The Impact of the Discourse of the "Politics of Protection": The Case of the EU and UN Policing and Military Missions to Chad (2007-2010)

This article evaluates the disputed relationship between the doctrines of the responsibility to protect and humanitarian military intervention and their impact through a case study of the European Union and United Nations military and policing operations in Chad, EUFOR Chad, and the United Nations M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:African security 2012-07, Vol.5 (3-4), p.179-198
1. Verfasser: Bono, Giovanna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 198
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 179
container_title African security
container_volume 5
creator Bono, Giovanna
description This article evaluates the disputed relationship between the doctrines of the responsibility to protect and humanitarian military intervention and their impact through a case study of the European Union and United Nations military and policing operations in Chad, EUFOR Chad, and the United Nations Mission in Central African Republic and Chad, MINURCAT. It shows that the power of the discourse of politics of protection needs to be studied carefully. This article suggests that the EUFOR mission had a negative impact on the protection dynamics of the conflict. EUFOR contributed to a worsening of the human rights and security situation, strengthened the authoritarian rule of President Déby, and promoted political irresponsibility by providing indirect backing for the Justice Equality Movement.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/19392206.2012.732889
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1283639567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48598833</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48598833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-db08e15d7cbf5529c3c94ca8d64e00ac8f2cacf4a03fa0706ce76ae1d08ece223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctO3DAUhqMKpHLpG7SSxYouMhzbieN0g9AUChLQWcysLXNiF6NMPLU9qniEvjVOU2AHK5_L_9nn-C-KzxRmFCSc0Ja3jIGYMaBs1nAmZfuh2BvLJWO02nmJQXws9mN8ABCMStgr_i7vDblabzQm4i1JOfvuIvptiOa5cLTwvUsO41hYBJ8MJueHo29khOf6VXm-InroyOqWjAi64de__MZlXofHHMSYyUiSJ_N73ZFjBtCUeWz4eljsWt1H8-n_eVCsLs6X88vy-uePq_nZdYm8rVPZ3YE0tO4avLN1zVrk2FaoZScqA6BRWoYabaWBWw0NCDSN0IZ2GUPDGD8ojqd7N8H_3pqY1DovbPpeD8Zvo6INk6KuZP6xd6VMcpGnEk2WVpMUg48xGKs2wa3zzoqCGk1Szyap0SQ1mZSxLxP2EJMPL0wl61ZKznP_dOq7wfqw1n986DuV9GPvgw16QBcVf_OFJ8vkn68</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1283639567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of the Discourse of the "Politics of Protection": The Case of the EU and UN Policing and Military Missions to Chad (2007-2010)</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Bono, Giovanna</creator><creatorcontrib>Bono, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><description>This article evaluates the disputed relationship between the doctrines of the responsibility to protect and humanitarian military intervention and their impact through a case study of the European Union and United Nations military and policing operations in Chad, EUFOR Chad, and the United Nations Mission in Central African Republic and Chad, MINURCAT. It shows that the power of the discourse of politics of protection needs to be studied carefully. This article suggests that the EUFOR mission had a negative impact on the protection dynamics of the conflict. EUFOR contributed to a worsening of the human rights and security situation, strengthened the authoritarian rule of President Déby, and promoted political irresponsibility by providing indirect backing for the Justice Equality Movement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-2206</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19392206.2012.732889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Armed Forces ; Authoritarianism ; Central African Republic ; Chad ; Conflict ; Equality ; European Union ; Human Security ; Humanitarian Intervention ; humanitarian interventions ; Law enforcement ; Military Intervention ; military interventions ; Original Articles ; Presidents ; Sudan ; United Nations</subject><ispartof>African security, 2012-07, Vol.5 (3-4), p.179-198</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2012</rights><rights>Copyright © Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-db08e15d7cbf5529c3c94ca8d64e00ac8f2cacf4a03fa0706ce76ae1d08ece223</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48598833$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48598833$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27842,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bono, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of the Discourse of the "Politics of Protection": The Case of the EU and UN Policing and Military Missions to Chad (2007-2010)</title><title>African security</title><description>This article evaluates the disputed relationship between the doctrines of the responsibility to protect and humanitarian military intervention and their impact through a case study of the European Union and United Nations military and policing operations in Chad, EUFOR Chad, and the United Nations Mission in Central African Republic and Chad, MINURCAT. It shows that the power of the discourse of politics of protection needs to be studied carefully. This article suggests that the EUFOR mission had a negative impact on the protection dynamics of the conflict. EUFOR contributed to a worsening of the human rights and security situation, strengthened the authoritarian rule of President Déby, and promoted political irresponsibility by providing indirect backing for the Justice Equality Movement.</description><subject>Armed Forces</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Central African Republic</subject><subject>Chad</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Human Security</subject><subject>Humanitarian Intervention</subject><subject>humanitarian interventions</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Military Intervention</subject><subject>military interventions</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Sudan</subject><subject>United Nations</subject><issn>1939-2206</issn><issn>1939-2214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctO3DAUhqMKpHLpG7SSxYouMhzbieN0g9AUChLQWcysLXNiF6NMPLU9qniEvjVOU2AHK5_L_9nn-C-KzxRmFCSc0Ja3jIGYMaBs1nAmZfuh2BvLJWO02nmJQXws9mN8ABCMStgr_i7vDblabzQm4i1JOfvuIvptiOa5cLTwvUsO41hYBJ8MJueHo29khOf6VXm-InroyOqWjAi64de__MZlXofHHMSYyUiSJ_N73ZFjBtCUeWz4eljsWt1H8-n_eVCsLs6X88vy-uePq_nZdYm8rVPZ3YE0tO4avLN1zVrk2FaoZScqA6BRWoYabaWBWw0NCDSN0IZ2GUPDGD8ojqd7N8H_3pqY1DovbPpeD8Zvo6INk6KuZP6xd6VMcpGnEk2WVpMUg48xGKs2wa3zzoqCGk1Szyap0SQ1mZSxLxP2EJMPL0wl61ZKznP_dOq7wfqw1n986DuV9GPvgw16QBcVf_OFJ8vkn68</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Bono, Giovanna</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis, Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>The Impact of the Discourse of the "Politics of Protection": The Case of the EU and UN Policing and Military Missions to Chad (2007-2010)</title><author>Bono, Giovanna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-db08e15d7cbf5529c3c94ca8d64e00ac8f2cacf4a03fa0706ce76ae1d08ece223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Armed Forces</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Central African Republic</topic><topic>Chad</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Human Security</topic><topic>Humanitarian Intervention</topic><topic>humanitarian interventions</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Military Intervention</topic><topic>military interventions</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Sudan</topic><topic>United Nations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bono, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>African security</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bono, Giovanna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of the Discourse of the "Politics of Protection": The Case of the EU and UN Policing and Military Missions to Chad (2007-2010)</atitle><jtitle>African security</jtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>179-198</pages><issn>1939-2206</issn><eissn>1939-2214</eissn><abstract>This article evaluates the disputed relationship between the doctrines of the responsibility to protect and humanitarian military intervention and their impact through a case study of the European Union and United Nations military and policing operations in Chad, EUFOR Chad, and the United Nations Mission in Central African Republic and Chad, MINURCAT. It shows that the power of the discourse of politics of protection needs to be studied carefully. This article suggests that the EUFOR mission had a negative impact on the protection dynamics of the conflict. EUFOR contributed to a worsening of the human rights and security situation, strengthened the authoritarian rule of President Déby, and promoted political irresponsibility by providing indirect backing for the Justice Equality Movement.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/19392206.2012.732889</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1939-2206
ispartof African security, 2012-07, Vol.5 (3-4), p.179-198
issn 1939-2206
1939-2214
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1283639567
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Armed Forces
Authoritarianism
Central African Republic
Chad
Conflict
Equality
European Union
Human Security
Humanitarian Intervention
humanitarian interventions
Law enforcement
Military Intervention
military interventions
Original Articles
Presidents
Sudan
United Nations
title The Impact of the Discourse of the "Politics of Protection": The Case of the EU and UN Policing and Military Missions to Chad (2007-2010)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T13%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20the%20Discourse%20of%20the%20%22Politics%20of%20Protection%22:%20The%20Case%20of%20the%20EU%20and%20UN%20Policing%20and%20Military%20Missions%20to%20Chad%20(2007-2010)&rft.jtitle=African%20security&rft.au=Bono,%20Giovanna&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=179-198&rft.issn=1939-2206&rft.eissn=1939-2214&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19392206.2012.732889&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48598833%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1283639567&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48598833&rfr_iscdi=true