Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of thoracic postherpetic neuralgia from the angulus costae: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is often refractory to existing treatments. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is known to be effective for treating neuropathic pain. In common, the targets of PRF treatment were the segmental dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons responsible for the pain. A potential complicatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pain physician 2013-01, Vol.16 (1), p.15-25
Hauptverfasser: Ke, Ma, Yinghui, Fan, Yi, Jin, Xeuhua, Huang, Xiaoming, Liu, Zhijun, Cheng, Chao, Huang, Yingwei, Wang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title Pain physician
container_volume 16
creator Ke, Ma
Yinghui, Fan
Yi, Jin
Xeuhua, Huang
Xiaoming, Liu
Zhijun, Cheng
Chao, Huang
Yingwei, Wang
description Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is often refractory to existing treatments. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is known to be effective for treating neuropathic pain. In common, the targets of PRF treatment were the segmental dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons responsible for the pain. A potential complication that can occasionally occur with PRF treatment is damage to the adjacent tissue and organ. The effectiveness of the angulus costae as a puncture site for PRF has not been tested in thoracic PHN treatment. The goal of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of PRF for treating thoracic PHN through the puncture of the angulus costae. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Department of Anesthesiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. Ninety-six patients with thoracic (T2-11) PHN were equally randomized assigned into 2 groups. The electrode needle punctured through the angulus costae of each patient guided by x-ray; PRF at 42° C for 120 seconds was applied after inducing paresthesia involving the affected dermatome area. PRF was applied in the PRF group (n = 48) twice. It was also applied in the sham group (n = 48) twice without radiofrequency energy output. The treatment was done once a week for 3 weeks. Tramadol was used for flare pain when the visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 3. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by VAS, SF-36 health survey questionnaire, side effects (type, frequency, and onset time) before treatment, at days 3, 7, and 14, and at months one, 2, 3 and 6 after PRF. The average of tramadol (mg/d) administered within the first  month after treatment was also recorded. The postprocedure VAS scores in the PRF group were significantly lower than those in the sham group and lasted for 6 months after treatment (P < 0.05). The SF-36 score, such as physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, social function, emotional role, and mental health index were significantly improved until 6 months after treatment in the PRF group compared to the sham group (P < 0.01-0.05). The average dosage of tramadol  administrated (mg/d) within the first  month after treatment was also significantly reduced in the PRF group compared to the sham group (P < 0.05). There were no obvious signs of pneumothorax, bleeding, infection, or other severe side effects in either group (P > 0.05). Single center study, relatively small number of patients. The strategy that the angulus costae b
doi_str_mv 10.36076/ppj.2013/16/15
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273807979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2655993031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-825673804146a6c9e790130bb63dec173057ced8471aa7afe18b8711fbaf23813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9v1DAQxS0EotuFMzdkiQuHpuuJN3bCDVXlj1SJC5wtxxm3Xjl2sJ1D-S58V5y2cOA0Gs1vnt7MI-QNsEsumBSHZTldtgz4AcQBumdk10LHGoDj8JzsoOO84dANZ-Q85xNjXAwDf0nOWs6PrONsR35fW-uMNvc0WrqsPuNEk55ctAl_rhjqwAVa7pCWhLrMGMpGlruYtHGGLjHXYVqw1CbgmrS_dZraFOeHLR1uV79maiqn8QPVVT1McXa_cLqgU1xHj83oXZi23sRQUvS-mijJaf-KvLC6enr9VPfkx6fr71dfmptvn79efbxpDB-gNH3bCcl7doSj0MIMKIf6EjaOgk9oQHLWSYNTf5SgtdQWoR97CWBHbVveA9-T94-6S4r16lzU7LJB73XAuGYF7SYvBzlU9N1_6CmuKVR3qhVdV__L-CZ4eKRMijkntGpJbtbpXgFTD8mpmpzaklMgVA1qT94-6a7jjNM__m9U_A_Fh5ao</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2655993031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of thoracic postherpetic neuralgia from the angulus costae: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ke, Ma ; Yinghui, Fan ; Yi, Jin ; Xeuhua, Huang ; Xiaoming, Liu ; Zhijun, Cheng ; Chao, Huang ; Yingwei, Wang</creator><creatorcontrib>Ke, Ma ; Yinghui, Fan ; Yi, Jin ; Xeuhua, Huang ; Xiaoming, Liu ; Zhijun, Cheng ; Chao, Huang ; Yingwei, Wang</creatorcontrib><description>Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is often refractory to existing treatments. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is known to be effective for treating neuropathic pain. In common, the targets of PRF treatment were the segmental dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons responsible for the pain. A potential complication that can occasionally occur with PRF treatment is damage to the adjacent tissue and organ. The effectiveness of the angulus costae as a puncture site for PRF has not been tested in thoracic PHN treatment. The goal of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of PRF for treating thoracic PHN through the puncture of the angulus costae. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Department of Anesthesiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. Ninety-six patients with thoracic (T2-11) PHN were equally randomized assigned into 2 groups. The electrode needle punctured through the angulus costae of each patient guided by x-ray; PRF at 42° C for 120 seconds was applied after inducing paresthesia involving the affected dermatome area. PRF was applied in the PRF group (n = 48) twice. It was also applied in the sham group (n = 48) twice without radiofrequency energy output. The treatment was done once a week for 3 weeks. Tramadol was used for flare pain when the visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 3. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by VAS, SF-36 health survey questionnaire, side effects (type, frequency, and onset time) before treatment, at days 3, 7, and 14, and at months one, 2, 3 and 6 after PRF. The average of tramadol (mg/d) administered within the first  month after treatment was also recorded. The postprocedure VAS scores in the PRF group were significantly lower than those in the sham group and lasted for 6 months after treatment (P &lt; 0.05). The SF-36 score, such as physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, social function, emotional role, and mental health index were significantly improved until 6 months after treatment in the PRF group compared to the sham group (P &lt; 0.01-0.05). The average dosage of tramadol  administrated (mg/d) within the first  month after treatment was also significantly reduced in the PRF group compared to the sham group (P &lt; 0.05). There were no obvious signs of pneumothorax, bleeding, infection, or other severe side effects in either group (P &gt; 0.05). Single center study, relatively small number of patients. The strategy that the angulus costae be used as the PRF puncture point of an electrode needle and the final localization of the needle tip as determined by sensory testing is an effective and safe therapeutic alternative for thoracic PHN treatment. Benefits include that the procedure is minimally invasive, provides short-term pain relief, and improves quality of life. NO ISRCTN25588650.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-3159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-1149</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.36076/ppj.2013/16/15</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23340530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Interventional Pain Physician</publisher><subject>Aged ; Double-Blind Method ; Electric stimulation therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Neuralgia, Postherpetic - therapy ; Pain ; Pain Measurement ; Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment - methods ; Thorax</subject><ispartof>Pain physician, 2013-01, Vol.16 (1), p.15-25</ispartof><rights>2013. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-825673804146a6c9e790130bb63dec173057ced8471aa7afe18b8711fbaf23813</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23340530$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ke, Ma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yinghui, Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xeuhua, Huang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiaoming, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhijun, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Huang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yingwei, Wang</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of thoracic postherpetic neuralgia from the angulus costae: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial</title><title>Pain physician</title><addtitle>Pain Physician</addtitle><description>Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is often refractory to existing treatments. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is known to be effective for treating neuropathic pain. In common, the targets of PRF treatment were the segmental dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons responsible for the pain. A potential complication that can occasionally occur with PRF treatment is damage to the adjacent tissue and organ. The effectiveness of the angulus costae as a puncture site for PRF has not been tested in thoracic PHN treatment. The goal of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of PRF for treating thoracic PHN through the puncture of the angulus costae. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Department of Anesthesiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. Ninety-six patients with thoracic (T2-11) PHN were equally randomized assigned into 2 groups. The electrode needle punctured through the angulus costae of each patient guided by x-ray; PRF at 42° C for 120 seconds was applied after inducing paresthesia involving the affected dermatome area. PRF was applied in the PRF group (n = 48) twice. It was also applied in the sham group (n = 48) twice without radiofrequency energy output. The treatment was done once a week for 3 weeks. Tramadol was used for flare pain when the visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 3. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by VAS, SF-36 health survey questionnaire, side effects (type, frequency, and onset time) before treatment, at days 3, 7, and 14, and at months one, 2, 3 and 6 after PRF. The average of tramadol (mg/d) administered within the first  month after treatment was also recorded. The postprocedure VAS scores in the PRF group were significantly lower than those in the sham group and lasted for 6 months after treatment (P &lt; 0.05). The SF-36 score, such as physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, social function, emotional role, and mental health index were significantly improved until 6 months after treatment in the PRF group compared to the sham group (P &lt; 0.01-0.05). The average dosage of tramadol  administrated (mg/d) within the first  month after treatment was also significantly reduced in the PRF group compared to the sham group (P &lt; 0.05). There were no obvious signs of pneumothorax, bleeding, infection, or other severe side effects in either group (P &gt; 0.05). Single center study, relatively small number of patients. The strategy that the angulus costae be used as the PRF puncture point of an electrode needle and the final localization of the needle tip as determined by sensory testing is an effective and safe therapeutic alternative for thoracic PHN treatment. Benefits include that the procedure is minimally invasive, provides short-term pain relief, and improves quality of life. NO ISRCTN25588650.