The Military Extremity Trauma Amputation/Limb Salvage (METALS) Study: Outcomes of Amputation Versus Limb Salvage Following Major Lower-Extremity Trauma

BACKGROUND:The study was performed to examine the hypothesis that functional outcomes following major lower-extremity trauma sustained in the military would be similar between patients treated with amputation and those who underwent limb salvage. METHODS:This is a retrospective cohort study of 324 s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2013-01, Vol.95 (2), p.138-145
Hauptverfasser: Doukas, COL (Ret) William C, Hayda, COL (Ret) Roman A, Frisch, H Michael, Andersen, COL Romney C, Mazurek, CDR Michael T, Ficke, COL James R, Keeling, CDR John J, Pasquina, COL Paul F, Wain, Harold J, Carlini, Anthony R, MacKenzie, Ellen J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 145
container_issue 2
container_start_page 138
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 95
creator Doukas, COL (Ret) William C
Hayda, COL (Ret) Roman A
Frisch, H Michael
Andersen, COL Romney C
Mazurek, CDR Michael T
Ficke, COL James R
Keeling, CDR John J
Pasquina, COL Paul F
Wain, Harold J
Carlini, Anthony R
MacKenzie, Ellen J
description BACKGROUND:The study was performed to examine the hypothesis that functional outcomes following major lower-extremity trauma sustained in the military would be similar between patients treated with amputation and those who underwent limb salvage. METHODS:This is a retrospective cohort study of 324 service members deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq who sustained a lower-limb injury requiring either amputation or limb salvage involving revascularization, bone graft/bone transport, local/free flap coverage, repair of a major nerve injury, or a complete compartment injury/compartment syndrome. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) questionnaire was used to measure overall function. Standard instruments were used to measure depression (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD Checklist-military version), chronic pain (Chronic Pain Grade Scale), and engagement in sports and leisure activities (Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire). The outcomes of amputation and salvage were compared by using regression analysis with adjustment for age, time until the interview, military rank, upper-limb and bilateral injuries, social support, and intensity of combat experiences. RESULTS:Overall response rates were modest (59.2%) and significantly different between those who underwent amputation (64.5%) and those treated with limb salvage (55.4%) (p = 0.02). In all SMFA domains except arm/hand function, the patients scored significantly worse than population norms. Also, 38.3% screened positive for depressive symptoms and 17.9%, for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). One-third (34.0%) were not working, on active duty, or in school. After adjustment for covariates, participants with an amputation had better scores in all SMFA domains compared with those whose limbs had been salvaged (p < 0.01). They also had a lower likelihood of PTSD and a higher likelihood of being engaged in vigorous sports. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to the percentage of patients with depressive symptoms, pain interfering with daily activities (pain interference), or work/school status. CONCLUSIONS:Major lower-limb trauma sustained in the military results in significant disability. Service members who undergo amputation appear to have better functional outcomes than those who undergo limb salvage. Caution is needed in interpreting these results as there was a potential for selection bias. LEVEL
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.K.00734
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273625129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1273625129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-82cc6e22935e0b55f7b384fba8ddefbc103d1f697b1f163255a2b6221fca77763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtv2zAQhImiQeM6vfVc8JgAlcOHSMm9uYHzlJGDnV4JSiJjpZTp8hHXv6R_N3ScBG1Pu1h8MwvMAPAZoxHBiJ9ef7-ej25GCBU0fwcGmFGWYVry92CAEMHZmDJ2CD56_4AQynNUfACHhFKSjzkegD-LpYKzznRBui2c_g5O9V3YwoWTsZdw0q9jkKGzq9Oq62s4l-ZR3it4PJsuJtX8BM5DbLff4G0Mje2Vh1b_pYE_lPPRw3-k59YYu-lW93AmH6yDld0ol_3_-QgcaGm8-vQyh-DufLo4u8yq24urs0mVNWRMy6wkTcMVSTtTqGZMFzUtc13Lsm2VrhuMaIs1Hxc11phTwpgkNScE60YWRcHpEBzvfdfO_orKB9F3vlHGyJWy0QtMCsoJw-nDEHzdo42z3julxdp1fYpNYCR2VYhdFeJGPFeR8C8vzrHuVfsGv2afgHwPbKwJKaifJqYkxFJJE5bJJLXFCc0IwhRhzFG2O5X0CetBlQI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1273625129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Military Extremity Trauma Amputation/Limb Salvage (METALS) Study: Outcomes of Amputation Versus Limb Salvage Following Major Lower-Extremity Trauma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Doukas, COL (Ret) William C ; Hayda, COL (Ret) Roman A ; Frisch, H Michael ; Andersen, COL Romney C ; Mazurek, CDR Michael T ; Ficke, COL James R ; Keeling, CDR John J ; Pasquina, COL Paul F ; Wain, Harold J ; Carlini, Anthony R ; MacKenzie, Ellen J</creator><creatorcontrib>Doukas, COL (Ret) William C ; Hayda, COL (Ret) Roman A ; Frisch, H Michael ; Andersen, COL Romney C ; Mazurek, CDR Michael T ; Ficke, COL James R ; Keeling, CDR John J ; Pasquina, COL Paul F ; Wain, Harold J ; Carlini, Anthony R ; MacKenzie, Ellen J</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:The study was performed to examine the hypothesis that functional outcomes following major lower-extremity trauma sustained in the military would be similar between patients treated with amputation and those who underwent limb salvage. METHODS:This is a retrospective cohort study of 324 service members deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq who sustained a lower-limb injury requiring either amputation or limb salvage involving revascularization, bone graft/bone transport, local/free flap coverage, repair of a major nerve injury, or a complete compartment injury/compartment syndrome. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) questionnaire was used to measure overall function. Standard instruments were used to measure depression (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD Checklist-military version), chronic pain (Chronic Pain Grade Scale), and engagement in sports and leisure activities (Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire). The outcomes of amputation and salvage were compared by using regression analysis with adjustment for age, time until the interview, military rank, upper-limb and bilateral injuries, social support, and intensity of combat experiences. RESULTS:Overall response rates were modest (59.2%) and significantly different between those who underwent amputation (64.5%) and those treated with limb salvage (55.4%) (p = 0.02). In all SMFA domains except arm/hand function, the patients scored significantly worse than population norms. Also, 38.3% screened positive for depressive symptoms and 17.9%, for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). One-third (34.0%) were not working, on active duty, or in school. After adjustment for covariates, participants with an amputation had better scores in all SMFA domains compared with those whose limbs had been salvaged (p &lt; 0.01). They also had a lower likelihood of PTSD and a higher likelihood of being engaged in vigorous sports. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to the percentage of patients with depressive symptoms, pain interfering with daily activities (pain interference), or work/school status. CONCLUSIONS:Major lower-limb trauma sustained in the military results in significant disability. Service members who undergo amputation appear to have better functional outcomes than those who undergo limb salvage. Caution is needed in interpreting these results as there was a potential for selection bias. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00734</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23324961</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Afghan Campaign 2001 ; Amputation ; Arm Injuries - epidemiology ; Arm Injuries - psychology ; Arm Injuries - surgery ; Chronic Disease ; Depression - epidemiology ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Iraq War, 2003-2011 ; Leg Injuries - epidemiology ; Leg Injuries - psychology ; Leg Injuries - surgery ; Limb Salvage ; Male ; Military Medicine ; Pain Measurement ; Recovery of Function ; Regression Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2013-01, Vol.95 (2), p.138-145</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2013 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-82cc6e22935e0b55f7b384fba8ddefbc103d1f697b1f163255a2b6221fca77763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23324961$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doukas, COL (Ret) William C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayda, COL (Ret) Roman A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisch, H Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, COL Romney C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazurek, CDR Michael T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ficke, COL James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeling, CDR John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasquina, COL Paul F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wain, Harold J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlini, Anthony R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKenzie, Ellen J</creatorcontrib><title>The Military Extremity Trauma Amputation/Limb Salvage (METALS) Study: Outcomes of Amputation Versus Limb Salvage Following Major Lower-Extremity Trauma</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:The study was performed to examine the hypothesis that functional outcomes following major lower-extremity trauma sustained in the military would be similar between patients treated with amputation and those who underwent limb salvage. METHODS:This is a retrospective cohort study of 324 service members deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq who sustained a lower-limb injury requiring either amputation or limb salvage involving revascularization, bone graft/bone transport, local/free flap coverage, repair of a major nerve injury, or a complete compartment injury/compartment syndrome. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) questionnaire was used to measure overall function. Standard instruments were used to measure depression (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD Checklist-military version), chronic pain (Chronic Pain Grade Scale), and engagement in sports and leisure activities (Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire). The outcomes of amputation and salvage were compared by using regression analysis with adjustment for age, time until the interview, military rank, upper-limb and bilateral injuries, social support, and intensity of combat experiences. RESULTS:Overall response rates were modest (59.2%) and significantly different between those who underwent amputation (64.5%) and those treated with limb salvage (55.4%) (p = 0.02). In all SMFA domains except arm/hand function, the patients scored significantly worse than population norms. Also, 38.3% screened positive for depressive symptoms and 17.9%, for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). One-third (34.0%) were not working, on active duty, or in school. After adjustment for covariates, participants with an amputation had better scores in all SMFA domains compared with those whose limbs had been salvaged (p &lt; 0.01). They also had a lower likelihood of PTSD and a higher likelihood of being engaged in vigorous sports. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to the percentage of patients with depressive symptoms, pain interfering with daily activities (pain interference), or work/school status. CONCLUSIONS:Major lower-limb trauma sustained in the military results in significant disability. Service members who undergo amputation appear to have better functional outcomes than those who undergo limb salvage. Caution is needed in interpreting these results as there was a potential for selection bias. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Afghan Campaign 2001</subject><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Arm Injuries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Arm Injuries - psychology</subject><subject>Arm Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Depression - epidemiology</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iraq War, 2003-2011</subject><subject>Leg Injuries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Leg Injuries - psychology</subject><subject>Leg Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Limb Salvage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Military Medicine</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtv2zAQhImiQeM6vfVc8JgAlcOHSMm9uYHzlJGDnV4JSiJjpZTp8hHXv6R_N3ScBG1Pu1h8MwvMAPAZoxHBiJ9ef7-ej25GCBU0fwcGmFGWYVry92CAEMHZmDJ2CD56_4AQynNUfACHhFKSjzkegD-LpYKzznRBui2c_g5O9V3YwoWTsZdw0q9jkKGzq9Oq62s4l-ZR3it4PJsuJtX8BM5DbLff4G0Mje2Vh1b_pYE_lPPRw3-k59YYu-lW93AmH6yDld0ol_3_-QgcaGm8-vQyh-DufLo4u8yq24urs0mVNWRMy6wkTcMVSTtTqGZMFzUtc13Lsm2VrhuMaIs1Hxc11phTwpgkNScE60YWRcHpEBzvfdfO_orKB9F3vlHGyJWy0QtMCsoJw-nDEHzdo42z3julxdp1fYpNYCR2VYhdFeJGPFeR8C8vzrHuVfsGv2afgHwPbKwJKaifJqYkxFJJE5bJJLXFCc0IwhRhzFG2O5X0CetBlQI</recordid><startdate>20130116</startdate><enddate>20130116</enddate><creator>Doukas, COL (Ret) William C</creator><creator>Hayda, COL (Ret) Roman A</creator><creator>Frisch, H Michael</creator><creator>Andersen, COL Romney C</creator><creator>Mazurek, CDR Michael T</creator><creator>Ficke, COL James R</creator><creator>Keeling, CDR John J</creator><creator>Pasquina, COL Paul F</creator><creator>Wain, Harold J</creator><creator>Carlini, Anthony R</creator><creator>MacKenzie, Ellen J</creator><general>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130116</creationdate><title>The Military Extremity Trauma Amputation/Limb Salvage (METALS) Study: Outcomes of Amputation Versus Limb Salvage Following Major Lower-Extremity Trauma</title><author>Doukas, COL (Ret) William C ; Hayda, COL (Ret) Roman A ; Frisch, H Michael ; Andersen, COL Romney C ; Mazurek, CDR Michael T ; Ficke, COL James R ; Keeling, CDR John J ; Pasquina, COL Paul F ; Wain, Harold J ; Carlini, Anthony R ; MacKenzie, Ellen J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-82cc6e22935e0b55f7b384fba8ddefbc103d1f697b1f163255a2b6221fca77763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Afghan Campaign 2001</topic><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Arm Injuries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Arm Injuries - psychology</topic><topic>Arm Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Depression - epidemiology</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iraq War, 2003-2011</topic><topic>Leg Injuries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Leg Injuries - psychology</topic><topic>Leg Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Limb Salvage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Military Medicine</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doukas, COL (Ret) William C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayda, COL (Ret) Roman A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisch, H Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, COL Romney C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazurek, CDR Michael T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ficke, COL