Evaluation of serovar-independent ELISA antigens of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in pigs following vaccination or experimental challenge with respiratory pathogens and natural A. pleuropneumoniae serovar 1 challenge
Objective To compare the sensitivity and cross‐reactivity of six serological enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on serovar‐independent antigens of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (App). Design An experimental pig trial using direct or natural challenge with App and direct challenge or...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian veterinary journal 2012-12, Vol.90 (12), p.490-498 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 498 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 490 |
container_title | Australian veterinary journal |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Eamens, GJ Gonsalves, JR Whittington, A-M Turner, B |
description | Objective
To compare the sensitivity and cross‐reactivity of six serological enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on serovar‐independent antigens of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (App).
Design
An experimental pig trial using direct or natural challenge with App and direct challenge or vaccination using other common respiratory pathogens.
Procedure
A 39‐kDa outer membrane protein antigen and five recombinant antigens from the ApxIVA gene of App were evaluated. The latter were derived from the ApxIVA N terminus (ApxIVA‐N, ApxIVA‐NP, ApxIVA‐NPS) or C terminus (ApxIVA‐C, ApxIVA‐CP). Pigs were sampled after direct challenge with App, Pasteurella multocida or Haemophilus parasuis, after vaccination with these organisms and after natural App infection. Clinical and necropsy findings were evaluated.
Results
The 39‐kDa ELISA had high sensitivity, but cross‐reactivity, following P. multocida challenge. ELISAs using ApxIVA N terminus antigens were clearly more sensitive than C terminus antigens for detection of App‐induced disease. Although affinity‐purified ApxIVA‐NP antigen detected marginally more diseased pigs than the ‐N and ‐NPS ELISAs, these assays only detected 41–47% of 17 pigs with lung lesions and microbiological evidence of App based on sampling up to 4–5 weeks after natural (13 pigs) or 5 weeks after direct App serovar 1 challenge (4 pigs).
Conclusions
The 39‐kDa ELISA readily detects App exposure and infection, but is adversely affected by P. multocida infection. ApxIVA‐N‐based ELISAs can be used to evaluate the App status of commercial herds, but a proportion of infected and diseased animals are seronegative at 1 month after likely exposure to aerosol transmission of App from clinical cases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.01008.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273655672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1257738842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3648-316c62952b4fcc04b1f90541a6fb5af5ee0c5d4d1c5e29e3b66db36eaaac897c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksuO0zAUhiMEYobCKyBLbNgk2HGcy4JFVZVhoBqEZmCWluOctC6unbGTXl6Vp8GZliLBBi9sS-f7_-PLH0WI4ISE8W6dkIKRGJeEJikmaYIJxmWyfxJdngtPo0uMMYtxltKL6IX3a4xpwVL2PLpIKSlzXJHL6Od8K_QgemUNsi3y4OxWuFiZBjoIk-nRfHF9O0XC9GoJxo_UVPbK2FpIpfXgUadhcLYzMGysUQKQMqhTS49aq7XdKbNEWyGlMqc2DsG-A6c2wV1oJFdCazBLQDvVr5AD3ykneusOqBP9yj52FaZBQT-4IJgm_7Y8HRyRP3Yvo2et0B5endZJ9O3D_G72MV58ubqeTRexonlWxpTkMk8rltZZKyXOatJWmGVE5G3NRMsAsGRN1hDJIK2A1nne1DQHIYQsq0LSSfT26Ns5-zCA7_lGeQlaCwN28JykBc0Zy4v0P1BWFLQssxF98xe6toMz4SKBIhmpSBl8J9HrEzXUG2h4F15VuAP__cEBeH8EdkrD4VwnmI9B4ms-5oWPeeFjkPhjkPieT79_GndBHx_1yvewP-uF-8HzIsSJ399c8fuyupt9_XzDb-kvKz3RAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1214191827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of serovar-independent ELISA antigens of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in pigs following vaccination or experimental challenge with respiratory pathogens and natural A. pleuropneumoniae serovar 1 challenge</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Eamens, GJ ; Gonsalves, JR ; Whittington, A-M ; Turner, B</creator><creatorcontrib>Eamens, GJ ; Gonsalves, JR ; Whittington, A-M ; Turner, B</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To compare the sensitivity and cross‐reactivity of six serological enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on serovar‐independent antigens of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (App).
