Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopyl: Part V: Analyzing Pure Fiber Samples and Samples with Small Admixtures According to Test Method IWTO-58
Test Method 58 was established by the International Wool Textile Organization in 2000 to analyze textile products made from specialty fibers, sheep's wool, and their blends. The method specifies the use of scanning electron microscopy to discriminate wool from all specialty fibers, such as cash...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Textile research journal 2003-08, Vol.73 (8), p.727-732 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 732 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 727 |
container_title | Textile research journal |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Wortmann, F.-J. Phan, K.-H. Augustin, P. |
description | Test Method 58 was established by the International Wool Textile Organization in 2000 to analyze textile products made from specialty fibers, sheep's wool, and their blends. The method specifies the use of scanning electron microscopy to discriminate wool from all specialty fibers, such as cashmere, mohair, etc., mainly according to the cuticle scale height criterion. In this work, after the first step of the analysis, where 150 fibers are identified for their type, three cases are distinguished for which either a purity check, a two-component analysis by number, or a quantitative analysis of a two-component blend is conducted. The consequences of the thresholds separating the three cases are considered in detail for the first two cases. For various hypothetical samples of practical relevance, the minimum and maximum potential weight fractions of small admixtures are assessed. Extended analysis protocols are investigated, which enable the operator to sensibly adjust the course of a given analysis to its specific, technical, legal, and economic requirements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/004051750307300811 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1283688799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_004051750307300811</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1283688799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-5ddf7f5a192910621cfb49dd1f831d2c84592dc761206c35e51e30c7485854063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwA0wZWUL97Dh2xqq0BakIIWC2XMepXKVOsR1E_h5HZUNiesu5V-8ehG4B3wNwPsO4wAw4wxRzirEAOEMT4EWZc16IczQZgXwkLtFVCHucGMHFBD289spFG1W0XyZb2a3x2bP9jr032dypdgg2ZNshe9PKOet22bI1OvrOJUr7LujuOLTX6KJRbTA3v3eKPlbL98VjvnlZPy3mm1yDKGLO6rrhDVNQkQpwSUA326Kqa2gEhZpoUbCK1JqXQHCpKTMMDMU6DWCCFbikU3R36j367rM3IcqDDdq0rXKm64MEImiZdlVVQskJHZ8M3jTy6O1B-UEClqMy-VdZCs1OoaB2Ru673icD4b_ED8Xuamo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1283688799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopyl: Part V: Analyzing Pure Fiber Samples and Samples with Small Admixtures According to Test Method IWTO-58</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Wortmann, F.-J. ; Phan, K.-H. ; Augustin, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wortmann, F.-J. ; Phan, K.-H. ; Augustin, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Test Method 58 was established by the International Wool Textile Organization in 2000 to analyze textile products made from specialty fibers, sheep's wool, and their blends. The method specifies the use of scanning electron microscopy to discriminate wool from all specialty fibers, such as cashmere, mohair, etc., mainly according to the cuticle scale height criterion. In this work, after the first step of the analysis, where 150 fibers are identified for their type, three cases are distinguished for which either a purity check, a two-component analysis by number, or a quantitative analysis of a two-component blend is conducted. The consequences of the thresholds separating the three cases are considered in detail for the first two cases. For various hypothetical samples of practical relevance, the minimum and maximum potential weight fractions of small admixtures are assessed. Extended analysis protocols are investigated, which enable the operator to sensibly adjust the course of a given analysis to its specific, technical, legal, and economic requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-5175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-7748</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/004051750307300811</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Admixtures ; Blends ; Fibers ; Polymer blends ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Textiles ; Wool</subject><ispartof>Textile research journal, 2003-08, Vol.73 (8), p.727-732</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-5ddf7f5a192910621cfb49dd1f831d2c84592dc761206c35e51e30c7485854063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/004051750307300811$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004051750307300811$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21800,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wortmann, F.-J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phan, K.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopyl: Part V: Analyzing Pure Fiber Samples and Samples with Small Admixtures According to Test Method IWTO-58</title><title>Textile research journal</title><description>Test Method 58 was established by the International Wool Textile Organization in 2000 to analyze textile products made from specialty fibers, sheep's wool, and their blends. The method specifies the use of scanning electron microscopy to discriminate wool from all specialty fibers, such as cashmere, mohair, etc., mainly according to the cuticle scale height criterion. In this work, after the first step of the analysis, where 150 fibers are identified for their type, three cases are distinguished for which either a purity check, a two-component analysis by number, or a quantitative analysis of a two-component blend is conducted. The consequences of the thresholds separating the three cases are considered in detail for the first two cases. For various hypothetical samples of practical relevance, the minimum and maximum potential weight fractions of small admixtures are assessed. Extended analysis protocols are investigated, which enable the operator to sensibly adjust the course of a given analysis to its specific, technical, legal, and economic requirements.</description><subject>Admixtures</subject><subject>Blends</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Polymer blends</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Textiles</subject><subject>Wool</subject><issn>0040-5175</issn><issn>1746-7748</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwA0wZWUL97Dh2xqq0BakIIWC2XMepXKVOsR1E_h5HZUNiesu5V-8ehG4B3wNwPsO4wAw4wxRzirEAOEMT4EWZc16IczQZgXwkLtFVCHucGMHFBD289spFG1W0XyZb2a3x2bP9jr032dypdgg2ZNshe9PKOet22bI1OvrOJUr7LujuOLTX6KJRbTA3v3eKPlbL98VjvnlZPy3mm1yDKGLO6rrhDVNQkQpwSUA326Kqa2gEhZpoUbCK1JqXQHCpKTMMDMU6DWCCFbikU3R36j367rM3IcqDDdq0rXKm64MEImiZdlVVQskJHZ8M3jTy6O1B-UEClqMy-VdZCs1OoaB2Ru673icD4b_ED8Xuamo</recordid><startdate>200308</startdate><enddate>200308</enddate><creator>Wortmann, F.-J.</creator><creator>Phan, K.-H.</creator><creator>Augustin, P.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200308</creationdate><title>Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopyl</title><author>Wortmann, F.-J. ; Phan, K.-H. ; Augustin, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-5ddf7f5a192910621cfb49dd1f831d2c84592dc761206c35e51e30c7485854063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Admixtures</topic><topic>Blends</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Polymer blends</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Textiles</topic><topic>Wool</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wortmann, F.-J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phan, K.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Textile research journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wortmann, F.-J.</au><au>Phan, K.-H.</au><au>Augustin, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopyl: Part V: Analyzing Pure Fiber Samples and Samples with Small Admixtures According to Test Method IWTO-58</atitle><jtitle>Textile research journal</jtitle><date>2003-08</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>727</spage><epage>732</epage><pages>727-732</pages><issn>0040-5175</issn><eissn>1746-7748</eissn><abstract>Test Method 58 was established by the International Wool Textile Organization in 2000 to analyze textile products made from specialty fibers, sheep's wool, and their blends. The method specifies the use of scanning electron microscopy to discriminate wool from all specialty fibers, such as cashmere, mohair, etc., mainly according to the cuticle scale height criterion. In this work, after the first step of the analysis, where 150 fibers are identified for their type, three cases are distinguished for which either a purity check, a two-component analysis by number, or a quantitative analysis of a two-component blend is conducted. The consequences of the thresholds separating the three cases are considered in detail for the first two cases. For various hypothetical samples of practical relevance, the minimum and maximum potential weight fractions of small admixtures are assessed. Extended analysis protocols are investigated, which enable the operator to sensibly adjust the course of a given analysis to its specific, technical, legal, and economic requirements.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/004051750307300811</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-5175 |
ispartof | Textile research journal, 2003-08, Vol.73 (8), p.727-732 |
issn | 0040-5175 1746-7748 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1283688799 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Admixtures Blends Fibers Polymer blends Scanning electron microscopy Textiles Wool |
title | Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopyl: Part V: Analyzing Pure Fiber Samples and Samples with Small Admixtures According to Test Method IWTO-58 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A02%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20Fiber%20Mixture%20Analysis%20by%20Scanning%20Electron%20Microscopyl:%20Part%20V:%20Analyzing%20Pure%20Fiber%20Samples%20and%20Samples%20with%20Small%20Admixtures%20According%20to%20Test%20Method%20IWTO-58&rft.jtitle=Textile%20research%20journal&rft.au=Wortmann,%20F.-J.&rft.date=2003-08&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=727&rft.epage=732&rft.pages=727-732&rft.issn=0040-5175&rft.eissn=1746-7748&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/004051750307300811&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1283688799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1283688799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_004051750307300811&rfr_iscdi=true |