The Effect of Variety on Physical Activity: A Cross-Sectional Study

ABSTRACTJuvancic-Heltzel, JA, Glickman, EL, and Barkley, JE. The effect of variety on physical activityA cross-sectional study. J Strength Cond Res 27(1)244–251, 2013—It has been repeatedly demonstrated that increasing the variety of available food and purchasing options reliably increases eating an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2013-01, Vol.27 (1), p.244-251
Hauptverfasser: Juvancic-Heltzel, Judith A., Glickman, Ellen L., Barkley, Jacob E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACTJuvancic-Heltzel, JA, Glickman, EL, and Barkley, JE. The effect of variety on physical activityA cross-sectional study. J Strength Cond Res 27(1)244–251, 2013—It has been repeatedly demonstrated that increasing the variety of available food and purchasing options reliably increases eating and consumer spending behavior, respectively. However, the potential probehavioral effect of increasing the variety of exercise equipment options on the amount of exercise individuals perform is very limited. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the amount, enjoyment (liking), and effort perception of resistance training exercise vs. sedentary alternatives during a high-variety (HV) resistance-exercise equipment condition (10 choices) vs. a low-variety (LV) equipment condition (2 choices). During each condition (HV) and (LV), children (8–12 years), young adults (18–26 years), and older adults (≥60 years) had free-choice access to both resistance-exercise equipment and sedentary activities for a total of 20 minutes. The amount of time allocated to resistance exercise, the total number of repetitions performed, and session liking were measured during each condition. The participants significantly (p ≤ 0.05 for all) increasedrepetitions performed (126.4 ± 71.7 vs. 88.0 ± 48.8), the amount of time allocated for exercise (14.3 ± 6.3 vs. 12.1 ± 6.5 minutes) and liking (8.1 ± 1.5 vs. 7.1 ± 2.1 cm) during the HV condition relative to the LV condition. The rating of perceived exertion was not significantly (p = 0.13) different from HV (4.2 ± 2.4) to LV (3.8 ± 2.3). Increasing the variety of exercise equipment available to children, young and older adults increased their exercise participation and enjoyment of that exercise without altering their perceived exertion. The practical application from this research is that increasing the variety of exercise equipment available to oneʼs clients may increase their exercise adherence.
ISSN:1064-8011
1533-4287
DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182518010