British Unionism, the constitution and the referendum, c.1907-14
This article examines Unionist constitutional thought in general, and Unionism's advocacy of the referendum in particular, in the period leading up to the 1911 Parliament Act. It argues that though the events around Lloyd George's budget in 1909 were crucial in focusing Unionist attention...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 2012-08, Vol.85 (229), p.505-525 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 525 |
---|---|
container_issue | 229 |
container_start_page | 505 |
container_title | Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Manton, Kevin |
description | This article examines Unionist constitutional thought in general, and Unionism's advocacy of the referendum in particular, in the period leading up to the 1911 Parliament Act. It argues that though the events around Lloyd George's budget in 1909 were crucial in focusing Unionist attention on the constitution, the adoption of the referendum was a product of a longstanding view of constitutional relationships. The article shows how Unionists sought to demonstrate the practicality of their proposals and that, rather than being something that Unionists adopted out of political desperation, the referendum was in fact all of a piece with their broader political and constitutional outlook. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-2281.2011.00586.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1244667532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1244667532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4126-af8c624ac2808e188342b9412a6bab42ba34c31f40080d94a452b82c608428253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PAjEQhhujiYj-h028eHDX6ed2DyYqKpigJiLx2JRSQhF2sd2N8O8tYDh4spdOZp5n0r4IJRgyHM_VLMNMyJQQiTMCGGcAXIpsdYBa-8EhakHBIaUsx8foJIQZAGDOixa6ufOudmGaDEtXlS4sLpN6ahNTlaF2dVPHZqLL8bbp7cR6W46bCJkMF5CnmJ2io4meB3v2e7fR8PHhvdNL-6_dp85tPzUME5HqiTSCMG2IBGmxlJSRURFHWoz0KNaaMkPxhAFIGBdMM05GkhgBkhFJOG2ji93epa--GhtqtXDB2Plcl7ZqgsKEMSFyTklEz_-gs6rxZXydwkAoo0VOIVJyRxlfhRD_ppbeLbRfR0htolUztUlQbRJUm2jVNlq1iur1Tv12c7v-t6d6T4O3WEU_3fku1Ha197X_VCKnOVcfL1016HSe2b0sFKc_2ymKGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1023439730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>British Unionism, the constitution and the referendum, c.1907-14</title><source>Oxford Academic Journals (OUP)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Manton, Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Manton, Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines Unionist constitutional thought in general, and Unionism's advocacy of the referendum in particular, in the period leading up to the 1911 Parliament Act. It argues that though the events around Lloyd George's budget in 1909 were crucial in focusing Unionist attention on the constitution, the adoption of the referendum was a product of a longstanding view of constitutional relationships. The article shows how Unionists sought to demonstrate the practicality of their proposals and that, rather than being something that Unionists adopted out of political desperation, the referendum was in fact all of a piece with their broader political and constitutional outlook.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-3471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2281</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2281.2011.00586.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Constitutional law ; Labor unions ; Referendums</subject><ispartof>Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, 2012-08, Vol.85 (229), p.505-525</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Institute of Historical Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4126-af8c624ac2808e188342b9412a6bab42ba34c31f40080d94a452b82c608428253</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1468-2281.2011.00586.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1468-2281.2011.00586.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manton, Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>British Unionism, the constitution and the referendum, c.1907-14</title><title>Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research</title><description>This article examines Unionist constitutional thought in general, and Unionism's advocacy of the referendum in particular, in the period leading up to the 1911 Parliament Act. It argues that though the events around Lloyd George's budget in 1909 were crucial in focusing Unionist attention on the constitution, the adoption of the referendum was a product of a longstanding view of constitutional relationships. The article shows how Unionists sought to demonstrate the practicality of their proposals and that, rather than being something that Unionists adopted out of political desperation, the referendum was in fact all of a piece with their broader political and constitutional outlook.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Labor unions</subject><subject>Referendums</subject><issn>0950-3471</issn><issn>1468-2281</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1PAjEQhhujiYj-h028eHDX6ed2DyYqKpigJiLx2JRSQhF2sd2N8O8tYDh4spdOZp5n0r4IJRgyHM_VLMNMyJQQiTMCGGcAXIpsdYBa-8EhakHBIaUsx8foJIQZAGDOixa6ufOudmGaDEtXlS4sLpN6ahNTlaF2dVPHZqLL8bbp7cR6W46bCJkMF5CnmJ2io4meB3v2e7fR8PHhvdNL-6_dp85tPzUME5HqiTSCMG2IBGmxlJSRURFHWoz0KNaaMkPxhAFIGBdMM05GkhgBkhFJOG2ji93epa--GhtqtXDB2Plcl7ZqgsKEMSFyTklEz_-gs6rxZXydwkAoo0VOIVJyRxlfhRD_ppbeLbRfR0htolUztUlQbRJUm2jVNlq1iur1Tv12c7v-t6d6T4O3WEU_3fku1Ha197X_VCKnOVcfL1016HSe2b0sFKc_2ymKGg</recordid><startdate>201208</startdate><enddate>201208</enddate><creator>Manton, Kevin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201208</creationdate><title>British Unionism, the constitution and the referendum, c.1907-14</title><author>Manton, Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4126-af8c624ac2808e188342b9412a6bab42ba34c31f40080d94a452b82c608428253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Labor unions</topic><topic>Referendums</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manton, Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manton, Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>British Unionism, the constitution and the referendum, c.1907-14</atitle><jtitle>Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research</jtitle><date>2012-08</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>229</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>525</epage><pages>505-525</pages><issn>0950-3471</issn><eissn>1468-2281</eissn><abstract>This article examines Unionist constitutional thought in general, and Unionism's advocacy of the referendum in particular, in the period leading up to the 1911 Parliament Act. It argues that though the events around Lloyd George's budget in 1909 were crucial in focusing Unionist attention on the constitution, the adoption of the referendum was a product of a longstanding view of constitutional relationships. The article shows how Unionists sought to demonstrate the practicality of their proposals and that, rather than being something that Unionists adopted out of political desperation, the referendum was in fact all of a piece with their broader political and constitutional outlook.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-2281.2011.00586.x</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-3471 |
ispartof | Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, 2012-08, Vol.85 (229), p.505-525 |
issn | 0950-3471 1468-2281 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1244667532 |
source | Oxford Academic Journals (OUP); Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Advocacy Constitutional law Labor unions Referendums |
title | British Unionism, the constitution and the referendum, c.1907-14 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A55%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=British%20Unionism,%20the%20constitution%20and%20the%20referendum,%20c.1907-14&rft.jtitle=Historical%20research%20:%20the%20bulletin%20of%20the%20Institute%20of%20Historical%20Research&rft.au=Manton,%20Kevin&rft.date=2012-08&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=229&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=525&rft.pages=505-525&rft.issn=0950-3471&rft.eissn=1468-2281&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-2281.2011.00586.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1244667532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1023439730&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |