Behaviour and neural responses in crucian carp to skin odours from cross-order species

Many teleost species respond with fright reactions to olfactory cues from injured skin of conspecifics, but they may also display responses to skin extracts of heterospecific fish. In the present study, we exposed crucian carp to skin extracts of conspecifics and three cross-order species of fish (b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behaviour 2012, Vol.149 (9), p.925-939
Hauptverfasser: Lastein, Stine, Stabell, Ole B, Larsen, Helene K, Hamdani, El Hassan, Døving, Kjell B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 939
container_issue 9
container_start_page 925
container_title Behaviour
container_volume 149
creator Lastein, Stine
Stabell, Ole B
Larsen, Helene K
Hamdani, El Hassan
Døving, Kjell B
description Many teleost species respond with fright reactions to olfactory cues from injured skin of conspecifics, but they may also display responses to skin extracts of heterospecific fish. In the present study, we exposed crucian carp to skin extracts of conspecifics and three cross-order species of fish (brown trout, pike, and perch). Behavioural experiments showed that conspecific skin extracts induced fright reactions in crucian carp; extracts of brown trout induced such behaviour less frequently, while extracts of perch and pike were poor inducers of fright responses. The olfactory bulb is chemo-topically organized, and different sub-sets of neurons respond to functionally related odorants that mediate distinct behaviours. Accordingly, behavioural responses to an alarm signal should be reflected by activation of the neurons mediating fright reaction. Extracellular recordings from single units in the olfactory bulb showed that the relay neurons activated by conspecific skin extracts were also activated by extracts of brown trout, whereas extracts of perch and pike less frequently activated these units. Thus, the difference in behavioural responses matched the differences in the neural responses, indicating that skin extracts of heterospecific fish are more likely to induce fright behaviour when the responding sub-set of olfactory neurons is similar to the sub-set responding to conspecific extracts. Our results suggest that responses to injured heterospecific fish rely on chemical resemblance between odorants from heterospecific and conspecific skin, and need not be based on any form of associative learning.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/1568539X-00003013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1268650962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41720596</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41720596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-d24210fda51f75993b6dbbeff2dc81cfaa14a69f6fb2981c791dbd626f3f0b973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9PwyAUx4nRxDn9AzyYcPRSLWVAOerinG5RD2q8EVogdnal8lqj_73M6o5yeeH74-Xlg9AxSc8I4fScMJ4zKl-SND6aErqDRhst2Yi7aBRVlgjJ5D46AFjFr2CUjdDzpX3VH5XvA9aNwY3tg65xsND6BizgqsFl6MtKx6lDizuP4S2K3sQKYBf8OgY8QOKDsQFDa8vKwiHac7oGe_Q7x-hpdvU4nSfL--ub6cUyKajIu8Rkk4ykzmhGnGBS0oKborDOZabMSem0JhPNpeOuyGQUhCSmMDzjjrq0kIKO0emwtw3-vbfQqXUFpa1r3VjfgyIZzzlLJc9ilAzRn3ODdaoN1VqHL0VStWGo_hiqP4axczJ0VtD5sC1MiMhSJnn0k8GvoLOfW1-HN8UFFUzdLh7V7G4xnz7IpSIxfz7ki1DVtVpFhk3E888F356YjEc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1268650962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behaviour and neural responses in crucian carp to skin odours from cross-order species</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Lastein, Stine ; Stabell, Ole B ; Larsen, Helene K ; Hamdani, El Hassan ; Døving, Kjell B</creator><creatorcontrib>Lastein, Stine ; Stabell, Ole B ; Larsen, Helene K ; Hamdani, El Hassan ; Døving, Kjell B</creatorcontrib><description>Many teleost species respond with fright reactions to olfactory cues from injured skin of conspecifics, but they may also display responses to skin extracts of heterospecific fish. In the present study, we exposed crucian carp to skin extracts of conspecifics and three cross-order species of fish (brown trout, pike, and perch). Behavioural experiments showed that conspecific skin extracts induced fright reactions in crucian carp; extracts of brown trout induced such behaviour less frequently, while extracts of perch and pike were poor inducers of fright responses. The olfactory bulb is chemo-topically organized, and different sub-sets of neurons respond to functionally related odorants that mediate distinct behaviours. Accordingly, behavioural responses to an alarm signal should be reflected by activation of the neurons mediating fright reaction. Extracellular recordings from single units in the olfactory bulb showed that the relay neurons activated by conspecific skin extracts were also activated by extracts of brown trout, whereas extracts of perch and pike less frequently activated these units. Thus, the difference in behavioural responses matched the differences in the neural responses, indicating that skin extracts of heterospecific fish are more likely to induce fright behaviour when the responding sub-set of olfactory neurons is similar to the sub-set responding to conspecific extracts. Our results suggest that responses to injured heterospecific fish rely on chemical resemblance between odorants from heterospecific and conspecific skin, and need not be based on any form of associative learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-539X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0005-7959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/1568539X-00003013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Brill</publisher><subject>alarm substance ; Carp ; cross-order ; Fish ; Freshwater ; fright reaction ; Mental stimulation ; Neurons ; Odors ; olfaction ; Olfactory bulb ; Olfactory pathways ; pheromone ; Predators ; Salmo trutta ; single unit ; Skin ; skin extract ; Teleostei ; Trout</subject><ispartof>Behaviour, 2012, Vol.149 (9), p.925-939</ispartof><rights>Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>2012 Koninklijke Brill NV</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-d24210fda51f75993b6dbbeff2dc81cfaa14a69f6fb2981c791dbd626f3f0b973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-d24210fda51f75993b6dbbeff2dc81cfaa14a69f6fb2981c791dbd626f3f0b973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41720596$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41720596$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,4012,27906,27907,27908,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lastein, Stine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stabell, Ole B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Helene K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamdani, El Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Døving, Kjell B</creatorcontrib><title>Behaviour and neural responses in crucian carp to skin odours from cross-order species</title><title>Behaviour</title><addtitle>BEH</addtitle><description>Many teleost species respond with fright reactions to olfactory cues from injured skin of conspecifics, but they may also display responses to skin extracts of heterospecific fish. In the present study, we exposed crucian carp to skin extracts of conspecifics and three cross-order species of fish (brown trout, pike, and perch). Behavioural experiments showed that conspecific skin extracts induced fright reactions in crucian carp; extracts of brown trout induced such behaviour less frequently, while extracts of perch and pike were poor inducers of fright responses. The olfactory bulb is chemo-topically organized, and different sub-sets of neurons respond to functionally related odorants that mediate distinct behaviours. Accordingly, behavioural responses to an alarm signal should be reflected by activation of the neurons mediating fright reaction. Extracellular recordings from single units in the olfactory bulb showed that the relay neurons activated by conspecific skin extracts were also activated by extracts of brown trout, whereas extracts of perch and pike less frequently activated these units. Thus, the difference in behavioural responses matched the differences in the neural responses, indicating that skin extracts of heterospecific fish are more likely to induce fright behaviour when the responding sub-set of olfactory neurons is similar to the sub-set responding to conspecific extracts. Our results suggest that responses to injured heterospecific fish rely on chemical resemblance between odorants from heterospecific and conspecific skin, and need not be based on any form of associative learning.</description><subject>alarm substance</subject><subject>Carp</subject><subject>cross-order</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>fright reaction</subject><subject>Mental stimulation</subject><subject>Neurons</subject><subject>Odors</subject><subject>olfaction</subject><subject>Olfactory bulb</subject><subject>Olfactory pathways</subject><subject>pheromone</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Salmo trutta</subject><subject>single unit</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>skin extract</subject><subject>Teleostei</subject><subject>Trout</subject><issn>0005-7959</issn><issn>1568-539X</issn><issn>0005-7959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9PwyAUx4nRxDn9AzyYcPRSLWVAOerinG5RD2q8EVogdnal8lqj_73M6o5yeeH74-Xlg9AxSc8I4fScMJ4zKl-SND6aErqDRhst2Yi7aBRVlgjJ5D46AFjFr2CUjdDzpX3VH5XvA9aNwY3tg65xsND6BizgqsFl6MtKx6lDizuP4S2K3sQKYBf8OgY8QOKDsQFDa8vKwiHac7oGe_Q7x-hpdvU4nSfL--ub6cUyKajIu8Rkk4ykzmhGnGBS0oKborDOZabMSem0JhPNpeOuyGQUhCSmMDzjjrq0kIKO0emwtw3-vbfQqXUFpa1r3VjfgyIZzzlLJc9ilAzRn3ODdaoN1VqHL0VStWGo_hiqP4axczJ0VtD5sC1MiMhSJnn0k8GvoLOfW1-HN8UFFUzdLh7V7G4xnz7IpSIxfz7ki1DVtVpFhk3E888F356YjEc</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Lastein, Stine</creator><creator>Stabell, Ole