Shrubs versus 'gullivers': woody species coping with disturbance in grasslands
Resprouting of trees and shrubs in forestgrassland ecotones is a key process to understand the dynamics of these systems under different disturbance regimes. This study integrates resprouting of grassland shrubs and pioneer forest trees ('gullivers'), burned in subtropical lowland grasslan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant ecology 2012-11, Vol.213 (11), p.1757-1768 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1768 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1757 |
container_title | Plant ecology |
container_volume | 213 |
creator | Hermann, Julia-Maria Haug, Stephan Pillar, Valério DePatta Pfadenhauer, Jörg |
description | Resprouting of trees and shrubs in forestgrassland ecotones is a key process to understand the dynamics of these systems under different disturbance regimes. This study integrates resprouting of grassland shrubs and pioneer forest trees ('gullivers'), burned in subtropical lowland grassland and cut in temperate highland grassland of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Per grassland site, 20 individuals each of 1-2 grassland shrub species (Asteraceae) and two forest tree species (Myrsinaceae, Myrtaceae) were tagged, and postdisturbance survival and growth monitored for 1 year at 2-4 month intervals. Differences in resprouting vigour (summed-up basal area of resprouted shoots per pre-disturbance summed-up area of basal stems), and in density and allometry of resprouted shoots (allocation mode) were compared between tree and shrub species by linear mixed effects modelling and multiple comparisons, using the Tukey test. All grassland shrub individuals resprouted and regained 73-142 % (species average) of pre-disturbance basal area within one year, as opposed to 14-24 % in trees. All Myrtaceae 'gullivers' resprouted, but up to two-thirds of Myrsine individuals did not survive disturbance. Tree species tended to produce either many slender or few stout shoots, while shrub species were intermediate between these extremes. Forest trees regained 22-46 % of predisturbance height, independent of allocation mode, and grassland shrubs up to 73 %. This suggests that grassland fires allow grassland shrubs but not forest trees to persist and to grow to reproductive size. Differing sprout allocation modes may reflect allometric constraints rather than strategies to outgrow the fire-prone grass matrix. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11258-012-0131-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1257761946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A363688174</galeid><jstor_id>41686805</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A363688174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a8ecdfe13c16deb900ea06aaed314273648fffe55d9e6ef2d4f74bfdfbf75b813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFTEQhRtRcBz9AS6EBhfjpsdU53ndDYMvGHShrkM6qfTk0rdzTXXPMP_eXFpEXEgokgrnqxxymuYlsEtgTL8lgF6ajkFfi0MnHjVnIDXvJJP943rmRnas5_pp84xoz1iluDxrvny7LetA7R0WWqm9GNdpSqfm4l17n3N4aOmIPiG1Ph_TPLb3abltQ6JlLYObPbZpbsfiiCY3B3rePIluInzxez9vfnx4__36U3fz9ePn66ubzgtgS-cM-hARuAcVcNgxho4p5zBwEL3mSpgYI0oZdqgw9kFELYYY4hC1HAzw8-bNNvdY8s8VabGHRB6nagLzSrZ-htYKdkJV6et_pPu8lrm6swB8J0WvpKmqy001ugltmmNeivN1BTwkn2eMqd5fccWVMaBFBWADfMlEBaM9lnRw5cECs6dI7BaJrZHYUyT2xPQbQ1U7j1j-svIf6NUG7WnJ5c8rApRRhkn-CwD7mI8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1139542658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shrubs versus 'gullivers': woody species coping with disturbance in grasslands</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hermann, Julia-Maria ; Haug, Stephan ; Pillar, Valério DePatta ; Pfadenhauer, Jörg</creator><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Julia-Maria ; Haug, Stephan ; Pillar, Valério DePatta ; Pfadenhauer, Jörg</creatorcontrib><description>Resprouting of trees and shrubs in forestgrassland ecotones is a key process to understand the dynamics of these systems under different disturbance regimes. This study integrates resprouting of grassland shrubs and pioneer forest trees ('gullivers'), burned in subtropical lowland grassland and cut in temperate highland grassland of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Per grassland site, 20 individuals each of 1-2 grassland shrub species (Asteraceae) and two forest tree species (Myrsinaceae, Myrtaceae) were tagged, and postdisturbance survival and growth monitored for 1 year at 2-4 month intervals. Differences in resprouting vigour (summed-up basal area of resprouted shoots per pre-disturbance summed-up area of basal stems), and in density and allometry of resprouted shoots (allocation mode) were compared between tree and shrub species by linear mixed effects modelling and multiple comparisons, using the Tukey test. All grassland shrub individuals resprouted and regained 73-142 % (species average) of pre-disturbance basal area within one year, as opposed to 14-24 % in trees. All Myrtaceae 'gullivers' resprouted, but up to two-thirds of Myrsine individuals did not survive disturbance. Tree species tended to produce either many slender or few stout shoots, while shrub species were intermediate between these extremes. Forest trees regained 22-46 % of predisturbance height, independent of allocation mode, and grassland shrubs up to 73 %. This suggests that grassland fires allow grassland shrubs but not forest trees to persist and to grow to reproductive size. Differing sprout allocation modes may reflect allometric constraints rather than strategies to outgrow the fire-prone grass matrix.