Case Based Review Questions, Review Sessions, and Call Schedule Type Enhance Knowledge Gains in a Surgical Clerkship

Introduction Medical students in surgical clerkships must gain surgical knowledge while doing clinical rotations. We developed a self-learning program, which is case based, the Case Review Question (CRQ) system. Our hypothesis was that students who used CRQs would score higher on the summative test,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical education 2013-01, Vol.70 (1), p.68-75
Hauptverfasser: McLean, Susan F., MD, Horn, Kathryn, MD, Tyroch, Alan H., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 75
container_issue 1
container_start_page 68
container_title Journal of surgical education
container_volume 70
creator McLean, Susan F., MD
Horn, Kathryn, MD
Tyroch, Alan H., MD
description Introduction Medical students in surgical clerkships must gain surgical knowledge while doing clinical rotations. We developed a self-learning program, which is case based, the Case Review Question (CRQ) system. Our hypothesis was that students who used CRQs would score higher on the summative test, Surgery NBME (National Board of Medical Examiners). Methods The setting is a surgical clerkship in a Liaison Council for Medical Education (LCME) approved Medical School, with summative examination using the NBME shelf examination in Surgery. Each CRQ document is a series of 20 to 25 questions based on cases. The cases are a paragraph, with pertinent medical facts and extra facts as distracters. The students are encouraged to use these questions to guide study. Students must come to a review session to hear the answers and a discussion. We review the NBME Surgery shelf examination scores taken before and after this program was initiated, along with changes in rotation group size, call schedule type, and other changes. Results CRQs, review sessions, and call schedule changes improved scores. NBME examination average rose from 77.12 to 82.01 (p = 0.004) after the CRQ program was initiated. Call schedule revision improved scores: intermittent call NBME score was 80.98, whereas night float schedule mean NBME was 84.66 (p < 0.001). During night float call, the CRQ program was already in effect, so that there is no non-CRQ program comparison group. Students scored higher in the second semester, throughout the study. First semester students scored a mean of 79.11, whereas second semester students scored 84.195 (p < 0.001). By the end of the study, there were no failures on the NBME examination, even in the first semester. The factors of presence of the CRQ program, review sessions, call schedule type, and which semester were all significant in a correlation matrix against NBME scores and in a regression analysis (p < 0.001). Conclusions The CRQ program of case-based self-study was associated with higher scores on the NBME shelf examination, as a summative test of medical knowledge in surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.07.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273783622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1931720412001869</els_id><sourcerecordid>1273783622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-6c8501cfec058527f7fc6372bb61ce2234eb27946867144c17e65e88ab7124c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0Eou3CL0BCPnIgwV-xkwNIEJWCqIRgy9lynEnXqdfZ2huq_fd12JYDFy7j0eh9ZzzPIPSKkpISKt-N5ZjmeF0yQllJVElI9QSd0lrVhRIVe5rzhtNCMSJO0FlKYxaIhjXP0QnjnCup-CnatyYB_pRDj3_Cbwd3-McMae-mkN4-VtaQ0rFgQo9b4z1e2w30swd8ddgBPg8bEyzgb2G689BfA74wLiTsAjZ4nT_prPG49RBv0sbtXqBng_EJXj68K_Tr8_lV-6W4_H7xtf14WVhBxb6Qtq4ItQNYUtUVU4MarOSKdZ2kFhjjAjqmGiFrqagQliqQFdS16RRlIktX6M2x7y5Ot8tWeuuSBe9NgGlOmjLFVc1lbrVC_Ci1cUopwqB30W1NPGhK9IJbj_oPbr3g1kTpTDO7Xj8MmLst9H89j3yz4P1RAHnNzDLqZB1kVL2LYPe6n9x_Bnz4x2-9CwvNGzhAGqc5hkxQU52yR6-Xiy8Hp4wQWsuG3wNYeKXt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1273783622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Case Based Review Questions, Review Sessions, and Call Schedule Type Enhance Knowledge Gains in a Surgical Clerkship</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>McLean, Susan F., MD ; Horn, Kathryn, MD ; Tyroch, Alan H., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>McLean, Susan F., MD ; Horn, Kathryn, MD ; Tyroch, Alan H., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Medical students in surgical clerkships must gain surgical knowledge while doing clinical rotations. We developed a self-learning program, which is case based, the Case Review Question (CRQ) system. Our hypothesis was that students who used CRQs would score higher on the summative test, Surgery NBME (National Board of Medical Examiners). Methods The setting is a surgical clerkship in a Liaison Council for Medical Education (LCME) approved Medical School, with summative examination using the NBME shelf examination in Surgery. Each CRQ document is a series of 20 to 25 questions based on cases. The cases are a paragraph, with pertinent medical facts and extra facts as distracters. The students are encouraged to use these questions to guide study. Students must come to a review session to hear the answers and a discussion. We review the NBME Surgery shelf examination scores taken before and after this program was initiated, along with changes in rotation group size, call schedule type, and other changes. Results CRQs, review sessions, and call schedule changes improved scores. NBME examination average rose from 77.12 to 82.01 (p = 0.004) after the CRQ program was initiated. Call schedule revision