The Effect on External Rotation of an Anchor Placed Anterior to the Biceps in Type 2 SLAP Repairs in a Cadaveric Throwing Model

Purpose This study examined whether there is a difference in external rotation (ER) between type 2 SLAP repairs consisting of anchors placed only posterior to the biceps insertion compared with repairs with an additional anchor placed anterior to the biceps. Methods Seven cadaveric shoulders from do...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2013, Vol.29 (1), p.18-24
Hauptverfasser: McCulloch, Patrick C., M.D, Andrews, Wade J., M.D, Alexander, Jerry, B.S, Brekke, Adam, B.S, Duwani, Salim, M.D, Noble, Philip, Ph.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 18
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 29
creator McCulloch, Patrick C., M.D
Andrews, Wade J., M.D
Alexander, Jerry, B.S
Brekke, Adam, B.S
Duwani, Salim, M.D
Noble, Philip, Ph.D
description Purpose This study examined whether there is a difference in external rotation (ER) between type 2 SLAP repairs consisting of anchors placed only posterior to the biceps insertion compared with repairs with an additional anchor placed anterior to the biceps. Methods Seven cadaveric shoulders from donors with a mean age of 39.4 years were tested. Type 2 SLAP lesions were created, followed by a 3-anchor repair: a standard repair with 2 anchors posterior to the biceps plus an additional anchor anterior to the biceps. The specimens were placed on a material testing system machine and rotation was measured under a constant torque. The sutures were then removed sequentially from anterior to posterior during testing. Results The average ER of the intact shoulder was 115.7° ± 2.6°. After SLAP tear creation and cyclic loading, the ER was 118.5° ± 2.6°, which decreased to 116.5° ± 2.6° after repair. This corresponds to a reduction of 2.0° of ER ( P < .0001) with the repair. After release of the anterior anchor, the ER increased to 117.9° ± 2.6°, which corresponds to an increase in shoulder motion of 1.4° of ER ( P  = .0011). Additional release of the middle anchor, leaving only the posterior anchor intact, resulted in 118.0° ± 2.7° of ER, which corresponds to an increase of only 0.1° of ER ( P  = .7667). Conclusions Following type 2 SLAP repair in the cadaveric shoulder, removing the effect of the anchor anterior to the biceps resulted in a small but statistically significant increase in ER. The anterior anchor had the greatest effect on ER. The presence of 1 or 2 anchors posterior to the biceps did not have a significant effect on rotation. Clinical Relevance When performing SLAP repairs on those in whom even a small loss of ER would be detrimental, such as baseball pitchers, avoidance of the use of an anchor anterior to the biceps should be considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273750053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749806312016180</els_id><sourcerecordid>1273750053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-5597f01bbf339e0171900f3971710997e173b7c84b116a0e4bcfe6a33cde1b9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGO0zAQhi0EYrsLb4CQj1wSxnESxxekUhUWqYjVbjlbjjOmLmkc7HShJ14dhy4cuHCyZ_z_M55vCHnBIGfA6tf7XIdpF3xeACtyqHMo2COyYFVRZ7zg7DFZgChl1kDNL8hljHsA4LzhT8lFehaikmxBfm53SNfWopmoH-j6x4Rh0D299ZOeXMp4S_VAl4PZ-UBvem2wS1FSuRRPnk7J_9YZHCN1A92eRqQFvdssb-gtjtqF32lNV7rT98lk6Db9-bsbvtCPvsP-GXlidR_x-cN5RT6_W29X19nm0_sPq-UmM2XDp6yqpLDA2tZyLhGYYBLAcinSDaQUyARvhWnKlrFaA5atsVhrzk2HrJWWX5FX57pj8N-OGCd1cNFg3-sB_TEqVgguKoCKJ2l5lprgYwxo1RjcQYeTYqBm9GqvzujVjF5BrRL6ZHv50OHYHrD7a_rDOgnenAWY5rx3GFQ0DocE1IWEX3Xe_a_DvwVM7wZndP8VTxj3_jivLs2iYvKou3n98_ZZKlKzBvgv9U-qHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1273750053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect on External Rotation of an Anchor Placed Anterior to the Biceps in Type 2 SLAP Repairs in a Cadaveric Throwing Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>McCulloch, Patrick C., M.D ; Andrews, Wade J., M.D ; Alexander, Jerry, B.S ; Brekke, Adam, B.S ; Duwani, Salim, M.D ; Noble, Philip, Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>McCulloch, Patrick C., M.D ; Andrews, Wade J., M.D ; Alexander, Jerry, B.S ; Brekke, Adam, B.S ; Duwani, Salim, M.D ; Noble, Philip, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This study examined whether there is a difference in external rotation (ER) between type 2 SLAP repairs consisting of anchors placed only posterior to the biceps insertion compared with repairs with an additional anchor placed anterior to the biceps. Methods Seven cadaveric shoulders from donors with a mean age of 39.4 years were tested. Type 2 SLAP lesions were created, followed by a 3-anchor repair: a standard repair with 2 anchors posterior to the biceps plus an additional anchor anterior to the biceps. The specimens were placed on a material testing system machine and rotation was measured under a constant torque. The sutures were then removed sequentially from anterior to posterior during testing. Results The average ER of the intact shoulder was 115.7° ± 2.6°. After SLAP tear creation and cyclic loading, the ER was 118.5° ± 2.6°, which decreased to 116.5° ± 2.6° after repair. This corresponds to a reduction of 2.0° of ER ( P &lt; .0001) with the repair. After release of the anterior anchor, the ER increased to 117.9° ± 2.6°, which corresponds to an increase in shoulder motion of 1.4° of ER ( P  = .0011). Additional release of the middle anchor, leaving only the posterior anchor intact, resulted in 118.0° ± 2.7° of ER, which corresponds to an increase of only 0.1° of ER ( P  = .7667). Conclusions Following type 2 SLAP repair in the cadaveric shoulder, removing the effect of the anchor anterior to the biceps resulted in a small but statistically significant increase in ER. The anterior anchor had the greatest effect on ER. The presence of 1 or 2 anchors posterior to the biceps did not have a significant effect on rotation. Clinical Relevance When performing SLAP repairs on those in whom even a small loss of ER would be detrimental, such as baseball pitchers, avoidance of the use of an anchor anterior to the biceps should be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23177591</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Athletic Performance ; Baseball ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cadaver ; Device Removal ; Fibrocartilage - injuries ; Fibrocartilage - surgery ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; Orthopedics ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Recovery of Function ; Rotation ; Shoulder Joint - surgery ; Stress, Mechanical ; Suture Anchors ; Torque ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2013, Vol.29 (1), p.18-24</ispartof><rights>Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>2013 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-5597f01bbf339e0171900f3971710997e173b7c84b116a0e4bcfe6a33cde1b9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-5597f01bbf339e0171900f3971710997e173b7c84b116a0e4bcfe6a33cde1b9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,4022,27921,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23177591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCulloch, Patrick C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Wade J., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Jerry, B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brekke, Adam, B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duwani, Salim, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Philip, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect on External Rotation of an Anchor Placed Anterior to the Biceps in Type 2 SLAP Repairs in a Cadaveric Throwing Model</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>Purpose This study examined whether there is a difference in external rotation (ER) between type 2 SLAP repairs consisting of anchors placed only posterior to the biceps insertion compared with repairs with an additional anchor placed anterior to the biceps. Methods Seven cadaveric shoulders from donors with a mean age of 39.4 years were tested. Type 2 SLAP lesions were created, followed by a 3-anchor repair: a standard repair with 2 anchors posterior to the biceps plus an additional anchor anterior to the biceps. The specimens were placed on a material testing system machine and rotation was measured under a constant torque. The sutures were then removed sequentially from anterior to posterior during testing. Results The average ER of the intact shoulder was 115.7° ± 2.6°. After SLAP tear creation and cyclic loading, the ER was 118.5° ± 2.6°, which decreased to 116.5° ± 2.6° after repair. This corresponds to a reduction of 2.0° of ER ( P &lt; .0001) with the repair. After release of the anterior anchor, the ER increased to 117.9° ± 2.6°, which corresponds to an increase in shoulder motion of 1.4° of ER ( P  = .0011). Additional release of the middle anchor, leaving only the posterior anchor intact, resulted in 118.0° ± 2.7° of ER, which corresponds to an increase of only 0.1° of ER ( P  = .7667). Conclusions Following type 2 SLAP repair in the cadaveric shoulder, removing the effect of the anchor anterior to the biceps resulted in a small but statistically significant increase in ER. The anterior anchor had the greatest effect on ER. The presence of 1 or 2 anchors posterior to the biceps did not have a significant effect on rotation. Clinical Relevance When performing SLAP repairs on those in whom even a small loss of ER would be detrimental, such as baseball pitchers, avoidance of the use of an anchor anterior to the biceps should be considered.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Athletic Performance</subject><subject>Baseball</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Fibrocartilage - injuries</subject><subject>Fibrocartilage - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Suture Anchors</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGO0zAQhi0EYrsLb4CQj1wSxnESxxekUhUWqYjVbjlbjjOmLmkc7HShJ14dhy4cuHCyZ_z_M55vCHnBIGfA6tf7XIdpF3xeACtyqHMo2COyYFVRZ7zg7DFZgChl1kDNL8hljHsA4LzhT8lFehaikmxBfm53SNfWopmoH-j6x4Rh0D299ZOeXMp4S_VAl4PZ-UBvem2wS1FSuRRPnk7J_9YZHCN1A92eRqQFvdssb-gtjtqF32lNV7rT98lk6Db9-bsbvtCPvsP-GXlidR_x-cN5RT6_W29X19nm0_sPq-UmM2XDp6yqpLDA2tZyLhGYYBLAcinSDaQUyARvhWnKlrFaA5atsVhrzk2HrJWWX5FX57pj8N-OGCd1cNFg3-sB_TEqVgguKoCKJ2l5lprgYwxo1RjcQYeTYqBm9GqvzujVjF5BrRL6ZHv50OHYHrD7a_rDOgnenAWY5rx3GFQ0DocE1IWEX3Xe_a_DvwVM7wZndP8VTxj3_jivLs2iYvKou3n98_ZZKlKzBvgv9U-qHQ</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>McCulloch, Patrick C., M.D</creator><creator>Andrews, Wade J., M.D</creator><creator>Alexander, Jerry, B.S</creator><creator>Brekke, Adam, B.S</creator><creator>Duwani, Salim, M.D</creator><creator>Noble, Philip, Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>The Effect on External Rotation of an Anchor Placed Anterior to the Biceps in Type 2 SLAP Repairs in a Cadaveric Throwing Model</title><author>McCulloch, Patrick C., M.D ; Andrews, Wade J., M.D ; Alexander, Jerry, B.S ; Brekke, Adam, B.S ; Duwani, Salim, M.D ; Noble, Philip, Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-5597f01bbf339e0171900f3971710997e173b7c84b116a0e4bcfe6a33cde1b9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Athletic Performance</topic><topic>Baseball</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Fibrocartilage - injuries</topic><topic>Fibrocartilage - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Suture Anchors</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCulloch, Patrick C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Wade J., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Jerry, B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brekke, Adam, B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duwani, Salim, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Philip, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCulloch, Patrick C., M.D</au><au>Andrews, Wade J., M.D</au><au>Alexander, Jerry, B.S</au><au>Brekke, Adam, B.S</au><au>Duwani, Salim, M.D</au><au>Noble, Philip, Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect on External Rotation of an Anchor Placed Anterior to the Biceps in Type 2 SLAP Repairs in a Cadaveric Throwing Model</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>18-24</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><abstract>Purpose This study examined whether there is a difference in external rotation (ER) between type 2 SLAP repairs consisting of anchors placed only posterior to the biceps insertion compared with repairs with an additional anchor placed anterior to the biceps. Methods Seven cadaveric shoulders from donors with a mean age of 39.4 years were tested. Type 2 SLAP lesions were created, followed by a 3-anchor repair: a standard repair with 2 anchors posterior to the biceps plus an additional anchor anterior to the biceps. The specimens were placed on a material testing system machine and rotation was measured under a constant torque. The sutures were then removed sequentially from anterior to posterior during testing. Results The average ER of the intact shoulder was 115.7° ± 2.6°. After SLAP tear creation and cyclic loading, the ER was 118.5° ± 2.6°, which decreased to 116.5° ± 2.6° after repair. This corresponds to a reduction of 2.0° of ER ( P &lt; .0001) with the repair. After release of the anterior anchor, the ER increased to 117.9° ± 2.6°, which corresponds to an increase in shoulder motion of 1.4° of ER ( P  = .0011). Additional release of the middle anchor, leaving only the posterior anchor intact, resulted in 118.0° ± 2.7° of ER, which corresponds to an increase of only 0.1° of ER ( P  = .7667). Conclusions Following type 2 SLAP repair in the cadaveric shoulder, removing the effect of the anchor anterior to the biceps resulted in a small but statistically significant increase in ER. The anterior anchor had the greatest effect on ER. The presence of 1 or 2 anchors posterior to the biceps did not have a significant effect on rotation. Clinical Relevance When performing SLAP repairs on those in whom even a small loss of ER would be detrimental, such as baseball pitchers, avoidance of the use of an anchor anterior to the biceps should be considered.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23177591</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.021</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 2013, Vol.29 (1), p.18-24
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273750053
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Athletic Performance
Baseball
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cadaver
Device Removal
Fibrocartilage - injuries
Fibrocartilage - surgery
Humans
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
Orthopedics
Range of Motion, Articular
Recovery of Function
Rotation
Shoulder Joint - surgery
Stress, Mechanical
Suture Anchors
Torque
Young Adult
title The Effect on External Rotation of an Anchor Placed Anterior to the Biceps in Type 2 SLAP Repairs in a Cadaveric Throwing Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A00%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20on%20External%20Rotation%20of%20an%20Anchor%20Placed%20Anterior%20to%20the%20Biceps%20in%20Type%202%20SLAP%20Repairs%20in%20a%20Cadaveric%20Throwing%20Model&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=McCulloch,%20Patrick%20C.,%20M.D&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=18-24&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1273750053%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1273750053&rft_id=info:pmid/23177591&rft_els_id=S0749806312016180&rfr_iscdi=true