Design
An experimental pig trial using direct or natural challenge with App and direct challenge or vaccination using other common respiratory pathogens.
Procedure
A 39‐kDa outer membrane protein antigen and five recombinant antigens from the ApxIVA gene of App were evaluated. The latter were derived from the ApxIVA N terminus (ApxIVA‐N, ApxIVA‐NP, ApxIVA‐NPS) or C terminus (ApxIVA‐C, ApxIVA‐CP). Pigs were sampled after direct challenge with App, Pasteurella multocida or Haemophilus parasuis, after vaccination with these organisms and after natural App infection. Clinical and necropsy findings were evaluated.
Results
The 39‐kDa ELISA had high sensitivity, but cross‐reactivity, following P. multocida challenge. ELISAs using ApxIVA N terminus antigens were clearly more sensitive than C terminus antigens for detection of App‐induced disease. Although affinity‐purified ApxIVA‐NP antigen detected marginally more diseased pigs than the ‐N and ‐NPS ELISAs, these assays only detected 41–47% of 17 pigs with lung lesions and microbiological evidence of App based on sampling up to 4–5 weeks after natural (13 pigs) or 5 weeks after direct App serovar 1 challenge (4 pigs).
Conclusions
The 39‐kDa ELISA readily detects App exposure and infection, but is adversely affected by P. multocida infection. ApxIVA‐N‐based ELISAs can be used to evaluate the App status of commercial herds, but a proportion of infected and diseased animals are seronegative at 1 month after likely exposure to aerosol transmission of App from clinical cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-0423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-0813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.01008.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23186091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Actinobacillus Infections - diagnosis ; Actinobacillus Infections - prevention & control ; Actinobacillus Infections - veterinary ; Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae ; Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae - immunology ; Animals ; Antigens, Bacterial - blood ; Antigens, Bacterial - immunology ; Bacteriology ; Cross Reactions ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - standards ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - veterinary ; Haemophilus parasuis ; Hogs ; Immunization ; Infections ; laboratory diagnosis ; microbiology ; Pasteurella multocida ; pigs ; Random Allocation ; serology ; Swine ; Swine Diseases - blood ; Swine Diseases - diagnosis ; Swine Diseases - prevention & control ; Vaccination - veterinary</subject><ispartof>Australian veterinary journal, 2012-12, Vol.90 (12), p.490-498</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. Australian Veterinary Journal © 2012 Australian Veterinary Association</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Australian Veterinary Journal © 2012 Australian Veterinary Association.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Australian Veterinary Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1751-0813.2012.01008.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1751-0813.2012.01008.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23186091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eamens, GJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonsalves, JR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittington, A-M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, B</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of serovar-independent ELISA antigens of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in pigs following vaccination or experimental challenge with respiratory pathogens and natural A. pleuropneumoniae serovar 1 challenge</title><title>Australian veterinary journal</title><addtitle>Aust Vet J</addtitle><description>Objective
To compare the sensitivity and cross‐reactivity of six serological enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on serovar‐independent antigens of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (App).
Design
An experimental pig trial using direct or natural challenge with App and direct challenge or vaccination using other common respiratory pathogens.
Procedure
A 39‐kDa outer membrane protein antigen and five recombinant antigens from the ApxIVA gene of App were evaluated. The latter were derived from the ApxIVA N terminus (ApxIVA‐N, ApxIVA‐NP, ApxIVA‐NPS) or C terminus (ApxIVA‐C, ApxIVA‐CP). Pigs were sampled after direct challenge with App, Pasteurella multocida or Haemophilus parasuis, after vaccination with these organisms and after natural App infection. Clinical and necropsy findings were evaluated.