improved scores: intermittent call NBME score was 80.98, whereas night float schedule mean NBME was 84.66 (p &lt; 0.001). During night float call, the CRQ program was already in effect, so that there is no non-CRQ program comparison group. Students scored higher in the second semester, throughout the study. First semester students scored a mean of 79.11, whereas second semester students scored 84.195 (p &lt; 0.001). By the end of the study, there were no failures on the NBME examination, even in the first semester. The factors of presence of the CRQ program, review sessions, call schedule type, and which semester were all significant in a correlation matrix against NBME scores and in a regression analysis (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions The CRQ program of case-based self-study was associated with higher scores on the NBME shelf examination, as a summative test of medical knowledge in surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.07.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23337673</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Case based learning ; Clinical Clerkship ; Clinical Competence ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Female ; General Surgery - education ; Humans ; Male ; medical knowledge ; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement ; Professionalism ; student clerkship ; Surgery ; surgery clerkship ; Texas ; undergraduate medical education</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical education, 2013-01, Vol.70 (1), p.68-75</ispartof><rights>Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>2012 Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-6c8501cfec058527f7fc6372bb61ce2234eb27946867144c17e65e88ab7124c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-6c8501cfec058527f7fc6372bb61ce2234eb27946867144c17e65e88ab7124c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.07.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23337673$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McLean, Susan F., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Kathryn, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyroch, Alan H., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Case Based Review Questions, Review Sessions, and Call Schedule Type Enhance Knowledge Gains in a Surgical Clerkship</title><title>Journal of surgical education</title><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><description>Introduction Medical students in surgical clerkships must gain surgical knowledge while doing clinical rotations. We developed a self-learning program, which is case based, the Case Review Question (CRQ) system. Our hypothesis was that students who used CRQs would score higher on the summative test, Surgery NBME (National Board of Medical Examiners). Methods The setting is a surgical clerkship in a Liaison Council for Medical Education (LCME) approved Medical School, with summative examination using the NBME shelf examination in Surgery. Each CRQ document is a series of 20 to 25 questions based on cases. The cases are a paragraph, with pertinent medical facts and extra facts as distracters. The students are encouraged to use these questions to guide study. Students must come to a review session to hear the answers and a discussion. We review the NBME Surgery shelf examination scores taken before and after this program was initiated, along with changes in rotation group size, call schedule type, and other changes. Results CRQs, review sessions, and call schedule changes improved scores. NBME examination average rose from 77.12 to 82.01 (p = 0.004) after the CRQ program was initiated. Call schedule revision improved scores: intermittent call NBME score was 80.98, whereas night float schedule mean NBME was 84.66 (p &lt; 0.001). During night float call, the CRQ program was already in effect, so that there is no non-CRQ program comparison group. Students scored higher in the second semester, throughout the study. First semester students scored a mean of 79.11, whereas second semester students scored 84.195 (p &lt; 0.001). By the end of the study, there were no failures on the NBME examination, even in the first semester. The factors of presence of the CRQ program, review sessions, call schedule type, and which semester were all significant in a correlation matrix against NBME scores and in a regression analysis (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions The CRQ program of case-based self-study was associated with higher scores on the NBME shelf examination, as a summative test of medical knowledge in surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Case based learning</subject><subject>Clinical Clerkship</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>medical knowledge</subject><subject>Practice-Based Learning and Improvement</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>student clerkship</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>surgery clerkship</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>undergraduate medical education</subject><issn>1931-7204</issn><issn>1878-7452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0Eou3CL0BCPnIgwV-xkwNIEJWCqIRgy9lynEnXqdfZ2huq_fd12JYDFy7j0eh9ZzzPIPSKkpISKt-N5ZjmeF0yQllJVElI9QSd0lrVhRIVe5rzhtNCMSJO0FlKYxaIhjXP0QnjnCup-CnatyYB_pRDj3_Cbwd3-McMae-mkN4-VtaQ0rFgQo9b4z1e2w30swd8ddgBPg8bEyzgb2G689BfA74wLiTsAjZ4nT_prPG49RBv0sbtXqBng_EJXj68K_Tr8_lV-6W4_H7xtf14WVhBxb6Qtq4ItQNYUtUVU4MarOSKdZ2kFhjjAjqmGiFrqagQliqQFdS16RRlIktX6M2x7y5Ot8tWeuuSBe9NgGlOmjLFVc1lbrVC_Ci1cUopwqB30W1NPGhK9IJbj_oPbr3g1kTpTDO7Xj8MmLst9H89j3yz4P1RAHnNzDLqZB1kVL2LYPe6n9x_Bnz4x2-9CwvNGzhAGqc5hkxQU52yR6-Xiy8Hp4wQWsuG3wNYeKXt</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>McLean, Susan