The Effect of Tax and Expenditure Limitations on Revenue Volatility: Evidence from Colorado
Much of the research on tax and expenditure limitations (TELs) focuses on the impact that limits have on the size of the public sector or the distribution of expenditures at the state and local levels. While these results shed light on the extent to which TELs succeed in reducing government spending...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public budgeting & finance 2012-10, Vol.32 (3), p.61-78 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 78 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 61 |
container_title | Public budgeting & finance |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | CLAIR, TRAVIS ST |
description | Much of the research on tax and expenditure limitations (TELs) focuses on the impact that limits have on the size of the public sector or the distribution of expenditures at the state and local levels. While these results shed light on the extent to which TELs succeed in reducing government spending, they do not have much to say about the impact of TELs on government budgeting or financial planning, despite the fact that voters support TELs in the hope of reducing government inefficiency (Courant, Gramlich, and Rubinfeld 1980; Ladd and Wilson 1982). This paper examines the effect of TELs on the stability of government revenues; sound tax policy entails controlling the volatility of revenues in order to plan more effectively for the future. Using panel data from Colorado's Division of Local Government as well as the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, this paper examines the impact of Colorado's 1992 Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) on local government finances. Results from difference‐in‐difference estimation suggest that TELs increase revenue and expenditure volatility. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2012.01016.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1266174046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2788532691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5106-804240f2f5ce9beb9474f2c52693ab8408e0e4deebec68b8acbff751164bc6a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv0zAYhiPEJMrgP1jiwiXhs2M7CQekUbUbUjXQKNuBg-U4n4VLGnd2MtJ_T0LRDjvNF1v28z7S5zdJCIWMTuvDLqOCQypKARkDyjKgQGU2vkgWjw8vkwWwQqSUArxKXse4AwAuC7FIfm5_IVlZi6Yn3pKtHonuGrIaD9g1rh8Cko3bu173zneR-I7c4AN2A5Jb306XreuPH8nqwTXYGSQ2-D1Z-tYH3fg3yZnVbcS3__fz5Md6tV1epZuvl1-WF5vUCAoyLYEzDpZZYbCqsa54wS0zgskq13XJoURA3iDWaGRZl9rU1haCUslrI7XMz5P3J-8h-PsBY6_2LhpsW92hH6KiTEpa8GniZ6CMckorDhP67gm680PopkHU9O8McimqWVieKBN8jAGtOgS31-GoKMwcVTs196DmHtRckPpXkBqn6KdT9I9r8fjsnPr2-WI9HydBehK42OP4KNDht5JFXgh1d32pNlfL7-vr9Y2q8r8rO6TN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1112036596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Tax and Expenditure Limitations on Revenue Volatility: Evidence from Colorado</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>CLAIR, TRAVIS ST</creator><creatorcontrib>CLAIR, TRAVIS ST</creatorcontrib><description>Much of the research on tax and expenditure limitations (TELs) focuses on the impact that limits have on the size of the public sector or the distribution of expenditures at the state and local levels. While these results shed light on the extent to which TELs succeed in reducing government spending, they do not have much to say about the impact of TELs on government budgeting or financial planning, despite the fact that voters support TELs in the hope of reducing government inefficiency (Courant, Gramlich, and Rubinfeld 1980; Ladd and Wilson 1982). This paper examines the effect of TELs on the stability of government revenues; sound tax policy entails controlling the volatility of revenues in order to plan more effectively for the future. Using panel data from Colorado's Division of Local Government as well as the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, this paper examines the impact of Colorado's 1992 Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) on local government finances. Results from difference‐in‐difference estimation suggest that TELs increase revenue and expenditure volatility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-1100</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2012.01016.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Appropriations and expenditures ; Bill of rights ; Census ; Colorado ; Estimation ; Expenditures ; Financial planning ; Government Spending ; Impact analysis ; Local Government ; Public Sector ; Revenue ; State government ; Studies ; Tax policy ; Taxation ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Public budgeting & finance, 2012-10, Vol.32 (3), p.61-78</ispartof><rights>2012 Public Financial Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Fall 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5106-804240f2f5ce9beb9474f2c52693ab8408e0e4deebec68b8acbff751164bc6a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5106-804240f2f5ce9beb9474f2c52693ab8408e0e4deebec68b8acbff751164bc6a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-5850.2012.01016.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-5850.2012.01016.