Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process

Abstract Background The aims of this study were to characterize obstacles affecting current sign-out practices and to evaluate the potential impact of standardized sign-out guidelines. Methods In June 2011, detailed guidelines for transitions of care were implemented, and a 29-item multiple-choice s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2013, Vol.205 (1), p.77-84
Hauptverfasser: Antonoff, Mara B., M.D, Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D, Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D, Krosch, Tara C., M.D, Holley, Christopher T., M.D, Maddaus, Michael A., M.D, D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 84
container_issue 1
container_start_page 77
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 205
creator Antonoff, Mara B., M.D
Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D
Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D
Krosch, Tara C., M.D
Holley, Christopher T., M.D
Maddaus, Michael A., M.D
D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D
description Abstract Background The aims of this study were to characterize obstacles affecting current sign-out practices and to evaluate the potential impact of standardized sign-out guidelines. Methods In June 2011, detailed guidelines for transitions of care were implemented, and a 29-item multiple-choice survey was developed to assess sign-out practices, attitudes, and barriers to effective communication. Surveys were administered to residents and nurses at 3 time points. Comparisons between time points were assessed using t tests and χ2 tests (α = .05). Results Guideline implementation achieved nonsignificant improvements in satisfaction with sign-outs, perceptions of patient safety, adequacy of information provided in sign-out, and patient knowledge by on-call residents. On follow-up, concerns surfaced regarding less complete sign-out processes due to new duty-hour restrictions. Conclusions Guideline implementation mildly improved perceptions of safety and adequacy of sign-out; however, persistent barriers to continuity of care remain. Sign-out standardization may not adequately ensure patient safety, and further efforts to improve handoff processes are in need.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1240899182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961012004138</els_id><sourcerecordid>1240899182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-6a9bfec17f405f751aa57a82c2a26307555daa7d37578f0927109c2dd31979223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAQgC1ERbeFnwCyxIFeEmaceG1zAKGKR6tKHABxtLyOs3XIJq0nqdR_X0e7gNQLJ2vkb17fMPYSoUTA9duudLuO5rQtBaAoQZYA5glboVamQK2rp2wFAKIwa4RjdkLU5RCxrp6xYyGMNDVWK3b563p8Q9yPdyHFYcvHOfE-Bw0fh0DveO5wkyItXxuXUgyJeBz4dB04xe1QjPPEb9LoA9FzdtS6nsKLw3vKfn7-9OP8a3H17cvF-cerwte1noq1M5s2eFRtDbJVEp2TymnhhRPrCpSUsnFONZWSSrdghEIwXjRNhUYZIapTdravm_vezoEmu4vkQ9-7IYwzWRQ1aGNQL-jrR2iXFxzydJmqTC1Rm4WSe8qnkSiF1uaVdy7dWwS7yLadPci2i2wL0mbZOe_Vofq82YXmb9Yfuxn4sAdC1nGX3VnyMQw-NDEFP9lmjP9t8f5RBd_HIXrX_w73gf5tYynn2O_LxZeDowDIE-jqASRCpfE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1239451892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D ; Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D ; Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D ; Krosch, Tara C., M.D ; Holley, Christopher T., M.D ; Maddaus, Michael A., M.D ; D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D ; Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D ; Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D ; Krosch, Tara C., M.D ; Holley, Christopher T., M.D ; Maddaus, Michael A., M.D ; D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The aims of this study were to characterize obstacles affecting current sign-out practices and to evaluate the potential impact of standardized sign-out guidelines. Methods In June 2011, detailed guidelines for transitions of care were implemented, and a 29-item multiple-choice survey was developed to assess sign-out practices, attitudes, and barriers to effective communication. Surveys were administered to residents and nurses at 3 time points. Comparisons between time points were assessed using t tests and χ2 tests (α = .05). Results Guideline implementation achieved nonsignificant improvements in satisfaction with sign-outs, perceptions of patient safety, adequacy of information provided in sign-out, and patient knowledge by on-call residents. On follow-up, concerns surfaced regarding less complete sign-out processes due to new duty-hour restrictions. Conclusions Guideline implementation mildly improved perceptions of safety and adequacy of sign-out; however, persistent barriers to continuity of care remain. Sign-out standardization may not adequately ensure patient safety, and further efforts to improve handoff processes are in need.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22959413</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Behavior ; Continuity of patient care ; Continuity of Patient Care - standards ; Education ; General Surgery - education ; Handoff ; Handover ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Medical residencies ; Minnesota ; Nursing Staff, Hospital ; Patient Handoff - standards ; Patient Safety ; Personnel Staffing and Scheduling ; Physicians ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Practice Patterns, Nurses' - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Residency ; Sign-out ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Transition in care</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2013, Vol.205 (1), p.77-84</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-6a9bfec17f405f751aa57a82c2a26307555daa7d37578f0927109c2dd31979223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-6a9bfec17f405f751aa57a82c2a26307555daa7d37578f0927109c2dd31979223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1239451892?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,4012,27906,27907,27908,45978,64366,64368,64370,72220</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22959413$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krosch, Tara C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holley, Christopher T., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddaus, Michael A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The aims of this study were to characterize obstacles affecting current sign-out practices and to evaluate the potential impact of standardized sign-out guidelines. Methods In June 2011, detailed guidelines for transitions of care were implemented, and a 29-item multiple-choice survey was developed to assess sign-out practices, attitudes, and barriers to effective communication. Surveys were administered to residents and nurses at 3 time points. Comparisons between time points were assessed using t tests and χ2 tests (α = .05). Results Guideline implementation achieved nonsignificant improvements in satisfaction with sign-outs, perceptions of patient safety, adequacy of information provided in sign-out, and patient knowledge by on-call residents. On follow-up, concerns surfaced regarding less complete sign-out processes due to new duty-hour restrictions. Conclusions Guideline implementation mildly improved perceptions of safety and adequacy of sign-out; however, persistent barriers to continuity of care remain. Sign-out standardization may not adequately ensure patient safety, and further efforts to improve handoff processes are in need.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Continuity of patient care</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Handoff</subject><subject>Handover</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Medical residencies</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital</subject><subject>Patient Handoff - standards</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Nurses' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Residency</subject><subject>Sign-out</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Transition in care</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAQgC1ERbeFnwCyxIFeEmaceG1zAKGKR6tKHABxtLyOs3XIJq0nqdR_X0e7gNQLJ2vkb17fMPYSoUTA9duudLuO5rQtBaAoQZYA5glboVamQK2rp2wFAKIwa4RjdkLU5RCxrp6xYyGMNDVWK3b563p8Q9yPdyHFYcvHOfE-Bw0fh0DveO5wkyItXxuXUgyJeBz4dB04xe1QjPPEb9LoA9FzdtS6nsKLw3vKfn7-9OP8a3H17cvF-cerwte1noq1M5s2eFRtDbJVEp2TymnhhRPrCpSUsnFONZWSSrdghEIwXjRNhUYZIapTdravm_vezoEmu4vkQ9-7IYwzWRQ1aGNQL-jrR2iXFxzydJmqTC1Rm4WSe8qnkSiF1uaVdy7dWwS7yLadPci2i2wL0mbZOe_Vofq82YXmb9Yfuxn4sAdC1nGX3VnyMQw-NDEFP9lmjP9t8f5RBd_HIXrX_w73gf5tYynn2O_LxZeDowDIE-jqASRCpfE</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D</creator><creator>Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D</creator><creator>Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D</creator><creator>Krosch, Tara C., M.D</creator><creator>Holley, Christopher T., M.D</creator><creator>Maddaus, Michael A., M.D</creator><creator>D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process</title><author>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D ; Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D ; Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D ; Krosch, Tara C., M.D ; Holley, Christopher T., M.D ; Maddaus, Michael A., M.D ; D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-6a9bfec17f405f751aa57a82c2a26307555daa7d37578f0927109c2dd31979223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Continuity of patient care</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Handoff</topic><topic>Handover</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Medical residencies</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital</topic><topic>Patient Handoff - standards</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Nurses' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Residency</topic><topic>Sign-out</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Transition in care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krosch, Tara C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holley, Christopher T., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddaus, Michael A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antonoff, Mara B., M.D</au><au>Berdan, Elizabeth A., M.D</au><au>Kirchner, Varvara A., M.D</au><au>Krosch, Tara C., M.D</au><au>Holley, Christopher T., M.D</au><au>Maddaus, Michael A., M.D</au><au>D'Cunha, Jonathan, M.D., Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>205</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>77-84</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The aims of this study were to characterize obstacles affecting current sign-out practices and to evaluate the potential impact of standardized sign-out guidelines. Methods In June 2011, detailed guidelines for transitions of care were implemented, and a 29-item multiple-choice survey was developed to assess sign-out practices, attitudes, and barriers to effective communication. Surveys were administered to residents and nurses at 3 time points. Comparisons between time points were assessed using t tests and χ2 tests (α = .05). Results Guideline implementation achieved nonsignificant improvements in satisfaction with sign-outs, perceptions of patient safety, adequacy of information provided in sign-out, and patient knowledge by on-call residents. On follow-up, concerns surfaced regarding less complete sign-out processes due to new duty-hour restrictions. Conclusions Guideline implementation mildly improved perceptions of safety and adequacy of sign-out; however, persistent barriers to continuity of care remain. Sign-out standardization may not adequately ensure patient safety, and further efforts to improve handoff processes are in need.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22959413</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.009</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 2013, Vol.205 (1), p.77-84
issn 0002-9610
1879-1883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1240899182
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Behavior
Continuity of patient care
Continuity of Patient Care - standards
Education
General Surgery - education
Handoff
Handover
Hospitals
Humans
Internship and Residency
Medical residencies
Minnesota
Nursing Staff, Hospital
Patient Handoff - standards
Patient Safety
Personnel Staffing and Scheduling
Physicians
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Practice Patterns, Nurses' - statistics & numerical data
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data
Residency
Sign-out
Surgery
Surveys and Questionnaires
Transition in care
title Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A30%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who's%20covering%20our%20loved%20ones:%20surprising%20barriers%20in%20the%20sign-out%20process&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Antonoff,%20Mara%20B.,%20M.D&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=205&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=77-84&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1240899182%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1239451892&rft_id=info:pmid/22959413&rft_els_id=S0002961012004138&rfr_iscdi=true