Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry
Objective The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram for fetal urine production (UPR) using biometric parameters. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed in 110 normal singleton fetuses with gestational ages ranging from 20 to 40 weeks. UPR was measured using tridimensional ultrasound (3-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2013, Vol.287 (1), p.31-35 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 35 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics |
container_volume | 287 |
creator | Peixoto-Filho, Fernando Maia de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira Velarde, Luis Guillermo Coca de Castro Mocarzel, Carolina Lopes, Laudelino Marques Ville, Yves |
description | Objective
The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram for fetal urine production (UPR) using biometric parameters.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was performed in 110 normal singleton fetuses with gestational ages ranging from 20 to 40 weeks. UPR was measured using tridimensional ultrasound (3-DUS) virtual organ computer-aided analysis. UPR (ml/h) was calculated during the filling phase using the equation, UPR = (VFB2−VFB1)/time. The values for UPR were plotted as a function of fetal biometry (femur, humerus, abdominal circumference, and head circumference and biparietal diameter) to obtain a nomogram for each parameter.
Results
A total of 110 normal singleton fetuses with gestational age between 20 and 40 weeks were investigated. Five of them were excluded because the image quality was insufficient for correct visualization of the bladder contour. Linear regression analysis of UPR as a function of femur, humerus, abdominal circumference, and head circumference and biparietal diameter generated curves that represents the normal range for UPR by fetal biometry, and expressed by the following equations: (1) Humerus length (HL): ln (UPR) = −5.9546 + 0.0958 × HL (mm); (
R
2
0.6422); (2) abdominal circumference: ln (UPR) = −1.0981 + 0.158 × AC (mm); (
R
2
0.6328); (3) femur length: ln (UPR) = −1.5133 + 0.0803 × FL (mm); (
R
2
0.6611); (4) biparietal diameter ln (UPR) = −7.8779 + 0.2368 × BPD−0.0012 × DBP
2
; (
R
2
0.7066). Although BPD has the highest correlation coefficient (
R
2
0.7066) there was no statistical significant difference between the parameters investigated for UPR prediction.
Conclusion
The use of biometric parameters for prediction of fetal UPR seems to be useful and can avoid the necessity of building local nomograms for different populations. The same strategy should be considered to other fields in fetal medicine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00404-012-2516-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273161841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1273161841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-97cbb41fb0a4af3cf21949e35645b35d817eb45544f995b2a7ba10e834ccac5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIwYuXaiZJm-Yoi1-w6EXPIUkT6bJt1qQ91F9vlq4KgqdMmGfeGR6EzgFfA8b8JmLMMMsxkJwUUObjAZoDoyTHHOAQzbHY1bjkM3QS4xonsKrKYzQjpBKC4nKOls8-tGqTBdW928z5kDnbp_8Qms5m2-DrwfSN7xLQ28wMsfdt82nrTI-Zbnxr-zCeoiOnNtGe7d8Feru_e10-5quXh6fl7So3lJM-F9xozcBprJhy1DgCgglLi5IVmhZ1BdxqVhSMOSEKTRTXCrCtKDNGmaKmC3Q15aazPgYbe9k20djNRnXWD1EC4RRKqBgk9PIPuvZD6NJ1kpCE8LISVaJgokzwMQbr5DY0rQqjBCx3huVkWCZxcmdYjmnmYp886NbWPxPfShNAJiCmVpIaflf_n_oFkdOGGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261876898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Peixoto-Filho, Fernando Maia ; de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira ; Velarde, Luis Guillermo Coca ; de Castro Mocarzel, Carolina ; Lopes, Laudelino Marques ; Ville, Yves</creator><creatorcontrib>Peixoto-Filho, Fernando Maia ; de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira ; Velarde, Luis Guillermo Coca ; de Castro Mocarzel, Carolina ; Lopes, Laudelino Marques ; Ville, Yves</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram for fetal urine production (UPR) using biometric parameters.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was performed in 110 normal singleton fetuses with gestational ages ranging from 20 to 40 weeks. UPR was measured using tridimensional ultrasound (3-DUS) virtual organ computer-aided analysis. UPR (ml/h) was calculated during the filling phase using the equation, UPR = (VFB2−VFB1)/time. The values for UPR were plotted as a function of fetal biometry (femur, humerus, abdominal circumference, and head circumference and biparietal diameter) to obtain a nomogram for each parameter.
