEKOY4I3SS1PNupTptu1s0c10w_l5trOvO0Fy7sAsb06LreGi1CWdIdRVaOK0atLD3prEr56qANivv-tsVUujGNlVja4O-eNPavkWfjI7ZbWifJU9q1QTzfD-fJN_ez5ezD-ni6uJy9naRakawSKuyLLIciChVSSqgJi8qnpUQtwprXilRZcCMgKLMa2Z0WYLKjSFaZEQTzOhJcjrmvfPuR2_CRrY2aNM0qjOuDxITzjBAbP0BaEGzLKMEIvrqP3Ttet_FRiKVc8zy-J6R4iOlvQvBm1reedsqv5MY5GCbXMvBHTm4Iwfb5G_b5DaGvtxf0JetqQ6Bf3yKwOs9oEJ8_9oPnoW_XAEFEYAjdz5yP21jdg8uQM6u3l0Oy5jgxZhgHTbO_1MIzYGSQU9H3ca_sT3oyn-XeUELJm8-X0ggH6-Xy69MLukvlbfLmw</recordid><startdate>201302</startdate><enddate>201302</enddate><creator>Dinerstein, Eric</creator><creator>Varma, Keshav</creator><creator>Wikramanayake, Eric</creator><creator>Powell, George</creator><creator>Lumpkin, Susan</creator><creator>Naidoo, Robin</creator><creator>Korchinsky, Mike</creator><creator>Del Valle, Christian</creator><creator>Lohani, Shubash</creator><creator>Seidensticker, John</creator><creator>Joldersma, Dirk</creator><creator>Lovejoy, Thomas</creator><creator>Kushlin, Andrey</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201302</creationdate><title>Enhancing Conservation, Ecosystem Services, and Local Livelihoods through a Wildlife Premium Mechanism</title><author>Dinerstein, Eric ; Varma, Keshav ; Wikramanayake, Eric ; Powell, George ; Lumpkin, Susan ; Naidoo, Robin ; Korchinsky, Mike ; Del Valle, Christian ; Lohani, Shubash ; Seidensticker, John ; Joldersma, Dirk ; Lovejoy, Thomas ; Kushlin, Andrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5219-dbb746029bab2d03e67d84b0baba1c8da9d405e907b6f5ecbb0a6ee2c942c2153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbon Sequestration</topic><topic>community based conservation</topic><topic>conservación basada en comunidades</topic><topic>Conservación de especies</topic><topic>conservación del paisaje</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Conservation Practice and Policy</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered Species</topic><topic>financiación sostenible para la conservación</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>landscape conservation</topic><topic>large mammals</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>mamíferos mayores</topic><topic>mecanismo de primas para la fauna</topic><topic>Nepal</topic><topic>Pago por Servicios Ambientales</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Peru</topic><topic>PES</topic><topic>Premiums</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>REDD - Reduction of Emissions for Deforestation and Degradation</topic><topic>Reducción de Emisiones por Deforestación y Degradación</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species conservation</topic><topic>sustainable financing for conservation</topic><topic>Tigers</topic><topic>Vertebrates - physiology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>wildlife premium mechanism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dinerstein, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varma, Keshav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wikramanayake, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumpkin, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naidoo, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korchinsky, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Valle, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohani, Shubash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidensticker, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joldersma, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushlin, Andrey</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dinerstein, Eric</au><au>Varma, Keshav</au><au>Wikramanayake, Eric</au><au>Powell, George</au><au>Lumpkin, Susan</au><au>Naidoo, Robin</au><au>Korchinsky, Mike</au><au>Del Valle, Christian</au><au>Lohani, Shubash</au><au>Seidensticker, John</au><au>Joldersma, Dirk</au><au>Lovejoy, Thomas</au><au>Kushlin, Andrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing Conservation, Ecosystem Services, and Local Livelihoods through a Wildlife Premium Mechanism</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><date>2013-02</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>14-23</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><coden>CBIOEF</coden><abstract>We propose the wildlife premium mechanism as an innovation to conserve endangered large vertebrates. The performance-based payment scheme would allow stakeholders in lower-income countries to generate revenue by recovering and maintaining threatened fauna that can also serve as umbrella species (i.e., species whose protection benefits other species with which they co-occur). There are 3 possible options for applying the premium: option 1, embed premiums in a carbon payment; option 2, link premiums to a related carbon payment, but as independent and legally separate transactions; option 3, link premiums to noncarbon payments for conserving ecosystem services (PES). Each option presents advantages, such as incentive payments to improve livelihoods of rural poor who reside in or near areas harboring umbrella species, and challenges, such as the establishment of a subnational carbon credit scheme. In Kenya, Peru, and Nepal pilot premium projects are now underway or being finalized that largely follow option 