Phylogenetic relationships within the Eurasian catfish family Siluridae (Pisces: Siluriformes), with comments on generic validities and biogeography
A numerical cladistic analysis, based on 23 terminal groups and 63 morphological characters, was done to infer phylogenetic relationships within the Eurasian catfish family Siluridae. Nine hundred and forty‐five equally most parsimonious trees (134 steps, consistency index 0.634) were found that dif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zoological journal of the Linnean Society 1995-09, Vol.115 (1), p.1-46 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 46 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Zoological journal of the Linnean Society |
container_volume | 115 |
creator | BORNBUSCH, ALAN H. |
description | A numerical cladistic analysis, based on 23 terminal groups and 63 morphological characters, was done to infer phylogenetic relationships within the Eurasian catfish family Siluridae. Nine hundred and forty‐five equally most parsimonious trees (134 steps, consistency index 0.634) were found that differ in their resolutions of four polychotomies. Strict consensus of these trees includes ten internal nodes, does not support monophyly of Silurus, Ompok and Kryptopterus, as usually defined, and offers ambiguous support for monophyly of Wallago. Silurus and Kryptopterus are each composed of two non‐sister group clades, and Ompok is composed of at least two such clades. Heuristic searches constrained by monophyly of Silurus, Ompok or Kryptopterus yielded trees five or six steps longer than the shortest trees free of constraints. The strict consensus also infers a basal dichotomy that separates the Siluridae into a temperate Eurasian clade with about 20 nominal species and a subtropical/tropical south and southeast Asian clade with about 75 nominal species. The distributions of these clades overlap in a relatively narrow region of east Asia. A heuristic search for trees 1 step longer than the shortest trees yielded 253890 trees. A strict consensus of these trees also infers a basal dichotomy between the above‐mentioned clades. This analysis revealed four additional putative synapomorphies of the Siluridae, pending further resolution of the family's outgroup relationships. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb02322.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1257852317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1257852317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-f8e07372d25446b730e99a8432600b9de1c7dee0c40df7808a220f453872cfad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkdtu1DAQhi0EEkvhHSyuikSCDzlW3KCqu4AKXalFSNxYXmfczJLEi-2lm_fggUnYVe_xjeXxfP8cfkJec5by6bzbppzVRSKLTKS8rvM0bpiQQqSHJ2Tx-PWULBgTWZKxSjwnL0LYsuld5XxB_qzbsXP3MEBEQz10OqIbQou7QB8wtjjQ2AK92nsdUA_U6GgxtNTqHruR3mK399hooOdrDAbCxSlkne8hvHn7T4Qa1_cwxEDdQOdafqr1W3fYYEQIVA8N3eDUhbv3eteOL8kzq7sAr073Gfm2vLq7_Jhc36w-XX64Toxkgie2AlbKUjQiz7JiU0oGda2rTIqCsU3dADdlA8BMxhpbVqzSQjCb5bIqhbG6kWfk_Ki78-7XHkJU_TxE1-kB3D4oLvKyyoXk5ZR6cUw13oXgwaqdx177UXGmZivUVs37VvO-1WyFOlmhDhP8_gg_YAfjf5Dqx81nPuHJEccQ4fCIa_9TFdP8ufr-daW-LNer9fK2VnfyL-r-ox8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1257852317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogenetic relationships within the Eurasian catfish family Siluridae (Pisces: Siluriformes), with comments on generic validities and biogeography</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>BORNBUSCH, ALAN H.</creator><creatorcontrib>BORNBUSCH, ALAN H.</creatorcontrib><description>A numerical cladistic analysis, based on 23 terminal groups and 63 morphological characters, was done to infer phylogenetic relationships within the Eurasian catfish family Siluridae. Nine hundred and forty‐five equally most parsimonious trees (134 steps, consistency index 0.634) were found that differ in their resolutions of four polychotomies. Strict consensus of these trees includes ten internal nodes, does not support monophyly of Silurus, Ompok and Kryptopterus, as usually defined, and offers ambiguous support for monophyly of Wallago. Silurus and Kryptopterus are each composed of two non‐sister group clades, and Ompok is composed of at least two such clades. Heuristic searches constrained by monophyly of Silurus, Ompok or Kryptopterus yielded trees five or six steps longer than the shortest trees free of constraints. The strict consensus also infers a basal dichotomy that separates the Siluridae into a temperate Eurasian clade with about 20 nominal species and a subtropical/tropical south and southeast Asian clade with about 75 nominal species. The distributions of these clades overlap in a relatively narrow region of east Asia. A heuristic search for trees 1 step longer than the shortest trees yielded 253890 trees. A strict consensus of these trees also infers a basal dichotomy between the above‐mentioned clades. This analysis revealed four additional putative synapomorphies of the Siluridae, pending further resolution of the family's outgroup relationships.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-4082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-3642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb02322.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>catfishes ; cladistics ; freshwater ; Kryptopterus ; morphology ; Ompok ; phylogenehc relationships ; Siluridae ; Siluriformes ; Silurus ; Wallago</subject><ispartof>Zoological journal of the Linnean Society, 1995-09, Vol.115 (1), p.1-46</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-f8e07372d25446b730e99a8432600b9de1c7dee0c40df7808a220f453872cfad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-f8e07372d25446b730e99a8432600b9de1c7dee0c40df7808a220f453872cfad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BORNBUSCH, ALAN H.</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogenetic relationships within the Eurasian catfish family Siluridae (Pisces: Siluriformes), with comments on generic validities and biogeography</title><title>Zoological journal of the Linnean Society</title><description>A numerical cladistic analysis, based on 23 terminal groups and 63 morphological characters, was done to infer phylogenetic relationships within the Eurasian catfish family Siluridae. Nine hundred and forty‐five equally most parsimonious trees (134 steps, consistency index 0.634) were found that differ in their resolutions of four polychotomies. Strict consensus of these trees includes ten internal nodes, does not support monophyly of Silurus, Ompok and Kryptopterus, as usually defined, and offers ambiguous support for monophyly of Wallago. Silurus and Kryptopterus are each composed of two non‐sister group clades, and Ompok is composed of at least two such clades. Heuristic searches constrained by monophyly of Silurus, Ompok or Kryptopterus yielded trees five or six steps longer than the shortest trees free of constraints. The strict consensus also infers a basal dichotomy that separates the Siluridae into a temperate Eurasian clade with about 20 nominal species and a subtropical/tropical south and southeast Asian clade with about 75 nominal species. The distributions of these clades overlap in a relatively narrow region of east Asia. A heuristic search for trees 1 step longer than the shortest trees yielded 253890 trees. A strict consensus of these trees also infers a basal dichotomy between the above‐mentioned clades. This analysis revealed four additional putative synapomorphies of the Siluridae, pending further resolution of the family's outgroup relationships.</description><subject>catfishes</subject><subject>cladistics</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>Kryptopterus</subject><subject>morphology</subject><subject>Ompok</subject><subject>phylogenehc relationships</subject><subject>Siluridae</subject><subject>Siluriformes</subject><subject>Silurus</subject><subject>Wallago</subject><issn>0024-4082</issn><issn>1096-3642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkdtu1DAQhi0EEkvhHSyuikSCDzlW3KCqu4AKXalFSNxYXmfczJLEi-2lm_fggUnYVe_xjeXxfP8cfkJec5by6bzbppzVRSKLTKS8rvM0bpiQQqSHJ2Tx-PWULBgTWZKxSjwnL0LYsuld5XxB_qzbsXP3MEBEQz10OqIbQou7QB8wtjjQ2AK92nsdUA_U6GgxtNTqHruR3mK399hooOdrDAbCxSlkne8hvHn7T4Qa1_cwxEDdQOdafqr1W3fYYEQIVA8N3eDUhbv3eteOL8kzq7sAr073Gfm2vLq7_Jhc36w-XX64Toxkgie2AlbKUjQiz7JiU0oGda2rTIqCsU3dADdlA8BMxhpbVqzSQjCb5bIqhbG6kWfk_Ki78-7XHkJU_TxE1-kB3D4oLvKyyoXk5ZR6cUw13oXgwaqdx177UXGmZivUVs37VvO-1WyFOlmhDhP8_gg_YAfjf5Dqx81nPuHJEccQ4fCIa_9TFdP8ufr-daW-LNer9fK2VnfyL-r-ox8</recordid><startdate>199509</startdate><enddate>199509</enddate><creator>BORNBUSCH, ALAN