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27842,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CLAIR, TRAVIS ST</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Tax and Expenditure Limitations on Revenue Volatility: Evidence from Colorado</title><title>Public budgeting & finance</title><addtitle>Public Budgeting & Finance</addtitle><description>Much of the research on tax and expenditure limitations (TELs) focuses on the impact that limits have on the size of the public sector or the distribution of expenditures at the state and local levels. While these results shed light on the extent to which TELs succeed in reducing government spending, they do not have much to say about the impact of TELs on government budgeting or financial planning, despite the fact that voters support TELs in the hope of reducing government inefficiency (Courant, Gramlich, and Rubinfeld 1980; Ladd and Wilson 1982). This paper examines the effect of TELs on the stability of government revenues; sound tax policy entails controlling the volatility of revenues in order to plan more effectively for the future. Using panel data from Colorado's Division of Local Government as well as the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, this paper examines the impact of Colorado's 1992 Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) on local government finances. Results from difference‐in‐difference estimation suggest that TELs increase revenue and expenditure volatility.</description><subject>Appropriations and expenditures</subject><subject>Bill of rights</subject><subject>Census</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Financial planning</subject><subject>Government Spending</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Local Government</subject><subject>Public Sector</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax policy</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0275-1100</issn><issn>1540-5850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFv0zAYhiPEJMrgP1jiwiXhs2M7CQekUbUbUjXQKNuBg-U4n4VLGnd2MtJ_T0LRDjvNF1v28z7S5zdJCIWMTuvDLqOCQypKARkDyjKgQGU2vkgWjw8vkwWwQqSUArxKXse4AwAuC7FIfm5_IVlZi6Yn3pKtHonuGrIaD9g1rh8Cko3bu173zneR-I7c4AN2A5Jb306XreuPH8nqwTXYGSQ2-D1Z-tYH3fg3yZnVbcS3__fz5Md6tV1epZuvl1-WF5vUCAoyLYEzDpZZYbCqsa54wS0zgskq13XJoURA3iDWaGRZl9rU1haCUslrI7XMz5P3J-8h-PsBY6_2LhpsW92hH6KiTEpa8GniZ6CMckorDhP67gm680PopkHU9O8McimqWVieKBN8jAGtOgS31-GoKMwcVTs196DmHtRckPpXkBqn6KdT9I9r8fjsnPr2-WI9HydBehK42OP4KNDht5JFXgh1d32pNlfL7-vr9Y2q8r8rO6TN</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>CLAIR, TRAVIS ST</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>The Effect of Tax and Expenditure Limitations on Revenue Volatility: Evidence from Colorado</title><author>CLAIR, TRAVIS ST</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5106-804240f2f5ce9beb9474f2c52693ab8408e0e4deebec68b8acbff751164bc6a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Appropriations and expenditures</topic><topic>Bill of rights</topic><topic>Census</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Financial planning</topic><topic>Government Spending</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Local Government</topic><topic>Public Sector</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax policy</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CLAIR, TRAVIS ST</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public budgeting & finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CLAIR, TRAVIS ST</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Tax and Expenditure Limitations on Revenue Volatility: Evidence from Colorado</atitle><jtitle>Public budgeting & finance</jtitle><addtitle>Public Budgeting & Finance</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>61-78</pages><issn>0275-1100</issn><eissn>1540-5850</eissn><abstract>Much of the research on tax and expenditure limitations (TELs) focuses on the impact that limits have on the size of the public sector or the distribution of expenditures at the state and local levels. While these results shed light on the extent to which TELs succeed in reducing government spending, they do not have much to say about the impact of TELs on government budgeting or financial planning, despite the fact that voters support TELs in the hope of reducing government inefficiency (Courant, Gramlich, and Rubinfeld 1980; Ladd and Wilson 1982). This paper examines the effect of TELs on the stability of government revenues; sound tax policy entails controlling the volatility of revenues in order to plan more effectively for the future. Using panel data from Colorado's Division of Local Government as well as the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, this paper examines the impact of Colorado's 1992 Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) on local government finances. Results from difference‐in‐difference estimation suggest that TELs increase revenue and expenditure volatility.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1540-5850.2012.01016.x</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0275-1100 |
ispartof | Public budgeting & finance, 2012-10, Vol.32 (3), p.61-78 |
issn | 0275-1100 1540-5850 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1266174046 |
source | EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Appropriations and expenditures Bill of rights Census Colorado Estimation Expenditures Financial planning Government Spending Impact analysis Local Government Public Sector Revenue State government Studies Tax policy Taxation Volatility |
title | The Effect of Tax and Expenditure Limitations on Revenue Volatility: Evidence from Colorado |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T21%3A36%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Tax%20and%20Expenditure%20Limitations%20on%20Revenue%20Volatility:%20Evidence%20from%20Colorado&rft.jtitle=Public%20budgeting%20&%20finance&rft.au=CLAIR,%20TRAVIS%20ST&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=61-78&rft.issn=0275-1100&rft.eissn=1540-5850&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2012.01016.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2788532691%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1112036596&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |