Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process
Abstract Background The aims of this study were to characterize obstacles affecting current sign-out practices and to evaluate the potential impact of standardized sign-out guidelines. Methods In June 2011, detailed guidelines for transitions of care were implemented, and a 29-item multiple-choice s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2013, Vol.205 (1), p.77-84 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 84 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 77 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 205 |
creator | Antonoff, Mara B., M.D Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D Krosch, Tara C., M.D Holley, Christopher T., M.D Maddaus, Michael A., M.D D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D |
description | Abstract Background The aims of this study were to characterize obstacles affecting current sign-out practices and to evaluate the potential impact of standardized sign-out guidelines. Methods In June 2011, detailed guidelines for transitions of care were implemented, and a 29-item multiple-choice survey was developed to assess sign-out practices, attitudes, and barriers to effective communication. Surveys were administered to residents and nurses at 3 time points. Comparisons between time points were assessed using t tests and χ2 tests (α = .05). Results Guideline implementation achieved nonsignificant improvements in satisfaction with sign-outs, perceptions of patient safety, adequacy of information provided in sign-out, and patient knowledge by on-call residents. On follow-up, concerns surfaced regarding less complete sign-out processes due to new duty-hour restrictions. Conclusions Guideline implementation mildly improved perceptions of safety and adequacy of sign-out; however, persistent barriers to continuity of care remain. Sign-out standardization may not adequately ensure patient safety, and further efforts to improve handoff processes are in need. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1240899182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961012004138</els_id><sourcerecordid>1240899182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-6a9bfec17f405f751aa57a82c2a26307555daa7d37578f0927109c2dd31979223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAQgC1ERbeFnwCyxIFeEmaceG1zAKGKR6tKHABxtLyOs3XIJq0nqdR_X0e7gNQLJ2vkb17fMPYSoUTA9duudLuO5rQtBaAoQZYA5glboVamQK2rp2wFAKIwa4RjdkLU5RCxrp6xYyGMNDVWK3b563p8Q9yPdyHFYcvHOfE-Bw0fh0DveO5wkyItXxuXUgyJeBz4dB04xe1QjPPEb9LoA9FzdtS6nsKLw3vKfn7-9OP8a3H17cvF-cerwte1noq1M5s2eFRtDbJVEp2TymnhhRPrCpSUsnFONZWSSrdghEIwXjRNhUYZIapTdravm_vezoEmu4vkQ9-7IYwzWRQ1aGNQL-jrR2iXFxzydJmqTC1Rm4WSe8qnkSiF1uaVdy7dWwS7yLadPci2i2wL0mbZOe_Vofq82YXmb9Yfuxn4sAdC1nGX3VnyMQw-NDEFP9lmjP9t8f5RBd_HIXrX_w73gf5tYynn2O_LxZeDowDIE-jqASRCpfE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1239451892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D ; Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D ; Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D ; Krosch, Tara C., M.D ; Holley, Christopher T., M.D ; Maddaus, Michael A., M.D ; D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D ; Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D ; Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D ; Krosch, Tara C., M.D ; Holley, Christopher T., M.D ; Maddaus, Michael A., M.D ; D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The aims of this study were to characterize obstacles affecting current sign-out practices and to evaluate the potential impact of standardized sign-out guidelines. Methods In June 2011, detailed guidelines for transitions of care were implemented, and a 29-item multiple-choice survey was developed to assess sign-out practices, attitudes, and barriers to effective communication. Surveys were administered to residents and nurses at 3 time points. Comparisons between time points were assessed using t tests and χ2 tests (α = .05). Results Guideline implementation achieved nonsignificant improvements in satisfaction with sign-outs, perceptions of patient safety, adequacy of information provided in sign-out, and patient knowledge by on-call residents. On follow-up, concerns surfaced regarding less complete sign-out processes due to new duty-hour restrictions. Conclusions Guideline implementation mildly improved perceptions of safety and adequacy of sign-out; however, persistent barriers to continuity of care remain. Sign-out standardization may not adequately ensure patient safety, and further efforts to improve handoff processes are in need.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22959413</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Behavior ; Continuity of patient care ; Continuity of Patient Care - standards ; Education ; General Surgery - education ; Handoff ; Handover ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Medical residencies ; Minnesota ; Nursing Staff, Hospital ; Patient Handoff - standards ; Patient Safety ; Personnel Staffing and Scheduling ; Physicians ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Practice Patterns, Nurses' - statistics & numerical data ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data ; Residency ; Sign-out ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Transition in care</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2013, Vol.205 (1), p.77-84</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-6a9bfec17f405f751aa57a82c2a26307555daa7d37578f0927109c2dd31979223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-6a9bfec17f405f751aa57a82c2a26307555daa7d37578f0927109c2dd31979223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1239451892?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,4012,27906,27907,27908,45978,64366,64368,64370,72220</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22959413$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krosch, Tara C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holley, Christopher T., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddaus, Michael A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The aims of this study were to characterize obstacles affecting current sign-out practices and to evaluate the potential impact of standardized sign-out guidelines. Methods In June 2011, detailed guidelines for transitions of care were implemented, and a 29-item multiple-choice survey was developed to assess sign-out practices, attitudes, and barriers to effective communication. Surveys were administered to residents and nurses at 3 time points. Comparisons between time points were assessed using t tests and χ2 tests (α = .05). Results Guideline implementation achieved nonsignificant improvements in satisfaction with sign-outs, perceptions of patient safety, adequacy of information provided in sign-out, and patient knowledge by on-call residents. On follow-up, concerns surfaced regarding less complete sign-out processes due to new duty-hour restrictions. Conclusions Guideline implementation mildly improved perceptions of safety and adequacy of sign-out; however, persistent barriers to continuity of care remain. Sign-out standardization may not adequately ensure patient safety, and further efforts to improve handoff processes are in need.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Continuity of patient care</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Handoff</subject><subject>Handover</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Medical residencies</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital</subject><subject>Patient Handoff - standards</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Nurses' - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Residency</subject><subject>Sign-out</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Transition in care</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAQgC1ERbeFnwCyxIFeEmaceG1zAKGKR6tKHABxtLyOs3XIJq0nqdR_X0e7gNQLJ2vkb17fMPYSoUTA9duudLuO5rQtBaAoQZYA5glboVamQK2rp2wFAKIwa4RjdkLU5RCxrp6xYyGMNDVWK3b563p8Q9yPdyHFYcvHOfE-Bw0fh0DveO5wkyItXxuXUgyJeBz4dB04xe1QjPPEb9LoA9FzdtS6nsKLw3vKfn7-9OP8a3H17cvF-cerwte1noq1M5s2eFRtDbJVEp2TymnhhRPrCpSUsnFONZWSSrdghEIwXjRNhUYZIapTdravm_vezoEmu4vkQ9-7IYwzWRQ1aGNQL-jrR2iXFxzydJmqTC1Rm4WSe8qnkSiF1uaVdy7dWwS7yLadPci2i2wL0mbZOe_Vofq82YXmb9Yfuxn4sAdC1nGX3VnyMQw-NDEFP9lmjP9t8f5RBd_HIXrX_w73gf5tYynn2O_LxZeDowDIE-jqASRCpfE</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D</creator><creator>Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D</creator><creator>Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D</creator><creator>Krosch, Tara C., M.D</creator><creator>Holley, Christopher T., M.D</creator><creator>Maddaus, Michael A., M.D</creator><creator>D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process</title><author>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D ; Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D ; Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D ; Krosch, Tara C., M.D ; Holley, Christopher T., M.D ; Maddaus, Michael A., M.D ; D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-6a9bfec17f405f751aa57a82c2a26307555daa7d37578f0927109c2dd31979223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Continuity of patient care</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Handoff</topic><topic>Handover</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Medical residencies</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital</topic><topic>Patient Handoff - standards</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Nurses' - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Residency</topic><topic>Sign-out</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Transition in care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krosch, Tara C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holley, Christopher T., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddaus, Michael A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D</au><au>Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D</au><au>Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D</au><au>Krosch, Tara C., M.D</au><au>Holley, Christopher T., M.D</au><au>Maddaus, Michael A., M.D</au><au>D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>205</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>77-84</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The aims of this study were to characterize obstacles affecting current sign-out practices and to evaluate the potential impact of standardized sign-out guidelines. Methods In June 2011, detailed guidelines for transitions of care were implemented, and a 29-item multiple-choice survey was developed to assess sign-out practices, attitudes, and barriers to effective communication. Surveys were administered to residents and nurses at 3 time points. Comparisons between time points were assessed using t tests and χ2 tests (α = .05). Results Guideline implementation achieved nonsignificant improvements in satisfaction with sign-outs, perceptions of patient safety, adequacy of information provided in sign-out, and patient knowledge by on-call residents. On follow-up, concerns surfaced regarding less complete sign-out processes due to new duty-hour restrictions. Conclusions Guideline implementation mildly improved perceptions of safety and adequacy of sign-out; however, persistent barriers to continuity of care remain. Sign-out standardization may not adequately ensure patient safety, and further efforts to improve handoff processes are in need.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22959413</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.009</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2013, Vol.205 (1), p.77-84 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1240899182 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Behavior Continuity of patient care Continuity of Patient Care - standards Education General Surgery - education Handoff Handover Hospitals Humans Internship and Residency Medical residencies Minnesota Nursing Staff, Hospital Patient Handoff - standards Patient Safety Personnel Staffing and Scheduling Physicians Practice Guidelines as Topic Practice Patterns, Nurses' - statistics & numerical data Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data Residency Sign-out Surgery Surveys and Questionnaires Transition in care |
title | Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A30%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who's%20covering%20our%20loved%20ones:%20surprising%20barriers%20in%20the%20sign-out%20process&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Antonoff,%20Mara%20B.,%20M.D&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=205&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=77-84&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1240899182%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1239451892&rft_id=info:pmid/22959413&rft_els_id=S0002961012004138&rfr_iscdi=true |