A Simple Framework for Assessing Technical Skills in a Resident Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): Vaginal Laceration Repair
Objectives Educators of trainees in procedure-based specialties need focused assessment tools that are valid, objective, and assess technical skills in a realistic context. A framework for hybrid assessment using standardized patient scenarios and bench skills testing might facilitate evaluation of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of surgical education 2013-01, Vol.70 (1), p.10-14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 10 |
container_title | Journal of surgical education |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Winkel, Abigail Ford, MD Lerner, Veronica, MD Zabar, Sondra R., MD Szyld, Demian, MD |
description | Objectives Educators of trainees in procedure-based specialties need focused assessment tools that are valid, objective, and assess technical skills in a realistic context. A framework for hybrid assessment using standardized patient scenarios and bench skills testing might facilitate evaluation of competency. Methods Seven PGY-1 obstetrics and gynecology residents participated in a hybrid assessment that used observed structured clinical examination (OSCE) by a standardized patient who had sustained a vaginal laceration during vaginal delivery. The residents elicited a history and counseled the patient, and then completed a laceration repair on a pelvic model. The residents were rated on their performance in the scenario, which included issues of cultural competency, rapport-building, patient counseling. The technical skills were videotaped and rated using a modified global assessment form by 2 faculty members on a 3-point scale from “not done” to “partly done” to “well-done.” Residents also completed a subjective assessment of the station. Results Mean technical performance of the residents on the technical skills was 55% “well-done,” with a range of 20%-90%. The assessment identified 3 residents as below the mean, and 1 resident with areas of deficiency. Subjective assessment by the residents was that juggling the technical, cognitive, and affective components of the examination was challenging. Conclusions Technical skills can be included in a case-based assessment using scenarios that address a range of cognitive and affective skills required of physicians. Results may help training programs assess individuals' abilities as well as identify program needs for curricular improvement. This framework might be useful in setting standards for competency and identifying poor performers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.08.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273781586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1931720412002255</els_id><sourcerecordid>1273781586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-f9bdfb17501e1250ce0f4efcf35a676b0bf723b55375a7f0565a9a58a4d90e463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhSNERUvhCZCQl-0iwT9xnCCBNBpNAWmkkZrC1nKc68GZ_Ax20tJX4KlxyNAFG1a-ss_x1f3OjaI3BCcEk-xdkzR-cvuEYkITnCcY82fRBclFHouU0-ehLhiJBcXpefTS-yYI0oIWL6JzyhgTWZZeRL9WqLTdsQV041QHD4M7IDM4tPIevLf9Ht2B_t5brVpUHmzbemR7pNAteFtDP6Jd5cHdQ43K0U16nFwo161dHJufqrO9Gu3Qo6tdud5cv0ff1D5ctWirNLjl6RaOyrpX0ZlRrYfXp_My-nqzuVt_jre7T1_Wq22sU5KOsSmq2lREcEyAUI41YJOC0YZxlYmswpURlFWcM8GVMJhnXBWK5yqtCwxpxi6jq-Xfoxt-TOBH2VmvoW1VD8PkJaGCiZzwfJayRard4L0DI4_Odso9SoLlHIJs5J8Q5ByCxLkMjIPr7anBVHVQP3n-Ug-CD4sAwpj3Fpz02kKvobYO9Cjrwf6nwcd__PpE_ACP4JthcoFwmET64JHlvAfzGhCKMaWBzG-qra8Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1273781586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Simple Framework for Assessing Technical Skills in a Resident Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): Vaginal Laceration Repair</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Winkel, Abigail Ford, MD ; Lerner, Veronica, MD ; Zabar, Sondra R., MD ; Szyld, Demian, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Winkel, Abigail Ford, MD ; Lerner, Veronica, MD ; Zabar, Sondra R., MD ; Szyld, Demian, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Educators of trainees in procedure-based specialties need focused assessment tools that are valid, objective, and assess technical skills in a realistic context. A framework for hybrid assessment using standardized patient scenarios and bench skills testing might facilitate evaluation of competency. Methods Seven PGY-1 obstetrics and gynecology residents participated in a hybrid assessment that used observed structured clinical examination (OSCE) by a standardized patient who had sustained a vaginal laceration during vaginal delivery. The residents elicited a history and counseled the patient, and then completed a laceration repair on a pelvic model. The residents were rated on their performance in the scenario, which included issues of cultural competency, rapport-building, patient counseling. The technical skills were videotaped and rated using a modified global assessment form by 2 faculty members on a 3-point scale from “not done” to “partly done” to “well-done.” Residents also completed a subjective assessment of the station. Results Mean technical performance of the residents on the technical skills was 55% “well-done,” with a range of 20%-90%. The assessment identified 3 residents as below the mean, and 1 resident with areas of deficiency. Subjective assessment by the residents was that juggling the technical, cognitive, and affective components of the examination was challenging. Conclusions Technical skills can be included in a case-based assessment using scenarios that address a range of cognitive and affective skills required of physicians. Results may help training programs assess individuals' abilities as well as identify program needs for curricular improvement. This framework might be useful in setting standards for competency and identifying poor performers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.08.