Preliminary Validation of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) in a Military Population

Background. The Army Surgeon General released the Pain Management Task Force final report in May 2010. Among military providers, concerns were raised that the standard numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain was inconsistently administered and of questionable clinical value. In response, the Defense and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) Mass.), 2013-01, Vol.14 (1), p.110-123
Hauptverfasser: Buckenmaier, Chester C., Galloway, Kevin T., Polomano, Rosemary C., McDuffie, Mary, Kwon, Nancy, Gallagher, Rollin M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 123
container_issue 1
container_start_page 110
container_title Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
container_volume 14
creator Buckenmaier, Chester C.
Galloway, Kevin T.
Polomano, Rosemary C.
McDuffie, Mary
Kwon, Nancy
Gallagher, Rollin M.
description Background. The Army Surgeon General released the Pain Management Task Force final report in May 2010. Among military providers, concerns were raised that the standard numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain was inconsistently administered and of questionable clinical value. In response, the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) was developed. Methods. The instrument design integrates pain rating scale features to improve interpretability of incremental pain intensity levels, and to improve communication and documentation across all transitions of care. A convenience sample of 350 inpatient and outpatient active duty or retired military service members participated in the study at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Participants completed the five‐item DVPRS—one pain intensity NRS with and without word descriptors presented in random order and four supplemental items measuring general activity, sleep, mood, and level of stress and the Brief Pain Inventory seven interference items. Using systematic sampling, a random sample was selected for a word descriptor validation procedure matching word phases to corresponding pain intensity on the NRS. Results. Parallel forms reliability and concurrent validity testing demonstrated a robust correlation. When the DVPRS was presented with the word descriptors first, the correlation between the two ratings was slightly higher, r = 0.929 (N = 171; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01516.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273579774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1273579774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-43f57ee606d252c06faf34d9f4c7db539d2710af5e67deaea3d358a654848c133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtP3DAUha2qVaHAX6gsdUMXk_rtZNFFBRSQQI14zNYy8XXrkceZxokK_74OM7Doqt74yv7u8fU5CGFKKlrWl1VFJVMLobiuGKGsIlRSVT2-QfuvF293NeNa7qEPOa8IoUrU_D3aY5xyTVWzj6AdIIZ1SHZ4wksbg7Nj6BPuPR5_AT4FDykDtsnhJYww2JRxa0PCN4VLP_FtZyPg49Nle3P7GZdzi69DDOMs1_abKT7LHaJ33sYMR7v9AN1_P7s7uVhc_Ti_PPl2teiEnsfmXmoARZRjknVEeeu5cI0XnXYPkjeOaUqsl6C0AwuWOy5rq6SoRd1Rzg_Q8VZ3M_S_J8ijWYfcQYw2QT9lQ5nmUjdai4J--gdd9dOQynSFUo1QTa2bQtVbqhv6nAfwZjOEdfmcocTMUZiVmV02s-NmjsI8R2EeS-vH3QPTwxrca-OL9wX4ugX-hAhP_y1s2uuzueJ_AX1Xlb4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1269469879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preliminary Validation of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) in a Military Population</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Buckenmaier, Chester C. ; Galloway, Kevin T. ; Polomano, Rosemary C. ; McDuffie, Mary ; Kwon, Nancy ; Gallagher, Rollin M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buckenmaier, Chester C. ; Galloway, Kevin T. ; Polomano, Rosemary C. ; McDuffie, Mary ; Kwon, Nancy ; Gallagher, Rollin M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. The Army Surgeon General released the Pain Management Task Force final report in May 2010. Among military providers, concerns were raised that the standard numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain was inconsistently administered and of questionable clinical value. In response, the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) was developed. Methods. The instrument design integrates pain rating scale features to improve interpretability of incremental pain intensity levels, and to improve communication and documentation across all transitions of care. A convenience sample of 350 inpatient and outpatient active duty or retired military service members participated in the study at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Participants completed the five‐item DVPRS—one pain intensity NRS with and without word descriptors presented in random order and four supplemental items measuring general activity, sleep, mood, and level of stress and the Brief Pain Inventory seven interference items. Using systematic sampling, a random sample was selected for a word descriptor validation procedure matching word phases to corresponding pain intensity on the NRS. Results. Parallel forms reliability and concurrent validity testing demonstrated a robust correlation. When the DVPRS was presented with the word descriptors first, the correlation between the two ratings was slightly higher, r = 0.929 (N = 171; P &lt; 0.001), than ordering first without the descriptors, r = 0.882 (N = 177; P &lt; 0.001). Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.943 showing excellent alignment of word descriptors by respondents (N = 42), matching them correctly with pain level. Conclusions. The DVPRS tool demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in a military population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-2375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4637</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01516.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23137169</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PMAEAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Military personnel ; Military Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pain - diagnosis ; Pain - epidemiology ; Pain management ; Pain Measurement ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pain Scales ; Pilot Projects ; Prevalence ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validation Study</subject><ispartof>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2013-01, Vol.14 (1), p.110-123</ispartof><rights>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</rights><rights>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2013 American Academy of Pain Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-43f57ee606d252c06faf34d9f4c7db539d2710af5e67deaea3d358a654848c133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-43f57ee606d252c06faf34d9f4c7db539d2710af5e67deaea3d358a654848c133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1526-4637.2012.01516.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1526-4637.2012.01516.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23137169$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buckenmaier, Chester C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, Kevin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polomano, Rosemary C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDuffie, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Rollin M.</creatorcontrib><title>Preliminary Validation of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) in a Military Population</title><title>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Pain Med</addtitle><description>Background. The Army Surgeon General released the Pain Management Task Force final report in May 2010. Among military providers, concerns were raised that the standard numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain was inconsistently administered and of questionable clinical value. In response, the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) was developed. Methods. The instrument design integrates pain rating scale features to improve interpretability of incremental pain intensity levels, and to improve communication and documentation across all transitions of care. A convenience sample of 350 inpatient and outpatient active duty or retired military service members participated in the study at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Participants completed the five‐item DVPRS—one pain intensity NRS with and without word descriptors presented in random order and four supplemental items measuring general activity, sleep, mood, and level of stress and the Brief Pain Inventory seven interference items. Using systematic sampling, a random sample was selected for a word descriptor validation procedure matching word phases to corresponding pain intensity on the NRS. Results. Parallel forms reliability and concurrent validity testing demonstrated a robust correlation. When the DVPRS was presented with the word descriptors first, the correlation between the two ratings was slightly higher, r = 0.929 (N = 171; P &lt; 0.001), than ordering first without the descriptors, r = 0.882 (N = 177; P &lt; 0.001). Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.943 showing excellent alignment of word descriptors by respondents (N = 42), matching them correctly with pain level. Conclusions. The DVPRS tool demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in a military population.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Military personnel</subject><subject>Military Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pain Scales</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validation Study</subject><issn>1526-2375</issn><issn>1526-4637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtP3DAUha2qVaHAX6gsdUMXk_rtZNFFBRSQQI14zNYy8XXrkceZxokK_74OM7Doqt74yv7u8fU5CGFKKlrWl1VFJVMLobiuGKGsIlRSVT2-QfuvF293NeNa7qEPOa8IoUrU_D3aY5xyTVWzj6AdIIZ1SHZ4wksbg7Nj6BPuPR5_AT4FDykDtsnhJYww2JRxa0PCN4VLP_FtZyPg49Nle3P7GZdzi69DDOMs1_abKT7LHaJ33sYMR7v9AN1_P7s7uVhc_Ti_PPl2teiEnsfmXmoARZRjknVEeeu5cI0XnXYPkjeOaUqsl6C0AwuWOy5rq6SoRd1Rzg_Q8VZ3M_S_J8ijWYfcQYw2QT9lQ5nmUjdai4J--gdd9dOQynSFUo1QTa2bQtVbqhv6nAfwZjOEdfmcocTMUZiVmV02s-NmjsI8R2EeS-vH3QPTwxrca-OL9wX4ugX-hAhP_y1s2uuzueJ_AX1Xlb4</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Buckenmaier, Chester C.</creator><creator>Galloway, Kevin T.</creator><creator>Polomano, Rosemary C.</creator><creator>McDuffie, Mary</creator><creator>Kwon, Nancy</creator><creator>Gallagher, Rollin M.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Preliminary Validation of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) in a Military Population</title><author>Buckenmaier, Chester C. ; Galloway, Kevin T. ; Polomano, Rosemary C. ; McDuffie, Mary ; Kwon, Nancy ; Gallagher, Rollin M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-43f57ee606d252c06faf34d9f4c7db539d2710af5e67deaea3d358a654848c133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Military personnel</topic><topic>Military Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pain Scales</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validation Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buckenmaier, Chester C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, Kevin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polomano, Rosemary C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDuffie, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Rollin M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buckenmaier, Chester C.</au><au>Galloway, Kevin T.</au><au>Polomano, Rosemary C.</au><au>McDuffie, Mary</au><au>Kwon, Nancy</au><au>Gallagher, Rollin M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preliminary Validation of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) in a Military Population</atitle><jtitle>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Med</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>110</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>110-123</pages><issn>1526-2375</issn><eissn>1526-4637</eissn><coden>PMAEAP</coden><abstract>Background. The Army Surgeon General released the Pain Management Task Force final report in May 2010. Among military providers, concerns were raised that the standard numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain was inconsistently administered and of questionable clinical value. In response, the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) was developed. Methods. The instrument design integrates pain rating scale features to improve interpretability of incremental pain intensity levels, and to improve communication and documentation across all transitions of care. A convenience sample of 350 inpatient and outpatient active duty or retired military service members participated in the study at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Participants completed the five‐item DVPRS—one pain intensity NRS with and without word descriptors presented in random order and four supplemental items measuring general activity, sleep, mood, and level of stress and the Brief Pain Inventory seven interference items. Using systematic sampling, a random sample was selected for a word descriptor validation procedure matching word phases to corresponding pain intensity on the NRS. Results. Parallel forms reliability and concurrent validity testing demonstrated a robust correlation. When the DVPRS was presented with the word descriptors first, the correlation between the two ratings was slightly higher, r = 0.929 (N = 171; P &lt; 0.001), than ordering first without the descriptors, r = 0.882 (N = 177; P &lt; 0.001). Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.943 showing excellent alignment of word descriptors by respondents (N = 42), matching them correctly with pain level. Conclusions. The DVPRS tool demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in a military population.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>23137169</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01516.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-2375
ispartof Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2013-01, Vol.14 (1), p.110-123
issn 1526-2375
1526-4637
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273579774
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Military personnel
Military Personnel - statistics & numerical data
Pain - diagnosis
Pain - epidemiology
Pain management
Pain Measurement
Pain Measurement - methods
Pain Measurement - statistics & numerical data
Pain Scales
Pilot Projects
Prevalence
Ratings & rankings
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Validation Study
title Preliminary Validation of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) in a Military Population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A58%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preliminary%20Validation%20of%20the%20Defense%20and%20Veterans%20Pain%20Rating%20Scale%20(DVPRS)%20in%20a%20Military%20Population&rft.jtitle=Pain%20medicine%20(Malden,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Buckenmaier,%20Chester%20C.&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=110-123&rft.issn=1526-2375&rft.eissn=1526-4637&rft.coden=PMAEAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01516.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1273579774%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1269469879&rft_id=info:pmid/23137169&rfr_iscdi=true