The relationship between anogenital distance and age
Summary In humans, recent studies have correlated anogenital distance (AGD) in adult men to intrinsic testicular function. Although rodent studies suggest that AGD is determined in utero and remains constant in adult life, it is not certain if AGD remains constant across a man's adult life. We...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Andrology (Oxford) 2013-01, Vol.1 (1), p.90-93 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 93 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 90 |
container_title | Andrology (Oxford) |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Eisenberg, M. L. Hsieh, T.‐C. Lipshultz, L. I. |
description | Summary
In humans, recent studies have correlated anogenital distance (AGD) in adult men to intrinsic testicular function. Although rodent studies suggest that AGD is determined in utero and remains constant in adult life, it is not certain if AGD remains constant across a man's adult life. We sought to determine if adult male AGD varies based on age. A cross‐sectional study of men being evaluated at a men's health clinic. Anogenital distance (the distance from the posterior aspect of the scrotum to the anal verge) and penile length (PL) were measured using digital callipers. anova and linear regression were used to determine correlations between AGD, fatherhood status and age. In all, 473 men were included in the analysis with a mean age of 43 ± 13 years. The mean AGD for the group was 39 ± 13 mm. Anogenital distance did not vary between age categories for the entire group, for fathers, and for childless men. Moreover, penile length also remained constant across age categories. On adjusted analyses stratified by fatherhood status, there was no relationship between AGDp and age. The current cross‐sectional study demonstrates that anogenital distance, defined as the distance from the posterior scrotum to the anal verge, is similar for men of different ages. As such, AGD may provide a measure for genital development and function throughout adult life. However, confirmation with longitudinal studies is needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00019.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273400707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3956483301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4769-45209f937189011d6050a3189b050b55da09c1daeb69ea7912a847d88ba0e3f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN9LwzAQgIMobsz9C1IQwZfWS9I2Dfgy5k8YCjKfQ9pet5aunU3Ltv_e1M0JPhkCuSTfXS4fIQ4Fj9pxW3gMfOEyyYSNKPMAgEpve0KGx4vTY0zlgIyNKSwEUT_ZORkwzoIo5MGQ-PMlOg2Wus3ryizztRNju0GsHF3VC6zyVpdOmptWVwnas9TRC7wgZ5kuDY4P64h8PD7Mp8_u7O3pZTqZuYkvQun6AQOZSS5oJIHSNIQANLeb2AZxEKQaZEJTjXEoUQtJmY58kUZRrAF5BnxEbvZ110392aFp1So3CZalrrDujKJMcB9AgLDo1R-0qLumst0pKsIQeECBWyraU0lTG9NgptZNvtLNTlFQvVxVqN6b6h2qXq76lqu2NvXy8EAXrzA9Jv6otMD1AdAm0WXWWGO5-eVCCX7k95-623ObvMTdvxtQk9f7dyr5F3xVkR8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1766035103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The relationship between anogenital distance and age</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Eisenberg, M. L. ; Hsieh, T.‐C. ; Lipshultz, L. I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, M. L. ; Hsieh, T.‐C. ; Lipshultz, L. I.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
In humans, recent studies have correlated anogenital distance (AGD) in adult men to intrinsic testicular function. Although rodent studies suggest that AGD is determined in utero and remains constant in adult life, it is not certain if AGD remains constant across a man's adult life. We sought to determine if adult male AGD varies based on age. A cross‐sectional study of men being evaluated at a men's health clinic. Anogenital distance (the distance from the posterior aspect of the scrotum to the anal verge) and penile length (PL) were measured using digital callipers. anova and linear regression were used to determine correlations between AGD, fatherhood status and age. In all, 473 men were included in the analysis with a mean age of 43 ± 13 years. The mean AGD for the group was 39 ± 13 mm. Anogenital distance did not vary between age categories for the entire group, for fathers, and for childless men. Moreover, penile length also remained constant across age categories. On adjusted analyses stratified by fatherhood status, there was no relationship between AGDp and age. The current cross‐sectional study demonstrates that anogenital distance, defined as the distance from the posterior scrotum to the anal verge, is similar for men of different ages. As such, AGD may provide a measure for genital development and function throughout adult life. However, confirmation with longitudinal studies is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-2919</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-2927</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00019.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23258635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Schaumburg, IL: American Society of Andrology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Anal Canal - anatomy & histology ; Anal Canal - growth & development ; Analysis of Variance ; azoospermia ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; genitalia ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Penis - anatomy & histology ; perineum ; Scrotum - anatomy & histology ; Scrotum - growth & development ; Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><ispartof>Andrology (Oxford), 2013-01, Vol.1 (1), p.90-93</ispartof><rights>2012 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2012 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4769-45209f937189011d6050a3189b050b55da09c1daeb69ea7912a847d88ba0e3f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4769-45209f937189011d6050a3189b050b55da09c1daeb69ea7912a847d88ba0e3f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.2047-2927.2012.00019.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.2047-2927.2012.00019.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,4022,27922,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26904840$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23258635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, T.‐C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipshultz, L. I.</creatorcontrib><title>The relationship between anogenital distance and age</title><title>Andrology (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Andrology</addtitle><description>Summary
