The effects of ignored versus foveated cues upon inhibition of return: An event-related potential study
Taylor and Klein (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26:1639–1656, 2000 ) discovered two mutually exclusive “flavors” of inhibition of return (IOR): When the oculomotor system is “actively suppressed,” IOR affects input processes (the perception/attention flavor), w...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2013-01, Vol.75 (1), p.29-40 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 40 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 29 |
| container_title | Attention, perception & psychophysics |
| container_volume | 75 |
| creator | Satel, Jason Hilchey, Matthew D. Wang, Zhiguo Story, Ross Klein, Raymond M. |
| description | Taylor and Klein (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26:1639–1656,
2000
) discovered two mutually exclusive “flavors” of inhibition of return (IOR): When the oculomotor system is “actively suppressed,” IOR affects input processes (the perception/attention flavor), whereas when the oculomotor system is “engaged,” IOR affects output processes (the motor flavor). Studies of brain activity with ignored cues have typically reported that IOR reduces an early sensory event-related potential (ERP) component (i.e., the P1 component) of the brain’s response to the target. Since eye movements were discouraged in these experiments, the P1 reduction might be a reflection of the perception/attention flavor of IOR. If, instead of ignoring the cue, participants made a prosaccade to the cue (and then returned to fixation) before responding to the target, the motor flavor of IOR should then be generated. We compared these two conditions while monitoring eye position and recording ERPs to the targets. If the P1 modulation is related to the perceptual/attentional flavor of IOR, we hypothesized that it might be absent when the motoric flavor of IOR was generated by a prosaccade to the cue. Our results demonstrated that target-related P1 reductions and behavioral IOR were similar, and significant, in both conditions. However, P1 modulations were significantly correlated with behavioral IOR only when the oculomotor system was actively suppressed, suggesting that P1 modulations may only affect behaviorally exhibited IOR when the attentional/perceptual flavor of IOR is recruited. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13414-012-0381-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273223340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1273223340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-9ab7d2ea3bffe0cb03f3ff7f1840de54143badb913186c3dac53af9402adc5e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rVDEQhoNY7If-AG8kIII3p81kzqd3pWgVCt604F3IyZlsU84ma5Kz0H_frLtWEbzKDPPMzDt5GXsL4hy7pr9IgDXUlQBZCeyhghfsBIYaKxzwx8vnWMIxO03pQYgW2068YscSRdcJ2Z-w1e09cbKWTE48WO5WPkSa-JZiWhK3YUs6l9wslPiyCZ47f-9Gl10JCx8pL9F_4pee05Z8riLNvxo2IZfU6ZmnvEyPr9mR1XOiN4f3jN19-Xx79bW6-X797erypjINQK4GPXaTJI1jkSTMKNCitZ2FvhYTNeVaHPU0DoDQtwYnbRrUdqiF1JNpCPGMfdzP3cTws2jOau2SoXnWnsKSFMgOpUSsRUHf_4M-hHJLUVeovmxsm14WCvaUiSGlSFZtolvr-KhAqJ0Lau-CKi6onQsKSs-7w-RlXNP03PH72wvw4QDoZPRso_bGpT9cO0Ar5O4auedSKfkVxb8k_nf7E7WyoFU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1281846582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of ignored versus foveated cues upon inhibition of return: An event-related potential study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Satel, Jason ; Hilchey, Matthew D. ; Wang, Zhiguo ; Story, Ross ; Klein, Raymond M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Satel, Jason ; Hilchey, Matthew D. ; Wang, Zhiguo ; Story, Ross ; Klein, Raymond M.</creatorcontrib><description>Taylor and Klein (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26:1639–1656,
2000
) discovered two mutually exclusive “flavors” of inhibition of return (IOR): When the oculomotor system is “actively suppressed,” IOR affects input processes (the perception/attention flavor), whereas when the oculomotor system is “engaged,” IOR affects output processes (the motor flavor). Studies of brain activity with ignored cues have typically reported that IOR reduces an early sensory event-related potential (ERP) component (i.e., the P1 component) of the brain’s response to the target. Since eye movements were discouraged in these experiments, the P1 reduction might be a reflection of the perception/attention flavor of IOR. If, instead of ignoring the cue, participants made a prosaccade to the cue (and then returned to fixation) before responding to the target, the motor flavor of IOR should then be generated. We compared these two conditions while monitoring eye position and recording ERPs to the targets. If the P1 modulation is related to the perceptual/attentional flavor of IOR, we hypothesized that it might be absent when the motoric flavor of IOR was generated by a prosaccade to the cue. Our results demonstrated that target-related P1 reductions and behavioral IOR were similar, and significant, in both conditions. However, P1 modulations were significantly correlated with behavioral IOR only when the oculomotor system was actively suppressed, suggesting that P1 modulations may only affect behaviorally exhibited IOR when the attentional/perceptual flavor of IOR is recruited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0381-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23077028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Activity levels. Psychomotricity ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Behavior ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - physiology ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive Psychology ; Cues ; Electroencephalography ; Evoked Potentials ; Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology ; Experimental Psychology ; Eye Movements ; Feedback (Response) ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Inhibition ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Male ; Motor Reactions ; Neurotransmission and behavior ; Perception ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Stimuli ; Vigilance. Attention. Sleep ; Vision ; Visual Environment ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2013-01, Vol.75 (1), p.29-40</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Jan 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-9ab7d2ea3bffe0cb03f3ff7f1840de54143badb913186c3dac53af9402adc5e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-9ab7d2ea3bffe0cb03f3ff7f1840de54143badb913186c3dac53af9402adc5e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-012-0381-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13414-012-0381-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26916023$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23077028$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Satel, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilchey, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhiguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Story, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Raymond M.</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of ignored versus foveated cues upon inhibition of return: An event-related potential study</title><title>Attention, perception & psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>Taylor and Klein (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26:1639–1656,
2000
) discovered two mutually exclusive “flavors” of inhibition of return (IOR): When the oculomotor system is “actively suppressed,” IOR affects input processes (the perception/attention flavor), whereas when the oculomotor system is “engaged,” IOR affects output processes (the motor flavor). Studies of brain activity with ignored cues have typically reported that IOR reduces an early sensory event-related potential (ERP) component (i.e., the P1 component) of the brain’s response to the target. Since eye movements were discouraged in these experiments, the P1 reduction might be a reflection of the perception/attention flavor of IOR. If, instead of ignoring the cue, participants made a prosaccade to the cue (and then returned to fixation) before responding to the target, the motor flavor of IOR should then be generated. We compared these two conditions while monitoring eye position and recording ERPs to the targets. If the P1 modulation is related to the perceptual/attentional flavor of IOR, we hypothesized that it might be absent when the motoric flavor of IOR was generated by a prosaccade to the cue. Our results demonstrated that target-related P1 reductions and behavioral IOR were similar, and significant, in both conditions. However, P1 modulations were significantly correlated with behavioral IOR only when the oculomotor system was actively suppressed, suggesting that P1 modulations may only affect behaviorally exhibited IOR when the attentional/perceptual flavor of IOR is recruited.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Experimental Psychology</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor Reactions</subject><subject>Neurotransmission and behavior</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Environment</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rVDEQhoNY7If-AG8kIII3p81kzqd3pWgVCt604F3IyZlsU84ma5Kz0H_frLtWEbzKDPPMzDt5GXsL4hy7pr9IgDXUlQBZCeyhghfsBIYaKxzwx8vnWMIxO03pQYgW2068YscSRdcJ2Z-w1e09cbKWTE48WO5WPkSa-JZiWhK3YUs6l9wslPiyCZ47f-9Gl10JCx8pL9F_4pee05Z8riLNvxo2IZfU6ZmnvEyPr9mR1XOiN4f3jN19-Xx79bW6-X797erypjINQK4GPXaTJI1jkSTMKNCitZ2FvhYTNeVaHPU0DoDQtwYnbRrUdqiF1JNpCPGMfdzP3cTws2jOau2SoXnWnsKSFMgOpUSsRUHf_4M-hHJLUVeovmxsm14WCvaUiSGlSFZtolvr-KhAqJ0Lau-CKi6onQsKSs-7w-RlXNP03PH72wvw4QDoZPRso_bGpT9cO0Ar5O4auedSKfkVxb8k_nf7E7WyoFU</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Satel, Jason</creator><creator>Hilchey, Matthew D.