The Intersection of Evidence-Based Practice With 5 Quality Improvement Methodologies
In this department, the authors highlight hot topics in nursing outcomes, research, and evidence-based practice relevant to the nurse administrator. The goal is to discuss the practical implications for nurse leaders in diverse healthcare settings. Content includes evidence-based projects and decisi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of nursing administration 2012-06, Vol.42 (6), p.299-304 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 304 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 299 |
| container_title | The Journal of nursing administration |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Seidl, Kristin L. Newhouse, Robin P. |
| description | In this department, the authors highlight hot topics in nursing outcomes, research, and evidence-based practice relevant to the nurse administrator. The goal is to discuss the practical implications for nurse leaders in diverse healthcare settings. Content includes evidence-based projects and decision making, locating measurement tools for quality improvement and safety projects, using outcome measures to evaluate quality, practice implications of administrative research, and exemplars of projects that demonstrate innovative approaches to organizational problems. In this article, the authors describe the intersection of various quality improvement methodologies with the evidence-based practice process. Five quality improvement approaches, plan-do-check-act, Six Sigma, Lean, root cause analysis, and failure mode effects analysis, are described and are used to frame examples. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31824ccdc9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1268081897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26822457</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26822457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-672316f30e3ab48a2ab3883e45d839f813617116e62e68291c2797e7139e305b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EokPhHyAUCVVik-J7nfixLFULI7UFpEEsI8e5IRmSuNhJq_57PJryUDddWdf-zvGxD2OvgR8DN-r91dXJMa85CBKgsXCuceYJW0EpTM4VwlO24pxjzotCHLAXMW7TWKDRz9kBogQlDazYZtNRtp5mCpHc3Psp8212dtM3NDnKP9hITfYl2HTkKPvez11WZl8XO_TzXbYer4O_oZGmObukufONH_yPnuJL9qy1Q6RX9-sh-3Z-tjn9lF98_rg-PbnIXcoEuVQoQLaCk7B1oS3aWmgtqCgbLUyrQaSUAJIkktRowKEyihQIQ4KXtThk7_a-KcevheJcjX10NAx2Ir_EClBqrkEb9TjKoVSlLBET-vYBuvVLmNJDEoVFul4LSFSxp1zwMQZqq-vQjzbcJajaFVSlgqqHBSXZm3vzpR6p-Sv608g_31s_7Fr5OSy3FKqO7DB3VaqQlwA8Rw7IZZry3dZOdrSXbePsw_9ZUHBVpY9ALEolfgNMpaUT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024713831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Intersection of Evidence-Based Practice With 5 Quality Improvement Methodologies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Seidl, Kristin L. ; Newhouse, Robin P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seidl, Kristin L. ; Newhouse, Robin P.</creatorcontrib><description>In this department, the authors highlight hot topics in nursing outcomes, research, and evidence-based practice relevant to the nurse administrator. The goal is to discuss the practical implications for nurse leaders in diverse healthcare settings. Content includes evidence-based projects and decision making, locating measurement tools for quality improvement and safety projects, using outcome measures to evaluate quality, practice implications of administrative research, and exemplars of projects that demonstrate innovative approaches to organizational problems. In this article, the authors describe the intersection of various quality improvement methodologies with the evidence-based practice process. Five quality improvement approaches, plan-do-check-act, Six Sigma, Lean, root cause analysis, and failure mode effects analysis, are described and are used to frame examples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-0721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31824ccdc9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22617691</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNUAAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Evidence and the Executive ; Evidence-based medicine ; Evidence-Based Practice - methods ; Humans ; Medication Errors - prevention & control ; Models, Organizational ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Organizational Case Studies ; Patients ; Quality Improvement ; Roles ; Root Cause Analysis ; Total Quality Management - methods ; United States</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nursing administration, 2012-06, Vol.42 (6), p.299-304</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Jun 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-672316f30e3ab48a2ab3883e45d839f813617116e62e68291c2797e7139e305b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-672316f30e3ab48a2ab3883e45d839f813617116e62e68291c2797e7139e305b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26822457$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26822457$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22617691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seidl, Kristin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newhouse, Robin P.</creatorcontrib><title>The Intersection of Evidence-Based Practice With 5 Quality Improvement Methodologies</title><title>The Journal of nursing administration</title><addtitle>J Nurs Adm</addtitle><description>In this department, the authors highlight hot topics in nursing outcomes, research, and evidence-based practice relevant to the nurse administrator. The goal is to discuss the practical implications for nurse leaders in diverse healthcare settings. Content includes evidence-based projects and decision making, locating measurement tools for quality improvement and safety projects, using outcome measures to evaluate quality, practice implications of administrative research, and exemplars of projects that demonstrate innovative approaches to organizational problems. In this article, the authors describe the intersection of various quality improvement methodologies with the evidence-based practice process. Five quality improvement approaches, plan-do-check-act, Six Sigma, Lean, root cause analysis, and failure mode effects analysis, are described and are used to frame examples.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Evidence and the Executive</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medication Errors - prevention & control</subject><subject>Models, Organizational</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Organizational Case Studies</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Root Cause Analysis</subject><subject>Total Quality Management - methods</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0002-0443</issn><issn>1539-0721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EokPhHyAUCVVik-J7nfixLFULI7UFpEEsI8e5IRmSuNhJq_57PJryUDddWdf-zvGxD2OvgR8DN-r91dXJMa85CBKgsXCuceYJW0EpTM4VwlO24pxjzotCHLAXMW7TWKDRz9kBogQlDazYZtNRtp5mCpHc3Psp8212dtM3NDnKP9hITfYl2HTkKPvez11WZl8XO_TzXbYer4O_oZGmObukufONH_yPnuJL9qy1Q6RX9-sh-3Z-tjn9lF98_rg-PbnIXcoEuVQoQLaCk7B1oS3aWmgtqCgbLUyrQaSUAJIkktRowKEyihQIQ4KXtThk7_a-KcevheJcjX10NAx2Ir_EClBqrkEb9TjKoVSlLBET-vYBuvVLmNJDEoVFul4LSFSxp1zwMQZqq-vQjzbcJajaFVSlgqqHBSXZm3vzpR6p-Sv608g_31s_7Fr5OSy3FKqO7DB3VaqQlwA8Rw7IZZry3dZOdrSXbePsw_9ZUHBVpY9ALEolfgNMpaUT</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Seidl, Kristin L.</creator><creator>Newhouse, Robin P.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>The Intersection of Evidence-Based Practice With 5 Quality Improvement Methodologies</title><author>Seidl, Kristin L. ; Newhouse, Robin P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-672316f30e3ab48a2ab3883e45d839f813617116e62e68291c2797e7139e305b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Evidence and the Executive</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medication Errors - prevention & control</topic><topic>Models, Organizational</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Organizational Case Studies</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Root Cause Analysis</topic><topic>Total Quality Management - methods</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seidl, Kristin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newhouse, Robin P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nursing administration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seidl, Kristin L.</au><au>Newhouse, Robin P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Intersection of Evidence-Based Practice With 5 Quality Improvement Methodologies</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nursing administration</jtitle><addtitle>J Nurs Adm</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>299-304</pages><issn>0002-0443</issn><eissn>1539-0721</eissn><coden>JNUAAK</coden><abstract>In this department, the authors highlight hot topics in nursing outcomes, research, and evidence-based practice relevant to the nurse administrator. The goal is to discuss the practical implications for nurse leaders in diverse healthcare settings. Content includes evidence-based projects and decision making, locating measurement tools for quality improvement and safety projects, using outcome measures to evaluate quality, practice implications of administrative research, and exemplars of projects that demonstrate innovative approaches to organizational problems. In this article, the authors describe the intersection of various quality improvement methodologies with the evidence-based practice process. Five quality improvement approaches, plan-do-check-act, Six Sigma, Lean, root cause analysis, and failure mode effects analysis, are described and are used to frame examples.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>22617691</pmid><doi>10.1097/NNA.0b013e31824ccdc9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-0443 |
| ispartof | The Journal of nursing administration, 2012-06, Vol.42 (6), p.299-304 |
| issn | 0002-0443 1539-0721 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1268081897 |
| source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Clinical outcomes Evidence and the Executive Evidence-based medicine Evidence-Based Practice - methods Humans Medication Errors - prevention & control Models, Organizational Nurses Nursing Organizational Case Studies Patients Quality Improvement Roles Root Cause Analysis Total Quality Management - methods United States |
| title | The Intersection of Evidence-Based Practice With 5 Quality Improvement Methodologies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A59%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Intersection%20of%20Evidence-Based%20Practice%20With%205%20Quality%20Improvement%20Methodologies&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nursing%20administration&rft.au=Seidl,%20Kristin%20L.&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=299-304&rft.issn=0002-0443&rft.eissn=1539-0721&rft.coden=JNUAAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/NNA.0b013e31824ccdc9&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26822457%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024713831&rft_id=info:pmid/22617691&rft_jstor_id=26822457&rfr_iscdi=true |