Urine test to diagnose urinary tract infection in high-risk pregnant women

To identify the accuracy of urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at high risk. a prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 164 pregnant women admitted to the high-risk the ward of the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) during t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia 2012-11, Vol.34 (11), p.488-493
Hauptverfasser: Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins, de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland, da Costa, Bruna Faria, do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz, Amaral, Mariana de Andrade, Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:por
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 493
container_issue 11
container_start_page 488
container_title Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia
container_volume 34
creator Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins
de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland
da Costa, Bruna Faria
do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz
Amaral, Mariana de Andrade
Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz
description To identify the accuracy of urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at high risk. a prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 164 pregnant women admitted to the high-risk the ward of the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) during the period from January to June 2011. Patients who had been taking antibiotics in the last ten days were excluded. All patients were subjected to simple urine tests and urine culture at the beginning of their admission. The agreement between the results of the examinations was evaluated by Kappa indices (K), and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were also determined. When only the presence of pus cells in urinalysis was used as a diagnostic criterion suggesting bacteriuria, there was a poor agreement when compared to uroculture (K=0.16). Accuracy was 61%, sensitivity 62.5%, and specificity 60.6%. PPV was 27.78% and NPV was 87%. The presence of alteration of urinalysis does not necessarily indicate an ongoing urinary tract infection, with urine culture being necessary. However, when urinalysis data are normal, uroculture may be avoided.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273206093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1273206093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p568-63a1da4a35337ea831413d3e7686ef6ebef852ef1bc5dab1c29a601e5b9080df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j01LxDAYhIMg7lr9C5Kjl0KSt03Toyx-suBlPZe0edONtmlNUsR_b8Hd0wzDMMxzQbZcMZnXAPWGXMf4yZioQBVXZCNAKCVKtSVvH8F5pAljommixuneTxHpssY6_NIUdJeo8xa75Ca_Onp0_TEPLn7ROWDvtU_0ZxrR35BLq4eItyfNyOHp8bB7yffvz6-7h30-l1LlEjQ3utBQAlSoFfCCgwGspJJoJbZoVSnQ8rYrjW55J2otGceyrZlixkJG7v9n5zB9L-vvZnSxw2HQHqclNnyFFEyylTsjd6fq0o5omjm4cYVqzvjwBxj4Vgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1273206093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urine test to diagnose urinary tract infection in high-risk pregnant women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins ; de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland ; da Costa, Bruna Faria ; do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz ; Amaral, Mariana de Andrade ; Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</creator><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins ; de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland ; da Costa, Bruna Faria ; do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz ; Amaral, Mariana de Andrade ; Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</creatorcontrib><description>To identify the accuracy of urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at high risk. a prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 164 pregnant women admitted to the high-risk the ward of the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) during the period from January to June 2011. Patients who had been taking antibiotics in the last ten days were excluded. All patients were subjected to simple urine tests and urine culture at the beginning of their admission. The agreement between the results of the examinations was evaluated by Kappa indices (K), and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were also determined. When only the presence of pus cells in urinalysis was used as a diagnostic criterion suggesting bacteriuria, there was a poor agreement when compared to uroculture (K=0.16). Accuracy was 61%, sensitivity 62.5%, and specificity 60.6%. PPV was 27.78% and NPV was 87%. The presence of alteration of urinalysis does not necessarily indicate an ongoing urinary tract infection, with urine culture being necessary. However, when urinalysis data are normal, uroculture may be avoided.