Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items
Although the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index was originally developed for the assessment of non-operative treatment, it is commonly used to evaluate patients undergoing either total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). We assessed the importance of the 17...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The bone & joint journal 2013-02, Vol.95-B (2), p.239-243 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 243 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 239 |
| container_title | The bone & joint journal |
| container_volume | 95-B |
| creator | Liebs, T R Herzberg, W Gluth, J Rüther, W Haasters, J Russlies, M Hassenpflug, J |
| description | Although the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index was originally developed for the assessment of non-operative treatment, it is commonly used to evaluate patients undergoing either total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). We assessed the importance of the 17 WOMAC function items from the perspective of 1198 patients who underwent either THR (n = 704) or TKR (n = 494) in order to develop joint-specific short forms. After these patients were administered the WOMAC pre-operatively and at three, six, 12 and 24 months' follow-up, they were asked to nominate an item of the function scale that was most important to them. The items chosen were significantly different between patients undergoing THR and those undergoing TKR (p < 0.001), and there was a shift in the priorities after surgery in both groups. Setting a threshold for prioritised items of ≥ 5% across all follow-up, eight items were selected for THR and seven for TKR, of which six items were common to both. The items comprising specific WOMAC-THR and TKR function short forms were found to be equally responsive compared with the original WOMAC function form. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.28383 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1283733353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1283733353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-b5eb0b5b9c9e529e6bc39a90cba31219002637bebf8405ee5ca3c2ac5664a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkc9u1DAQxq0KRKvSN0CVb-WSZeyJs_GxXQGtVNQDILhZtnfSdZvEwfZW4g14bJL-gbnMaPR930jzY-ydgJVAkB8AQVSNhJ8rrS7kSrbY4gE7klDrqq6hffUyo64P2UnOdzBXC0LU4g07lIiNAlRH7M_3HMZbXnbEJ1sCjeUs84lSnsiX8EC8RL6lB-rjxLv9OO_iyPMupsK7mIbMF2Hogl-EJRbb812YuB23_H4k4omm3noa5mDubKYtn_0_br6cb_7HhUJDfsted7bPdPLcj9nXTx-_bS6r65vPV5vz68ojrEvlFDlwymmvSUlNjfOorQbvLAopNIBscO3IdW0Nikh5i15ar5qmti0es_dPqVOKv_aUixlC9tT3dqS4z0bMn1wjosJZWj9JfYo5J-rMlMJg028jwCwQzALBLBDMAsE8Qphtp88X9m6g7T_Ty8vxL52ehFM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1283733353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Liebs, T R ; Herzberg, W ; Gluth, J ; Rüther, W ; Haasters, J ; Russlies, M ; Hassenpflug, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Liebs, T R ; Herzberg, W ; Gluth, J ; Rüther, W ; Haasters, J ; Russlies, M ; Hassenpflug, J</creatorcontrib><description>Although the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index was originally developed for the assessment of non-operative treatment, it is commonly used to evaluate patients undergoing either total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). We assessed the importance of the 17 WOMAC function items from the perspective of 1198 patients who underwent either THR (n = 704) or TKR (n = 494) in order to develop joint-specific short forms. After these patients were administered the WOMAC pre-operatively and at three, six, 12 and 24 months' follow-up, they were asked to nominate an item of the function scale that was most important to them. The items chosen were significantly different between patients undergoing THR and those undergoing TKR (p < 0.001), and there was a shift in the priorities after surgery in both groups. Setting a threshold for prioritised items of ≥ 5% across all follow-up, eight items were selected for THR and seven for TKR, of which six items were common to both. The items comprising specific WOMAC-THR and TKR function short forms were found to be equally responsive compared with the original WOMAC function form.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-4394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-4408</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.28383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23365035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health Priorities - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Ontario ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - physiopathology ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The bone & joint journal, 2013-02, Vol.95-B (2), p.239-243</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-b5eb0b5b9c9e529e6bc39a90cba31219002637bebf8405ee5ca3c2ac5664a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-b5eb0b5b9c9e529e6bc39a90cba31219002637bebf8405ee5ca3c2ac5664a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23365035$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liebs, T R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzberg, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gluth, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüther, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haasters, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russlies, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassenpflug, J</creatorcontrib><title>Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items</title><title>The bone & joint journal</title><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><description>Although the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index was originally developed for the assessment of non-operative treatment, it is commonly used to