Death versus GDP! Decoding the Fatality Indicators on Work Safety Regulation in Post-Deng China

This article examines how Chinese reformers have used a set of “fatality indicators” to deal with the serious work safety situation in the past two decades. It argues that the system of fatality indicators is a prudent strategy to tackle the responsibility deficiencies in the previous work safety re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The China quarterly (London) 2012-06, Vol.210 (210), p.355-377
Hauptverfasser: Chan, Hon S., Gao, Jie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 377
container_issue 210
container_start_page 355
container_title The China quarterly (London)
container_volume 210
creator Chan, Hon S.
Gao, Jie
description This article examines how Chinese reformers have used a set of “fatality indicators” to deal with the serious work safety situation in the past two decades. It argues that the system of fatality indicators is a prudent strategy to tackle the responsibility deficiencies in the previous work safety regulatory system and strengthen the central government's supervision over local safety management. The primary purpose of implementing the fatality indicators is to shift local officials' focus from a GDP-centred growth mode to a new mindset of achieving a balance between economic development and social stability in local governance. The article also indicates that the decline in work-related fatalities in recent years is evidence of the effectiveness of the fatality indicators. These achievements aside, however, the introduction of fatality indicators is closely associated with an increase in local officials' dishonest reporting of real death tolls and the fluctuation in very serious accidents.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0305741012000379
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1240208514</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0305741012000379</cupid><jstor_id>23510690</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23510690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ef845ac35a0d1bfa122a7c9526bb3d51a1371a04e7a247c7f4147dc7c564f4bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU-LFDEQxYMoOK5-AA9CxIuXXqvypzN9lJnddWHBxVU8NjXp9EzGns6apIX99qaZZRFF9FSh3u-9JFWMvUQ4RUDz7gYkaKPKWQCANM0jtkBVLytRq-Vjtpjlatafsmcp7aFwGusFa9eO8o7_cDFNiV-sr1_ztbOh8-OW553j55Rp8PmOX46dt5RDTDyM_GuI3_gN9a4on9x2Gij70vYjvw4pV2tX7KudH-k5e9LTkNyL-3rCvpyffV59qK4-Xlyu3l9VVhnMleuXSpOVmqDDTU8oBBnbaFFvNrLTSCgNEihnSChjTa9Qmc4aq2vVq8KcsLfH3NsYvk8u5fbgk3XDQKMLU2pRKBCw1Kj-jaKotQSl4T9QlELWIGVB3_yG7sMUx_LnFsvwoZGimSk8UjaGlKLr29voDxTvCtTOi2z_WGTxvDp69qmM_8EgpEaom_mR8j6TDpvou6379eq_pf4EQXilwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030093293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Death versus GDP! Decoding the Fatality Indicators on Work Safety Regulation in Post-Deng China</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Chan, Hon S. ; Gao, Jie</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Hon S. ; Gao, Jie</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines how Chinese reformers have used a set of “fatality indicators” to deal with the serious work safety situation in the past two decades. It argues that the system of fatality indicators is a prudent strategy to tackle the responsibility deficiencies in the previous work safety regulatory system and strengthen the central government's supervision over local safety management. The primary purpose of implementing the fatality indicators is to shift local officials' focus from a GDP-centred growth mode to a new mindset of achieving a balance between economic development and social stability in local governance. The article also indicates that the decline in work-related fatalities in recent years is evidence of the effectiveness of the fatality indicators. These achievements aside, however, the introduction of fatality indicators is closely associated with an increase in local officials' dishonest reporting of real death tolls and the fluctuation in very serious accidents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0305741012000379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Accountability ; Aviation ; Central Government ; China ; Chinese languages ; Coal ; Death ; Death &amp; dying ; Economic Development ; Economic regulation ; Economic stabilization ; Effectiveness ; Fatalities ; GDP ; Governance ; Government ; Gross Domestic Product ; Indexes (Measures) ; Leadership ; Local government ; Mines ; Mining accidents &amp; safety ; Mortality ; Occupational accidents ; Occupational health ; Occupational safety ; Occupational Safety and Health ; Peoples Republic of China ; Regulation ; Regulatory reform ; Responsibility ; Safety management ; Safety standards ; Social stability ; Stability ; Supervision ; Traffic accidents ; Work place safety regulation</subject><ispartof>The China quarterly (London), 2012-06, Vol.210 (210), p.355-377</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The China Quarterly 2012</rights><rights>School of Oriental and African Studies, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ef845ac35a0d1bfa122a7c9526bb3d51a1371a04e7a247c7f4147dc7c564f4bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ef845ac35a0d1bfa122a7c9526bb3d51a1371a04e7a247c7f4147dc7c564f4bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23510690$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0305741012000379/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,12845,27924,27925,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Hon S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Jie</creatorcontrib><title>Death versus GDP! Decoding the Fatality Indicators on Work Safety Regulation in Post-Deng China</title><title>The China quarterly (London)</title><description>This article examines how Chinese reformers have used a set of “fatality indicators” to deal with the serious work safety situation in the past two decades. It argues that the system of fatality indicators is a prudent strategy to tackle the responsibility deficiencies in the previous work safety regulatory system and strengthen the central government's supervision over local safety management. The primary purpose of implementing the fatality indicators is to shift local officials' focus from a GDP-centred growth mode to a new mindset of achieving a balance between economic development and social stability in local governance. The article also indicates that the decline in work-related fatalities in recent years is evidence of the effectiveness of the fatality indicators. These achievements aside, however, the introduction of fatality indicators is closely associated with an increase in local officials' dishonest reporting of real death tolls and the fluctuation in very serious accidents.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Central Government</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Death &amp; dying</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Economic regulation</subject><subject>Economic stabilization</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Indexes (Measures)</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Mines</subject><subject>Mining accidents &amp; safety</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Occupational accidents</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Occupational Safety and Health</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulatory reform</subject><subject>Responsibility</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Safety standards</subject><subject>Social stability</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Traffic accidents</subject><subject>Work place safety regulation</subject><issn>0305-7410</issn><issn>1468-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU-LFDEQxYMoOK5-AA9CxIuXXqvypzN9lJnddWHBxVU8NjXp9EzGns6apIX99qaZZRFF9FSh3u-9JFWMvUQ4RUDz7gYkaKPKWQCANM0jtkBVLytRq-Vjtpjlatafsmcp7aFwGusFa9eO8o7_cDFNiV-sr1_ztbOh8-OW553j55Rp8PmOX46dt5RDTDyM_GuI3_gN9a4on9x2Gij70vYjvw4pV2tX7KudH-k5e9LTkNyL-3rCvpyffV59qK4-Xlyu3l9VVhnMleuXSpOVmqDDTU8oBBnbaFFvNrLTSCgNEihnSChjTa9Qmc4aq2vVq8KcsLfH3NsYvk8u5fbgk3XDQKMLU2pRKBCw1Kj-jaKotQSl4T9QlELWIGVB3_yG7sMUx_LnFsvwoZGimSk8UjaGlKLr29voDxTvCtTOi2z_WGTxvDp69qmM_8EgpEaom_mR8j6TDpvou6379eq_pf4EQXilwQ</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Chan, Hon S.</creator><creator>Gao, Jie</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Death versus GDP! Decoding the Fatality Indicators on Work Safety Regulation in Post-Deng China</title><author>Chan, Hon S. ; Gao, Jie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ef845ac35a0d1bfa122a7c9526bb3d51a1371a04e7a247c7f4147dc7c564f4bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Central Government</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Death &amp; dying</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Economic regulation</topic><topic>Economic stabilization</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Indexes (Measures)</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Mines</topic><topic>Mining accidents &amp; safety</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Occupational accidents</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Occupational Safety and Health</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulatory reform</topic><topic>Responsibility</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Safety standards</topic><topic>Social stability</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Traffic accidents</topic><topic>Work place safety regulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Hon S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Jie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The China quarterly (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Hon S.</au><au>Gao, Jie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Death versus GDP! Decoding the Fatality Indicators on Work Safety Regulation in Post-Deng China</atitle><jtitle>The China quarterly (London)</jtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>210</volume><issue>210</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>355-377</pages><issn>0305-7410</issn><eissn>1468-2648</eissn><abstract>This article examines how Chinese reformers have used a set of “fatality indicators” to deal with the serious work safety situation in the past two decades. It argues that the system of fatality indicators is a prudent strategy to tackle the responsibility deficiencies in the previous work safety regulatory system and strengthen the central government's supervision over local safety management. The primary purpose of implementing the fatality indicators is to shift local officials' focus from a GDP-centred growth mode to a new mindset of achieving a balance between economic development and social stability in local governance. The article also indicates that the decline in work-related fatalities in recent years is evidence of the effectiveness of the fatality indicators. These achievements aside, however, the introduction of fatality indicators is closely associated with an increase in local officials' dishonest reporting of real death tolls and the fluctuation in very serious accidents.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0305741012000379</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-7410
ispartof The China quarterly (London), 2012-06, Vol.210 (210), p.355-377
issn 0305-7410
1468-2648
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1240208514
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Accidents
Accountability
Aviation
Central Government
China
Chinese languages
Coal
Death
Death & dying
Economic Development
Economic regulation
Economic stabilization
Effectiveness
Fatalities
GDP
Governance
Government
Gross Domestic Product
Indexes (Measures)
Leadership
Local government
Mines
Mining accidents & safety
Mortality
Occupational accidents
Occupational health
Occupational safety
Occupational Safety and Health
Peoples Republic of China
Regulation
Regulatory reform
Responsibility
Safety management
Safety standards
Social stability
Stability
Supervision
Traffic accidents
Work place safety regulation
title Death versus GDP! Decoding the Fatality Indicators on Work Safety Regulation in Post-Deng China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T05%3A15%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Death%20versus%20GDP!%20Decoding%20the%20Fatality%20Indicators%20on%20Work%20Safety%20Regulation%20in%20Post-Deng%20China&rft.jtitle=The%20China%20quarterly%20(London)&rft.au=Chan,%20Hon%20S.&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=210&rft.issue=210&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=355-377&rft.issn=0305-7410&rft.eissn=1468-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0305741012000379&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23510690%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030093293&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0305741012000379&rft_jstor_id=23510690&rfr_iscdi=true