Contrasting pattern of mitochondrial population diversity between an estuarine bivalve, the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea, and the closely related Pacific oyster C. gigas
The Kumamoto oyster ( Crassostrea sikamea ) shows a spatially restricted distribution, favoring estuarine tideland environment. On the other hand, the Pacific oyster ( C. gigas ) has a broader range of habitat. The present study compared the mitochondrial population structure between the two closely...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine biology 2012-12, Vol.159 (12), p.2757-2776 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2776 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2757 |
container_title | Marine biology |
container_volume | 159 |
creator | Sekino, Masashi Sato, Shin’ichi Hong, Jae-Sang Li, Qi |
description | The Kumamoto oyster (
Crassostrea sikamea
) shows a spatially restricted distribution, favoring estuarine tideland environment. On the other hand, the Pacific oyster (
C. gigas
) has a broader range of habitat. The present study compared the mitochondrial population structure between the two closely related species. For accurate species identification of oysters sampled from Japanese and East Asian continental coasts, we performed sequencing analysis of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and PCR-RFLP assay of the first internal transcribed spacer of nuclear rRNA genes. Then, we estimated the extent of population differentiation within each of
C. sikamea
and
C. gigas
based on the mtDNA data. Few haplotypes were shared among the sites of sampling in
C. sikamea
, which contrasted with an extensive haplotype sharing among
C. gigas
samples. We discuss the mechanisms of elevated population differentiation observed in
C. sikamea
in light of the ecology and the ancient ocean geography around the present-day habitats. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00227-012-2037-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1257767481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A354662157</galeid><sourcerecordid>A354662157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-206d64768e1cbd766a07c89047ceb5c0778e993cdc5ee5c6bfbac80be00c7f4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEEkvhB3CzhJA4NIvtJHZyrFblQ1SCA5ytiTNJXRx7sZ1F21_FT8TLVuVDi3yw7HnedzzjKYrnjK4ZpfJ1pJRzWVLGS04rWd4-KFasrnjJZFc9LFY53JQVE_xx8STGG5rPkler4sfGuxQgJuMmsoWUMDjiRzKb5PW1d0MwYMnWbxcLyXhHBrPDEE3akx7Td0RHwBGMaYFgHJLe7MDu8JykayQflhlmnzzx-5iNySYnij6mgECi-QozwnmWD79gbX1EuycBcyYcyCfQZjT6Xrsmk5kgPi0ejWAjPrvbz4ovby4_b96VVx_fvt9cXJW6aWjKTRCDqKVokel-kEIAlbrtaC019o2mUrbYdZUedIPYaNGPPeiW9kiplmM9VGfFq6PvNvhvSy5QzSZqtBYc-iUqxhsphaxbltEX_6A3fgkuv04x1knW5o_oflMTWFTGjT73XR9M1UXV1EJw1shMlSeoCR0GsN7haPL1X_z6BJ_XgLPRJwXsKNDBxxhwVNtgZgh7xag6jJI6jpLKo6QOo6Rus-blXYEQNdgxgNMm3gu5EKxrapo5fuRiDrkJwx-N-K_5T4kz25I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1197181439</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrasting pattern of mitochondrial population diversity between an estuarine bivalve, the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea, and the closely related Pacific oyster C. gigas</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sekino, Masashi ; Sato, Shin’ichi ; Hong, Jae-Sang ; Li, Qi</creator><creatorcontrib>Sekino, Masashi ; Sato, Shin’ichi ; Hong, Jae-Sang ; Li, Qi</creatorcontrib><description>The Kumamoto oyster (
Crassostrea sikamea
) shows a spatially restricted distribution, favoring estuarine tideland environment. On the other hand, the Pacific oyster (
C. gigas
) has a broader range of habitat. The present study compared the mitochondrial population structure between the two closely related species. For accurate species identification of oysters sampled from Japanese and East Asian continental coasts, we performed sequencing analysis of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and PCR-RFLP assay of the first internal transcribed spacer of nuclear rRNA genes. Then, we estimated the extent of population differentiation within each of
C. sikamea
and
C. gigas
based on the mtDNA data. Few haplotypes were shared among the sites of sampling in
C. sikamea
, which contrasted with an extensive haplotype sharing among
C. gigas
samples. We discuss the mechanisms of elevated population differentiation observed in
C. sikamea
in light of the ecology and the ancient ocean geography around the present-day habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00227-012-2037-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MBIOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bivalvia ; Brackish ; Brackish water ecosystems ; Crassostrea ; Crassostrea sikamea ; Distribution ; Estuaries ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetic aspects ; Genetic diversity ; Geography ; Habitats ; Haplotypes ; Life Sciences ; Marine ; Marine & Freshwater Sciences ; Marine biology ; Microbiology ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Mollusks ; Oceanography ; Original Paper ; Oysters ; Population differentiation ; Population structure ; Sea water ecosystems ; Shellfish ; Synecology ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Marine biology, 2012-12, Vol.159 (12), p.2757-2776</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-206d64768e1cbd766a07c89047ceb5c0778e993cdc5ee5c6bfbac80be00c7f4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-206d64768e1cbd766a07c89047ceb5c0778e993cdc5ee5c6bfbac80be00c7f4d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00227-012-2037-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00227-012-2037-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26619540$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sekino, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shin’ichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jae-Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qi</creatorcontrib><title>Contrasting pattern of mitochondrial population diversity between an estuarine bivalve, the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea, and the closely related Pacific oyster C. gigas</title><title>Marine biology</title><addtitle>Mar Biol</addtitle><description>The Kumamoto oyster (
Crassostrea sikamea
) shows a spatially restricted distribution, favoring estuarine tideland environment. On the other hand, the Pacific oyster (
C. gigas
