SPERM COMPETITION GAMES: A GENERAL MODEL FOR PRECOPULATORY MALE-MALE COMPETITION
Reproductive males face a trade-off between expenditure on precopulatory male—male competition—increasing the number of females that they secure as mates—and sperm competition—increasing their fertilization success with those females. Previous sperm allocation models have focused on scramble competi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evolution 2013-01, Vol.67 (1), p.95-109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 109 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 95 |
container_title | Evolution |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Parker, Geoff A. Lessells, Catherine M. Simmons, Leigh W. |
description | Reproductive males face a trade-off between expenditure on precopulatory male—male competition—increasing the number of females that they secure as mates—and sperm competition—increasing their fertilization success with those females. Previous sperm allocation models have focused on scramble competition in which males compete by searching for mates and the number of matings rises linearly with precopulatory expenditure. However, recent studies have emphasized contest competition involving precopulatory expenditure on armaments, where winning contests may be highly dependent on marginal increases in relative armament level. Here, we develop a general model of sperm allocation that allows us to examine the effect of all forms of precopulatory competition on sperm allocation patterns. The model predicts that sperm allocation decreases if either the "mate-competition loading," a, or the number of males competing for each mating, M, increases. Other predictions remain unchanged from previous models: (i) expenditure per ejaculate should increase and then decrease, and (ii) total postcopulatory expenditure should increase, as the level of sperm competition increases. A negative correlation between a and M is biologically plausible, and may buffer deviations from the previous models. There is some support for our predictions from comparative analyses across dung beetle species and frog populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01741.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273258280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23327704</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23327704</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-beab5871d7f315764752705220634ed5ba66ca3779ddb9ba2e1de6cfd9437bd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtLwzAYxYMoOi9_ghLwxZfWXJpLBR9KjXPQrqWbik-hXTNY3UXbDed_b-rmGOYhCZzfd_g4BwCIkYvtua1czJh0GPe4SxAmLsLCw-76AHR2wiHoIIQ9h0qCTsBp01QIIZ9h_xicEEqkb6EOSAepymIYJnGqhr1hL-nDbhCrwR0MYFf1VRZEME4eVAQfkwymmQqT9DkKhkn2BuMgUk577Y-fg6NxPm3MxfY9A8-Pahg-OVHS7YVB5Iw8JLFTmLxgUuBSjClmgnuCEYEYIYhTz5SsyDkf5VQIvywLv8iJwaXho3Hpe1QUpaRn4Gbj-1EvPlemWerZpBmZ6TSfm8Wq0ZgISpgkEln0-h9aLVb13G5nKS4ktpbUUldbalXMTKk_6sksr7_1X1YWuN8AX5Op-d7pGOm2E13pNnrdRq_bTvRvJ3qt1UvS_uz85Wa-apaLes-fEiFQ6-9s9EmzNOudntfvmgsqmH7td_ULp2E0oKHm9Aeet46x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1267814373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SPERM COMPETITION GAMES: A GENERAL MODEL FOR PRECOPULATORY MALE-MALE COMPETITION</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Parker, Geoff A. ; Lessells, Catherine M. ; Simmons, Leigh W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parker, Geoff A. ; Lessells, Catherine M. ; Simmons, Leigh W.</creatorcontrib><description>Reproductive males face a trade-off between expenditure on precopulatory male—male competition—increasing the number of females that they secure as mates—and sperm competition—increasing their fertilization success with those females. Previous sperm allocation models have focused on scramble competition in which males compete by searching for mates and the number of matings rises linearly with precopulatory expenditure. However, recent studies have emphasized contest competition involving precopulatory expenditure on armaments, where winning contests may be highly dependent on marginal increases in relative armament level. Here, we develop a general model of sperm allocation that allows us to examine the effect of all forms of precopulatory competition on sperm allocation patterns. The model predicts that sperm allocation decreases if either the "mate-competition loading," a, or the number of males competing for each mating, M, increases. Other predictions remain unchanged from previous models: (i) expenditure per ejaculate should increase and then decrease, and (ii) total postcopulatory expenditure should increase, as the level of sperm competition increases. A negative correlation between a and M is biologically plausible, and may buffer deviations from the previous models. There is some support for our predictions from comparative analyses across dung beetle species and frog populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-3820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01741.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23289564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Comparative analysis ; Contest competition ; Contests ; Copulation ; Correlation analysis ; Ecological competition ; ejaculate allocation ; Ejaculation ; Evolution ; Evolution, Molecular ; Female animals ; life-history trade-off ; Male ; Male animals ; Mating behavior ; Modeling ; Models, Biological ; Reproduction ; scramble competition ; Sexual Behavior, Animal ; Sperm competition ; Spermatozoa ; Spermatozoa - physiology ; Testes ; weapons</subject><ispartof>Evolution, 2013-01, Vol.67 (1), p.95-109</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Society for the Study of Evolution</rights><rights>2012 The Author(s). © 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.</rights><rights>2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.</rights><rights>Copyright Society for the Study of Evolution Jan 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-beab5871d7f315764752705220634ed5ba66ca3779ddb9ba2e1de6cfd9437bd83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23327704$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23327704$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23289564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parker, Geoff A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lessells, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, Leigh W.</creatorcontrib><title>SPERM COMPETITION GAMES: A GENERAL MODEL FOR PRECOPULATORY MALE-MALE COMPETITION</title><title>Evolution</title><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><description>Reproductive males face a trade-off between expenditure on precopulatory male—male competition—increasing the number of females that they secure as mates—and sperm competition—increasing their fertilization success with those females. Previous sperm allocation models have focused on scramble competition in which males compete by searching for mates and the number of matings rises linearly with precopulatory expenditure. However, recent studies have emphasized contest competition involving precopulatory expenditure on armaments, where winning contests may be highly dependent on marginal increases in relative armament level. Here, we develop a general model of sperm allocation that allows us to examine the effect of all forms of precopulatory competition on sperm allocation patterns. The model predicts that sperm allocation decreases if either the "mate-competition loading," a, or the number of males competing for each mating, M, increases. Other predictions remain unchanged from previous models: (i) expenditure per ejaculate should increase and then decrease, and (ii) total postcopulatory expenditure should increase, as the level of sperm competition increases. A negative correlation between a and M is biologically plausible, and may buffer deviations from the previous models. There is some support for our predictions from comparative analyses across dung beetle species and frog populations.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Contest competition</subject><subject>Contests</subject><subject>Copulation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>ejaculate allocation</subject><subject>Ejaculation</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>life-history trade-off</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>scramble competition</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Sperm competition</subject><subject>Spermatozoa</subject><subject>Spermatozoa - physiology</subject><subject>Testes</subject><subject>weapons</subject><issn>0014-3820</issn><issn>1558-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtLwzAYxYMoOi9_ghLwxZfWXJpLBR9KjXPQrqWbik-hXTNY3UXbDed_b-rmGOYhCZzfd_g4BwCIkYvtua1czJh0GPe4SxAmLsLCw-76AHR2wiHoIIQ9h0qCTsBp01QIIZ9h_xicEEqkb6EOSAepymIYJnGqhr1hL-nDbhCrwR0MYFf1VRZEME4eVAQfkwymmQqT9DkKhkn2BuMgUk577Y-fg6NxPm3MxfY9A8-Pahg-OVHS7YVB5Iw8JLFTmLxgUuBSjClmgnuCEYEYIYhTz5SsyDkf5VQIvywLv8iJwaXho3Hpe1QUpaRn4Gbj-1EvPlemWerZpBmZ6TSfm8Wq0ZgISpgkEln0-h9aLVb13G5nKS4ktpbUUldbalXMTKk_6sksr7_1X1YWuN8AX5Op-d7pGOm2E13pNnrdRq_bTvRvJ3qt1UvS_uz85Wa-apaLes-fEiFQ6-9s9EmzNOudntfvmgsqmH7td_ULp2E0oKHm9Aeet46x</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Parker, Geoff A.</creator><creator>Lessells, Catherine M.</creator><creator>Simmons, Leigh W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>SPERM COMPETITION GAMES: A GENERAL MODEL FOR PRECOPULATORY MALE-MALE COMPETITION</title><author>Parker, Geoff A. ; Lessells, Catherine M. ; Simmons, Leigh W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-beab5871d7f315764752705220634ed5ba66ca3779ddb9ba2e1de6cfd9437bd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Contest competition</topic><topic>Contests</topic><topic>Copulation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>ejaculate allocation</topic><topic>Ejaculation</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>life-history trade-off</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>scramble competition</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Sperm competition</topic><topic>Spermatozoa</topic><topic>Spermatozoa - physiology</topic><topic>Testes</topic><topic>weapons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parker, Geoff A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lessells, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, Leigh W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parker, Geoff A.</au><au>Lessells, Catherine M.</au><au>Simmons, Leigh W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SPERM COMPETITION GAMES: A GENERAL MODEL FOR PRECOPULATORY MALE-MALE COMPETITION</atitle><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>95-109</pages><issn>0014-3820</issn><eissn>1558-5646</eissn><abstract>Reproductive males face a trade-off between expenditure on precopulatory male—male competition—increasing the number of females that they secure as mates—and sperm competition—increasing their fertilization success with those females. Previous sperm allocation models have focused on scramble competition in which males compete by searching for mates and the number of matings rises linearly with precopulatory expenditure. However, recent studies have emphasized contest competition involving precopulatory expenditure on armaments, where winning contests may be highly dependent on marginal increases in relative armament level. Here, we develop a general model of sperm allocation that allows us to examine the effect of all forms of precopulatory competition on sperm allocation patterns. The model predicts that sperm allocation decreases if either the "mate-competition loading," a, or the number of males competing for each mating, M, increases. Other predictions remain unchanged from previous models: (i) expenditure per ejaculate should increase and then decrease, and (ii) total postcopulatory expenditure should increase, as the level of sperm competition increases. A negative correlation between a and M is biologically plausible, and may buffer deviations from the previous models. There is some support for our predictions from comparative analyses across dung beetle species and frog populations.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>23289564</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01741.x</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-3820 |
ispartof | Evolution, 2013-01, Vol.67 (1), p.95-109 |
issn | 0014-3820 1558-5646 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273258280 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals Comparative analysis Contest competition Contests Copulation Correlation analysis Ecological competition ejaculate allocation Ejaculation Evolution Evolution, Molecular Female animals life-history trade-off Male Male animals Mating behavior Modeling Models, Biological Reproduction scramble competition Sexual Behavior, Animal Sperm competition Spermatozoa Spermatozoa - physiology Testes weapons |
title | SPERM COMPETITION GAMES: A GENERAL MODEL FOR PRECOPULATORY MALE-MALE COMPETITION |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A41%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SPERM%20COMPETITION%20GAMES:%20A%20GENERAL%20MODEL%20FOR%20PRECOPULATORY%20MALE-MALE%20COMPETITION&rft.jtitle=Evolution&rft.au=Parker,%20Geoff%20A.&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=95-109&rft.issn=0014-3820&rft.eissn=1558-5646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01741.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23327704%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1267814373&rft_id=info:pmid/23289564&rft_jstor_id=23327704&rfr_iscdi=true |