Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Soft Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Biomechanical Study

Background: Optimization of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) fixation is desired to improve graft healing. New soft tissue cortical suspension devices for femoral tunnel fixation should be biomechanically evaluated. Hypothesis: All femoral fixation devices would prevent a clinically significant amou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sports medicine 2013-02, Vol.41 (2), p.416-422
Hauptverfasser: Petre, Benjamin M., Smith, Sean D., Jansson, Kyle S., de Meijer, Peter-Paul, Hackett, Thomas R., LaPrade, Robert F., Wijdicks, Coen A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 422
container_issue 2
container_start_page 416
container_title The American journal of sports medicine
container_volume 41
creator Petre, Benjamin M.
Smith, Sean D.
Jansson, Kyle S.
de Meijer, Peter-Paul
Hackett, Thomas R.
LaPrade, Robert F.
Wijdicks, Coen A.
description Background: Optimization of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) fixation is desired to improve graft healing. New soft tissue cortical suspension devices for femoral tunnel fixation should be biomechanically evaluated. Hypothesis: All femoral fixation devices would prevent a clinically significant amount of displacement and support loads significantly larger than in situ forces experienced by the ACL during early rehabilitation. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Four cortical soft tissue ACL graft suspension devices were tested under cyclic and pull-to-failure loading conditions in both an isolated device-only setup and as a complete bone-device-tendon construct in porcine femurs using a tensile testing machine. Results: There were significant differences in the ultimate failure loads among the devices. The highest ultimate failure loads when tested as a construct were observed for the XO Button (1748 N), followed by the Endobutton CL (1456 N), ToggleLoc with ZipLoop (1334 N), and TightRope RT (859 N). Cyclic displacement after 1000 cycles during isolated device testing was less than 1 mm for all devices. Cyclic displacements after 1000 cycles in the porcine construct were 1.88 mm, 2.74 mm, 3.34 mm, and 1.82 mm for the Endobutton, TightRope, ToggleLoc, and XO Button, respectively; all were significantly different from each other except when the Endobutton was compared with the XO Button. The ToggleLoc exceeded the 3.0-mm displacement threshold defined as a clinical failure. The most displacement occurred during the first cycle, especially for the adjustable-length loop devices. Stiffness reapproximated the native ACL stiffness for all constructs. Conclusion: The Endobutton, TightRope, and XO Button have the necessary biomechanical properties with regard to ultimate failure strength, displacement, and stiffness for initial fixation of soft tissue grafts in the femoral tunnel for ACL reconstruction. The ToggleLoc had sufficient ultimate failure strength but crossed our 3.0-mm clinical failure threshold for cyclic displacement. Although this study was not designed to compare fixed and adjustable-length loop devices, it was noted that both fixed-loop devices allowed less cyclic displacement and initial displacement. Clinical Relevance: Adjustable-length loop devices may need to be retensioned after cycling the knee and fixing the tibial side to account for the increased initial displacement seen with these devices.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0363546512469875
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1283730737</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0363546512469875</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1283730737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-21e51caeb860ff2dd28a2be39c5d599075d3b76fe2e4cbe635fb506b3430cf043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOo7uXUnBjZtqHs2jSxkdFQYEH0spaXojkWkzJqngvzfDqIjgJgnnfvfcm4PQEcFnhEh5jplgvBKc0ErUSvItNCGc05IxwbfRZF0u1_U9tB_jK8aYSKF20R5lVDBaqwl6nkPvg14WMx-SM_nxMMYVDNH5obiEd2cgFtaH4sHbVDy6GEcoLoYEwWVxFkbjdIJi4V50D0Mq7sH4Iaasp-xwgHasXkY4_Lqn6Gl-9Ti7KRd317ezi0VpGFGppAQ4MRpaJbC1tOuo0rQFVhve8brGkneslcIChcq0kP9sW45FyyqGjcUVm6LTje8q-LcRYmp6Fw0sl3oAP8aGUMUkwzIfU3TyB331YxjydmuKU6mUYJnCG8oEH2MA26yC63X4aAhu1tE3f6PPLcdfxmPbQ_fT8J11BsoNEPUL_Jr6n-En3LSLhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1285278863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Soft Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Biomechanical Study</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Petre, Benjamin M. ; Smith, Sean D. ; Jansson, Kyle S. ; de Meijer, Peter-Paul ; Hackett, Thomas R. ; LaPrade, Robert F. ; Wijdicks, Coen A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Petre, Benjamin M. ; Smith, Sean D. ; Jansson, Kyle S. ; de Meijer, Peter-Paul ; Hackett, Thomas R. ; LaPrade, Robert F. ; Wijdicks, Coen A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Optimization of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) fixation is desired to improve graft healing. New soft tissue cortical suspension devices for femoral tunnel fixation should be biomechanically evaluated. Hypothesis: All femoral fixation devices would prevent a clinically significant amount of displacement and support loads significantly larger than in situ forces experienced by the ACL during early rehabilitation. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Four cortical soft tissue ACL graft suspension devices were tested under cyclic and pull-to-failure loading conditions in both an isolated device-only setup and as a complete bone-device-tendon construct in porcine femurs using a tensile testing machine. Results: There were significant differences in the ultimate failure loads among the devices. The highest ultimate failure loads when tested as a construct were observed for the XO Button (1748 N), followed by the Endobutton CL (1456 N), ToggleLoc with ZipLoop (1334 N), and TightRope RT (859 N). Cyclic displacement after 1000 cycles during isolated device testing was less than 1 mm for all devices. Cyclic displacements after 1000 cycles in the porcine construct were 1.88 mm, 2.74 mm, 3.34 mm, and 1.82 mm for the Endobutton, TightRope, ToggleLoc, and XO Button, respectively; all were significantly different from each other except when the Endobutton was compared with the XO Button. The ToggleLoc exceeded the 3.0-mm displacement threshold defined as a clinical failure. The most displacement occurred during the first cycle, especially for the adjustable-length loop devices. Stiffness reapproximated the native ACL stiffness for all constructs. Conclusion: The Endobutton, TightRope, and XO Button have the necessary biomechanical properties with regard to ultimate failure strength, displacement, and stiffness for initial fixation of soft tissue grafts in the femoral tunnel for ACL reconstruction. The ToggleLoc had sufficient ultimate failure strength but crossed our 3.0-mm clinical failure threshold for cyclic displacement. Although this study was not designed to compare fixed and adjustable-length loop devices, it was noted that both fixed-loop devices allowed less cyclic displacement and initial displacement. Clinical Relevance: Adjustable-length loop devices may need to be retensioned after cycling the knee and fixing the tibial side to account for the increased initial displacement seen with these devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0363546512469875</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23263298</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSMDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - physiopathology ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Comparative studies ; Disease Models, Animal ; Femur - surgery ; Internal Fixators ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Ligaments ; Orthopedics ; Performance evaluation ; Skin &amp; tissue grafts ; Swine</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 2013-02, Vol.41 (2), p.416-422</ispartof><rights>2012 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Feb 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-21e51caeb860ff2dd28a2be39c5d599075d3b76fe2e4cbe635fb506b3430cf043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0363546512469875$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0363546512469875$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23263298$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petre, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sean D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansson, Kyle S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Meijer, Peter-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackett, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPrade, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijdicks, Coen A.</creatorcontrib><title>Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Soft Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Biomechanical Study</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Background: Optimization of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) fixation is desired to improve graft healing. New soft tissue cortical suspension devices for femoral tunnel fixation should be biomechanically evaluated. Hypothesis: All femoral fixation devices would prevent a clinically significant amount of displacement and support loads significantly larger than in situ forces experienced by the ACL during early rehabilitation. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Four cortical soft tissue ACL graft suspension devices were tested under cyclic and pull-to-failure loading conditions in both an isolated device-only setup and as a complete bone-device-tendon construct in porcine femurs using a tensile testing machine. Results: There were significant differences in the ultimate failure loads among the devices. The highest ultimate failure loads when tested as a construct were observed for the XO Button (1748 N), followed by the Endobutton CL (1456 N), ToggleLoc with ZipLoop (1334 N), and TightRope RT (859 N). Cyclic displacement after 1000 cycles during isolated device testing was less than 1 mm for all devices. Cyclic displacements after 1000 cycles in the porcine construct were 1.88 mm, 2.74 mm, 3.34 mm, and 1.82 mm for the Endobutton, TightRope, ToggleLoc, and XO Button, respectively; all were significantly different from each other except when the Endobutton was compared with the XO Button. The ToggleLoc exceeded the 3.0-mm displacement threshold defined as a clinical failure. The most displacement occurred during the first cycle, especially for the adjustable-length loop devices. Stiffness reapproximated the native ACL stiffness for all constructs. Conclusion: The Endobutton, TightRope, and XO Button have the necessary biomechanical properties with regard to ultimate failure strength, displacement, and stiffness for initial fixation of soft tissue grafts in the femoral tunnel for ACL reconstruction. The ToggleLoc had sufficient ultimate failure strength but crossed our 3.0-mm clinical failure threshold for cyclic displacement. Although this study was not designed to compare fixed and adjustable-length loop devices, it was noted that both fixed-loop devices allowed less cyclic displacement and initial displacement. Clinical Relevance: Adjustable-length loop devices may need to be retensioned after cycling the knee and fixing the tibial side to account for the increased initial displacement seen with these devices.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - physiopathology</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Internal Fixators</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOo7uXUnBjZtqHs2jSxkdFQYEH0spaXojkWkzJqngvzfDqIjgJgnnfvfcm4PQEcFnhEh5jplgvBKc0ErUSvItNCGc05IxwbfRZF0u1_U9tB_jK8aYSKF20R5lVDBaqwl6nkPvg14WMx-SM_nxMMYVDNH5obiEd2cgFtaH4sHbVDy6GEcoLoYEwWVxFkbjdIJi4V50D0Mq7sH4Iaasp-xwgHasXkY4_Lqn6Gl-9Ti7KRd317ezi0VpGFGppAQ4MRpaJbC1tOuo0rQFVhve8brGkneslcIChcq0kP9sW45FyyqGjcUVm6LTje8q-LcRYmp6Fw0sl3oAP8aGUMUkwzIfU3TyB331YxjydmuKU6mUYJnCG8oEH2MA26yC63X4aAhu1tE3f6PPLcdfxmPbQ_fT8J11BsoNEPUL_Jr6n-En3LSLhw</recordid><startdate>201302</startdate><enddate>201302</enddate><creator>Petre, Benjamin M.</creator><creator>Smith, Sean D.</creator><creator>Jansson, Kyle S.</creator><creator>de Meijer, Peter-Paul</creator><creator>Hackett, Thomas R.</creator><creator>LaPrade, Robert F.</creator><creator>Wijdicks, Coen A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201302</creationdate><title>Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Soft Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</title><author>Petre, Benjamin M. ; Smith, Sean D. ; Jansson, Kyle S. ; de Meijer, Peter-Paul ; Hackett, Thomas R. ; LaPrade, Robert F. ; Wijdicks, Coen A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-21e51caeb860ff2dd28a2be39c5d599075d3b76fe2e4cbe635fb506b3430cf043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - physiopathology</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Internal Fixators</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petre, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sean D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansson, Kyle S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Meijer, Peter-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackett, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPrade, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijdicks, Coen A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petre, Benjamin M.</au><au>Smith, Sean D.</au><au>Jansson, Kyle S.</au><au>de Meijer, Peter-Paul</au><au>Hackett, Thomas R.</au><au>LaPrade, Robert F.</au><au>Wijdicks, Coen A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Soft Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Biomechanical Study</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2013-02</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>416</spage><epage>422</epage><pages>416-422</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><coden>AJSMDO</coden><abstract>Background: Optimization of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) fixation is desired to improve graft healing. New soft tissue cortical suspension devices for femoral tunnel fixation should be biomechanically evaluated. Hypothesis: All femoral fixation devices would prevent a clinically significant amount of displacement and support loads significantly larger than in situ forces experienced by the ACL during early rehabilitation. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Four cortical soft tissue ACL graft suspension devices were tested under cyclic and pull-to-failure loading conditions in both an isolated device-only setup and as a complete bone-device-tendon construct in porcine femurs using a tensile testing machine. Results: There were significant differences in the ultimate failure loads among the devices. The highest ultimate failure loads when tested as a construct were observed for the XO Button (1748 N), followed by the Endobutton CL (1456 N), ToggleLoc with ZipLoop (1334 N), and TightRope RT (859 N). Cyclic displacement after 1000 cycles during isolated device testing was less than 1 mm for all devices. Cyclic displacements after 1000 cycles in the porcine construct were 1.88 mm, 2.74 mm, 3.34 mm, and 1.82 mm for the Endobutton, TightRope, ToggleLoc, and XO Button, respectively; all were significantly different from each other except when the Endobutton was compared with the XO Button. The ToggleLoc exceeded the 3.0-mm displacement threshold defined as a clinical failure. The most displacement occurred during the first cycle, especially for the adjustable-length loop devices. Stiffness reapproximated the native ACL stiffness for all constructs. Conclusion: The Endobutton, TightRope, and XO Button have the necessary biomechanical properties with regard to ultimate failure strength, displacement, and stiffness for initial fixation of soft tissue grafts in the femoral tunnel for ACL reconstruction. The ToggleLoc had sufficient ultimate failure strength but crossed our 3.0-mm clinical failure threshold for cyclic displacement. Although this study was not designed to compare fixed and adjustable-length loop devices, it was noted that both fixed-loop devices allowed less cyclic displacement and initial displacement. Clinical Relevance: Adjustable-length loop devices may need to be retensioned after cycling the knee and fixing the tibial side to account for the increased initial displacement seen with these devices.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23263298</pmid><doi>10.1177/0363546512469875</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-5465
ispartof The American journal of sports medicine, 2013-02, Vol.41 (2), p.416-422
issn 0363-5465
1552-3365
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1283730737
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Anterior Cruciate Ligament - physiopathology
Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation
Biomechanical Phenomena
Biomechanics
Comparative studies
Disease Models, Animal
Femur - surgery
Internal Fixators
Knee Joint - physiopathology
Knee Joint - surgery
Ligaments
Orthopedics
Performance evaluation
Skin & tissue grafts
Swine
title Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Soft Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Biomechanical Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A10%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Femoral%20Cortical%20Suspension%20Devices%20for%20Soft%20Tissue%20Anterior%20Cruciate%20Ligament%20Reconstruction:%20A%20Comparative%20Biomechanical%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Petre,%20Benjamin%20M.&rft.date=2013-02&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=422&rft.pages=416-422&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft.coden=AJSMDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0363546512469875&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1283730737%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1285278863&rft_id=info:pmid/23263298&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0363546512469875&rfr_iscdi=true