In humans, recent studies have correlated anogenital distance (AGD) in adult men to intrinsic testicular function. Although rodent studies suggest that AGD is determined in utero and remains constant in adult life, it is not certain if AGD remains constant across a man's adult life. We sought to determine if adult male AGD varies based on age. A cross‐sectional study of men being evaluated at a men's health clinic. Anogenital distance (the distance from the posterior aspect of the scrotum to the anal verge) and penile length (PL) were measured using digital callipers. anova and linear regression were used to determine correlations between AGD, fatherhood status and age. In all, 473 men were included in the analysis with a mean age of 43 ± 13 years. The mean AGD for the group was 39 ± 13 mm. Anogenital distance did not vary between age categories for the entire group, for fathers, and for childless men. Moreover, penile length also remained constant across age categories. On adjusted analyses stratified by fatherhood status, there was no relationship between AGDp and age. The current cross‐sectional study demonstrates that anogenital distance, defined as the distance from the posterior scrotum to the anal verge, is similar for men of different ages. As such, AGD may provide a measure for genital development and function throughout adult life. However, confirmation with longitudinal studies is needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anal Canal - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Anal Canal - growth & development</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>azoospermia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>genitalia</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Penis - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>perineum</subject><subject>Scrotum - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Scrotum - growth & development</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><issn>2047-2919</issn><issn>2047-2927</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkN9LwzAQgIMobsz9C1IQwZfWS9I2Dfgy5k8YCjKfQ9pet5aunU3Ltv_e1M0JPhkCuSTfXS4fIQ4Fj9pxW3gMfOEyyYSNKPMAgEpve0KGx4vTY0zlgIyNKSwEUT_ZORkwzoIo5MGQ-PMlOg2Wus3ryizztRNju0GsHF3VC6zyVpdOmptWVwnas9TRC7wgZ5kuDY4P64h8PD7Mp8_u7O3pZTqZuYkvQun6AQOZSS5oJIHSNIQANLeb2AZxEKQaZEJTjXEoUQtJmY58kUZRrAF5BnxEbvZ110392aFp1So3CZalrrDujKJMcB9AgLDo1R-0qLumst0pKsIQeECBWyraU0lTG9NgptZNvtLNTlFQvVxVqN6b6h2qXq76lqu2NvXy8EAXrzA9Jv6otMD1AdAm0WXWWGO5-eVCCX7k95-623ObvMTdvxtQk9f7dyr5F3xVkR8</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Eisenberg, M. L.</creator><creator>Hsieh, T.‐C.</creator><creator>Lipshultz, L. I.</creator><general>American Society of Andrology</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>The relationship between anogenital distance and age</title><author>Eisenberg, M. L. ; Hsieh, T.‐C. ; Lipshultz, L. I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4769-45209f937189011d6050a3189b050b55da09c1daeb69ea7912a847d88ba0e3f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anal Canal - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Anal Canal - growth & development</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>azoospermia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>genitalia</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Penis - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>perineum</topic><topic>Scrotum - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Scrotum - growth & development</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, T.‐C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipshultz, L. I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Andrology (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eisenberg, M. L.</au><au>Hsieh, T.‐C.</au><au>Lipshultz, L. I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The relationship between anogenital distance and age</atitle><jtitle>Andrology (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Andrology</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>90-93</pages><issn>2047-2919</issn><eissn>2047-2927</eissn><abstract>Summary
In humans, recent studies have correlated anogenital distance (AGD) in adult men to intrinsic testicular function. Although rodent studies suggest that AGD is determined in utero and remains constant in adult life, it is not certain if AGD remains constant across a man's adult life. We sought to determine if adult male AGD varies based on age. A cross‐sectional study of men being evaluated at a men's health clinic. Anogenital distance (the distance from the posterior aspect of the scrotum to the anal verge) and penile length (PL) were measured using digital callipers. anova and linear regression were used to determine correlations between AGD, fatherhood status and age. In all, 473 men were included in the analysis with a mean age of 43 ± 13 years. The mean AGD for the group was 39 ± 13 mm. Anogenital distance did not vary between age categories for the entire group, for fathers, and for childless men. Moreover, penile length also remained constant across age categories. On adjusted analyses stratified by fatherhood status, there was no relationship between AGDp and age. The current cross‐sectional study demonstrates that anogenital distance, defined as the distance from the posterior scrotum to the anal verge, is similar for men of different ages. As such, AGD may provide a measure for genital development and function throughout adult life. However, confirmation with longitudinal studies is needed.</abstract><cop>Schaumburg, IL</cop><pub>American Society of Andrology</pub><pmid>23258635</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00019.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2047-2919 |
ispartof | Andrology (Oxford), 2013-01, Vol.1 (1), p.90-93 |
issn | 2047-2919 2047-2927 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273400707 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adult Age Factors Aged Anal Canal - anatomy & histology Anal Canal - growth & development Analysis of Variance azoospermia Biological and medical sciences Birth control Cross-Sectional Studies genitalia Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Linear Models Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Penis - anatomy & histology perineum Scrotum - anatomy & histology Scrotum - growth & development Sterility. Assisted procreation |
title | The relationship between anogenital distance and age |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T13%3A55%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20relationship%20between%20anogenital%20distance%20and%20age&rft.jtitle=Andrology%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Eisenberg,%20M.%20L.&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=90-93&rft.issn=2047-2919&rft.eissn=2047-2927&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00019.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3956483301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1766035103&rft_id=info:pmid/23258635&rfr_iscdi=true |