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23337664</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>assessment ; Clinical Competence ; Delivery, Obstetric - adverse effects ; Educational Measurement ; Episiotomy ; Female ; Gynecology - education ; Humans ; Interpersonal and Communication Skills ; Lacerations - surgery ; Manikins ; Medical Knowledge ; observed structured clinical examination ; Obstetrics - education ; Patient Care ; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement ; Professionalism ; residency ; Surgery ; technical skills ; Vagina - injuries ; Vagina - surgery ; vaginal laceration repair</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical education, 2013-01, Vol.70 (1), p.10-14</ispartof><rights>Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>2012 Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-f9bdfb17501e1250ce0f4efcf35a676b0bf723b55375a7f0565a9a58a4d90e463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-f9bdfb17501e1250ce0f4efcf35a676b0bf723b55375a7f0565a9a58a4d90e463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720412002255$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23337664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winkel, Abigail Ford, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerner, Veronica, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zabar, Sondra R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szyld, Demian, MD</creatorcontrib><title>A Simple Framework for Assessing Technical Skills in a Resident Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): Vaginal Laceration Repair</title><title>Journal of surgical education</title><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><description>Objectives Educators of trainees in procedure-based specialties need focused assessment tools that are valid, objective, and assess technical skills in a realistic context. A framework for hybrid assessment using standardized patient scenarios and bench skills testing might facilitate evaluation of competency. Methods Seven PGY-1 obstetrics and gynecology residents participated in a hybrid assessment that used observed structured clinical examination (OSCE) by a standardized patient who had sustained a vaginal laceration during vaginal delivery. The residents elicited a history and counseled the patient, and then completed a laceration repair on a pelvic model. The residents were rated on their performance in the scenario, which included issues of cultural competency, rapport-building, patient counseling. The technical skills were videotaped and rated using a modified global assessment form by 2 faculty members on a 3-point scale from “not done” to “partly done” to “well-done.” Residents also completed a subjective assessment of the station. Results Mean technical performance of the residents on the technical skills was 55% “well-done,” with a range of 20%-90%. The assessment identified 3 residents as below the mean, and 1 resident with areas of deficiency. Subjective assessment by the residents was that juggling the technical, cognitive, and affective components of the examination was challenging. Conclusions Technical skills can be included in a case-based assessment using scenarios that address a range of cognitive and affective skills required of physicians. Results may help training programs assess individuals' abilities as well as identify program needs for curricular improvement. This framework might be useful in setting standards for competency and identifying poor performers.</description><subject>assessment</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - adverse effects</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Episiotomy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal and Communication Skills</subject><subject>Lacerations - surgery</subject><subject>Manikins</subject><subject>Medical Knowledge</subject><subject>observed structured clinical examination</subject><subject>Obstetrics - education</subject><subject>Patient Care</subject><subject>Practice-Based Learning and Improvement</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>residency</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>technical skills</subject><subject>Vagina - injuries</subject><subject>Vagina - surgery</subject><subject>vaginal laceration repair</subject><issn>1931-7204</issn><issn>1878-7452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhSNERUvhCZCQl-0iwT9xnCCBNBpNAWmkkZrC1nKc68GZ_Ax20tJX4KlxyNAFG1a-ss_x1f3OjaI3BCcEk-xdkzR-cvuEYkITnCcY82fRBclFHouU0-ehLhiJBcXpefTS-yYI0oIWL6JzyhgTWZZeRL9WqLTdsQV041QHD4M7IDM4tPIevLf9Ht2B_t5brVpUHmzbemR7pNAteFtDP6Jd5cHdQ43K0U16nFwo161dHJufqrO9Gu3Qo6tdud5cv0ff1D5ctWirNLjl6RaOyrpX0ZlRrYfXp_My-nqzuVt_jre7T1_Wq22sU5KOsSmq2lREcEyAUI41YJOC0YZxlYmswpURlFWcM8GVMJhnXBWK5yqtCwxpxi6jq-Xfoxt-TOBH2VmvoW1VD8PkJaGCiZzwfJayRard4L0DI4_Odso9SoLlHIJs5J8Q5ByCxLkMjIPr7anBVHVQP3n-Ug-CD4sAwpj3Fpz02kKvobYO9Cjrwf6nwcd__PpE_ACP4JthcoFwmET64JHlvAfzGhCKMaWBzG-qra8Z</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Winkel, Abigail Ford, MD</creator><creator>Lerner, Veronica, MD</creator><creator>Zabar, Sondra