Results
The 39‐kDa ELISA had high sensitivity, but cross‐reactivity, following P. multocida challenge. ELISAs using ApxIVA N terminus antigens were clearly more sensitive than C terminus antigens for detection of App‐induced disease. Although affinity‐purified ApxIVA‐NP antigen detected marginally more diseased pigs than the ‐N and ‐NPS ELISAs, these assays only detected 41–47% of 17 pigs with lung lesions and microbiological evidence of App based on sampling up to 4–5 weeks after natural (13 pigs) or 5 weeks after direct App serovar 1 challenge (4 pigs).
Conclusions
The 39‐kDa ELISA readily detects App exposure and infection, but is adversely affected by P. multocida infection. ApxIVA‐N‐based ELISAs can be used to evaluate the App status of commercial herds, but a proportion of infected and diseased animals are seronegative at 1 month after likely exposure to aerosol transmission of App from clinical cases.</description><subject>Actinobacillus Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Actinobacillus Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Actinobacillus Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae</subject><subject>Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae - immunology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antigens, Bacterial - blood</subject><subject>Antigens, Bacterial - immunology</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Cross Reactions</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - standards</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - veterinary</subject><subject>Haemophilus parasuis</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>laboratory diagnosis</subject><subject>microbiology</subject><subject>Pasteurella multocida</subject><subject>pigs</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>serology</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - blood</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Vaccination - veterinary</subject><issn>0005-0423</issn><issn>1751-0813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksuO0zAUhiMEYobCKyBLbNgk2HGcy4JFVZVhoBqEZmCWluOctC6unbGTXl6Vp8GZliLBBi9sS-f7_-PLH0WI4ISE8W6dkIKRGJeEJikmaYIJxmWyfxJdngtPo0uMMYtxltKL6IX3a4xpwVL2PLpIKSlzXJHL6Od8K_QgemUNsi3y4OxWuFiZBjoIk-nRfHF9O0XC9GoJxo_UVPbK2FpIpfXgUadhcLYzMGysUQKQMqhTS49aq7XdKbNEWyGlMqc2DsG-A6c2wV1oJFdCazBLQDvVr5AD3ykneusOqBP9yj52FaZBQT-4IJgm_7Y8HRyRP3Yvo2et0B5endZJ9O3D_G72MV58ubqeTRexonlWxpTkMk8rltZZKyXOatJWmGVE5G3NRMsAsGRN1hDJIK2A1nne1DQHIYQsq0LSSfT26Ns5-zCA7_lGeQlaCwN28JykBc0Zy4v0P1BWFLQssxF98xe6toMz4SKBIhmpSBl8J9HrEzXUG2h4F15VuAP__cEBeH8EdkrD4VwnmI9B4ms-5oWPeeFjkPhjkPieT79_GndBHx_1yvewP-uF-8HzIsSJ399c8fuyupt9_XzDb-kvKz3RAg</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Eamens, GJ</creator><creator>Gonsalves, JR</creator><creator>Whittington, A-M</creator><creator>Turner, B</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Evaluation of serovar-independent ELISA antigens of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in pigs following vaccination or experimental challenge with respiratory pathogens and natural A. pleuropneumoniae serovar 1 challenge</title><author>Eamens, GJ ; Gonsalves, JR ; Whittington, A-M ; Turner, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3648-316c62952b4fcc04b1f90541a6fb5af5ee0c5d4d1c5e29e3b66db36eaaac897c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Actinobacillus Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Actinobacillus Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Actinobacillus Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae</topic><topic>Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae - immunology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antigens, Bacterial - blood</topic><topic>Antigens, Bacterial - immunology</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Cross Reactions</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - standards</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - veterinary</topic><topic>Haemophilus parasuis</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>laboratory diagnosis</topic><topic>microbiology</topic><topic>Pasteurella multocida</topic><topic>pigs</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>serology</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - blood</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Vaccination - veterinary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eamens, GJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonsalves, JR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittington, A-M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian veterinary journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eamens, GJ</au><au>Gonsalves, JR</au><au>Whittington, A-M</au><au>Turner, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of serovar-independent ELISA antigens of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in pigs following vaccination or experimental challenge with respiratory pathogens and natural A. pleuropneumoniae serovar 1 challenge</atitle><jtitle>Australian veterinary journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Vet J</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>490-498</pages><issn>0005-0423</issn><eissn>1751-0813</eissn><abstract>Objective
To compare the sensitivity and cross‐reactivity of six serological enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on serovar‐independent antigens of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (App).