Results
A total of 110 normal singleton fetuses with gestational age between 20 and 40 weeks were investigated. Five of them were excluded because the image quality was insufficient for correct visualization of the bladder contour. Linear regression analysis of UPR as a function of femur, humerus, abdominal circumference, and head circumference and biparietal diameter generated curves that represents the normal range for UPR by fetal biometry, and expressed by the following equations: (1) Humerus length (HL): ln (UPR) = −5.9546 + 0.0958 × HL (mm); (
R
2
0.6422); (2) abdominal circumference: ln (UPR) = −1.0981 + 0.158 × AC (mm); (
R
2
0.6328); (3) femur length: ln (UPR) = −1.5133 + 0.0803 × FL (mm); (
R
2
0.6611); (4) biparietal diameter ln (UPR) = −7.8779 + 0.2368 × BPD−0.0012 × DBP
2
; (
R
2
0.7066). Although BPD has the highest correlation coefficient (
R
2
0.7066) there was no statistical significant difference between the parameters investigated for UPR prediction.
Conclusion
The use of biometric parameters for prediction of fetal UPR seems to be useful and can avoid the necessity of building local nomograms for different populations. The same strategy should be considered to other fields in fetal medicine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2516-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22899306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Abdomen - diagnostic imaging ; Abdomen - embryology ; Biometrics ; Biometry ; Cephalometry ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diuresis ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - embryology ; Fetus - physiology ; Fetuses ; Gestational Age ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Humerus - diagnostic imaging ; Humerus - embryology ; Maternal-Fetal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nomograms ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Pregnancy ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods ; Urinary Bladder - diagnostic imaging ; Urinary Bladder - embryology ; Urine ; Urine - physiology</subject><ispartof>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2013, Vol.287 (1), p.31-35</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics is a copyright of Springer, (2012). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-97cbb41fb0a4af3cf21949e35645b35d817eb45544f995b2a7ba10e834ccac5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-97cbb41fb0a4af3cf21949e35645b35d817eb45544f995b2a7ba10e834ccac5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-012-2516-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-012-2516-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22899306$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peixoto-Filho, Fernando Maia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velarde, Luis Guillermo Coca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Castro Mocarzel, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Laudelino Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ville, Yves</creatorcontrib><title>Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry</title><title>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Objective
The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram for fetal urine production (UPR) using biometric parameters.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was performed in 110 normal singleton fetuses with gestational ages ranging from 20 to 40 weeks. UPR was measured using tridimensional ultrasound (3-DUS) virtual organ computer-aided analysis. UPR (ml/h) was calculated during the filling phase using the equation, UPR = (VFB2−VFB1)/time. The values for UPR were plotted as a function of fetal biometry (femur, humerus, abdominal circumference, and head circumference and biparietal diameter) to obtain a nomogram for each parameter.
Results
A total of 110 normal singleton fetuses with gestational age between 20 and 40 weeks were investigated. Five of them were excluded because the image quality was insufficient for correct visualization of the bladder contour. Linear regression analysis of UPR as a function of femur, humerus, abdominal circumference, and head circumference and biparietal diameter generated curves that represents the normal range for UPR by fetal biometry, and expressed by the following equations: (1) Humerus length (HL): ln (UPR) = −5.9546 + 0.0958 × HL (mm); (
R
2
0.6422); (2) abdominal circumference: ln (UPR) = −1.0981 + 0.158 × AC (mm); (
R
2
0.6328); (3) femur length: ln (UPR) = −1.5133 + 0.0803 × FL (mm); (
R
2
0.6611); (4) biparietal diameter ln (UPR) = −7.8779 + 0.2368 × BPD−0.0012 × DBP
2
; (
R
2
0.7066). Although BPD has the highest correlation coefficient (
R
2
0.7066) there was no statistical significant difference between the parameters investigated for UPR prediction.