evaluate patients undergoing either total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). We assessed the importance of the 17 WOMAC function items from the perspective of 1198 patients who underwent either THR (n = 704) or TKR (n = 494) in order to develop joint-specific short forms. After these patients were administered the WOMAC pre-operatively and at three, six, 12 and 24 months' follow-up, they were asked to nominate an item of the function scale that was most important to them. The items chosen were significantly different between patients undergoing THR and those undergoing TKR (p < 0.001), and there was a shift in the priorities after surgery in both groups. Setting a threshold for prioritised items of ≥ 5% across all follow-up, eight items were selected for THR and seven for TKR, of which six items were common to both. The items comprising specific WOMAC-THR and TKR function short forms were found to be equally responsive compared with the original WOMAC function form.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health Priorities - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2049-4394</issn><issn>2049-4408</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkc9u1DAQxq0KRKvSN0CVb-WSZeyJs_GxXQGtVNQDILhZtnfSdZvEwfZW4g14bJL-gbnMaPR930jzY-ydgJVAkB8AQVSNhJ8rrS7kSrbY4gE7klDrqq6hffUyo64P2UnOdzBXC0LU4g07lIiNAlRH7M_3HMZbXnbEJ1sCjeUs84lSnsiX8EC8RL6lB-rjxLv9OO_iyPMupsK7mIbMF2Hogl-EJRbb812YuB23_H4k4omm3noa5mDubKYtn_0_br6cb_7HhUJDfsted7bPdPLcj9nXTx-_bS6r65vPV5vz68ojrEvlFDlwymmvSUlNjfOorQbvLAopNIBscO3IdW0Nikh5i15ar5qmti0es_dPqVOKv_aUixlC9tT3dqS4z0bMn1wjosJZWj9JfYo5J-rMlMJg028jwCwQzALBLBDMAsE8Qphtp88X9m6g7T_Ty8vxL52ehFM</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Liebs, T R</creator><creator>Herzberg, W</creator><creator>Gluth, J</creator><creator>Rüther, W</creator><creator>Haasters, J</creator><creator>Russlies, M</creator><creator>Hassenpflug, J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items</title><author>Liebs, T R ; Herzberg, W ; Gluth, J ; Rüther, W ; Haasters, J ; Russlies, M ; Hassenpflug, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-b5eb0b5b9c9e529e6bc39a90cba31219002637bebf8405ee5ca3c2ac5664a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health Priorities - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liebs, T R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzberg, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gluth, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüther, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haasters, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russlies, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassenpflug, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The bone & joint journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liebs, T R</au><au>Herzberg, W</au><au>Gluth, J</au><au>Rüther, W</au><au>Haasters, J</au><au>Russlies, M</au><au>Hassenpflug, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items</atitle><jtitle>The bone & joint journal</jtitle><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>95-B</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>239-243</pages><issn>2049-4394</issn><eissn>2049-4408</eissn><abstract>Although the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index was originally developed for the assessment of non-operative treatment, it is commonly used to evaluate patients undergoing either total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). We assessed the importance of the 17 WOMAC function items from the perspective of 1198 patients who underwent either THR (n = 704) or TKR (n = 494) in order to develop joint-specific short forms. After these patients were administered the WOMAC pre-operatively and at three, six, 12 and 24 months' follow-up, they were asked to nominate an item of the function scale that was most important to them. The items chosen were significantly different between patients undergoing THR and those undergoing TKR (p < 0.001), and there was a shift in the priorities after surgery in both groups. Setting a threshold for prioritised items of ≥ 5% across all follow-up, eight items were selected for THR and seven for TKR, of which six items were common to both. The items comprising specific WOMAC-THR and TKR function short forms were found to be equally responsive compared with the original WOMAC function form.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>23365035</pmid><doi>10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.28383</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2049-4394 |
| ispartof | The bone & joint journal, 2013-02, Vol.95-B (2), p.239-243 |
| issn | 2049-4394 2049-4408 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1283733353 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods Female Follow-Up Studies Health Priorities - statistics & numerical data Humans Male Middle Aged Multicenter Studies as Topic Ontario Osteoarthritis, Hip - physiopathology Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery Prospective Studies Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Severity of Illness Index Surveys and Questionnaires Treatment Outcome |
| title | Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A37%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20the%20patient's%20perspective%20to%20develop%20function%20short%20forms%20specific%20to%20total%20hip%20and%20knee%20replacement%20based%20on%20WOMAC%20function%20items&rft.jtitle=The%20bone%20&%20joint%20journal&rft.au=Liebs,%20T%20R&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=95-B&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=239-243&rft.issn=2049-4394&rft.eissn=2049-4408&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.28383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1283733353%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1283733353&rft_id=info:pmid/23365035&rfr_iscdi=true |