Comparison of Two Aerobic Field Tests in Young Tennis Players

ABSTRACTFargeas-Gluck, M-A and Léger, LA. Comparison of two aerobic field tests in young tennis players. J Strength Cond Res 26(11)3036–3042, 2012—This study compares the maximal responses of a new aerobic tennis field test, the NAVTEN to a known aerobic field test, often used with young tennis play...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2012-11, Vol.26 (11), p.3036-3042
Hauptverfasser: Fargeas-Gluck, Marie-Agnès, Léger, Luc A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3042
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3036
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 26
creator Fargeas-Gluck, Marie-Agnès
Léger, Luc A.
description ABSTRACTFargeas-Gluck, M-A and Léger, LA. Comparison of two aerobic field tests in young tennis players. J Strength Cond Res 26(11)3036–3042, 2012—This study compares the maximal responses of a new aerobic tennis field test, the NAVTEN to a known aerobic field test, often used with young tennis players, that is, the continuous multistage 20-m shuttle run test (20-m SRT). The NAVTEN is an intermittent (1-minute/1-minute) multistage test with side-to-side displacements and ball hitting. Ten young elite tennis players aged 12.9 ± 0.3 (mean ± SD) randomly performed both tests and were continuously monitored for heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2) using the Vmax ST (Sensormedics). The 20-m SRT and NAVTEN show similar HRpeak (202 ± 6.1 vs. 208 ± 9.5, respectively) and V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak (54.2 ± 5.9 vs. 54.9 ± 6.0 ml·kg·min). Pearson correlations between both tests were 0.88 and 0.92 for V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak and maximal speed, respectively. The NAVTEN yielded V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak values that are typical for active subjects of that age and are similar to the 20-m SRT supporting its use to measure aerobic fitness of young tennis players in specific and entertaining field conditions. The fact that two-thirds of the tennis players achieved a different ranking (±1 rank) with the NAVTEN and the 20-m SRT suggests that the NAVTEN may be more specific than the 20-m SRT to assess aerobic fitness of tennis players. From a practical point of view, the NAVTEN test is more specific and pedagogical for young tennis players even though both tests yield similar maximal values.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182472fc3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1238117335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2799814641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4633-f0b8b3795cf173b7239657f6c97aec1f76b8144b64951e3c267c9bb356872253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkT1PwzAQhi0E4qPwDxCKxMKS4vPZsTMwVBWfQgKJLExR7DqQksbFblT132PUwtABMd2d9Nx7Hy8hp0CHICC_fHgZD6mmgBZBMS5ZbXCHHIJATDlTcjfmNOOpogAH5CiEKaVMCIH75IAxRmUsDsnV2M3mlW-C6xJXJ8XSJSPrnW5MctPYdpIUNixC0nTJq-u7t1h2XROS57ZaWR-OyV5dtcGebOKAFDfXxfgufXy6vR-PHlPDs7hOTbXSKHNhapCoJcM8E7LOTC4ra6CWmVbAuc54LsCiYZk0udYoMiUZEzggF2vZuXeffVyonDXB2LatOuv6UAJDBVEZ_4ECxCGIyCN6voVOXe-7eMc3JVAhFSpSfE0Z70Lwti7nvplVflUCLb-NKKMR5bYRse1sI97rmZ38Nv18PgJqDSxdu4iv_Gj7pfXlu63axfvf2l9ocZLc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1115383058</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two Aerobic Field Tests in Young Tennis Players</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Fargeas-Gluck, Marie-Agnès ; Léger, Luc A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fargeas-Gluck, Marie-Agnès ; Léger, Luc A.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTFargeas-Gluck, M-A and Léger, LA. Comparison of two aerobic field tests in young tennis players. J Strength Cond Res 26(11)3036–3042, 2012—This study compares the maximal responses of a new aerobic tennis field test, the NAVTEN to a known aerobic field test, often used with young tennis players, that is, the continuous multistage 20-m shuttle run test (20-m SRT). The NAVTEN is an intermittent (1-minute/1-minute) multistage test with side-to-side displacements and ball hitting. Ten young elite tennis players aged 12.9 ± 0.3 (mean ± SD) randomly performed both tests and were continuously monitored for heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2) using the Vmax ST (Sensormedics). The 20-m SRT and NAVTEN show similar HRpeak (202 ± 6.1 vs. 208 ± 9.5, respectively) and V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak (54.2 ± 5.9 vs. 54.9 ± 6.0 ml·kg·min). Pearson correlations between both tests were 0.88 and 0.92 for V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak and maximal speed, respectively. The NAVTEN yielded V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak values that are typical for active subjects of that age and are similar to the 20-m SRT supporting its use to measure aerobic fitness of young tennis players in specific and entertaining field conditions. The fact that two-thirds of the tennis players achieved a different ranking (±1 rank) with the NAVTEN and the 20-m SRT suggests that the NAVTEN may be more specific than the 20-m SRT to assess aerobic fitness of tennis players. From a practical point of view, the NAVTEN test is more specific and pedagogical for young tennis players even though both tests yield similar maximal values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182472fc3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22207255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Strength and Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Athletes ; Cardiorespiratory endurance ; Child ; Comparative analysis ; Exercise ; Exercise Test - methods ; Female ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Male ; Maximum oxygen consumption ; Oxygen ; Oxygen Consumption ; Physical Fitness - physiology ; Speed ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Tennis ; Tennis (players) ; Tennis - physiology ; Tests ; Young adults ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2012-11, Vol.26 (11), p.3036-3042</ispartof><rights>2012 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Nov 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4633-f0b8b3795cf173b7239657f6c97aec1f76b8144b64951e3c267c9bb356872253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4633-f0b8b3795cf173b7239657f6c97aec1f76b8144b64951e3c267c9bb356872253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22207255$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fargeas-Gluck, Marie-Agnès</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Léger, Luc A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two Aerobic Field Tests in Young Tennis Players</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTFargeas-Gluck, M-A and Léger, LA. Comparison of two aerobic field tests in young tennis players. J Strength Cond Res 26(11)3036–3042, 2012—This study compares the maximal responses of a new aerobic tennis field test, the NAVTEN to a known aerobic field test, often used with young tennis players, that is, the continuous multistage 20-m shuttle run test (20-m SRT). The NAVTEN is an intermittent (1-minute/1-minute) multistage test with side-to-side displacements and ball hitting. Ten young elite tennis players aged 12.9 ± 0.3 (mean ± SD) randomly performed both tests and were continuously monitored for heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2) using the Vmax ST (Sensormedics). The 20-m SRT and NAVTEN show similar HRpeak (202 ± 6.1 vs. 208 ± 9.5, respectively) and V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak (54.2 ± 5.9 vs. 54.9 ± 6.0 ml·kg·min). Pearson correlations between both tests were 0.88 and 0.92 for V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak and maximal speed, respectively. The NAVTEN yielded V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak values that are typical for active subjects of that age and are similar to the 20-m SRT supporting its use to measure aerobic fitness of young tennis players in specific and entertaining field conditions. The fact that two-thirds of the tennis players achieved a different ranking (±1 rank) with the NAVTEN and the 20-m SRT suggests that the NAVTEN may be more specific than the 20-m SRT to assess aerobic fitness of tennis players. From a practical point of view, the NAVTEN test is more specific and pedagogical for young tennis players even though both tests yield similar maximal values.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Cardiorespiratory endurance</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise Test - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maximum oxygen consumption</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Physical Fitness - physiology</subject><subject>Speed</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Tennis</subject><subject>Tennis (players)</subject><subject>Tennis - physiology</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkT1PwzAQhi0E4qPwDxCKxMKS4vPZsTMwVBWfQgKJLExR7DqQksbFblT132PUwtABMd2d9Nx7Hy8hp0CHICC_fHgZD6mmgBZBMS5ZbXCHHIJATDlTcjfmNOOpogAH5CiEKaVMCIH75IAxRmUsDsnV2M3mlW-C6xJXJ8XSJSPrnW5MctPYdpIUNixC0nTJq-u7t1h2XROS57ZaWR-OyV5dtcGebOKAFDfXxfgufXy6vR-PHlPDs7hOTbXSKHNhapCoJcM8E7LOTC4ra6CWmVbAuc54LsCiYZk0udYoMiUZEzggF2vZuXeffVyonDXB2LatOuv6UAJDBVEZ_4ECxCGIyCN6voVOXe-7eMc3JVAhFSpSfE0Z70Lwti7nvplVflUCLb-NKKMR5bYRse1sI97rmZ38Nv18PgJqDSxdu4iv_Gj7pfXlu63axfvf2l9ocZLc</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Fargeas-Gluck, Marie-Agnès</creator><creator>Léger, Luc A.</creator><general>National Strength and Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two Aerobic Field Tests in Young Tennis Players</title><author>Fargeas-Gluck, Marie-Agnès ; Léger, Luc A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4633-f0b8b3795cf173b7239657f6c97aec1f76b8144b64951e3c267c9bb356872253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Cardiorespiratory endurance</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise Test - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maximum oxygen consumption</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Physical Fitness - physiology</topic><topic>Speed</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Tennis</topic><topic>Tennis (players)</topic><topic>Tennis - physiology</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fargeas-Gluck, Marie-Agnès</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Léger, Luc A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fargeas-Gluck, Marie-Agnès</au><au>Léger, Luc A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two Aerobic Field Tests in Young Tennis Players</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3036</spage><epage>3042</epage><pages>3036-3042</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTFargeas-Gluck, M-A and Léger, LA. Comparison of two aerobic field tests in young tennis players. J Strength Cond Res 26(11)3036–3042, 2012—This study compares the maximal responses of a new aerobic tennis field test, the NAVTEN to a known aerobic field test, often used with young tennis players, that is, the continuous multistage 20-m shuttle run test (20-m SRT). The NAVTEN is an intermittent (1-minute/1-minute) multistage test with side-to-side displacements and ball hitting. Ten young elite tennis players aged 12.9 ± 0.3 (mean ± SD) randomly performed both tests and were continuously monitored for heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2) using the Vmax ST (Sensormedics). The 20-m SRT and NAVTEN show similar HRpeak (202 ± 6.1 vs. 208 ± 9.5, respectively) and V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak (54.2 ± 5.9 vs. 54.9 ± 6.0 ml·kg·min). Pearson correlations between both tests were 0.88 and 0.92 for V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak and maximal speed, respectively. The NAVTEN yielded V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak values that are typical for active subjects of that age and are similar to the 20-m SRT supporting its use to measure aerobic fitness of young tennis players in specific and entertaining field conditions. The fact that two-thirds of the tennis players achieved a different ranking (±1 rank) with the NAVTEN and the 20-m SRT suggests that the NAVTEN may be more specific than the 20-m SRT to assess aerobic fitness of tennis players. From a practical point of view, the NAVTEN test is more specific and pedagogical for young tennis players even though both tests yield similar maximal values.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Strength and Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>22207255</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182472fc3</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2012-11, Vol.26 (11), p.3036-3042
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1238117335
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Athletes
Cardiorespiratory endurance
Child
Comparative analysis
Exercise
Exercise Test - methods
Female
Heart Rate
Humans
Male
Maximum oxygen consumption
Oxygen
Oxygen Consumption
Physical Fitness - physiology
Speed
Statistics, Nonparametric
Tennis
Tennis (players)
Tennis - physiology
Tests
Young adults
Youth
title Comparison of Two Aerobic Field Tests in Young Tennis Players
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T15%3A08%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20Aerobic%20Field%20Tests%20in%20Young%20Tennis%20Players&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Fargeas-Gluck,%20Marie-Agn%C3%A8s&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3036&rft.epage=3042&rft.pages=3036-3042&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182472fc3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2799814641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1115383058&rft_id=info:pmid/22207255&rfr_iscdi=true