Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models
Sierra Nevada snowmelt and runoff is a key source of water for many of California's 38 million residents and nearly the entire population of western Nevada. The purpose of this study was to assess the impacts of expected 21st Century climatic changes in the Sierra Nevada at the subwatershed sca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2012-12, Vol.48 (6), p.1104-1125 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1125 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1104 |
container_title | Journal of the American Water Resources Association |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Ficklin, Darren L. Stewart, Iris T. Maurer, Edwin P. |
description | Sierra Nevada snowmelt and runoff is a key source of water for many of California's 38 million residents and nearly the entire population of western Nevada. The purpose of this study was to assess the impacts of expected 21st Century climatic changes in the Sierra Nevada at the subwatershed scale, for all hydrologic flow components, and for a suite of 16 General Circulation Models (GCMs) with two emission scenarios. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated and validated at 35 unimpaired streamflow sites. Results show that temperatures are projected to increase throughout the Sierra Nevada, whereas precipitation projections vary between GCMs. These climatic changes drive a decrease in average annual streamflow and an advance of snowmelt and runoff by several weeks. The largest streamflow reductions were found in the mid-range elevations due to less snow accumulation, whereas the higher elevation watersheds were more resilient due to colder temperatures. Simulation results showed that decreases in snowmelt affects not only streamflow, but evapotranspiration, surface, and subsurface flows, such that less water is available in spring and summer, thus potentially affecting aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Declining spring and summer flows did not equally affect all subwatersheds in the region, and the subwatershed perspective allowed for identification for the most sensitive basins throughout the Sierra Nevada. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00675.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1268651019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1268651019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-f7d5112b20d88a0bc61d3b4fb923aeddae8b33106e85e459b85f7cfbaf047aa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9v1DAQxSMEEqXwHSwhJC4JHjv-kyONultgaZFoVW7RJHEqL157ayfQ5dPjqlUPncuM9H7vzWiKggCtINenbQVKsBKk1hWjwCpKpRLV3Yvi6El4mWfa8LJW9a_XxZuUtpSCAM2Pin8_YtiaYbbBJxImwiDNpDV-XuKB_LQmRiTn5g-OSDZhQEfODmMMLtzYgaxc-EvasNsHnw2JXCXrbwh6cuqT2fXO3AeujTcx-1obh8Xh_SLyPYzGpbfFqwldMu8e-3FxtTq9bM_KzcX6S_t5UyKnai4nNQoA1jM6ao20HySMvK-nvmEczTii0T3nQKXRwtSi6bWY1DD1ONFaISp-XHx8yN3HcLuYNHc7mwbjHHoTltQBk1oKoNBk9P0zdBuW6PN1HUhWN7TREjL14ZHClF8yRfSDTd0-2h3GQ8ekAsqlzFz5wNk0m7snHePvTiquRHd9vu5WJyfQfvvKug3_D-dAjB8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1624909861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ficklin, Darren L. ; Stewart, Iris T. ; Maurer, Edwin P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ficklin, Darren L. ; Stewart, Iris T. ; Maurer, Edwin P.</creatorcontrib><description>Sierra Nevada snowmelt and runoff is a key source of water for many of California's 38 million residents and nearly the entire population of western Nevada. The purpose of this study was to assess the impacts of expected 21st Century climatic changes in the Sierra Nevada at the subwatershed scale, for all hydrologic flow components, and for a suite of 16 General Circulation Models (GCMs) with two emission scenarios. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated and validated at 35 unimpaired streamflow sites. Results show that temperatures are projected to increase throughout the Sierra Nevada, whereas precipitation projections vary between GCMs. These climatic changes drive a decrease in average annual streamflow and an advance of snowmelt and runoff by several weeks. The largest streamflow reductions were found in the mid-range elevations due to less snow accumulation, whereas the higher elevation watersheds were more resilient due to colder temperatures. Simulation results showed that decreases in snowmelt affects not only streamflow, but evapotranspiration, surface, and subsurface flows, such that less water is available in spring and summer, thus potentially affecting aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Declining spring and summer flows did not equally affect all subwatersheds in the region, and the subwatershed perspective allowed for identification for the most sensitive basins throughout the Sierra Nevada. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-474X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-1688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00675.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWRAF5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Circulation ; climate variability/change ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Elevation ; Evapotranspiration ; Exact sciences and technology ; hydrologic cycle ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; infiltration ; Precipitation ; Projection ; Runoff ; Simulation ; snow hydrology ; Spring (season) ; Stream flow ; Summer ; surface water hydrology ; Temperature ; Water resources ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2012-12, Vol.48 (6), p.1104-1125</ispartof><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dec 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26710366$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ficklin, Darren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Iris T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Edwin P.</creatorcontrib><title>Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models</title><title>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><description>Sierra Nevada snowmelt and runoff is a key source of water for many of California's 38 million residents and nearly the entire population of western Nevada. The purpose of this study was to assess the impacts of expected 21st Century climatic changes in the Sierra Nevada at the subwatershed scale, for all hydrologic flow components, and for a suite of 16 General Circulation Models (GCMs) with two emission scenarios. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated and validated at 35 unimpaired streamflow sites. Results show that temperatures are projected to increase throughout the Sierra Nevada, whereas precipitation projections vary between GCMs. These climatic changes drive a decrease in average annual streamflow and an advance of snowmelt and runoff by several weeks. The largest streamflow reductions were found in the mid-range elevations due to less snow accumulation, whereas the higher elevation watersheds were more resilient due to colder temperatures. Simulation results showed that decreases in snowmelt affects not only streamflow, but evapotranspiration, surface, and subsurface flows, such that less water is available in spring and summer, thus potentially affecting aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Declining spring and summer flows did not equally affect all subwatersheds in the region, and the subwatershed perspective allowed for identification for the most sensitive basins throughout the Sierra Nevada. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Circulation</subject><subject>climate variability/change</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>hydrologic cycle</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>infiltration</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Projection</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>snow hydrology</subject><subject>Spring (season)</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>surface water hydrology</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1093-474X</issn><issn>1752-1688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE9v1DAQxSMEEqXwHSwhJC4JHjv-kyONultgaZFoVW7RJHEqL157ayfQ5dPjqlUPncuM9H7vzWiKggCtINenbQVKsBKk1hWjwCpKpRLV3Yvi6El4mWfa8LJW9a_XxZuUtpSCAM2Pin8_YtiaYbbBJxImwiDNpDV-XuKB_LQmRiTn5g-OSDZhQEfODmMMLtzYgaxc-EvasNsHnw2JXCXrbwh6cuqT2fXO3AeujTcx-1obh8Xh_SLyPYzGpbfFqwldMu8e-3FxtTq9bM_KzcX6S_t5UyKnai4nNQoA1jM6ao20HySMvK-nvmEczTii0T3nQKXRwtSi6bWY1DD1ONFaISp-XHx8yN3HcLuYNHc7mwbjHHoTltQBk1oKoNBk9P0zdBuW6PN1HUhWN7TREjL14ZHClF8yRfSDTd0-2h3GQ8ekAsqlzFz5wNk0m7snHePvTiquRHd9vu5WJyfQfvvKug3_D-dAjB8</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Ficklin, Darren L.</creator><creator>Stewart, Iris T.</creator><creator>Maurer, Edwin P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Water Resources Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models</title><author>Ficklin, Darren L. ; Stewart, Iris T. ; Maurer, Edwin P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-f7d5112b20d88a0bc61d3b4fb923aeddae8b33106e85e459b85f7cfbaf047aa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Circulation</topic><topic>climate variability/change</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>hydrologic cycle</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>infiltration</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Projection</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>snow hydrology</topic><topic>Spring (season)</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>surface water hydrology</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ficklin, Darren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Iris T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Edwin P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ficklin, Darren L.</au><au>Stewart, Iris T.</au><au>Maurer, Edwin P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1104</spage><epage>1125</epage><pages>1104-1125</pages><issn>1093-474X</issn><eissn>1752-1688</eissn><coden>JWRAF5</coden><abstract>Sierra Nevada snowmelt and runoff is a key source of water for many of California's 38 million residents and nearly the entire population of western Nevada. The purpose of this study was to assess the impacts of expected 21st Century climatic changes in the Sierra Nevada at the subwatershed scale, for all hydrologic flow components, and for a suite of 16 General Circulation Models (GCMs) with two emission scenarios. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated and validated at 35 unimpaired streamflow sites. Results show that temperatures are projected to increase throughout the Sierra Nevada, whereas precipitation projections vary between GCMs. These climatic changes drive a decrease in average annual streamflow and an advance of snowmelt and runoff by several weeks. The largest streamflow reductions were found in the mid-range elevations due to less snow accumulation, whereas the higher elevation watersheds were more resilient due to colder temperatures. Simulation results showed that decreases in snowmelt affects not only streamflow, but evapotranspiration, surface, and subsurface flows, such that less water is available in spring and summer, thus potentially affecting aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Declining spring and summer flows did not equally affect all subwatersheds in the region, and the subwatershed perspective allowed for identification for the most sensitive basins throughout the Sierra Nevada. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00675.x</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1093-474X |
ispartof | Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2012-12, Vol.48 (6), p.1104-1125 |
issn | 1093-474X 1752-1688 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1268651019 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Assessments Circulation climate variability/change Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Elevation Evapotranspiration Exact sciences and technology hydrologic cycle Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology infiltration Precipitation Projection Runoff Simulation snow hydrology Spring (season) Stream flow Summer surface water hydrology Temperature Water resources Watersheds |
title | Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A54%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Projections%20of%2021st%20Century%20Sierra%20Nevada%20Local%20Hydrologic%20Flow%20Components%20Using%20an%20Ensemble%20of%20General%20Circulation%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Water%20Resources%20Association&rft.au=Ficklin,%20Darren%20L.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1104&rft.epage=1125&rft.pages=1104-1125&rft.issn=1093-474X&rft.eissn=1752-1688&rft.coden=JWRAF5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00675.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E1268651019%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1624909861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |