Robust 2D/3D registration for fast-flexion motion of the knee joint using hybrid optimization
Previously, we proposed a 2D/3D registration method that uses Powell’s algorithm to obtain 3D motion of a knee joint by 3D computed-tomography and bi-plane fluoroscopic images. The 2D/3D registration is performed consecutively and automatically for each frame of the fluoroscopic images. This method...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiological physics and technology 2013, Vol.6 (1), p.170-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 170 |
container_title | Radiological physics and technology |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Ohnishi, Takashi Suzuki, Masahiko Kobayashi, Tatsuya Naomoto, Shinji Sukegawa, Tomoyuki Nawata, Atsushi Haneishi, Hideaki |
description | Previously, we proposed a 2D/3D registration method that uses Powell’s algorithm to obtain 3D motion of a knee joint by 3D computed-tomography and bi-plane fluoroscopic images. The 2D/3D registration is performed consecutively and automatically for each frame of the fluoroscopic images. This method starts from the optimum parameters of the previous frame for each frame except for the first one, and it searches for the next set of optimum parameters using Powell’s algorithm. However, if the flexion motion of the knee joint is fast, it is likely that Powell’s algorithm will provide a mismatch because the initial parameters are far from the correct ones. In this study, we applied a hybrid optimization algorithm (HPS) combining Powell’s algorithm with the Nelder–Mead simplex (NM-simplex) algorithm to overcome this problem. The performance of the HPS was compared with the separate performances of Powell’s algorithm and the NM-simplex algorithm, the Quasi-Newton algorithm and hybrid optimization algorithm with the Quasi-Newton and NM-simplex algorithms with five patient data sets in terms of the root-mean-square error (RMSE), target registration error (TRE), success rate, and processing time. The RMSE, TRE, and the success rate of the HPS were better than those of the other optimization algorithms, and the processing time was similar to that of Powell’s algorithm alone. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12194-012-0185-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1282513537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1282513537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349y-957ad82f6de8c80121c41ecf05c1d80fcba6815a9c3d78bd7e58fe08b42d503a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBCIlsIHcEE-cgn12nHjHFF5SpWQEByR5Th269LExU4kwteTPuiRw2pXs7OjnUHoEsgNEJKNI1DI04QA7UvwpDtCQxATnhCWwvFhZmyAzmJcEjIBSukpGlAGTOQ0H6KPV1-0scH0bszucDBzF5ugGudrbH3AVsUmsSvzvQEqv8W9xc3C4M_aGLz0rm5wG109x4uuCK7Eft24yv1sNc7RiVWraC72fYTeH-7fpk_J7OXxeXo7SzRL8y7JeaZKQe2kNEKL3g7oFIy2hGsoBbG6UBMBXOWalZkoysxwYQ0RRUpLTphiI3S9010H_9Wa2MjKRW1WK1Ub30YJVFAOjLOsp8KOqoOPMRgr18FVKnQSiNykKnepyv4NuUlVdv3N1V6-LSpTHi7-YuwJdEeI_aqemyCXvg11b_kf1V_9hoPP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1282513537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robust 2D/3D registration for fast-flexion motion of the knee joint using hybrid optimization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Ohnishi, Takashi ; Suzuki, Masahiko ; Kobayashi, Tatsuya ; Naomoto, Shinji ; Sukegawa, Tomoyuki ; Nawata, Atsushi ; Haneishi, Hideaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Ohnishi, Takashi ; Suzuki, Masahiko ; Kobayashi, Tatsuya ; Naomoto, Shinji ; Sukegawa, Tomoyuki ; Nawata, Atsushi ; Haneishi, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><description>Previously, we proposed a 2D/3D registration method that uses Powell’s algorithm to obtain 3D motion of a knee joint by 3D computed-tomography and bi-plane fluoroscopic images. The 2D/3D registration is performed consecutively and automatically for each frame of the fluoroscopic images. This method starts from the optimum parameters of the previous frame for each frame except for the first one, and it searches for the next set of optimum parameters using Powell’s algorithm. However, if the flexion motion of the knee joint is fast, it is likely that Powell’s algorithm will provide a mismatch because the initial parameters are far from the correct ones. In this study, we applied a hybrid optimization algorithm (HPS) combining Powell’s algorithm with the Nelder–Mead simplex (NM-simplex) algorithm to overcome this problem. The performance of the HPS was compared with the separate performances of Powell’s algorithm and the NM-simplex algorithm, the Quasi-Newton algorithm and hybrid optimization algorithm with the Quasi-Newton and NM-simplex algorithms with five patient data sets in terms of the root-mean-square error (RMSE), target registration error (TRE), success rate, and processing time. The RMSE, TRE, and the success rate of the HPS were better than those of the other optimization algorithms, and the processing time was similar to that of Powell’s algorithm alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-0333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-0341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12194-012-0185-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23138929</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Imaging ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Medical and Radiation Physics ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Movement ; Nuclear Medicine ; Radiology ; Radiotherapy ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Radiological physics and technology, 2013, Vol.6 (1), p.170-179</ispartof><rights>Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349y-957ad82f6de8c80121c41ecf05c1d80fcba6815a9c3d78bd7e58fe08b42d503a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349y-957ad82f6de8c80121c41ecf05c1d80fcba6815a9c3d78bd7e58fe08b42d503a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12194-012-0185-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12194-012-0185-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23138929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ohnishi, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naomoto, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukegawa, Tomoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawata, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haneishi, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><title>Robust 2D/3D registration for fast-flexion motion of the knee joint using hybrid optimization</title><title>Radiological physics and technology</title><addtitle>Radiol Phys Technol</addtitle><addtitle>Radiol Phys Technol</addtitle><description>Previously, we proposed a 2D/3D registration method that uses Powell’s algorithm to obtain 3D motion of a knee joint by 3D computed-tomography and bi-plane fluoroscopic images. The 2D/3D registration is performed consecutively and automatically for each frame of the fluoroscopic images. This method starts from the optimum parameters of the previous frame for each frame except for the first one, and it searches for the next set of optimum parameters using Powell’s algorithm. However, if the flexion motion of the knee joint is fast, it is likely that Powell’s algorithm will provide a mismatch because the initial parameters are far from the correct ones. In this study, we applied a hybrid optimization algorithm (HPS) combining Powell’s algorithm with the Nelder–Mead simplex (NM-simplex) algorithm to overcome this problem. The performance of the HPS was compared with the separate performances of Powell’s algorithm and the NM-simplex algorithm, the Quasi-Newton algorithm and hybrid optimization algorithm with the Quasi-Newton and NM-simplex algorithms with five patient data sets in terms of the root-mean-square error (RMSE), target registration error (TRE), success rate, and processing time. The RMSE, TRE, and the success rate of the HPS were better than those of the other optimization algorithms, and the processing time was similar to that of Powell’s algorithm alone.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Medical and Radiation Physics</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>1865-0333</issn><issn>1865-0341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBCIlsIHcEE-cgn12nHjHFF5SpWQEByR5Th269LExU4kwteTPuiRw2pXs7OjnUHoEsgNEJKNI1DI04QA7UvwpDtCQxATnhCWwvFhZmyAzmJcEjIBSukpGlAGTOQ0H6KPV1-0scH0bszucDBzF5ugGudrbH3AVsUmsSvzvQEqv8W9xc3C4M_aGLz0rm5wG109x4uuCK7Eft24yv1sNc7RiVWraC72fYTeH-7fpk_J7OXxeXo7SzRL8y7JeaZKQe2kNEKL3g7oFIy2hGsoBbG6UBMBXOWalZkoysxwYQ0RRUpLTphiI3S9010H_9Wa2MjKRW1WK1Ub30YJVFAOjLOsp8KOqoOPMRgr18FVKnQSiNykKnepyv4NuUlVdv3N1V6-LSpTHi7-YuwJdEeI_aqemyCXvg11b_kf1V_9hoPP</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Ohnishi, Takashi</creator><creator>Suzuki, Masahiko</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Tatsuya</creator><creator>Naomoto, Shinji</creator><creator>Sukegawa, Tomoyuki</creator><creator>Nawata, Atsushi</creator><creator>Haneishi, Hideaki</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Robust 2D/3D registration for fast-flexion motion of the knee joint using hybrid optimization</title><author>Ohnishi, Takashi ; Suzuki, Masahiko ; Kobayashi, Tatsuya ; Naomoto, Shinji ; Sukegawa, Tomoyuki ; Nawata, Atsushi ; Haneishi, Hideaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349y-957ad82f6de8c80121c41ecf05c1d80fcba6815a9c3d78bd7e58fe08b42d503a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Medical and Radiation Physics</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ohnishi, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naomoto, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukegawa, Tomoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawata, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haneishi, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiological physics and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ohnishi, Takashi</au><au>Suzuki, Masahiko</au><au>Kobayashi, Tatsuya</au><au>Naomoto, Shinji</au><au>Sukegawa, Tomoyuki</au><au>Nawata, Atsushi</au><au>Haneishi, Hideaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robust 2D/3D registration for fast-flexion motion of the knee joint using hybrid optimization</atitle><jtitle>Radiological physics and technology</jtitle><stitle>Radiol Phys Technol</stitle><addtitle>Radiol Phys Technol</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>170-179</pages><issn>1865-0333</issn><eissn>1865-0341</eissn><abstract>Previously, we proposed a 2D/3D registration method that uses Powell’s algorithm to obtain 3D motion of a knee joint by 3D computed-tomography and bi-plane fluoroscopic images. The 2D/3D registration is performed consecutively and automatically for each frame of the fluoroscopic images. This method starts from the optimum parameters of the previous frame for each frame except for the first one, and it searches for the next set of optimum parameters using Powell’s algorithm. However, if the flexion motion of the knee joint is fast, it is likely that Powell’s algorithm will provide a mismatch because the initial parameters are far from the correct ones. In this study, we applied a hybrid optimization algorithm (HPS) combining Powell’s algorithm with the Nelder–Mead simplex (NM-simplex) algorithm to overcome this problem. The performance of the HPS was compared with the separate performances of Powell’s algorithm and the NM-simplex algorithm, the Quasi-Newton algorithm and hybrid optimization algorithm with the Quasi-Newton and NM-simplex algorithms with five patient data sets in terms of the root-mean-square error (RMSE), target registration error (TRE), success rate, and processing time. The RMSE, TRE, and the success rate of the HPS were better than those of the other optimization algorithms, and the processing time was similar to that of Powell’s algorithm alone.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>23138929</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12194-012-0185-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1865-0333 |
ispartof | Radiological physics and technology, 2013, Vol.6 (1), p.170-179 |
issn | 1865-0333 1865-0341 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1282513537 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Imaging Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging Knee Joint - physiology Medical and Radiation Physics Medicine Medicine & Public Health Movement Nuclear Medicine Radiology Radiotherapy Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Robust 2D/3D registration for fast-flexion motion of the knee joint using hybrid optimization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T17%3A59%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robust%202D/3D%20registration%20for%20fast-flexion%20motion%20of%20the%20knee%20joint%20using%20hybrid%20optimization&rft.jtitle=Radiological%20physics%20and%20technology&rft.au=Ohnishi,%20Takashi&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=170-179&rft.issn=1865-0333&rft.eissn=1865-0341&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12194-012-0185-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1282513537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1282513537&rft_id=info:pmid/23138929&rfr_iscdi=true |