) has a broader range of habitat. The present study compared the mitochondrial population structure between the two closely related species. For accurate species identification of oysters sampled from Japanese and East Asian continental coasts, we performed sequencing analysis of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and PCR-RFLP assay of the first internal transcribed spacer of nuclear rRNA genes. Then, we estimated the extent of population differentiation within each of
C. sikamea
and
C. gigas
based on the mtDNA data. Few haplotypes were shared among the sites of sampling in
C. sikamea
, which contrasted with an extensive haplotype sharing among
C. gigas
samples. We discuss the mechanisms of elevated population differentiation observed in
C. sikamea
in light of the ecology and the ancient ocean geography around the present-day habitats.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bivalvia</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>Crassostrea</subject><subject>Crassostrea sikamea</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Haplotypes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Oysters</subject><subject>Population differentiation</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>Sea water ecosystems</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0025-3162</issn><issn>1432-1793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEEkvhB3CzhJA4NIvtJHZyrFblQ1SCA5ytiTNJXRx7sZ1F21_FT8TLVuVDi3yw7HnedzzjKYrnjK4ZpfJ1pJRzWVLGS04rWd4-KFasrnjJZFc9LFY53JQVE_xx8STGG5rPkler4sfGuxQgJuMmsoWUMDjiRzKb5PW1d0MwYMnWbxcLyXhHBrPDEE3akx7Td0RHwBGMaYFgHJLe7MDu8JykayQflhlmnzzx-5iNySYnij6mgECi-QozwnmWD79gbX1EuycBcyYcyCfQZjT6Xrsmk5kgPi0ejWAjPrvbz4ovby4_b96VVx_fvt9cXJW6aWjKTRCDqKVokel-kEIAlbrtaC019o2mUrbYdZUedIPYaNGPPeiW9kiplmM9VGfFq6PvNvhvSy5QzSZqtBYc-iUqxhsphaxbltEX_6A3fgkuv04x1knW5o_oflMTWFTGjT73XR9M1UXV1EJw1shMlSeoCR0GsN7haPL1X_z6BJ_XgLPRJwXsKNDBxxhwVNtgZgh7xag6jJI6jpLKo6QOo6Rus-blXYEQNdgxgNMm3gu5EKxrapo5fuRiDrkJwx-N-K_5T4kz25I</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Sekino, Masashi</creator><creator>Sato, Shin’ichi</creator><creator>Hong, Jae-Sang</creator><creator>Li, Qi</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Contrasting pattern of mitochondrial population diversity between an estuarine bivalve, the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea, and the closely related Pacific oyster C. gigas</title><author>Sekino, Masashi ; Sato, Shin’ichi ; Hong, Jae-Sang ; Li, Qi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-206d64768e1cbd766a07c89047ceb5c0778e993cdc5ee5c6bfbac80be00c7f4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bivalvia</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>Crassostrea</topic><topic>Crassostrea sikamea</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Haplotypes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Oysters</topic><topic>Population differentiation</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>Sea water ecosystems</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sekino, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shin’ichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jae-Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qi</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sekino, Masashi</au><au>Sato, Shin’ichi</au><au>Hong, Jae-Sang</au><au>Li, Qi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrasting pattern of mitochondrial population diversity between an estuarine bivalve, the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea, and the closely related Pacific oyster C. gigas</atitle><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle><stitle>Mar Biol</stitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2757</spage><epage>2776</epage><pages>2757-2776</pages><issn>0025-3162</issn><eissn>1432-1793</eissn><coden>MBIOAJ</coden><abstract>The Kumamoto oyster (
Crassostrea sikamea
) shows a spatially restricted distribution, favoring estuarine tideland environment. On the other hand, the Pacific oyster (
C. gigas
) has a broader range of habitat. The present study compared the mitochondrial population structure between the two closely related species. For accurate species identification of oysters sampled from Japanese and East Asian continental coasts, we performed sequencing analysis of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and PCR-RFLP assay of the first internal transcribed spacer of nuclear rRNA genes. Then, we estimated the extent of population differentiation within each of
C. sikamea
and
C. gigas
based on the mtDNA data. Few haplotypes were shared among the sites of sampling in
C. sikamea
, which contrasted with an extensive haplotype sharing among
C. gigas
samples. We discuss the mechanisms of elevated population differentiation observed in
C. sikamea
in light of the ecology and the ancient ocean geography around the present-day habitats.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00227-012-2037-z</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-3162 |
ispartof | Marine biology, 2012-12, Vol.159 (12), p.2757-2776 |
issn | 0025-3162 1432-1793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1257767481 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Bivalvia Brackish Brackish water ecosystems Crassostrea Crassostrea sikamea Distribution Estuaries Freshwater & Marine Ecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetic aspects Genetic diversity Geography Habitats Haplotypes Life Sciences Marine Marine & Freshwater Sciences Marine biology Microbiology Mitochondrial DNA Mollusks Oceanography Original Paper Oysters Population differentiation Population structure Sea water ecosystems Shellfish Synecology Zoology |
title | Contrasting pattern of mitochondrial population diversity between an estuarine bivalve, the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea, and the closely related Pacific oyster C. gigas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A00%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrasting%20pattern%20of%20mitochondrial%20population%20diversity%20between%20an%20estuarine%20bivalve,%20the%20Kumamoto%20oyster%20Crassostrea%20sikamea,%20and%20the%20closely%20related%20Pacific%20oyster%20C.%20gigas&rft.jtitle=Marine%20biology&rft.au=Sekino,%20Masashi&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2757&rft.epage=2776&rft.pages=2757-2776&rft.issn=0025-3162&rft.eissn=1432-1793&rft.coden=MBIOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00227-012-2037-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA354662157%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1197181439&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A354662157&rfr_iscdi=true |