Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopyl: Part V: Analyzing Pure Fiber Samples and Samples with Small Admixtures According to Test Method IWTO-58

Test Method 58 was established by the International Wool Textile Organization in 2000 to analyze textile products made from specialty fibers, sheep's wool, and their blends. The method specifies the use of scanning electron microscopy to discriminate wool from all specialty fibers, such as cash...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Textile research journal 2003-08, Vol.73 (8), p.727-732
Hauptverfasser: Wortmann, F.-J., Phan, K.-H., Augustin, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 732
container_issue 8
container_start_page 727
container_title Textile research journal
container_volume 73
creator Wortmann, F.-J.
Phan, K.-H.
Augustin, P.
description Test Method 58 was established by the International Wool Textile Organization in 2000 to analyze textile products made from specialty fibers, sheep's wool, and their blends. The method specifies the use of scanning electron microscopy to discriminate wool from all specialty fibers, such as cashmere, mohair, etc., mainly according to the cuticle scale height criterion. In this work, after the first step of the analysis, where 150 fibers are identified for their type, three cases are distinguished for which either a purity check, a two-component analysis by number, or a quantitative analysis of a two-component blend is conducted. The consequences of the thresholds separating the three cases are considered in detail for the first two cases. For various hypothetical samples of practical relevance, the minimum and maximum potential weight fractions of small admixtures are assessed. Extended analysis protocols are investigated, which enable the operator to sensibly adjust the course of a given analysis to its specific, technical, legal, and economic requirements.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/004051750307300811
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1283688799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_004051750307300811</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1283688799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-5ddf7f5a192910621cfb49dd1f831d2c84592dc761206c35e51e30c7485854063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwA0wZWUL97Dh2xqq0BakIIWC2XMepXKVOsR1E_h5HZUNiesu5V-8ehG4B3wNwPsO4wAw4wxRzirEAOEMT4EWZc16IczQZgXwkLtFVCHucGMHFBD289spFG1W0XyZb2a3x2bP9jr032dypdgg2ZNshe9PKOet22bI1OvrOJUr7LujuOLTX6KJRbTA3v3eKPlbL98VjvnlZPy3mm1yDKGLO6rrhDVNQkQpwSUA326Kqa2gEhZpoUbCK1JqXQHCpKTMMDMU6DWCCFbikU3R36j367rM3IcqDDdq0rXKm64MEImiZdlVVQskJHZ8M3jTy6O1B-UEClqMy-VdZCs1OoaB2Ru673icD4b_ED8Xuamo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1283688799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopyl: Part V: Analyzing Pure Fiber Samples and Samples with Small Admixtures According to Test Method IWTO-58</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Wortmann, F.-J. ; Phan, K.-H. ; Augustin, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wortmann, F.-J. ; Phan, K.-H. ; Augustin, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Test Method 58 was established by the International Wool Textile Organization in 2000 to analyze textile products made from specialty fibers, sheep's wool, and their blends. The method specifies the use of scanning electron microscopy to discriminate wool from all specialty fibers, such as cashmere, mohair, etc., mainly according to the cuticle scale height criterion. In this work, after the first step of the analysis, where 150 fibers are identified for their type, three cases are distinguished for which either a purity check, a two-component analysis by number, or a quantitative analysis of a two-component blend is conducted. The consequences of the thresholds separating the three cases are considered in detail for the first two cases. For various hypothetical samples of practical relevance, the minimum and maximum potential weight fractions of small admixtures are assessed. Extended analysis protocols are investigated, which enable the operator to sensibly adjust the course of a given analysis to its specific, technical, legal, and economic requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-5175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-7748</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/004051750307300811</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Admixtures ; Blends ; Fibers ; Polymer blends ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Textiles ; Wool</subject><ispartof>Textile research journal, 2003-08, Vol.73 (8), p.727-732</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-5ddf7f5a192910621cfb49dd1f831d2c84592dc761206c35e51e30c7485854063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/004051750307300811$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004051750307300811$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21800,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wortmann, F.-J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phan, K.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopyl: Part V: Analyzing Pure Fiber Samples and Samples with Small Admixtures According to Test Method IWTO-58</title><title>Textile research journal</title><description>Test Method 58 was established by the International Wool Textile Organization in 2000 to analyze textile products made from specialty fibers, sheep's wool, and their blends. The method specifies the use of scanning electron microscopy to discriminate wool from all specialty fibers, such as cashmere, mohair, etc., mainly according to the cuticle scale height criterion. In this work, after the first step of the analysis, where 150 fibers are identified for their type, three cases are distinguished for which either a purity check, a two-component analysis by number, or a quantitative analysis of a two-component blend is conducted. The consequences of the thresholds separating the three cases are considered in detail for the first two cases. For various hypothetical samples of practical relevance, the minimum and maximum potential weight fractions of small admixtures are assessed. Extended analysis protocols are investigated, which enable the operator to sensibly adjust the course of a given analysis to its specific, technical, legal, and economic requirements.</description><subject>Admixtures</subject><subject>Blends</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Polymer blends</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Textiles</subject><subject>Wool</subject><issn>0040-5175</issn><issn>1746-7748</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwA0wZWUL97Dh2xqq0BakIIWC2XMepXKVOsR1E_h5HZUNiesu5V-8ehG4B3wNwPsO4wAw4wxRzirEAOEMT4EWZc16IczQZgXwkLtFVCHucGMHFBD289spFG1W0XyZb2a3x2bP9jr032dypdgg2ZNshe9PKOet22bI1OvrOJUr7LujuOLTX6KJRbTA3v3eKPlbL98VjvnlZPy3mm1yDKGLO6rrhDVNQkQpwSUA326Kqa2gEhZpoUbCK1JqXQHCpKTMMDMU6DWCCFbikU3R36j367rM3IcqDDdq0rXKm64MEImiZdlVVQskJHZ8M3jTy6O1B-UEClqMy-VdZCs1OoaB2Ru673icD4b_ED8Xuamo</recordid><startdate>200308</startdate><enddate>200308</enddate><creator>Wortmann, F.-J.</creator><creator>Phan, K.-H.</creator><creator>Augustin, P.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200308</creationdate><title>Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopyl</title><author>Wortmann, F.-J. ; Phan, K.-H. ; Augustin, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-5ddf7f5a192910621cfb49dd1f831d2c84592dc761206c35e51e30c7485854063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Admixtures</topic><topic>Blends</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Polymer blends</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Textiles</topic><topic>Wool</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wortmann, F.-J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phan, K.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Textile research journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wortmann, F.-J.</au><au>Phan, K.-H.</au><au>Augustin, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopyl: Part V: Analyzing Pure Fiber Samples and Samples with Small Admixtures According to Test Method IWTO-58</atitle><jtitle>Textile research journal</jtitle><date>2003-08</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>727</spage><epage>732</epage><pages>727-732</pages><issn>0040-5175</issn><eissn>1746-7748</eissn><abstract>Test Method 58 was established by the International Wool Textile Organization in 2000 to analyze textile products made from specialty fibers, sheep's wool, and their blends. The method specifies the use of scanning electron microscopy to discriminate wool from all specialty fibers, such as cashmere, mohair, etc., mainly according to the cuticle scale height criterion. In this work, after the first step of the analysis, where 150 fibers are identified for their type, three cases are distinguished for which either a purity check, a two-component analysis by number, or a quantitative analysis of a two-component blend is conducted. The consequences of the thresholds separating the three cases are considered in detail for the first two cases. For various hypothetical samples of practical relevance, the minimum and maximum potential weight fractions of small admixtures are assessed. Extended analysis protocols are investigated, which enable the operator to sensibly adjust the course of a given analysis to its specific, technical, legal, and economic requirements.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/004051750307300811</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-5175
ispartof Textile research journal, 2003-08, Vol.73 (8), p.727-732
issn 0040-5175
1746-7748
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1283688799
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Admixtures
Blends
Fibers
Polymer blends
Scanning electron microscopy
Textiles
Wool
title Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopyl: Part V: Analyzing Pure Fiber Samples and Samples with Small Admixtures According to Test Method IWTO-58
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A02%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20Fiber%20Mixture%20Analysis%20by%20Scanning%20Electron%20Microscopyl:%20Part%20V:%20Analyzing%20Pure%20Fiber%20Samples%20and%20Samples%20with%20Small%20Admixtures%20According%20to%20Test%20Method%20IWTO-58&rft.jtitle=Textile%20research%20journal&rft.au=Wortmann,%20F.-J.&rft.date=2003-08&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=727&rft.epage=732&rft.pages=727-732&rft.issn=0040-5175&rft.eissn=1746-7748&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/004051750307300811&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1283688799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1283688799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_004051750307300811&rfr_iscdi=true