H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199509</creationdate><title>Phylogenetic relationships within the Eurasian catfish family Siluridae (Pisces: Siluriformes), with comments on generic validities and biogeography</title><author>BORNBUSCH, ALAN H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-f8e07372d25446b730e99a8432600b9de1c7dee0c40df7808a220f453872cfad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>catfishes</topic><topic>cladistics</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>Kryptopterus</topic><topic>morphology</topic><topic>Ompok</topic><topic>phylogenehc relationships</topic><topic>Siluridae</topic><topic>Siluriformes</topic><topic>Silurus</topic><topic>Wallago</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BORNBUSCH, ALAN H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Zoological journal of the Linnean Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BORNBUSCH, ALAN H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogenetic relationships within the Eurasian catfish family Siluridae (Pisces: Siluriformes), with comments on generic validities and biogeography</atitle><jtitle>Zoological journal of the Linnean Society</jtitle><date>1995-09</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>1-46</pages><issn>0024-4082</issn><eissn>1096-3642</eissn><abstract>A numerical cladistic analysis, based on 23 terminal groups and 63 morphological characters, was done to infer phylogenetic relationships within the Eurasian catfish family Siluridae. Nine hundred and forty‐five equally most parsimonious trees (134 steps, consistency index 0.634) were found that differ in their resolutions of four polychotomies. Strict consensus of these trees includes ten internal nodes, does not support monophyly of Silurus, Ompok and Kryptopterus, as usually defined, and offers ambiguous support for monophyly of Wallago. Silurus and Kryptopterus are each composed of two non‐sister group clades, and Ompok is composed of at least two such clades. Heuristic searches constrained by monophyly of Silurus, Ompok or Kryptopterus yielded trees five or six steps longer than the shortest trees free of constraints. The strict consensus also infers a basal dichotomy that separates the Siluridae into a temperate Eurasian clade with about 20 nominal species and a subtropical/tropical south and southeast Asian clade with about 75 nominal species. The distributions of these clades overlap in a relatively narrow region of east Asia. A heuristic search for trees 1 step longer than the shortest trees yielded 253890 trees. A strict consensus of these trees also infers a basal dichotomy between the above‐mentioned clades. This analysis revealed four additional putative synapomorphies of the Siluridae, pending further resolution of the family's outgroup relationships.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb02322.x</doi><tpages>46</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0024-4082 |
ispartof | Zoological journal of the Linnean Society, 1995-09, Vol.115 (1), p.1-46 |
issn | 0024-4082 1096-3642 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1257852317 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | catfishes cladistics freshwater Kryptopterus morphology Ompok phylogenehc relationships Siluridae Siluriformes Silurus Wallago |
title | Phylogenetic relationships within the Eurasian catfish family Siluridae (Pisces: Siluriformes), with comments on generic validities and biogeography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A29%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogenetic%20relationships%20within%20the%20Eurasian%20catfish%20family%20Siluridae%20(Pisces:%20Siluriformes),%20with%20comments%20on%20generic%20validities%20and%20biogeography&rft.jtitle=Zoological%20journal%20of%20the%20Linnean%20Society&rft.au=BORNBUSCH,%20ALAN%20H.&rft.date=1995-09&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=1-46&rft.issn=0024-4082&rft.eissn=1096-3642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb02322.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1257852317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1257852317&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |