Laparoendoscopic Single Site (LESS) In Vivo Suturing Using a Magnetic Anchoring and Guidance System (MAGS) Camera in a Porcine Model: Impact on Ergonomics and Workload

Objective To compare the ergonomics and workload of the surgeon during single-site suturing while using the magnetic anchoring and guidance system (MAGS) camera vs a conventional laparoscope. Methods Seven urologic surgeons were enrolled and divided into an expert group (n = 2) and a novice group (n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2013, Vol.81 (1), p.80-84
Hauptverfasser: Yin, Gang, Han, Woong Kyu, Faddegon, Stephen, Tan, Yung Khan, Liu, Zhuo-Wei, Olweny, Ephrem O, Scott, Daniel J, Cadeddu, Jeffrey A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To compare the ergonomics and workload of the surgeon during single-site suturing while using the magnetic anchoring and guidance system (MAGS) camera vs a conventional laparoscope. Methods Seven urologic surgeons were enrolled and divided into an expert group (n = 2) and a novice group (n = 5) according to their laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) experience. Each surgeon performed 2 conventional LESS and 2 MAGS camera-assisted LESS vesicostomy closures in a porcine model. A Likert scale (scoring 1-5) questionnaire assessing workload, ergonomics, technical difficulty, visualization, and needle handling, as well as a validated National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire were used to evaluate the tasks and workloads. Results MAGS LESS suturing was universally favored by expert and novice surgeons compared with conventional LESS in workload (3.4 vs 4.2), ergonomics (3.4 vs 4.4), technical challenge (3.3 vs 4.3), visualization (2.4 vs 3.3), and needle handling (3.1 vs 3.9 respectively; P  
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2012.09.018