R., MD</creator><creator>Szyld, Demian, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>A Simple Framework for Assessing Technical Skills in a Resident Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): Vaginal Laceration Repair</title><author>Winkel, Abigail Ford, MD ; Lerner, Veronica, MD ; Zabar, Sondra R., MD ; Szyld, Demian, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-f9bdfb17501e1250ce0f4efcf35a676b0bf723b55375a7f0565a9a58a4d90e463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>assessment</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - adverse effects</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Episiotomy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal and Communication Skills</topic><topic>Lacerations - surgery</topic><topic>Manikins</topic><topic>Medical Knowledge</topic><topic>observed structured clinical examination</topic><topic>Obstetrics - education</topic><topic>Patient Care</topic><topic>Practice-Based Learning and Improvement</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>residency</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>technical skills</topic><topic>Vagina - injuries</topic><topic>Vagina - surgery</topic><topic>vaginal laceration repair</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winkel, Abigail Ford, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerner, Veronica, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zabar, Sondra R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szyld, Demian, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winkel, Abigail Ford, MD</au><au>Lerner, Veronica, MD</au><au>Zabar, Sondra R., MD</au><au>Szyld, Demian, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Simple Framework for Assessing Technical Skills in a Resident Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): Vaginal Laceration Repair</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>10</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>10-14</pages><issn>1931-7204</issn><eissn>1878-7452</eissn><abstract>Objectives Educators of trainees in procedure-based specialties need focused assessment tools that are valid, objective, and assess technical skills in a realistic context. A framework for hybrid assessment using standardized patient scenarios and bench skills testing might facilitate evaluation of competency. Methods Seven PGY-1 obstetrics and gynecology residents participated in a hybrid assessment that used observed structured clinical examination (OSCE) by a standardized patient who had sustained a vaginal laceration during vaginal delivery. The residents elicited a history and counseled the patient, and then completed a laceration repair on a pelvic model. The residents were rated on their performance in the scenario, which included issues of cultural competency, rapport-building, patient counseling. The technical skills were videotaped and rated using a modified global assessment form by 2 faculty members on a 3-point scale from “not done” to “partly done” to “well-done.” Residents also completed a subjective assessment of the station. Results Mean technical performance of the residents on the technical skills was 55% “well-done,” with a range of 20%-90%. The assessment identified 3 residents as below the mean, and 1 resident with areas of deficiency. Subjective assessment by the residents was that juggling the technical, cognitive, and affective components of the examination was challenging. Conclusions Technical skills can be included in a case-based assessment using scenarios that address a range of cognitive and affective skills required of physicians. Results may help training programs assess individuals' abilities as well as identify program needs for curricular improvement. This framework might be useful in setting standards for competency and identifying poor performers.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23337664</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.08.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1931-7204 |
ispartof | Journal of surgical education, 2013-01, Vol.70 (1), p.10-14 |
issn | 1931-7204 1878-7452 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273781586 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | assessment Clinical Competence Delivery, Obstetric - adverse effects Educational Measurement Episiotomy Female Gynecology - education Humans Interpersonal and Communication Skills Lacerations - surgery Manikins Medical Knowledge observed structured clinical examination Obstetrics - education Patient Care Practice-Based Learning and Improvement Professionalism residency Surgery technical skills Vagina - injuries Vagina - surgery vaginal laceration repair |
title | A Simple Framework for Assessing Technical Skills in a Resident Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): Vaginal Laceration Repair |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A39%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Simple%20Framework%20for%20Assessing%20Technical%20Skills%20in%20a%20Resident%20Observed%20Structured%20Clinical%20Examination%20(OSCE):%20Vaginal%20Laceration%20Repair&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20education&rft.au=Winkel,%20Abigail%20Ford,%20MD&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=10-14&rft.issn=1931-7204&rft.eissn=1878-7452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.08.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1273781586%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1273781586&rft_id=info:pmid/23337664&rft_els_id=S1931720412002255&rfr_iscdi=true |