Contrasting pattern of mitochondrial population diversity between an estuarine bivalve, the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea, and the closely related Pacific oyster C. gigas

The Kumamoto oyster ( Crassostrea sikamea ) shows a spatially restricted distribution, favoring estuarine tideland environment. On the other hand, the Pacific oyster ( C. gigas ) has a broader range of habitat. The present study compared the mitochondrial population structure between the two closely...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine biology 2012-12, Vol.159 (12), p.2757-2776
Hauptverfasser: Sekino, Masashi, Sato, Shin’ichi, Hong, Jae-Sang, Li, Qi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2776
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2757
container_title Marine biology
container_volume 159
creator Sekino, Masashi
Sato, Shin’ichi
Hong, Jae-Sang
Li, Qi
description The Kumamoto oyster ( Crassostrea sikamea ) shows a spatially restricted distribution, favoring estuarine tideland environment. On the other hand, the Pacific oyster ( C. gigas ) has a broader range of habitat. The present study compared the mitochondrial population structure between the two closely related species. For accurate species identification of oysters sampled from Japanese and East Asian continental coasts, we performed sequencing analysis of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and PCR-RFLP assay of the first internal transcribed spacer of nuclear rRNA genes. Then, we estimated the extent of population differentiation within each of C. sikamea and C. gigas based on the mtDNA data. Few haplotypes were shared among the sites of sampling in C. sikamea , which contrasted with an extensive haplotype sharing among C. gigas samples. We discuss the mechanisms of elevated population differentiation observed in C. sikamea in light of the ecology and the ancient ocean geography around the present-day habitats.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00227-012-2037-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1257767481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A354662157</galeid><sourcerecordid>A354662157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-206d64768e1cbd766a07c89047ceb5c0778e993cdc5ee5c6bfbac80be00c7f4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEEkvhB3CzhJA4NIvtJHZyrFblQ1SCA5ytiTNJXRx7sZ1F21_FT8TLVuVDi3yw7HnedzzjKYrnjK4ZpfJ1pJRzWVLGS04rWd4-KFasrnjJZFc9LFY53JQVE_xx8STGG5rPkler4sfGuxQgJuMmsoWUMDjiRzKb5PW1d0MwYMnWbxcLyXhHBrPDEE3akx7Td0RHwBGMaYFgHJLe7MDu8JykayQflhlmnzzx-5iNySYnij6mgECi-QozwnmWD79gbX1EuycBcyYcyCfQZjT6Xrsmk5kgPi0ejWAjPrvbz4ovby4_b96VVx_fvt9cXJW6aWjKTRCDqKVokel-kEIAlbrtaC019o2mUrbYdZUedIPYaNGPPeiW9kiplmM9VGfFq6PvNvhvSy5QzSZqtBYc-iUqxhsphaxbltEX_6A3fgkuv04x1knW5o_oflMTWFTGjT73XR9M1UXV1EJw1shMlSeoCR0GsN7haPL1X_z6BJ_XgLPRJwXsKNDBxxhwVNtgZgh7xag6jJI6jpLKo6QOo6Rus-blXYEQNdgxgNMm3gu5EKxrapo5fuRiDrkJwx-N-K_5T4kz25I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1197181439</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrasting pattern of mitochondrial population diversity between an estuarine bivalve, the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea, and the closely related Pacific oyster C. gigas</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sekino, Masashi ; Sato, Shin’ichi ; Hong, Jae-Sang ; Li, Qi</creator><creatorcontrib>Sekino, Masashi ; Sato, Shin’ichi ; Hong, Jae-Sang ; Li, Qi</creatorcontrib><description>The Kumamoto oyster ( Crassostrea sikamea ) shows a spatially restricted distribution, favoring estuarine tideland environment. On the other hand, the Pacific oyster ( C. gigas ) has a broader range of habitat. The present study compared the mitochondrial population structure between the two closely related species. For accurate species identification of oysters sampled from Japanese and East Asian continental coasts, we performed sequencing analysis of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and PCR-RFLP assay of the first internal transcribed spacer of nuclear rRNA genes. Then, we estimated the extent of population differentiation within each of C. sikamea and C. gigas based on the mtDNA data. Few haplotypes were shared among the sites of sampling in C. sikamea , which contrasted with an extensive haplotype sharing among C. gigas samples. We discuss the mechanisms of elevated population differentiation observed in C. sikamea in light of the ecology and the ancient ocean geography around the present-day habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00227-012-2037-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MBIOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bivalvia ; Brackish ; Brackish water ecosystems ; Crassostrea ; Crassostrea sikamea ; Distribution ; Estuaries ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetic aspects ; Genetic diversity ; Geography ; Habitats ; Haplotypes ; Life Sciences ; Marine ; Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences ; Marine biology ; Microbiology ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Mollusks ; Oceanography ; Original Paper ; Oysters ; Population differentiation ; Population structure ; Sea water ecosystems ; Shellfish ; Synecology ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Marine biology, 2012-12, Vol.159 (12), p.2757-2776</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-206d64768e1cbd766a07c89047ceb5c0778e993cdc5ee5c6bfbac80be00c7f4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-206d64768e1cbd766a07c89047ceb5c0778e993cdc5ee5c6bfbac80be00c7f4d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00227-012-2037-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00227-012-2037-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26619540$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sekino, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shin’ichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jae-Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qi</creatorcontrib><title>Contrasting pattern of mitochondrial population diversity between an estuarine bivalve, the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea, and the closely related Pacific oyster C. gigas</title><title>Marine biology</title><addtitle>Mar Biol</addtitle><description>The Kumamoto oyster ( Crassostrea sikamea ) shows a spatially restricted distribution, favoring estuarine tideland environment. On the other hand, the Pacific oyster ( C. gigas ) has a broader range of habitat. The present study compared the mitochondrial population structure between the two closely related species. For accurate species identification of oysters sampled from Japanese and East Asian continental coasts, we performed sequencing analysis of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and PCR-RFLP assay of the first internal transcribed spacer of nuclear rRNA genes. Then, we estimated the extent of population differentiation within each of C. sikamea and C. gigas based on the mtDNA data. Few haplotypes were shared among the sites of sampling in C. sikamea , which contrasted with an extensive haplotype sharing among C. gigas samples. We discuss the mechanisms of elevated population differentiation observed in C. sikamea in light of the ecology and the ancient ocean geography around the present-day habitats.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bivalvia</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>Crassostrea</subject><subject>Crassostrea sikamea</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Haplotypes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Oysters</subject><subject>Population differentiation</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>Sea water ecosystems</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0025-3162</issn><issn>1432-1793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEEkvhB3CzhJA4NIvtJHZyrFblQ1SCA5ytiTNJXRx7sZ1F21_FT8TLVuVDi3yw7HnedzzjKYrnjK4ZpfJ1pJRzWVLGS04rWd4-KFasrnjJZFc9LFY53JQVE_xx8STGG5rPkler4sfGuxQgJuMmsoWUMDjiRzKb5PW1d0MwYMnWbxcLyXhHBrPDEE3akx7Td0RHwBGMaYFgHJLe7MDu8JykayQflhlmnzzx-5iNySYnij6mgECi-QozwnmWD79gbX1EuycBcyYcyCfQZjT6Xrsmk5kgPi0ejWAjPrvbz4ovby4_b96VVx_fvt9cXJW6aWjKTRCDqKVokel-kEIAlbrtaC019o2mUrbYdZUedIPYaNGPPeiW9kiplmM9VGfFq6PvNvhvSy5QzSZqtBYc-iUqxhsphaxbltEX_6A3fgkuv04x1knW5o_oflMTWFTGjT73XR9M1UXV1EJw1shMlSeoCR0GsN7haPL1X_z6BJ_XgLPRJwXsKNDBxxhwVNtgZgh7xag6jJI6jpLKo6QOo6Rus-blXYEQNdgxgNMm3gu5EKxrapo5fuRiDrkJwx-N-K_5T4kz25I</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Sekino, Masashi</creator><creator>Sato, Shin’ichi</creator><creator>Hong, Jae-Sang</creator><creator>Li, Qi</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Contrasting pattern of mitochondrial population diversity between an estuarine bivalve, the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea, and the closely related Pacific oyster C. gigas</title><author>Sekino, Masashi ; Sato, Shin’ichi ; Hong, Jae-Sang ; Li, Qi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-206d64768e1cbd766a07c89047ceb5c0778e993cdc5ee5c6bfbac80be00c7f4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bivalvia</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>Crassostrea</topic><topic>Crassostrea sikamea</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Haplotypes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Oysters</topic><topic>Population differentiation</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>Sea water ecosystems</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sekino, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shin’ichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jae-Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qi</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sekino, Masashi</au><au>Sato, Shin’ichi</au><au>Hong, Jae-Sang</au><au>Li, Qi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrasting pattern of mitochondrial population diversity between an estuarine bivalve, the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea, and the closely related Pacific oyster C. gigas</atitle><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle><stitle>Mar Biol</stitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2757</spage><epage>2776</epage><pages>2757-2776</pages><issn>0025-3162</issn><eissn>1432-1793</eissn><coden>MBIOAJ</coden><abstract>The Kumamoto oyster ( Crassostrea sikamea ) shows a spatially restricted distribution, favoring estuarine tideland environment. On the other hand, the Pacific oyster ( C. gigas ) has a broader range of habitat. The present study compared the mitochondrial population structure between the two closely related species. For accurate species identification of oysters sampled from Japanese and East Asian continental coasts, we performed sequencing analysis of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and PCR-RFLP assay of the first internal transcribed spacer of nuclear rRNA genes. Then, we estimated the extent of population differentiation within each of C. sikamea and C. gigas based on the mtDNA data. Few haplotypes were shared among the sites of sampling in C. sikamea , which contrasted with an extensive haplotype sharing among C. gigas samples. We discuss the mechanisms of elevated population differentiation observed in C. sikamea in light of the ecology and the ancient ocean geography around the present-day habitats.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00227-012-2037-z</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-3162
ispartof Marine biology, 2012-12, Vol.159 (12), p.2757-2776
issn 0025-3162
1432-1793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1257767481
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Bivalvia
Brackish
Brackish water ecosystems
Crassostrea
Crassostrea sikamea
Distribution
Estuaries
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetic aspects
Genetic diversity
Geography
Habitats
Haplotypes
Life Sciences
Marine
Marine & Freshwater Sciences
Marine biology
Microbiology
Mitochondrial DNA
Mollusks
Oceanography
Original Paper
Oysters
Population differentiation
Population structure
Sea water ecosystems
Shellfish
Synecology
Zoology
title Contrasting pattern of mitochondrial population diversity between an estuarine bivalve, the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea, and the closely related Pacific oyster C. gigas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A00%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrasting%20pattern%20of%20mitochondrial%20population%20diversity%20between%20an%20estuarine%20bivalve,%20the%20Kumamoto%20oyster%20Crassostrea%20sikamea,%20and%20the%20closely%20related%20Pacific%20oyster%20C.%20gigas&rft.jtitle=Marine%20biology&rft.au=Sekino,%20Masashi&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2757&rft.epage=2776&rft.pages=2757-2776&rft.issn=0025-3162&rft.eissn=1432-1793&rft.coden=MBIOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00227-012-2037-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA354662157%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1197181439&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A354662157&rfr_iscdi=true