Design
An experimental pig trial using direct or natural challenge with App and direct challenge or vaccination using other common respiratory pathogens.
Procedure
A 39‐kDa outer membrane protein antigen and five recombinant antigens from the ApxIVA gene of App were evaluated. The latter were derived from the ApxIVA N terminus (ApxIVA‐N, ApxIVA‐NP, ApxIVA‐NPS) or C terminus (ApxIVA‐C, ApxIVA‐CP). Pigs were sampled after direct challenge with App, Pasteurella multocida or Haemophilus parasuis, after vaccination with these organisms and after natural App infection. Clinical and necropsy findings were evaluated.
Results
The 39‐kDa ELISA had high sensitivity, but cross‐reactivity, following P. multocida challenge. ELISAs using ApxIVA N terminus antigens were clearly more sensitive than C terminus antigens for detection of App‐induced disease. Although affinity‐purified ApxIVA‐NP antigen detected marginally more diseased pigs than the ‐N and ‐NPS ELISAs, these assays only detected 41–47% of 17 pigs with lung lesions and microbiological evidence of App based on sampling up to 4–5 weeks after natural (13 pigs) or 5 weeks after direct App serovar 1 challenge (4 pigs).
Conclusions
The 39‐kDa ELISA readily detects App exposure and infection, but is adversely affected by P. multocida infection. ApxIVA‐N‐based ELISAs can be used to evaluate the App status of commercial herds, but a proportion of infected and diseased animals are seronegative at 1 month after likely exposure to aerosol transmission of App from clinical cases.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23186091</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.01008.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0005-0423 |
ispartof | Australian veterinary journal, 2012-12, Vol.90 (12), p.490-498 |
issn | 0005-0423 1751-0813 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273655672 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Actinobacillus Infections - diagnosis Actinobacillus Infections - prevention & control Actinobacillus Infections - veterinary Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae - immunology Animals Antigens, Bacterial - blood Antigens, Bacterial - immunology Bacteriology Cross Reactions Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - standards Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - veterinary Haemophilus parasuis Hogs Immunization Infections laboratory diagnosis microbiology Pasteurella multocida pigs Random Allocation serology Swine Swine Diseases - blood Swine Diseases - diagnosis Swine Diseases - prevention & control Vaccination - veterinary |
title | Evaluation of serovar-independent ELISA antigens of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in pigs following vaccination or experimental challenge with respiratory pathogens and natural A. pleuropneumoniae serovar 1 challenge |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T15%3A58%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20serovar-independent%20ELISA%20antigens%20of%20Actinobacillus%20pleuropneumoniae%20in%20pigs%20following%20vaccination%20or%20experimental%20challenge%20with%20respiratory%20pathogens%20and%20natural%20A.%20pleuropneumoniae%20serovar%201%20challenge&rft.jtitle=Australian%20veterinary%20journal&rft.au=Eamens,%20GJ&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=490-498&rft.issn=0005-0423&rft.eissn=1751-0813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.01008.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1257738842%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1214191827&rft_id=info:pmid/23186091&rfr_iscdi=true |