Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models

Sierra Nevada snowmelt and runoff is a key source of water for many of California's 38 million residents and nearly the entire population of western Nevada. The purpose of this study was to assess the impacts of expected 21st Century climatic changes in the Sierra Nevada at the subwatershed sca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2012-12, Vol.48 (6), p.1104-1125
Hauptverfasser: Ficklin, Darren L., Stewart, Iris T., Maurer, Edwin P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1125
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1104
container_title Journal of the American Water Resources Association
container_volume 48
creator Ficklin, Darren L.
Stewart, Iris T.
Maurer, Edwin P.
description Sierra Nevada snowmelt and runoff is a key source of water for many of California's 38 million residents and nearly the entire population of western Nevada. The purpose of this study was to assess the impacts of expected 21st Century climatic changes in the Sierra Nevada at the subwatershed scale, for all hydrologic flow components, and for a suite of 16 General Circulation Models (GCMs) with two emission scenarios. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated and validated at 35 unimpaired streamflow sites. Results show that temperatures are projected to increase throughout the Sierra Nevada, whereas precipitation projections vary between GCMs. These climatic changes drive a decrease in average annual streamflow and an advance of snowmelt and runoff by several weeks. The largest streamflow reductions were found in the mid-range elevations due to less snow accumulation, whereas the higher elevation watersheds were more resilient due to colder temperatures. Simulation results showed that decreases in snowmelt affects not only streamflow, but evapotranspiration, surface, and subsurface flows, such that less water is available in spring and summer, thus potentially affecting aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Declining spring and summer flows did not equally affect all subwatersheds in the region, and the subwatershed perspective allowed for identification for the most sensitive basins throughout the Sierra Nevada. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00675.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1268651019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1268651019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-f7d5112b20d88a0bc61d3b4fb923aeddae8b33106e85e459b85f7cfbaf047aa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9v1DAQxSMEEqXwHSwhJC4JHjv-kyONultgaZFoVW7RJHEqL157ayfQ5dPjqlUPncuM9H7vzWiKggCtINenbQVKsBKk1hWjwCpKpRLV3Yvi6El4mWfa8LJW9a_XxZuUtpSCAM2Pin8_YtiaYbbBJxImwiDNpDV-XuKB_LQmRiTn5g-OSDZhQEfODmMMLtzYgaxc-EvasNsHnw2JXCXrbwh6cuqT2fXO3AeujTcx-1obh8Xh_SLyPYzGpbfFqwldMu8e-3FxtTq9bM_KzcX6S_t5UyKnai4nNQoA1jM6ao20HySMvK-nvmEczTii0T3nQKXRwtSi6bWY1DD1ONFaISp-XHx8yN3HcLuYNHc7mwbjHHoTltQBk1oKoNBk9P0zdBuW6PN1HUhWN7TREjL14ZHClF8yRfSDTd0-2h3GQ8ekAsqlzFz5wNk0m7snHePvTiquRHd9vu5WJyfQfvvKug3_D-dAjB8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1624909861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ficklin, Darren L. ; Stewart, Iris T. ; Maurer, Edwin P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ficklin, Darren L. ; Stewart, Iris T. ; Maurer, Edwin P.</creatorcontrib><description>Sierra Nevada snowmelt and runoff is a key source of water for many of California's 38 million residents and nearly the entire population of western Nevada. The purpose of this study was to assess the impacts of expected 21st Century climatic changes in the Sierra Nevada at the subwatershed scale, for all hydrologic flow components, and for a suite of 16 General Circulation Models (GCMs) with two emission scenarios. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated and validated at 35 unimpaired streamflow sites. Results show that temperatures are projected to increase throughout the Sierra Nevada, whereas precipitation projections vary between GCMs. These climatic changes drive a decrease in average annual streamflow and an advance of snowmelt and runoff by several weeks. The largest streamflow reductions were found in the mid-range elevations due to less snow accumulation, whereas the higher elevation watersheds were more resilient due to colder temperatures. Simulation results showed that decreases in snowmelt affects not only streamflow, but evapotranspiration, surface, and subsurface flows, such that less water is available in spring and summer, thus potentially affecting aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Declining spring and summer flows did not equally affect all subwatersheds in the region, and the subwatershed perspective allowed for identification for the most sensitive basins throughout the Sierra Nevada. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-474X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-1688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00675.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWRAF5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Circulation ; climate variability/change ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Elevation ; Evapotranspiration ; Exact sciences and technology ; hydrologic cycle ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; infiltration ; Precipitation ; Projection ; Runoff ; Simulation ; snow hydrology ; Spring (season) ; Stream flow ; Summer ; surface water hydrology ; Temperature ; Water resources ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2012-12, Vol.48 (6), p.1104-1125</ispartof><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dec 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26710366$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ficklin, Darren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Iris T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Edwin P.</creatorcontrib><title>Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models</title><title>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><description>Sierra Nevada snowmelt and runoff is a key source of water for many of California's 38 million residents and nearly the entire population of western Nevada. The purpose of this study was to assess the impacts of expected 21st Century climatic changes in the Sierra Nevada at the subwatershed scale, for all hydrologic flow components, and for a suite of 16 General Circulation Models (GCMs) with two emission scenarios. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated and validated at 35 unimpaired streamflow sites. Results show that temperatures are projected to increase throughout the Sierra Nevada, whereas precipitation projections vary between GCMs. These climatic changes drive a decrease in average annual streamflow and an advance of snowmelt and runoff by several weeks. The largest streamflow reductions were found in the mid-range elevations due to less snow accumulation, whereas the higher elevation watersheds were more resilient due to colder temperatures. Simulation results showed that decreases in snowmelt affects not only streamflow, but evapotranspiration, surface, and subsurface flows, such that less water is available in spring and summer, thus potentially affecting aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Declining spring and summer flows did not equally affect all subwatersheds in the region, and the subwatershed perspective allowed for identification for the most sensitive basins throughout the Sierra Nevada. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Circulation</subject><subject>climate variability/change</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>hydrologic cycle</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>infiltration</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Projection</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>snow hydrology</subject><subject>Spring (season)</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>surface water hydrology</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1093-474X</issn><issn>1752-1688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE9v1DAQxSMEEqXwHSwhJC4JHjv-kyONultgaZFoVW7RJHEqL157ayfQ5dPjqlUPncuM9H7vzWiKggCtINenbQVKsBKk1hWjwCpKpRLV3Yvi6El4mWfa8LJW9a_XxZuUtpSCAM2Pin8_YtiaYbbBJxImwiDNpDV-XuKB_LQmRiTn5g-OSDZhQEfODmMMLtzYgaxc-EvasNsHnw2JXCXrbwh6cuqT2fXO3AeujTcx-1obh8Xh_SLyPYzGpbfFqwldMu8e-3FxtTq9bM_KzcX6S_t5UyKnai4nNQoA1jM6ao20HySMvK-nvmEczTii0T3nQKXRwtSi6bWY1DD1ONFaISp-XHx8yN3HcLuYNHc7mwbjHHoTltQBk1oKoNBk9P0zdBuW6PN1HUhWN7TREjL14ZHClF8yRfSDTd0-2h3GQ8ekAsqlzFz5wNk0m7snHePvTiquRHd9vu5WJyfQfvvKug3_D-dAjB8</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Ficklin, Darren L.</creator><creator>Stewart, Iris T.</creator><creator>Maurer, Edwin P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Water Resources Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models</title><author>Ficklin, Darren L. ; Stewart, Iris T. ; Maurer, Edwin P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-f7d5112b20d88a0bc61d3b4fb923aeddae8b33106e85e459b85f7cfbaf047aa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Circulation</topic><topic>climate variability/change</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>hydrologic cycle</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>infiltration</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Projection</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>snow hydrology</topic><topic>Spring (season)</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>surface water hydrology</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ficklin, Darren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Iris T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Edwin P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ficklin, Darren L.</au><au>Stewart, Iris T.</au><au>Maurer, Edwin P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1104</spage><epage>1125</epage><pages>1104-1125</pages><issn>1093-474X</issn><eissn>1752-1688</eissn><coden>JWRAF5</coden><abstract>Sierra Nevada snowmelt and runoff is a key source of water for many of California's 38 million residents and nearly the entire population of western Nevada. The purpose of this study was to assess the impacts of expected 21st Century climatic changes in the Sierra Nevada at the subwatershed scale, for all hydrologic flow components, and for a suite of 16 General Circulation Models (GCMs) with two emission scenarios. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated and validated at 35 unimpaired streamflow sites. Results show that temperatures are projected to increase throughout the Sierra Nevada, whereas precipitation projections vary between GCMs. These climatic changes drive a decrease in average annual streamflow and an advance of snowmelt and runoff by several weeks. The largest streamflow reductions were found in the mid-range elevations due to less snow accumulation, whereas the higher elevation watersheds were more resilient due to colder temperatures. Simulation results showed that decreases in snowmelt affects not only streamflow, but evapotranspiration, surface, and subsurface flows, such that less water is available in spring and summer, thus potentially affecting aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Declining spring and summer flows did not equally affect all subwatersheds in the region, and the subwatershed perspective allowed for identification for the most sensitive basins throughout the Sierra Nevada. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00675.x</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1093-474X
ispartof Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2012-12, Vol.48 (6), p.1104-1125
issn 1093-474X
1752-1688
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1268651019
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Assessments
Circulation
climate variability/change
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Elevation
Evapotranspiration
Exact sciences and technology
hydrologic cycle
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
infiltration
Precipitation
Projection
Runoff
Simulation
snow hydrology
Spring (season)
Stream flow
Summer
surface water hydrology
Temperature
Water resources
Watersheds
title Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A54%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Projections%20of%2021st%20Century%20Sierra%20Nevada%20Local%20Hydrologic%20Flow%20Components%20Using%20an%20Ensemble%20of%20General%20Circulation%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Water%20Resources%20Association&rft.au=Ficklin,%20Darren%20L.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1104&rft.epage=1125&rft.pages=1104-1125&rft.issn=1093-474X&rft.eissn=1752-1688&rft.coden=JWRAF5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00675.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E1268651019%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1624909861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true