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Electric stimulation therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuralgia, Postherpetic - therapy</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment - methods</subject><subject>Thorax</subject><issn>1533-3159</issn><issn>2150-1149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9v1DAQxS0EotuFMzdkiQuHpuuJN3bCDVXlj1SJC5wtxxm3Xjl2sJ1D-S58V5y2cOA0Gs1vnt7MI-QNsEsumBSHZTldtgz4AcQBumdk10LHGoDj8JzsoOO84dANZ-Q85xNjXAwDf0nOWs6PrONsR35fW-uMNvc0WrqsPuNEk55ctAl_rhjqwAVa7pCWhLrMGMpGlruYtHGGLjHXYVqw1CbgmrS_dZraFOeHLR1uV79maiqn8QPVVT1McXa_cLqgU1xHj83oXZi23sRQUvS-mijJaf-KvLC6enr9VPfkx6fr71dfmptvn79efbxpDB-gNH3bCcl7doSj0MIMKIf6EjaOgk9oQHLWSYNTf5SgtdQWoR97CWBHbVveA9-T94-6S4r16lzU7LJB73XAuGYF7SYvBzlU9N1_6CmuKVR3qhVdV__L-CZ4eKRMijkntGpJbtbpXgFTD8mpmpzaklMgVA1qT94-6a7jjNM__m9U_A_Fh5ao</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Ke, Ma</creator><creator>Yinghui, Fan</creator><creator>Yi, Jin</creator><creator>Xeuhua, Huang</creator><creator>Xiaoming, Liu</creator><creator>Zhijun, Cheng</creator><creator>Chao, Huang</creator><creator>Yingwei, Wang</creator><general>American Society of Interventional Pain Physician</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of thoracic postherpetic neuralgia from the angulus costae: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial</title><author>Ke, Ma ; Yinghui, Fan ; Yi, Jin ; Xeuhua, Huang ; Xiaoming, Liu ; Zhijun, Cheng ; Chao, Huang ; Yingwei, Wang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-825673804146a6c9e790130bb63dec173057ced8471aa7afe18b8711fbaf23813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Electric stimulation therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuralgia, Postherpetic - therapy</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment - methods</topic><topic>Thorax</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ke, Ma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yinghui, Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xeuhua, Huang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiaoming, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhijun, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Huang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yingwei, Wang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain physician</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ke, Ma</au><au>Yinghui, Fan</au><au>Yi, Jin</au><au>Xeuhua, Huang</au><au>Xiaoming, Liu</au><au>Zhijun, Cheng</au><au>Chao, Huang</au><au>Yingwei, Wang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of thoracic postherpetic neuralgia from the angulus costae: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Pain physician</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Physician</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>15-25</pages><issn>1533-3159</issn><eissn>2150-1149</eissn><abstract>Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is often refractory to existing treatments. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is known to be effective for treating neuropathic pain. In common, the targets of PRF treatment were the segmental dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons responsible for the pain. A potential complication that can occasionally occur with PRF treatment is damage to the adjacent tissue and organ. The effectiveness of the angulus costae as a puncture site for PRF has not been tested in thoracic PHN treatment. The goal of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of PRF for treating thoracic PHN through the puncture of the angulus costae. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Department of Anesthesiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. Ninety-six patients with thoracic (T2-11) PHN were equally randomized assigned into 2 groups. The electrode needle punctured through the angulus costae of each patient guided by x-ray; PRF at 42° C for 120 seconds was applied after inducing paresthesia involving the affected dermatome area. PRF was applied in the PRF group (n = 48) twice. It was also applied in the sham group (n = 48) twice without radiofrequency energy output. The treatment was done once a week for 3 weeks. Tramadol was used for flare pain when the visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 3. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by VAS, SF-36 health survey questionnaire, side effects (type, frequency, and onset time) before treatment, at days 3, 7, and 14, and at months one, 2, 3 and 6 after PRF. The average of tramadol (mg/d) administered within the first  month after treatment was also recorded. The postprocedure VAS scores in the PRF group were significantly lower than those in the sham group and lasted for 6 months after treatment (P &lt; 0.05). The SF-36 score, such as physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, social function, emotional role, and mental health index were significantly improved until 6 months after treatment in the PRF group compared to the sham group (P &lt; 0.01-0.05). The average dosage of tramadol  administrated (mg/d) within the first  month after treatment was also significantly reduced in the PRF group compared to the sham group (P &lt; 0.05). There were no obvious signs of pneumothorax, bleeding, infection, or other severe side effects in either group (P &gt; 0.05). Single center study, relatively small number of patients. The strategy that the angulus costae be used as the PRF puncture point of an electrode needle and the final localization of the needle tip as determined by sensory testing is an effective and safe therapeutic alternative for thoracic PHN treatment. Benefits include that the procedure is minimally invasive, provides short-term pain relief, and improves quality of life. NO ISRCTN25588650.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Interventional Pain Physician</pub><pmid>23340530</pmid><doi>10.36076/ppj.2013/16/15</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1533-3159
ispartof Pain physician, 2013-01, Vol.16 (1), p.15-25
issn 1533-3159
2150-1149
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273807979
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aged
Double-Blind Method
Electric stimulation therapy
Female
Humans
Male
Neuralgia, Postherpetic - therapy
Pain
Pain Measurement
Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment - methods
Thorax
title Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of thoracic postherpetic neuralgia from the angulus costae: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A49%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20pulsed%20radiofrequency%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20thoracic%20postherpetic%20neuralgia%20from%20the%20angulus%20costae:%20a%20randomized,%20double-blinded,%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Pain%20physician&rft.au=Ke,%20Ma&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=15-25&rft.issn=1533-3159&rft.eissn=2150-1149&rft_id=info:doi/10.36076/ppj.2013/16/15&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2655993031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2655993031&rft_id=info:pmid/23340530&rfr_iscdi=true