Linear and Daily Undulating Resistance Training Periodizations Have Differential Beneficial Effects in Young Sedentary Women
Abstract The aim of this randomized controlled study was to verify the impact of a 12-weeks muscular endurance (ME) training of high repetitions (i. e., 15–30) with 2 different periodization models on body composition, maximal strength, muscular endurance and cardiorespiratory fitness. Twenty eight...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of sports medicine 2012-09, Vol.33 (9), p.723-727 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 727 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 723 |
| container_title | International journal of sports medicine |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | de Lima, C. Boullosa, D. A. Frollini, A. B. Donatto, F. F. Leite, R. D. Gonelli, P.R. G. Montebello, M.I. L. Prestes, J. Cesar, M. C. |
| description | Abstract
The aim of this randomized controlled study was to verify the impact of a 12-weeks muscular endurance (ME) training of high repetitions (i. e., 15–30) with 2 different periodization models on body composition, maximal strength, muscular endurance and cardiorespiratory fitness. Twenty eight sedentary women aged 20–35 years were randomly assigned to: control (CON) (n=8), linear periodization (LP) (n=10) and daily undulating periodization (DUP) (n=10). LP and DUP models significantly improved body composition, maximal strength and ME. However, no significant changes were detected for cardiorespiratory fitness. LP showed a higher body fat loss ( − 12.73%) compared to DUP ( − 9.93%) (
p
=0.049), and systematically higher effect sizes (ES) when compared with DUP for maximal strength and cardiorespiratory fitness parameters (e. g. ES=0.53 for ventilatory threshold). In contrast, DUP exhibited a significantly (
p
=0.002) greater ME gain (129.43%) compared to LP (70.72%) in bench press, and greater ES in all exercises. It may be suggested that LP performed with a high number of repetitions may be considered an appropriate periodization model for untrained young women that would likely lead to the improvement of body composition and maximum strength performance, whereas DUP is more effective for the development of ME. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-0032-1306324 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1238119657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1034803609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-31cd45dd21a79e3aa4ea0956b639bbf35d30ccb89ef298f5bb6b93a76f5c40693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EosvClSPyBYlLir-zPkJb2korFUErxCmaOGNwlTitnSAV9cfjaLflhDjNaPTMOx8vIa85O-RM6_e5YkyKiktmpFBPyIoraStpjXpKVozXolJGiAPyIudrxriyXD4nB0JoI2plVuR-GyJCohA7egyhv6NXsZt7mEL8Qb9gDnmC6JBeJghxqX3GFMYu_C7EGDM9g19Ij4P3mDBOAXr6ESP64Jb0pJTdlGmI9Ps4l-av2BUK0h39Ng4YX5JnHvqMr_ZxTa4-nVwenVXbi9Pzow_bypVDpkpy1ynddYJDbVECKARmtWmNtG3rpe4kc67dWPTCbrxuW9NaCbXx2ilmrFyTdzvdmzTezpinZgjZYd9DxHHODRdyw7k1uv4_yqTaMGnYonq4Q10ac07om5sUhnJcgZrFnCY3iznN3pzS8GavPbcDdo_4gxsFeLsHIDvofSqvD_kvVyjOywZrUu246WfAAZvrcU6xPPBfg_8ABS2l6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034803609</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linear and Daily Undulating Resistance Training Periodizations Have Differential Beneficial Effects in Young Sedentary Women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>de Lima, C. ; Boullosa, D. A. ; Frollini, A. B. ; Donatto, F. F. ; Leite, R. D. ; Gonelli, P.R. G. ; Montebello, M.I. L. ; Prestes, J. ; Cesar, M. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Lima, C. ; Boullosa, D. A. ; Frollini, A. B. ; Donatto, F. F. ; Leite, R. D. ; Gonelli, P.R. G. ; Montebello, M.I. L. ; Prestes, J. ; Cesar, M. C.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
The aim of this randomized controlled study was to verify the impact of a 12-weeks muscular endurance (ME) training of high repetitions (i. e., 15–30) with 2 different periodization models on body composition, maximal strength, muscular endurance and cardiorespiratory fitness. Twenty eight sedentary women aged 20–35 years were randomly assigned to: control (CON) (n=8), linear periodization (LP) (n=10) and daily undulating periodization (DUP) (n=10). LP and DUP models significantly improved body composition, maximal strength and ME. However, no significant changes were detected for cardiorespiratory fitness. LP showed a higher body fat loss ( − 12.73%) compared to DUP ( − 9.93%) (
p
=0.049), and systematically higher effect sizes (ES) when compared with DUP for maximal strength and cardiorespiratory fitness parameters (e. g. ES=0.53 for ventilatory threshold). In contrast, DUP exhibited a significantly (
p