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-0237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11258-012-0131-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Allometry ; Applied Ecology ; Asteraceae ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Community & Population Ecology ; Disturbance ; Ecology ; Ecotones ; Fires ; Forest & brush fires ; Forest trees ; Forests ; Grasses ; Grassland fires ; Grasslands ; Highlands ; Life Sciences ; Lowlands ; Myrsinaceae ; Myrsine ; Myrtaceae ; Plant Ecology ; Plant reproduction ; Plant species ; Plants ; Population density ; Shoots ; Shrubs ; Stems ; Survival ; Terrestial Ecology ; Trees ; Woodland grasslands</subject><ispartof>Plant ecology, 2012-11, Vol.213 (11), p.1757-1768</ispartof><rights>2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a8ecdfe13c16deb900ea06aaed314273648fffe55d9e6ef2d4f74bfdfbf75b813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a8ecdfe13c16deb900ea06aaed314273648fffe55d9e6ef2d4f74bfdfbf75b813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41686805$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41686805$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Julia-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haug, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillar, Valério DePatta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfadenhauer, Jörg</creatorcontrib><title>Shrubs versus 'gullivers': woody species coping with disturbance in grasslands</title><title>Plant ecology</title><addtitle>Plant Ecol</addtitle><description>Resprouting of trees and shrubs in forestgrassland ecotones is a key process to understand the dynamics of these systems under different disturbance regimes. This study integrates resprouting of grassland shrubs and pioneer forest trees ('gullivers'), burned in subtropical lowland grassland and cut in temperate highland grassland of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Per grassland site, 20 individuals each of 1-2 grassland shrub species (Asteraceae) and two forest tree species (Myrsinaceae, Myrtaceae) were tagged, and postdisturbance survival and growth monitored for 1 year at 2-4 month intervals. Differences in resprouting vigour (summed-up basal area of resprouted shoots per pre-disturbance summed-up area of basal stems), and in density and allometry of resprouted shoots (allocation mode) were compared between tree and shrub species by linear mixed effects modelling and multiple comparisons, using the Tukey test. All grassland shrub individuals resprouted and regained 73-142 % (species average) of pre-disturbance basal area within one year, as opposed to 14-24 % in trees. All Myrtaceae 'gullivers' resprouted, but up to two-thirds of Myrsine individuals did not survive disturbance. Tree species tended to produce either many slender or few stout shoots, while shrub species were intermediate between these extremes. Forest trees regained 22-46 % of predisturbance height, independent of allocation mode, and grassland shrubs up to 73 %. This suggests that grassland fires allow grassland shrubs but not forest trees to persist and to grow to reproductive size. Differing sprout allocation modes may reflect allometric constraints rather than strategies to outgrow the fire-prone grass matrix.</description><subject>Allometry</subject><subject>Applied Ecology</subject><subject>Asteraceae</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Community & Population Ecology</subject><subject>Disturbance</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotones</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Forest & brush fires</subject><subject>Forest trees</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grassland fires</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Highlands</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lowlands</subject><subject>Myrsinaceae</subject><subject>Myrsine</subject><subject>Myrtaceae</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Shoots</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><subject>Stems</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Terrestial Ecology</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Woodland grasslands</subject><issn>1385-0237</issn><issn>1573-5052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuLFTEQhRtRcBz9AS6EBhfjpsdU53ndDYMvGHShrkM6qfTk0rdzTXXPMP_eXFpEXEgokgrnqxxymuYlsEtgTL8lgF6ajkFfi0MnHjVnIDXvJJP943rmRnas5_pp84xoz1iluDxrvny7LetA7R0WWqm9GNdpSqfm4l17n3N4aOmIPiG1Ph_TPLb3abltQ6JlLYObPbZpbsfiiCY3B3rePIluInzxez9vfnx4__36U3fz9ePn66ubzgtgS-cM-hARuAcVcNgxho4p5zBwEL3mSpgYI0oZdqgw9kFELYYY4hC1HAzw8-bNNvdY8s8VabGHRB6nagLzSrZ-htYKdkJV6et_pPu8lrm6swB8J0WvpKmqy001ugltmmNeivN1BTwkn2eMqd5fccWVMaBFBWADfMlEBaM9lnRw5cECs6dI7BaJrZHYUyT2xPQbQ1U7j1j-svIf6NUG7WnJ5c8rApRRhkn-CwD7mI8</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Hermann, Julia-Maria</creator><creator>Haug, Stephan</creator><creator>Pillar, Valério DePatta</creator><creator>Pfadenhauer, Jörg</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Shrubs versus 'gullivers': woody species coping with disturbance in