</creator><creator>Wang, Zhiguo</creator><creator>Story, Ross</creator><creator>Klein, Raymond M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>The effects of ignored versus foveated cues upon inhibition of return: An event-related potential study</title><author>Satel, Jason ; Hilchey, Matthew D. ; Wang, Zhiguo ; Story, Ross ; Klein, Raymond M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-9ab7d2ea3bffe0cb03f3ff7f1840de54143badb913186c3dac53af9402adc5e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Experimental Psychology</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor Reactions</topic><topic>Neurotransmission and behavior</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Environment</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Satel, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilchey, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhiguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Story, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Raymond M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Satel, Jason</au><au>Hilchey, Matthew D.</au><au>Wang, Zhiguo</au><au>Story, Ross</au><au>Klein, Raymond M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of ignored versus foveated cues upon inhibition of return: An event-related potential study</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>29-40</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>Taylor and Klein (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26:1639–1656,
2000
) discovered two mutually exclusive “flavors” of inhibition of return (IOR): When the oculomotor system is “actively suppressed,” IOR affects input processes (the perception/attention flavor), whereas when the oculomotor system is “engaged,” IOR affects output processes (the motor flavor). Studies of brain activity with ignored cues have typically reported that IOR reduces an early sensory event-related potential (ERP) component (i.e., the P1 component) of the brain’s response to the target. Since eye movements were discouraged in these experiments, the P1 reduction might be a reflection of the perception/attention flavor of IOR. If, instead of ignoring the cue, participants made a prosaccade to the cue (and then returned to fixation) before responding to the target, the motor flavor of IOR should then be generated. We compared these two conditions while monitoring eye position and recording ERPs to the targets. If the P1 modulation is related to the perceptual/attentional flavor of IOR, we hypothesized that it might be absent when the motoric flavor of IOR was generated by a prosaccade to the cue. Our results demonstrated that target-related P1 reductions and behavioral IOR were similar, and significant, in both conditions. However, P1 modulations were significantly correlated with behavioral IOR only when the oculomotor system was actively suppressed, suggesting that P1 modulations may only affect behaviorally exhibited IOR when the attentional/perceptual flavor of IOR is recruited.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23077028</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13414-012-0381-1</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1943-3921 |
| ispartof | Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2013-01, Vol.75 (1), p.29-40 |
| issn | 1943-3921 1943-393X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273223340 |
| source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Accuracy Activity levels. Psychomotricity Adult Analysis of Variance Attention Attention - physiology Behavior Behavioral psychophysiology Behavioral Science and Psychology Bias Biological and medical sciences Brain - physiology Cognition & reasoning Cognitive Psychology Cues Electroencephalography Evoked Potentials Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology Experimental Psychology Eye Movements Feedback (Response) Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Inhibition Inhibition (Psychology) Male Motor Reactions Neurotransmission and behavior Perception Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Resistance (Psychology) Stimuli Vigilance. Attention. Sleep Vision Visual Environment Visual Perception - physiology Young Adult |
| title | The effects of ignored versus foveated cues upon inhibition of return: An event-related potential study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T03%3A58%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20ignored%20versus%20foveated%20cues%20upon%20inhibition%20of%20return:%20An%20event-related%20potential%20study&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Satel,%20Jason&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=29-40&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-012-0381-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1273223340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1281846582&rft_id=info:pmid/23077028&rfr_iscdi=true |