F., MD</creator><creator>Horn, Kathryn, MD</creator><creator>Tyroch, Alan H., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Case Based Review Questions, Review Sessions, and Call Schedule Type Enhance Knowledge Gains in a Surgical Clerkship</title><author>McLean, Susan F., MD ; Horn, Kathryn, MD ; Tyroch, Alan H., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-6c8501cfec058527f7fc6372bb61ce2234eb27946867144c17e65e88ab7124c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Case based learning</topic><topic>Clinical Clerkship</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>medical knowledge</topic><topic>Practice-Based Learning and Improvement</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>student clerkship</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>surgery clerkship</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>undergraduate medical education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McLean, Susan F., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Kathryn, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyroch, Alan H., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McLean, Susan F., MD</au><au>Horn, Kathryn, MD</au><au>Tyroch, Alan H., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Case Based Review Questions, Review Sessions, and Call Schedule Type Enhance Knowledge Gains in a Surgical Clerkship</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>68</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>68-75</pages><issn>1931-7204</issn><eissn>1878-7452</eissn><abstract>Introduction Medical students in surgical clerkships must gain surgical knowledge while doing clinical rotations. We developed a self-learning program, which is case based, the Case Review Question (CRQ) system. Our hypothesis was that students who used CRQs would score higher on the summative test, Surgery NBME (National Board of Medical Examiners). Methods The setting is a surgical clerkship in a Liaison Council for Medical Education (LCME) approved Medical School, with summative examination using the NBME shelf examination in Surgery. Each CRQ document is a series of 20 to 25 questions based on cases. The cases are a paragraph, with pertinent medical facts and extra facts as distracters. The students are encouraged to use these questions to guide study. Students must come to a review session to hear the answers and a discussion. We review the NBME Surgery shelf examination scores taken before and after this program was initiated, along with changes in rotation group size, call schedule type, and other changes. Results CRQs, review sessions, and call schedule changes improved scores. NBME examination average rose from 77.12 to 82.01 (p = 0.004) after the CRQ program was initiated. Call schedule revision improved scores: intermittent call NBME score was 80.98, whereas night float schedule mean NBME was 84.66 (p &lt; 0.001). During night float call, the CRQ program was already in effect, so that there is no non-CRQ program comparison group. Students scored higher in the second semester, throughout the study. First semester students scored a mean of 79.11, whereas second semester students scored 84.195 (p &lt; 0.001). By the end of the study, there were no failures on the NBME examination, even in the first semester. The factors of presence of the CRQ program, review sessions, call schedule type, and which semester were all significant in a correlation matrix against NBME scores and in a regression analysis (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions The CRQ program of case-based self-study was associated with higher scores on the NBME shelf examination, as a summative test of medical knowledge in surgery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23337673</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.07.005</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-7204
ispartof Journal of surgical education, 2013-01, Vol.70 (1), p.68-75
issn 1931-7204
1878-7452
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273783622
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Analysis of Variance
Case based learning
Clinical Clerkship
Clinical Competence
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Educational Measurement - methods
Female
General Surgery - education
Humans
Male
medical knowledge
Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
Professionalism
student clerkship
Surgery
surgery clerkship
Texas
undergraduate medical education
title Case Based Review Questions, Review Sessions, and Call Schedule Type Enhance Knowledge Gains in a Surgical Clerkship
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T08%3A23%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Case%20Based%20Review%20Questions,%20Review%20Sessions,%20and%20Call%20Schedule%20Type%20Enhance%20Knowledge%20Gains%20in%20a%20Surgical%20Clerkship&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20education&rft.au=McLean,%20Susan%20F.,%20MD&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=68-75&rft.issn=1931-7204&rft.eissn=1878-7452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.07.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1273783622%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1273783622&rft_id=info:pmid/23337673&rft_els_id=S1931720412001869&rfr_iscdi=true