1. The Kasigau (Kenya) project is the first voluntary carbon credit project to win approval from the 2 leading groups sanctioning such protocols and has already sold carbon credits totaling over $1.2 million since June 2011. A portion of the earnings is divided among community landowners and projects that support community members and has added over 350 jobs to the local economy. All 3 projects involve extensive community management because they occur on lands where locals hold the title or have a long-term lease from the government. The monitoring, reporting, and verification required to make premium payments credible to investors include transparent methods for collecting data on key indices by trained community members and verification of their reporting by a biologist. A wildlife premium readiness fund would enable expansion of pilot programs needed to test options beyond those presented here. Proponemos un mecanismo de compensación de vida silvestre como una innovación para la conservación de vertebrados en peligro. El esquema de pagos basados en resultados permitiría que actores en países con bajo ingreso generen ganancias mediante la recuperación y mantenimiento de fauna amenazada que también puede servir como especies paraguas (i.e., especies cuya protección protege a otras). Hay tres mecanismos posibles para aplicar la compensación: opción 1, incluir las compensaciones en un pago por carbono; opción 2, asociar las compensaciones con un pago por carbono, pero como transacciones independientes y separadas legalmente; opción 3, asociar las compensaciones con pagos por la conservación de servicios del ecosistema (PSE) no relacionados con carbono. Cada opción tiene ventajas, como los incentivos para mejorar la calidad de vida de habitantes rurales que viven en o cerca de áreas con especies paragua, y retos, como el establecimiento de un esquema subnacional de crédito de carbono. El proyecto Kasigau (Kenia) es el primer proyecto de crédito de carbón voluntario que obtiene la aprobación de los dos grupos que aprueban tales protocolos y ha vendido créditos de carbón por más de $1.2 millones desde 2011. Una porción de las ganancias se divide entre propietarios y proyectos que apoyan a miembros de la comunidad y ha añadido más de 350 empleos a la economía local. Los tres proyectos implican manejo comunitario extensivo porque se llevan a cabo en tierras propiedad de habitantes locales o que están arrendados a largo plazo por el gobierno. El monitoreo, registro y verificación requeridos para que el pago de las compensaciones tenga credibilidad para los inversionistas incluye métodos transparentes para la recolección de datos de índices clave por miembros de la comunidad capacitados para ello y la verificación del reporte por un biólogo. Un fondo disponible para compensaciones de vida silvestre permitiría la expansión de programas piloto que se requieren para probar opciones distintas a las presentadas aquí.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23181423</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01959.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
ispartof | Conservation biology, 2013-02, Vol.27 (1), p.14-23 |
issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1285100423 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Applied ecology Biodiversity conservation Biological and medical sciences Carbon Sequestration community based conservation conservación basada en comunidades Conservación de especies conservación del paisaje Conservation biology Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Conservation Practice and Policy Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Developing countries Ecosystem Endangered & extinct species Endangered Species financiación sostenible para la conservación Forest conservation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Investors Kenya landscape conservation large mammals LDCs Mammalia mamíferos mayores mecanismo de primas para la fauna Nepal Pago por Servicios Ambientales Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking Payments Peru PES Premiums Protected areas REDD - Reduction of Emissions for Deforestation and Degradation Reducción de Emisiones por Deforestación y Degradación Species species conservation sustainable financing for conservation Tigers Vertebrates - physiology Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution Wildlife conservation wildlife premium mechanism |
title | Enhancing Conservation, Ecosystem Services, and Local Livelihoods through a Wildlife Premium Mechanism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T14%3A30%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20Conservation,%20Ecosystem%20Services,%20and%20Local%20Livelihoods%20through%20a%20Wildlife%20Premium%20Mechanism&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Dinerstein,%20Eric&rft.date=2013-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=14-23&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.coden=CBIOEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01959.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23360329%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1268156318&rft_id=info:pmid/23181423&rft_jstor_id=23360329&rfr_iscdi=true |