Urine test to diagnose urinary tract infection in high-risk pregnant women
To identify the accuracy of urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at high risk. a prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 164 pregnant women admitted to the high-risk the ward of the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) during t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia 2012-11, Vol.34 (11), p.488-493 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | por |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 493 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 488 |
container_title | Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland da Costa, Bruna Faria do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz Amaral, Mariana de Andrade Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz |
description | To identify the accuracy of urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at high risk.
a prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 164 pregnant women admitted to the high-risk the ward of the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) during the period from January to June 2011. Patients who had been taking antibiotics in the last ten days were excluded. All patients were subjected to simple urine tests and urine culture at the beginning of their admission. The agreement between the results of the examinations was evaluated by Kappa indices (K), and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were also determined.
When only the presence of pus cells in urinalysis was used as a diagnostic criterion suggesting bacteriuria, there was a poor agreement when compared to uroculture (K=0.16). Accuracy was 61%, sensitivity 62.5%, and specificity 60.6%. PPV was 27.78% and NPV was 87%.
The presence of alteration of urinalysis does not necessarily indicate an ongoing urinary tract infection, with urine culture being necessary. However, when urinalysis data are normal, uroculture may be avoided. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273206093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1273206093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p568-63a1da4a35337ea831413d3e7686ef6ebef852ef1bc5dab1c29a601e5b9080df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j01LxDAYhIMg7lr9C5Kjl0KSt03Toyx-suBlPZe0edONtmlNUsR_b8Hd0wzDMMxzQbZcMZnXAPWGXMf4yZioQBVXZCNAKCVKtSVvH8F5pAljommixuneTxHpssY6_NIUdJeo8xa75Ca_Onp0_TEPLn7ROWDvtU_0ZxrR35BLq4eItyfNyOHp8bB7yffvz6-7h30-l1LlEjQ3utBQAlSoFfCCgwGspJJoJbZoVSnQ8rYrjW55J2otGceyrZlixkJG7v9n5zB9L-vvZnSxw2HQHqclNnyFFEyylTsjd6fq0o5omjm4cYVqzvjwBxj4Vgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1273206093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urine test to diagnose urinary tract infection in high-risk pregnant women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins ; de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland ; da Costa, Bruna Faria ; do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz ; Amaral, Mariana de Andrade ; Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</creator><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins ; de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland ; da Costa, Bruna Faria ; do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz ; Amaral, Mariana de Andrade ; Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</creatorcontrib><description>To identify the accuracy of urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at high risk.
a prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 164 pregnant women admitted to the high-risk the ward of the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) during the period from January to June 2011. Patients who had been taking antibiotics in the last ten days were excluded. All patients were subjected to simple urine tests and urine culture at the beginning of their admission. The agreement between the results of the examinations was evaluated by Kappa indices (K), and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were also determined.
When only the presence of pus cells in urinalysis was used as a diagnostic criterion suggesting bacteriuria, there was a poor agreement when compared to uroculture (K=0.16). Accuracy was 61%, sensitivity 62.5%, and specificity 60.6%. PPV was 27.78% and NPV was 87%.
The presence of alteration of urinalysis does not necessarily indicate an ongoing urinary tract infection, with urine culture being necessary. However, when urinalysis data are normal, uroculture may be avoided.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1806-9339</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23288258</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - urine ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment ; Urinalysis ; Urinary Tract Infections - urine ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2012-11, Vol.34 (11), p.488-493</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23288258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, Bruna Faria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, Mariana de Andrade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</creatorcontrib><title>Urine test to diagnose urinary tract infection in high-risk pregnant women</title><title>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</title><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><description>To identify the accuracy of urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at high risk.
a prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 164 pregnant women admitted to the high-risk the ward of the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) during the period from January to June 2011. Patients who had been taking antibiotics in the last ten days were excluded. All patients were subjected to simple urine tests and urine culture at the beginning of their admission. The agreement between the results of the examinations was evaluated by Kappa indices (K), and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were also determined.
