Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education
Virtual reality simulators with self-assessment software may assist novice robotic surgeons to augment direct proctoring in robotic surgical skill acquisition. We compare and correlate the da Vinci Trainer™ (dVT) and da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulators (dVSSS) in subjects with varying robotic experi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endourology 2012-12, Vol.26 (12), p.1629-1634 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1634 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1629 |
container_title | Journal of endourology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Liss, Michael A Abdelshehid, Corollos Quach, Stephen Lusch, Achim Graversen, Joseph Landman, Jaime McDougall, Elspeth M |
description | Virtual reality simulators with self-assessment software may assist novice robotic surgeons to augment direct proctoring in robotic surgical skill acquisition. We compare and correlate the da Vinci Trainer™ (dVT) and da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulators (dVSSS) in subjects with varying robotic experience.
Students, urology residents, fellows, and practicing urologists with varying robotic experience were enrolled after local institutional review board approval. Three virtual reality tasks were preformed in sequential order (pegboard 1, pegboard 2, and tubes)-initially on the dVSSS and then on the dVT. The Mimic™ software used on both systems provides raw values and percent scores that were used in statistical evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-tailed independent t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey, and the Pearson rank correlation coefficient where appropriate.
Thirty-two participants were recruited for this study and separated into five groups based on robotic surgery experience. In regards to construct validity, both simulators were able to differentiate differences among the five robotic surgery experience groups in the tubes suturing task (p≤0.00). Sixty-seven percent (4/6) robotic experts thought that surgical simulation should be implemented in residency training. The overall cohort considered both platforms easy to learn and use.
Although performance scores were less in the dVT compared with the dVSSS, both simulators demonstrate good content and construct validity. The simulators appear to be equivalent for assessing surgeon proficiency and either can be used for robotic skills training with self-assessment feedback. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/end.2012.0328 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1238106113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1238106113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p563-72974d0c469d6211e46e8e3647e0c256e0052e5f69c12f890407934e2ebf79f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1KxDAUhYMgzji6dCtZjmDH_LRpuxTxD0bcDIO7kklvx2ja1KRB3PskvoWv45NYptXV4Z7z3cPlInRCyYKSLL-AplwwQtmCcJbtoSlNkjTKCXmaoEPvXwihXFB-gCaMZXFCUz5F32tpdCk7bZtzrKxzYMZBNmVv1K102tsG2wp3z4BLide6URp3TuoG3Pzn8-tsxw7pEPrgtlpJg_2rNsZjr-vQ99oRD143293Cg661Gkxvq-5dOsCVdTg4a2xfgZ3d2K7X_0Yog9pdeIT2K2k8HI86Q6ub69XVXbR8vL2_ulxGbSJ4lLI8jUuiYpGXglEKsYAMuIhTIIolAghJGCSVyBVlVZaTmKQ5j4HBpkrzKuMzNB9qW2ffAviuqLVXYIxswAZfUMYzSgSlvEdPRzRsaiiL1ulauo_i79v8F9qbhFc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1238106113</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Liss, Michael A ; Abdelshehid, Corollos ; Quach, Stephen ; Lusch, Achim ; Graversen, Joseph ; Landman, Jaime ; McDougall, Elspeth M</creator><creatorcontrib>Liss, Michael A ; Abdelshehid, Corollos ; Quach, Stephen ; Lusch, Achim ; Graversen, Joseph ; Landman, Jaime ; McDougall, Elspeth M</creatorcontrib><description>Virtual reality simulators with self-assessment software may assist novice robotic surgeons to augment direct proctoring in robotic surgical skill acquisition. We compare and correlate the da Vinci Trainer™ (dVT) and da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulators (dVSSS) in subjects with varying robotic experience.
Students, urology residents, fellows, and practicing urologists with varying robotic experience were enrolled after local institutional review board approval. Three virtual reality tasks were preformed in sequential order (pegboard 1, pegboard 2, and tubes)-initially on the dVSSS and then on the dVT. The Mimic™ software used on both systems provides raw values and percent scores that were used in statistical evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-tailed independent t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey, and the Pearson rank correlation coefficient where appropriate.
Thirty-two participants were recruited for this study and separated into five groups based on robotic surgery experience. In regards to construct validity, both simulators were able to differentiate differences among the five robotic surgery experience groups in the tubes suturing task (p≤0.00). Sixty-seven percent (4/6) robotic experts thought that surgical simulation should be implemented in residency training. The overall cohort considered both platforms easy to learn and use.
Although performance scores were less in the dVT compared with the dVSSS, both simulators demonstrate good content and construct validity. The simulators appear to be equivalent for assessing surgeon proficiency and either can be used for robotic skills training with self-assessment feedback.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1557-900X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0328</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22845173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Clinical Competence ; Computer Simulation ; Demography ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Robotics - education ; Software ; Sutures ; Urologic Surgical Procedures - education</subject><ispartof>Journal of endourology, 2012-12, Vol.26 (12), p.1629-1634</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22845173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liss, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelshehid, Corollos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quach, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lusch, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graversen, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landman, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDougall, Elspeth M</creatorcontrib><title>Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education</title><title>Journal of endourology</title><addtitle>J Endourol</addtitle><description>Virtual reality simulators with self-assessment software may assist novice robotic surgeons to augment direct proctoring in robotic surgical skill acquisition. We compare and correlate the da Vinci Trainer™ (dVT) and da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulators (dVSSS) in subjects with varying robotic experience.
Students, urology residents, fellows, and practicing urologists with varying robotic experience were enrolled after local institutional review board approval. Three virtual reality tasks were preformed in sequential order (pegboard 1, pegboard 2, and tubes)-initially on the dVSSS and then on the dVT. The Mimic™ software used on both systems provides raw values and percent scores that were used in statistical evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-tailed independent t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey, and the Pearson rank correlation coefficient where appropriate.
Thirty-two participants were recruited for this study and separated into five groups based on robotic surgery experience. In regards to construct validity, both simulators were able to differentiate differences among the five robotic surgery experience groups in the tubes suturing task (p≤0.00). Sixty-seven percent (4/6) robotic experts thought that surgical simulation should be implemented in residency training. The overall cohort considered both platforms easy to learn and use.
Although performance scores were less in the dVT compared with the dVSSS, both simulators demonstrate good content and construct validity. The simulators appear to be equivalent for assessing surgeon proficiency and either can be used for robotic skills training with self-assessment feedback.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Robotics - education</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures - education</subject><issn>1557-900X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1KxDAUhYMgzji6dCtZjmDH_LRpuxTxD0bcDIO7kklvx2ja1KRB3PskvoWv45NYptXV4Z7z3cPlInRCyYKSLL-AplwwQtmCcJbtoSlNkjTKCXmaoEPvXwihXFB-gCaMZXFCUz5F32tpdCk7bZtzrKxzYMZBNmVv1K102tsG2wp3z4BLide6URp3TuoG3Pzn8-tsxw7pEPrgtlpJg_2rNsZjr-vQ99oRD143293Cg661Gkxvq-5dOsCVdTg4a2xfgZ3d2K7X_0Yog9pdeIT2K2k8HI86Q6ub69XVXbR8vL2_ulxGbSJ4lLI8jUuiYpGXglEKsYAMuIhTIIolAghJGCSVyBVlVZaTmKQ5j4HBpkrzKuMzNB9qW2ffAviuqLVXYIxswAZfUMYzSgSlvEdPRzRsaiiL1ulauo_i79v8F9qbhFc</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Liss, Michael A</creator><creator>Abdelshehid, Corollos</creator><creator>Quach, Stephen</creator><creator>Lusch, Achim</creator><creator>Graversen, Joseph</creator><creator>Landman, Jaime</creator><creator>McDougall, Elspeth M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education</title><author>Liss, Michael A ; Abdelshehid, Corollos ; Quach, Stephen ; Lusch, Achim ; Graversen, Joseph ; Landman, Jaime ; McDougall, Elspeth M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p563-72974d0c469d6211e46e8e3647e0c256e0052e5f69c12f890407934e2ebf79f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Robotics - education</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures - education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liss, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelshehid, Corollos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quach, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lusch, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graversen, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landman, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDougall, Elspeth M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endourology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liss, Michael A</au><au>Abdelshehid, Corollos</au><au>Quach, Stephen</au><au>Lusch, Achim</au><au>Graversen, Joseph</au><au>Landman, Jaime</au><au>McDougall, Elspeth M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endourology</jtitle><addtitle>J Endourol</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1629</spage><epage>1634</epage><pages>1629-1634</pages><eissn>1557-900X</eissn><abstract>Virtual reality simulators with self-assessment software may assist novice robotic surgeons to augment direct proctoring in robotic surgical skill acquisition. We compare and correlate the da Vinci Trainer™ (dVT) and da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulators (dVSSS) in subjects with varying robotic experience.
Students, urology residents, fellows, and practicing urologists with varying robotic experience were enrolled after local institutional review board approval. Three virtual reality tasks were preformed in sequential order (pegboard 1, pegboard 2, and tubes)-initially on the dVSSS and then on the dVT. The Mimic™ software used on both systems provides raw values and percent scores that were used in statistical evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-tailed independent t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey, and the Pearson rank correlation coefficient where appropriate.
Thirty-two participants were recruited for this study and separated into five groups based on robotic surgery experience. In regards to construct validity, both simulators were able to differentiate differences among the five robotic surgery experience groups in the tubes suturing task (p≤0.00). Sixty-seven percent (4/6) robotic experts thought that surgical simulation should be implemented in residency training. The overall cohort considered both platforms easy to learn and use.
Although performance scores were less in the dVT compared with the dVSSS, both simulators demonstrate good content and construct validity. The simulators appear to be equivalent for assessing surgeon proficiency and either can be used for robotic skills training with self-assessment feedback.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22845173</pmid><doi>10.1089/end.2012.0328</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1557-900X |
ispartof | Journal of endourology, 2012-12, Vol.26 (12), p.1629-1634 |
issn | 1557-900X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1238106113 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Clinical Competence Computer Simulation Demography Female Humans Male Middle Aged Reproducibility of Results Robotics - education Software Sutures Urologic Surgical Procedures - education |
title | Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T07%3A15%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation,%20correlation,%20and%20comparison%20of%20the%20da%20Vinci%20trainer(%E2%84%A2)%20and%20the%20daVinci%20surgical%20skills%20simulator(%E2%84%A2)%20using%20the%20Mimic(%E2%84%A2)%20software%20for%20urologic%20robotic%20surgical%20education&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endourology&rft.au=Liss,%20Michael%20A&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1629&rft.epage=1634&rft.pages=1629-1634&rft.eissn=1557-900X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/end.2012.0328&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1238106113%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1238106113&rft_id=info:pmid/22845173&rfr_iscdi=true |