James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeling, CDR John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasquina, COL Paul F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wain, Harold J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlini, Anthony R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKenzie, Ellen J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doukas, COL (Ret) William C</au><au>Hayda, COL (Ret) Roman A</au><au>Frisch, H Michael</au><au>Andersen, COL Romney C</au><au>Mazurek, CDR Michael T</au><au>Ficke, COL James R</au><au>Keeling, CDR John J</au><au>Pasquina, COL Paul F</au><au>Wain, Harold J</au><au>Carlini, Anthony R</au><au>MacKenzie, Ellen J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Military Extremity Trauma Amputation/Limb Salvage (METALS) Study: Outcomes of Amputation Versus Limb Salvage Following Major Lower-Extremity Trauma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2013-01-16</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>138</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>138-145</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:The study was performed to examine the hypothesis that functional outcomes following major lower-extremity trauma sustained in the military would be similar between patients treated with amputation and those who underwent limb salvage. METHODS:This is a retrospective cohort study of 324 service members deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq who sustained a lower-limb injury requiring either amputation or limb salvage involving revascularization, bone graft/bone transport, local/free flap coverage, repair of a major nerve injury, or a complete compartment injury/compartment syndrome. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) questionnaire was used to measure overall function. Standard instruments were used to measure depression (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD Checklist-military version), chronic pain (Chronic Pain Grade Scale), and engagement in sports and leisure activities (Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire). The outcomes of amputation and salvage were compared by using regression analysis with adjustment for age, time until the interview, military rank, upper-limb and bilateral injuries, social support, and intensity of combat experiences. RESULTS:Overall response rates were modest (59.2%) and significantly different between those who underwent amputation (64.5%) and those treated with limb salvage (55.4%) (p = 0.02). In all SMFA domains except arm/hand function, the patients scored significantly worse than population norms. Also, 38.3% screened positive for depressive symptoms and 17.9%, for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). One-third (34.0%) were not working, on active duty, or in school. After adjustment for covariates, participants with an amputation had better scores in all SMFA domains compared with those whose limbs had been salvaged (p &lt; 0.01). They also had a lower likelihood of PTSD and a higher likelihood of being engaged in vigorous sports. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to the percentage of patients with depressive symptoms, pain interfering with daily activities (pain interference), or work/school status. CONCLUSIONS:Major lower-limb trauma sustained in the military results in significant disability. Service members who undergo amputation appear to have better functional outcomes than those who undergo limb salvage. Caution is needed in interpreting these results as there was a potential for selection bias. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</pub><pmid>23324961</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.K.00734</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2013-01, Vol.95 (2), p.138-145
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273625129
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Afghan Campaign 2001
Amputation
Arm Injuries - epidemiology
Arm Injuries - psychology
Arm Injuries - surgery
Chronic Disease
Depression - epidemiology
Disability Evaluation
Female
Humans
Iraq War, 2003-2011
Leg Injuries - epidemiology
Leg Injuries - psychology
Leg Injuries - surgery
Limb Salvage
Male
Military Medicine
Pain Measurement
Recovery of Function
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
United States - epidemiology
title The Military Extremity Trauma Amputation/Limb Salvage (METALS) Study: Outcomes of Amputation Versus Limb Salvage Following Major Lower-Extremity Trauma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A55%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Military%20Extremity%20Trauma%20Amputation/Limb%20Salvage%20(METALS)%20Study:%20Outcomes%20of%20Amputation%20Versus%20Limb%20Salvage%20Following%20Major%20Lower-Extremity%20Trauma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Doukas,%20COL%20(Ret)%20William%20C&rft.date=2013-01-16&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=138-145&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.K.00734&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1273625129%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1273625129&rft_id=info:pmid/23324961&rfr_iscdi=true