When only the presence of pus cells in urinalysis was used as a diagnostic criterion suggesting bacteriuria, there was a poor agreement when compared to uroculture (K=0.16). Accuracy was 61%, sensitivity 62.5%, and specificity 60.6%. PPV was 27.78% and NPV was 87%.
The presence of alteration of urinalysis does not necessarily indicate an ongoing urinary tract infection, with urine culture being necessary. However, when urinalysis data are normal, uroculture may be avoided.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - urine</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Urinalysis</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - urine</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1806-9339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j01LxDAYhIMg7lr9C5Kjl0KSt03Toyx-suBlPZe0edONtmlNUsR_b8Hd0wzDMMxzQbZcMZnXAPWGXMf4yZioQBVXZCNAKCVKtSVvH8F5pAljommixuneTxHpssY6_NIUdJeo8xa75Ca_Onp0_TEPLn7ROWDvtU_0ZxrR35BLq4eItyfNyOHp8bB7yffvz6-7h30-l1LlEjQ3utBQAlSoFfCCgwGspJJoJbZoVSnQ8rYrjW55J2otGceyrZlixkJG7v9n5zB9L-vvZnSxw2HQHqclNnyFFEyylTsjd6fq0o5omjm4cYVqzvjwBxj4Vgg</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins</creator><creator>de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland</creator><creator>da Costa, Bruna Faria</creator><creator>do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz</creator><creator>Amaral, Mariana de Andrade</creator><creator>Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Urine test to diagnose urinary tract infection in high-risk pregnant women</title><author>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins ; de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland ; da Costa, Bruna Faria ; do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz ; Amaral, Mariana de Andrade ; Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p568-63a1da4a35337ea831413d3e7686ef6ebef852ef1bc5dab1c29a601e5b9080df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - urine</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Urinalysis</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - urine</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, Bruna Faria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, Mariana de Andrade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia de Queiroz Lins</au><au>de Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland</au><au>da Costa, Bruna Faria</au><au>do Nascimento, Flávia Renata Queiroz</au><au>Amaral, Mariana de Andrade</au><au>Serafim, Ana Caroline Paz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urine test to diagnose urinary tract infection in high-risk pregnant women</atitle><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>488</spage><epage>493</epage><pages>488-493</pages><eissn>1806-9339</eissn><abstract>To identify the accuracy of urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at high risk.
a prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 164 pregnant women admitted to the high-risk the ward of the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) during the period from January to June 2011. Patients who had been taking antibiotics in the last ten days were excluded. All patients were subjected to simple urine tests and urine culture at the beginning of their admission. The agreement between the results of the examinations was evaluated by Kappa indices (K), and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were also determined.
When only the presence of pus cells in urinalysis was used as a diagnostic criterion suggesting bacteriuria, there was a poor agreement when compared to uroculture (K=0.16). Accuracy was 61%, sensitivity 62.5%, and specificity 60.6%. PPV was 27.78% and NPV was 87%.
The presence of alteration of urinalysis does not necessarily indicate an ongoing urinary tract infection, with urine culture being necessary. However, when urinalysis data are normal, uroculture may be avoided.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>23288258</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1806-9339 |
ispartof | Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2012-11, Vol.34 (11), p.488-493 |
issn | 1806-9339 |
language | por |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273206093 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Cross-Sectional Studies Female Humans Middle Aged Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - urine Prospective Studies Reproducibility of Results Risk Assessment Urinalysis Urinary Tract Infections - urine Young Adult |
title | Urine test to diagnose urinary tract infection in high-risk pregnant women |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T13%3A41%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urine%20test%20to%20diagnose%20urinary%20tract%20infection%20in%20high-risk%20pregnant%20women&rft.jtitle=Revista%20Brasileira%20de%20ginecologia%20e%20obstetr%C3%ADcia&rft.au=Guerra,%20Gl%C3%A1ucia%20Virg%C3%ADnia%20de%20Queiroz%20Lins&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=488&rft.epage=493&rft.pages=488-493&rft.eissn=1806-9339&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1273206093%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1273206093&rft_id=info:pmid/23288258&rfr_iscdi=true |