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1806-9339</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23288258</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - urine ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment ; Urinalysis ; Urinary Tract Infections - urine ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2012-11, Vol.34 (11), p.488-493</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23288258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, Bruna Faria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, Mariana de Andrade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</creatorcontrib><title>Urine test to diagnose urinary tract infection in high-risk pregnant women</title><title>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</title><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><description>To identify the accuracy of urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at high risk. a prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 164 pregnant women admitted to the high-risk the ward of the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) during the period from January to June 2011. Patients who had been taking antibiotics in the last ten days were excluded. All patients were subjected to simple urine tests and urine culture at the beginning of their admission. The agreement between the results of the examinations was evaluated by Kappa indices (K), and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were also determined. When only the presence of pus cells in urinalysis was used as a diagnostic criterion suggesting bacteriuria, there was a poor agreement when compared to uroculture (K=0.16). Accuracy was 61%, sensitivity 62.5%, and specificity 60.6%. PPV was 27.78% and NPV was 87%. The presence of alteration of urinalysis does not necessarily indicate an ongoing urinary tract infection, with urine culture being necessary. However, when urinalysis data are normal, uroculture may be avoided.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - urine</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Urinalysis</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - urine</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1806-9339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j01LxDAYhIMg7lr9C5Kjl0KSt03Toyx-suBlPZe0edONtmlNUsR_b8Hd0wzDMMxzQbZcMZnXAPWGXMf4yZioQBVXZCNAKCVKtSVvH8F5pAljommixuneTxHpssY6_NIUdJeo8xa75Ca_Onp0_TEPLn7ROWDvtU_0ZxrR35BLq4eItyfNyOHp8bB7yffvz6-7h30-l1LlEjQ3utBQAlSoFfCCgwGspJJoJbZoVSnQ8rYrjW55J2otGceyrZlixkJG7v9n5zB9L-vvZnSxw2HQHqclNnyFFEyylTsjd6fq0o5omjm4cYVqzvjwBxj4Vgg</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins</creator><creator>de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland</creator><creator>da Costa, Bruna Faria</creator><creator>do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz</creator><creator>Amaral, Mariana de Andrade</creator><creator>Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Urine test to diagnose urinary tract infection in high-risk pregnant women</title><author>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins ; de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland ; da Costa, Bruna Faria ; do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz ; Amaral, Mariana de Andrade ; Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p568-63a1da4a35337ea831413d3e7686ef6ebef852ef1bc5dab1c29a601e5b9080df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - urine</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Urinalysis</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - urine</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, Bruna Faria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, Mariana de Andrade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins</au><au>de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland</au><au>da Costa, Bruna Faria</au><au>do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz</au><au>Amaral, Mariana de Andrade</au><au>Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urine test to diagnose urinary tract infection in high-risk pregnant women</atitle><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>488</spage><epage>493</epage><pages>488-493</pages><eissn>1806-9339</eissn><abstract>To identify the accuracy of urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at high risk. a prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 164 pregnant women admitted to the high-risk the ward of the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) during the period from January to June 2011. Patients who had been taking antibiotics in the last ten days were excluded. All patients were subjected to simple urine tests and urine culture at the beginning of their admission. The agreement between the results of the examinations was evaluated by Kappa indices (K), and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were also determined. When only the presence of pus cells in urinalysis was used as a diagnostic criterion suggesting bacteriuria, there was a poor agreement when compared to uroculture (K=0.16). Accuracy was 61%, sensitivity 62.5%, and specificity 60.6%. PPV was 27.78% and NPV was 87%. The presence of alteration of urinalysis does not necessarily indicate an ongoing urinary tract infection, with urine culture being necessary. However, when urinalysis data are normal, uroculture may be avoided.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>23288258</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1806-9339
ispartof Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2012-11, Vol.34 (11), p.488-493
issn 1806-9339
language por
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273206093
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - urine
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
Urinalysis
Urinary Tract Infections - urine
Young Adult
title Urine test to diagnose urinary tract infection in high-risk pregnant women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T13%3A41%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urine%20test%20to%20diagnose%20urinary%20tract%20infection%20in%20high-risk%20pregnant%20women&rft.jtitle=Revista%20Brasileira%20de%20ginecologia%20e%20obstetr%C3%ADcia&rft.au=Guerra,%20Gl%C3%A1ucia%20Virg%C3%ADnia%20de%20Queiroz%20Lins&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=488&rft.epage=493&rft.pages=488-493&rft.eissn=1806-9339&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1273206093%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1273206093&rft_id=info:pmid/23288258&rfr_iscdi=true