=0.002) greater ME gain (129.43%) compared to LP (70.72%) in bench press, and greater ES in all exercises. It may be suggested that LP performed with a high number of repetitions may be considered an appropriate periodization model for untrained young women that would likely lead to the improvement of body composition and maximum strength performance, whereas DUP is more effective for the development of ME.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0172-4622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-3964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1306324</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22562746</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJSMDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stuttgart · New York: Georg Thieme Verlag KG</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anaerobic Threshold - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body composition ; Body Composition - physiology ; Cardiorespiratory endurance ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Models, Theoretical ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Muscular endurance ; Physical Endurance - physiology ; Physical Fitness - physiology ; Resistance Training - methods ; Sedentary Lifestyle ; Sports medicine ; Strength ; Strength (performance) ; Time Factors ; Training & Testing ; Ventilatory threshold ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports ; Women ; Young Adult ; Youth</subject><ispartof>International journal of sports medicine, 2012-09, Vol.33 (9), p.723-727</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-31cd45dd21a79e3aa4ea0956b639bbf35d30ccb89ef298f5bb6b93a76f5c40693</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0032-1306324.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0032-1306324$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3017,3018,27924,27925,54559,54560</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26271110$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22562746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Lima, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boullosa, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frollini, A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donatto, F. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, R. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonelli, P.R. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montebello, M.I. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prestes, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesar, M. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Linear and Daily Undulating Resistance Training Periodizations Have Differential Beneficial Effects in Young Sedentary Women</title><title>International journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Abstract
The aim of this randomized controlled study was to verify the impact of a 12-weeks muscular endurance (ME) training of high repetitions (i. e., 15–30) with 2 different periodization models on body composition, maximal strength, muscular endurance and cardiorespiratory fitness. Twenty eight sedentary women aged 20–35 years were randomly assigned to: control (CON) (n=8), linear periodization (LP) (n=10) and daily undulating periodization (DUP) (n=10). LP and DUP models significantly improved body composition, maximal strength and ME. However, no significant changes were detected for cardiorespiratory fitness. LP showed a higher body fat loss ( − 12.73%) compared to DUP ( − 9.93%) (
p
=0.049), and systematically higher effect sizes (ES) when compared with DUP for maximal strength and cardiorespiratory fitness parameters (e. g. ES=0.53 for ventilatory threshold). In contrast, DUP exhibited a significantly (
p
=0.002) greater ME gain (129.43%) compared to LP (70.72%) in bench press, and greater ES in all exercises. It may be suggested that LP performed with a high number of repetitions may be considered an appropriate periodization model for untrained young women that would likely lead to the improvement of body composition and maximum strength performance, whereas DUP is more effective for the development of ME.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anaerobic Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body composition</subject><subject>Body Composition - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiorespiratory endurance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Muscular endurance</subject><subject>Physical Endurance - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Fitness - physiology</subject><subject>Resistance Training - methods</subject><subject>Sedentary Lifestyle</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Strength (performance)</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Training & Testing</subject><subject>Ventilatory threshold</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0172-4622</issn><issn>1439-3964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EosvClSPyBYlLir-zPkJb2korFUErxCmaOGNwlTitnSAV9cfjaLflhDjNaPTMOx8vIa85O-RM6_e5YkyKiktmpFBPyIoraStpjXpKVozXolJGiAPyIudrxriyXD4nB0JoI2plVuR-GyJCohA7egyhv6NXsZt7mEL8Qb9gDnmC6JBeJghxqX3GFMYu_C7EGDM9g19Ij4P3mDBOAXr6ESP64Jb0pJTdlGmI9Ps4l-av2BUK0h39Ng4YX5JnHvqMr_ZxTa4-nVwenVXbi9Pzow_bypVDpkpy1ynddYJDbVECKARmtWmNtG3rpe4kc67dWPTCbrxuW9NaCbXx2ilmrFyTdzvdmzTezpinZgjZYd9DxHHODRdyw7k1uv4_yqTaMGnYonq4Q10ac07om5sUhnJcgZrFnCY3iznN3pzS8GavPbcDdo_4gxsFeLsHIDvofSqvD_kvVyjOywZrUu246WfAAZvrcU6xPPBfg_8ABS2l6A</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>de Lima, C.</creator><creator>Boullosa, D. A.</creator><creator>Frollini, A. B.</creator><creator>Donatto, F. F.</creator><creator>Leite, R. D.</creator><creator>Gonelli, P.R. G.</creator><creator>Montebello, M.I. L.</creator><creator>Prestes, J.</creator><creator>Cesar, M. C.</creator><general>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</general><general>Thieme</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Linear and Daily Undulating Resistance Training Periodizations Have Differential Beneficial Effects in Young Sedentary Women</title><author>de Lima, C. ; Boullosa, D. A. ; Frollini, A. B. ; Donatto, F. F. ; Leite, R. D. ; Gonelli, P.R. G. ; Montebello, M.I. L. ; Prestes, J. ; Cesar, M. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-31cd45dd21a79e3aa4ea0956b639bbf35d30ccb89ef298f5bb6b93a76f5c40693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anaerobic Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body composition</topic><topic>Body Composition - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiorespiratory endurance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Muscular endurance</topic><topic>Physical Endurance - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Fitness - physiology</topic><topic>Resistance Training - methods</topic><topic>Sedentary Lifestyle</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Strength (performance)</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Training & Testing</topic><topic>Ventilatory threshold</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Lima, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boullosa, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frollini, A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donatto, F. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, R. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonelli, P.R. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montebello, M.I. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prestes, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesar, M. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>International journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Lima, C.</au><au>Boullosa, D. A.</au><au>Frollini, A. B.</au><au>Donatto, F. F.</au><au>Leite, R. D.</au><au>Gonelli, P.R. G.</au><au>Montebello, M.I. L.</au><au>Prestes, J.</au><au>Cesar, M. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linear and Daily Undulating Resistance Training Periodizations Have Differential Beneficial Effects in Young Sedentary Women</atitle><jtitle>International journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>723</spage><epage>727</epage><pages>723-727</pages><issn>0172-4622</issn><eissn>1439-3964</eissn><coden>IJSMDA</coden><abstract>Abstract
The aim of this randomized controlled study was to verify the impact of a 12-weeks muscular endurance (ME) training of high repetitions (i. e., 15–30) with 2 different periodization models on body composition, maximal strength, muscular endurance and cardiorespiratory fitness. Twenty eight sedentary women aged 20–35 years were randomly assigned to: control (CON) (n=8), linear periodization (LP) (n=10) and daily undulating periodization (DUP) (n=10). LP and DUP models significantly improved body composition, maximal strength and ME. However, no significant changes were detected for cardiorespiratory fitness. LP showed a higher body fat loss ( − 12.73%) compared to DUP ( − 9.93%) (
p
=0.049), and systematically higher effect sizes (ES) when compared with DUP for maximal strength and cardiorespiratory fitness parameters (e. g. ES=0.53 for ventilatory threshold). In contrast, DUP exhibited a significantly (
p
=0.002) greater ME gain (129.43%) compared to LP (70.72%) in bench press, and greater ES in all exercises. It may be suggested that LP performed with a high number of repetitions may be considered an appropriate periodization model for untrained young women that would likely lead to the improvement of body composition and maximum strength performance, whereas DUP is more effective for the development of ME.</abstract><cop>Stuttgart · New York</cop><pub>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</pub><pmid>22562746</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0032-1306324</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0172-4622 |
| ispartof | International journal of sports medicine, 2012-09, Vol.33 (9), p.723-727 |
| issn | 0172-4622 1439-3964 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1238119657 |
| source | MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Anaerobic Threshold - physiology Biological and medical sciences Body composition Body Composition - physiology Cardiorespiratory endurance Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Models, Theoretical Muscle Strength - physiology Muscular endurance Physical Endurance - physiology Physical Fitness - physiology Resistance Training - methods Sedentary Lifestyle Sports medicine Strength Strength (performance) Time Factors Training & Testing Ventilatory threshold Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports Women Young Adult Youth |
| title | Linear and Daily Undulating Resistance Training Periodizations Have Differential Beneficial Effects in Young Sedentary Women |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T11%3A52%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linear%20and%20Daily%20Undulating%20Resistance%20Training%20Periodizations%20Have%20Differential%20Beneficial%20Effects%20in%20Young%20Sedentary%20Women&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=de%20Lima,%20C.&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=723&rft.epage=727&rft.pages=723-727&rft.issn=0172-4622&rft.eissn=1439-3964&rft.coden=IJSMDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0032-1306324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1034803609%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034803609&rft_id=info:pmid/22562746&rfr_iscdi=true |