grasslands</title><author>Hermann, Julia-Maria ; Haug, Stephan ; Pillar, Valério DePatta ; Pfadenhauer, Jörg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a8ecdfe13c16deb900ea06aaed314273648fffe55d9e6ef2d4f74bfdfbf75b813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Allometry</topic><topic>Applied Ecology</topic><topic>Asteraceae</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Community & Population Ecology</topic><topic>Disturbance</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotones</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Forest & brush fires</topic><topic>Forest trees</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grassland fires</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Highlands</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lowlands</topic><topic>Myrsinaceae</topic><topic>Myrsine</topic><topic>Myrtaceae</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Shoots</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><topic>Stems</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Terrestial Ecology</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Woodland grasslands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Julia-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haug, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillar, Valério DePatta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfadenhauer, Jörg</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hermann, Julia-Maria</au><au>Haug, Stephan</au><au>Pillar, Valério DePatta</au><au>Pfadenhauer, Jörg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shrubs versus 'gullivers': woody species coping with disturbance in grasslands</atitle><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle><stitle>Plant Ecol</stitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>213</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1757</spage><epage>1768</epage><pages>1757-1768</pages><issn>1385-0237</issn><eissn>1573-5052</eissn><abstract>Resprouting of trees and shrubs in forestgrassland ecotones is a key process to understand the dynamics of these systems under different disturbance regimes. This study integrates resprouting of grassland shrubs and pioneer forest trees ('gullivers'), burned in subtropical lowland grassland and cut in temperate highland grassland of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Per grassland site, 20 individuals each of 1-2 grassland shrub species (Asteraceae) and two forest tree species (Myrsinaceae, Myrtaceae) were tagged, and postdisturbance survival and growth monitored for 1 year at 2-4 month intervals. Differences in resprouting vigour (summed-up basal area of resprouted shoots per pre-disturbance summed-up area of basal stems), and in density and allometry of resprouted shoots (allocation mode) were compared between tree and shrub species by linear mixed effects modelling and multiple comparisons, using the Tukey test. All grassland shrub individuals resprouted and regained 73-142 % (species average) of pre-disturbance basal area within one year, as opposed to 14-24 % in trees. All Myrtaceae 'gullivers' resprouted, but up to two-thirds of Myrsine individuals did not survive disturbance. Tree species tended to produce either many slender or few stout shoots, while shrub species were intermediate between these extremes. Forest trees regained 22-46 % of predisturbance height, independent of allocation mode, and grassland shrubs up to 73 %. This suggests that grassland fires allow grassland shrubs but not forest trees to persist and to grow to reproductive size. Differing sprout allocation modes may reflect allometric constraints rather than strategies to outgrow the fire-prone grass matrix.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11258-012-0131-4</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1385-0237 |
ispartof | Plant ecology, 2012-11, Vol.213 (11), p.1757-1768 |
issn | 1385-0237 1573-5052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1257761946 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Allometry Applied Ecology Asteraceae Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Community & Population Ecology Disturbance Ecology Ecotones Fires Forest & brush fires Forest trees Forests Grasses Grassland fires Grasslands Highlands Life Sciences Lowlands Myrsinaceae Myrsine Myrtaceae Plant Ecology Plant reproduction Plant species Plants Population density Shoots Shrubs Stems Survival Terrestial Ecology Trees Woodland grasslands |
title | Shrubs versus 'gullivers': woody species coping with disturbance in grasslands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T00%3A05%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shrubs%20versus%20'gullivers':%20woody%20species%20coping%20with%20disturbance%20in%20grasslands&rft.jtitle=Plant%20ecology&rft.au=Hermann,%20Julia-Maria&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=213&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1757&rft.epage=1768&rft.pages=1757-1768&rft.issn=1385-0237&rft.eissn=1573-5052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11258-012-0131-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA363688174%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1139542658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A363688174&rft_jstor_id=41686805&rfr_iscdi=true |