Conclusion
The use of biometric parameters for prediction of fetal UPR seems to be useful and can avoid the necessity of building local nomograms for different populations. The same strategy should be considered to other fields in fetal medicine.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abdomen - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Abdomen - embryology</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Biometry</subject><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diuresis</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - embryology</subject><subject>Fetus - physiology</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humerus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humerus - embryology</subject><subject>Maternal-Fetal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - embryology</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Urine - physiology</subject><issn>0932-0067</issn><issn>1432-0711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIwYuXaiZJm-Yoi1-w6EXPIUkT6bJt1qQ91F9vlq4KgqdMmGfeGR6EzgFfA8b8JmLMMMsxkJwUUObjAZoDoyTHHOAQzbHY1bjkM3QS4xonsKrKYzQjpBKC4nKOls8-tGqTBdW928z5kDnbp_8Qms5m2-DrwfSN7xLQ28wMsfdt82nrTI-Zbnxr-zCeoiOnNtGe7d8Feru_e10-5quXh6fl7So3lJM-F9xozcBprJhy1DgCgglLi5IVmhZ1BdxqVhSMOSEKTRTXCrCtKDNGmaKmC3Q15aazPgYbe9k20djNRnXWD1EC4RRKqBgk9PIPuvZD6NJ1kpCE8LISVaJgokzwMQbr5DY0rQqjBCx3huVkWCZxcmdYjmnmYp886NbWPxPfShNAJiCmVpIaflf_n_oFkdOGGw</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Peixoto-Filho, Fernando Maia</creator><creator>de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira</creator><creator>Velarde, Luis Guillermo Coca</creator><creator>de Castro Mocarzel, Carolina</creator><creator>Lopes, Laudelino Marques</creator><creator>Ville, Yves</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry</title><author>Peixoto-Filho, Fernando Maia ; de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira ; Velarde, Luis Guillermo Coca ; de Castro Mocarzel, Carolina ; Lopes, Laudelino Marques ; Ville, Yves</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-97cbb41fb0a4af3cf21949e35645b35d817eb45544f995b2a7ba10e834ccac5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abdomen - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Abdomen - embryology</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Biometry</topic><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diuresis</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - embryology</topic><topic>Fetus - physiology</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humerus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humerus - embryology</topic><topic>Maternal-Fetal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - embryology</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Urine - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peixoto-Filho, Fernando Maia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velarde, Luis Guillermo Coca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Castro Mocarzel, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Laudelino Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ville, Yves</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peixoto-Filho, Fernando Maia</au><au>de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira</au><au>Velarde, Luis Guillermo Coca</au><au>de Castro Mocarzel, Carolina</au><au>Lopes, Laudelino Marques</au><au>Ville, Yves</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry</atitle><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><stitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</stitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>287</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>31-35</pages><issn>0932-0067</issn><eissn>1432-0711</eissn><abstract>Objective
The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram for fetal urine production (UPR) using biometric parameters.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was performed in 110 normal singleton fetuses with gestational ages ranging from 20 to 40 weeks. UPR was measured using tridimensional ultrasound (3-DUS) virtual organ computer-aided analysis. UPR (ml/h) was calculated during the filling phase using the equation, UPR = (VFB2−VFB1)/time. The values for UPR were plotted as a function of fetal biometry (femur, humerus, abdominal circumference, and head circumference and biparietal diameter) to obtain a nomogram for each parameter.
Results
A total of 110 normal singleton fetuses with gestational age between 20 and 40 weeks were investigated. Five of them were excluded because the image quality was insufficient for correct visualization of the bladder contour. Linear regression analysis of UPR as a function of femur, humerus, abdominal circumference, and head circumference and biparietal diameter generated curves that represents the normal range for UPR by fetal biometry, and expressed by the following equations: (1) Humerus length (HL): ln (UPR) = −5.9546 + 0.0958 × HL (mm); (
R
2
0.6422); (2) abdominal circumference: ln (UPR) = −1.0981 + 0.158 × AC (mm); (
R
2
0.6328); (3) femur length: ln (UPR) = −1.5133 + 0.0803 × FL (mm); (
R
2
0.6611); (4) biparietal diameter ln (UPR) = −7.8779 + 0.2368 × BPD−0.0012 × DBP
2
; (
R
2
0.7066). Although BPD has the highest correlation coefficient (
R
2
0.7066) there was no statistical significant difference between the parameters investigated for UPR prediction.
Conclusion
The use of biometric parameters for prediction of fetal UPR seems to be useful and can avoid the necessity of building local nomograms for different populations. The same strategy should be considered to other fields in fetal medicine.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22899306</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00404-012-2516-y</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0932-0067 |
ispartof | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2013, Vol.287 (1), p.31-35 |
issn | 0932-0067 1432-0711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1273161841 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abdomen Abdomen - diagnostic imaging Abdomen - embryology Biometrics Biometry Cephalometry Cross-Sectional Studies Diuresis Endocrinology Female Femur - diagnostic imaging Femur - embryology Fetus - physiology Fetuses Gestational Age Gynecology Human Genetics Humans Humerus - diagnostic imaging Humerus - embryology Maternal-Fetal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nomograms Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery Pregnancy Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods Urinary Bladder - diagnostic imaging Urinary Bladder - embryology Urine Urine - physiology |
title | Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A13%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Normal%20range%20for%20fetal%20urine%20production%20rate%20customized%20by%20biometry&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Peixoto-Filho,%20Fernando%20Maia&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=287&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=31-35&rft.issn=0932-0067&rft.eissn=1432-0711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00404-012-2516-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1273161841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261876898&rft_id=info:pmid/22899306&rfr_iscdi=true |