B</creator><creator>Larsen, Helene K</creator><creator>Hamdani, El Hassan</creator><creator>Døving, Kjell B</creator><general>Brill</general><general>BRILL</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Behaviour and neural responses in crucian carp to skin odours from cross-order species</title><author>Lastein, Stine ; Stabell, Ole B ; Larsen, Helene K ; Hamdani, El Hassan ; Døving, Kjell B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-d24210fda51f75993b6dbbeff2dc81cfaa14a69f6fb2981c791dbd626f3f0b973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>alarm substance</topic><topic>Carp</topic><topic>cross-order</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>fright reaction</topic><topic>Mental stimulation</topic><topic>Neurons</topic><topic>Odors</topic><topic>olfaction</topic><topic>Olfactory bulb</topic><topic>Olfactory pathways</topic><topic>pheromone</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Salmo trutta</topic><topic>single unit</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>skin extract</topic><topic>Teleostei</topic><topic>Trout</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lastein, Stine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stabell, Ole B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Helene K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamdani, El Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Døving, Kjell B</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lastein, Stine</au><au>Stabell, Ole B</au><au>Larsen, Helene K</au><au>Hamdani, El Hassan</au><au>Døving, Kjell B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behaviour and neural responses in crucian carp to skin odours from cross-order species</atitle><jtitle>Behaviour</jtitle><addtitle>BEH</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>925</spage><epage>939</epage><pages>925-939</pages><issn>0005-7959</issn><eissn>1568-539X</eissn><eissn>0005-7959</eissn><abstract>Many teleost species respond with fright reactions to olfactory cues from injured skin of conspecifics, but they may also display responses to skin extracts of heterospecific fish. In the present study, we exposed crucian carp to skin extracts of conspecifics and three cross-order species of fish (brown trout, pike, and perch). Behavioural experiments showed that conspecific skin extracts induced fright reactions in crucian carp; extracts of brown trout induced such behaviour less frequently, while extracts of perch and pike were poor inducers of fright responses. The olfactory bulb is chemo-topically organized, and different sub-sets of neurons respond to functionally related odorants that mediate distinct behaviours. Accordingly, behavioural responses to an alarm signal should be reflected by activation of the neurons mediating fright reaction. Extracellular recordings from single units in the olfactory bulb showed that the relay neurons activated by conspecific skin extracts were also activated by extracts of brown trout, whereas extracts of perch and pike less frequently activated these units. Thus, the difference in behavioural responses matched the differences in the neural responses, indicating that skin extracts of heterospecific fish are more likely to induce fright behaviour when the responding sub-set of olfactory neurons is similar to the sub-set responding to conspecific extracts. Our results suggest that responses to injured heterospecific fish rely on chemical resemblance between odorants from heterospecific and conspecific skin, and need not be based on any form of associative learning.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Brill</pub><doi>10.1163/1568539X-00003013</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0005-7959
ispartof Behaviour, 2012, Vol.149 (9), p.925-939
issn 0005-7959
1568-539X
0005-7959
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1268650962
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects alarm substance
Carp
cross-order
Fish
Freshwater
fright reaction
Mental stimulation
Neurons
Odors
olfaction
Olfactory bulb
Olfactory pathways
pheromone
Predators
Salmo trutta
single unit
Skin
skin extract
Teleostei
Trout
title Behaviour and neural responses in crucian carp to skin odours from cross-order species
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T02%3A53%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behaviour%20and%20neural%20responses%20in%20crucian%20carp%20to%20skin%20odours%20from%20cross-order%20species&rft.jtitle=Behaviour&rft.au=Lastein,%20Stine&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=925&rft.epage=939&rft.pages=925-939&rft.issn=0005-7959&rft.eissn=1568-539X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/1568539X-00003013&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41720596%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1268650962&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41720596&rfr_iscdi=true