Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education

Virtual reality simulators with self-assessment software may assist novice robotic surgeons to augment direct proctoring in robotic surgical skill acquisition. We compare and correlate the da Vinci Trainer™ (dVT) and da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulators (dVSSS) in subjects with varying robotic experi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endourology 2012-12, Vol.26 (12), p.1629-1634
Hauptverfasser: Liss, Michael A, Abdelshehid, Corollos, Quach, Stephen, Lusch, Achim, Graversen, Joseph, Landman, Jaime, McDougall, Elspeth M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1634
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1629
container_title Journal of endourology
container_volume 26
creator Liss, Michael A
Abdelshehid, Corollos
Quach, Stephen
Lusch, Achim
Graversen, Joseph
Landman, Jaime
McDougall, Elspeth M
description Virtual reality simulators with self-assessment software may assist novice robotic surgeons to augment direct proctoring in robotic surgical skill acquisition. We compare and correlate the da Vinci Trainer™ (dVT) and da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulators (dVSSS) in subjects with varying robotic experience. Students, urology residents, fellows, and practicing urologists with varying robotic experience were enrolled after local institutional review board approval. Three virtual reality tasks were preformed in sequential order (pegboard 1, pegboard 2, and tubes)-initially on the dVSSS and then on the dVT. The Mimic™ software used on both systems provides raw values and percent scores that were used in statistical evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-tailed independent t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey, and the Pearson rank correlation coefficient where appropriate. Thirty-two participants were recruited for this study and separated into five groups based on robotic surgery experience. In regards to construct validity, both simulators were able to differentiate differences among the five robotic surgery experience groups in the tubes suturing task (p≤0.00). Sixty-seven percent (4/6) robotic experts thought that surgical simulation should be implemented in residency training. The overall cohort considered both platforms easy to learn and use. Although performance scores were less in the dVT compared with the dVSSS, both simulators demonstrate good content and construct validity. The simulators appear to be equivalent for assessing surgeon proficiency and either can be used for robotic skills training with self-assessment feedback.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/end.2012.0328
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1238106113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1238106113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p563-72974d0c469d6211e46e8e3647e0c256e0052e5f69c12f890407934e2ebf79f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1KxDAUhYMgzji6dCtZjmDH_LRpuxTxD0bcDIO7kklvx2ja1KRB3PskvoWv45NYptXV4Z7z3cPlInRCyYKSLL-AplwwQtmCcJbtoSlNkjTKCXmaoEPvXwihXFB-gCaMZXFCUz5F32tpdCk7bZtzrKxzYMZBNmVv1K102tsG2wp3z4BLide6URp3TuoG3Pzn8-tsxw7pEPrgtlpJg_2rNsZjr-vQ99oRD143293Cg661Gkxvq-5dOsCVdTg4a2xfgZ3d2K7X_0Yog9pdeIT2K2k8HI86Q6ub69XVXbR8vL2_ulxGbSJ4lLI8jUuiYpGXglEKsYAMuIhTIIolAghJGCSVyBVlVZaTmKQ5j4HBpkrzKuMzNB9qW2ffAviuqLVXYIxswAZfUMYzSgSlvEdPRzRsaiiL1ulauo_i79v8F9qbhFc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1238106113</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Liss, Michael A ; Abdelshehid, Corollos ; Quach, Stephen ; Lusch, Achim ; Graversen, Joseph ; Landman, Jaime ; McDougall, Elspeth M</creator><creatorcontrib>Liss, Michael A ; Abdelshehid, Corollos ; Quach, Stephen ; Lusch, Achim ; Graversen, Joseph ; Landman, Jaime ; McDougall, Elspeth M</creatorcontrib><description>Virtual reality simulators with self-assessment software may assist novice robotic surgeons to augment direct proctoring in robotic surgical skill acquisition. We compare and correlate the da Vinci Trainer™ (dVT) and da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulators (dVSSS) in subjects with varying robotic experience. Students, urology residents, fellows, and practicing urologists with varying robotic experience were enrolled after local institutional review board approval. Three virtual reality tasks were preformed in sequential order (pegboard 1, pegboard 2, and tubes)-initially on the dVSSS and then on the dVT. The Mimic™ software used on both systems provides raw values and percent scores that were used in statistical evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-tailed independent t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey, and the Pearson rank correlation coefficient where appropriate. Thirty-two participants were recruited for this study and separated into five groups based on robotic surgery experience. In regards to construct validity, both simulators were able to differentiate differences among the five robotic surgery experience groups in the tubes suturing task (p≤0.00). Sixty-seven percent (4/6) robotic experts thought that surgical simulation should be implemented in residency training. The overall cohort considered both platforms easy to learn and use. Although performance scores were less in the dVT compared with the dVSSS, both simulators demonstrate good content and construct validity. The simulators appear to be equivalent for assessing surgeon proficiency and either can be used for robotic skills training with self-assessment feedback.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1557-900X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0328</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22845173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Clinical Competence ; Computer Simulation ; Demography ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Robotics - education ; Software ; Sutures ; Urologic Surgical Procedures - education</subject><ispartof>Journal of endourology, 2012-12, Vol.26 (12), p.1629-1634</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22845173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liss, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelshehid, Corollos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quach, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lusch, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graversen, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landman, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDougall, Elspeth M</creatorcontrib><title>Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education</title><title>Journal of endourology</title><addtitle>J Endourol</addtitle><description>Virtual reality simulators with self-assessment software may assist novice robotic surgeons to augment direct proctoring in robotic surgical skill acquisition. We compare and correlate the da Vinci Trainer™ (dVT) and da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulators (dVSSS) in subjects with varying robotic experience. Students, urology residents, fellows, and practicing urologists with varying robotic experience were enrolled after local institutional review board approval. Three virtual reality tasks were preformed in sequential order (pegboard 1, pegboard 2, and tubes)-initially on the dVSSS and then on the dVT. The Mimic™ software used on both systems provides raw values and percent scores that were used in statistical evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-tailed independent t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey, and the Pearson rank correlation coefficient where appropriate. Thirty-two participants were recruited for this study and separated into five groups based on robotic surgery experience. In regards to construct validity, both simulators were able to differentiate differences among the five robotic surgery experience groups in the tubes suturing task (p≤0.00). Sixty-seven percent (4/6) robotic experts thought that surgical simulation should be implemented in residency training. The overall cohort considered both platforms easy to learn and use. Although performance scores were less in the dVT compared with the dVSSS, both simulators demonstrate good content and construct validity. The simulators appear to be equivalent for assessing surgeon proficiency and either can be used for robotic skills training with self-assessment feedback.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Robotics - education</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures - education</subject><issn>1557-900X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1KxDAUhYMgzji6dCtZjmDH_LRpuxTxD0bcDIO7kklvx2ja1KRB3PskvoWv45NYptXV4Z7z3cPlInRCyYKSLL-AplwwQtmCcJbtoSlNkjTKCXmaoEPvXwihXFB-gCaMZXFCUz5F32tpdCk7bZtzrKxzYMZBNmVv1K102tsG2wp3z4BLide6URp3TuoG3Pzn8-tsxw7pEPrgtlpJg_2rNsZjr-vQ99oRD143293Cg661Gkxvq-5dOsCVdTg4a2xfgZ3d2K7X_0Yog9pdeIT2K2k8HI86Q6ub69XVXbR8vL2_ulxGbSJ4lLI8jUuiYpGXglEKsYAMuIhTIIolAghJGCSVyBVlVZaTmKQ5j4HBpkrzKuMzNB9qW2ffAviuqLVXYIxswAZfUMYzSgSlvEdPRzRsaiiL1ulauo_i79v8F9qbhFc</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Liss, Michael A</creator><creator>Abdelshehid, Corollos</creator><creator>Quach, Stephen</creator><creator>Lusch, Achim</creator><creator>Graversen, Joseph</creator><creator>Landman, Jaime</creator><creator>McDougall, Elspeth M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education</title><author>Liss, Michael A ; Abdelshehid, Corollos ; Quach, Stephen ; Lusch, Achim ; Graversen, Joseph ; Landman, Jaime ; McDougall, Elspeth M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p563-72974d0c469d6211e46e8e3647e0c256e0052e5f69c12f890407934e2ebf79f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Robotics - education</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures - education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liss, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelshehid, Corollos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quach, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lusch, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graversen, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landman, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDougall, Elspeth M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endourology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liss, Michael A</au><au>Abdelshehid, Corollos</au><au>Quach, Stephen</au><au>Lusch, Achim</au><au>Graversen, Joseph</au><au>Landman, Jaime</au><au>McDougall, Elspeth M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endourology</jtitle><addtitle>J Endourol</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1629</spage><epage>1634</epage><pages>1629-1634</pages><eissn>1557-900X</eissn><abstract>Virtual reality simulators with self-assessment software may assist novice robotic surgeons to augment direct proctoring in robotic surgical skill acquisition. We compare and correlate the da Vinci Trainer™ (dVT) and da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulators (dVSSS) in subjects with varying robotic experience. Students, urology residents, fellows, and practicing urologists with varying robotic experience were enrolled after local institutional review board approval. Three virtual reality tasks were preformed in sequential order (pegboard 1, pegboard 2, and tubes)-initially on the dVSSS and then on the dVT. The Mimic™ software used on both systems provides raw values and percent scores that were used in statistical evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-tailed independent t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey, and the Pearson rank correlation coefficient where appropriate. Thirty-two participants were recruited for this study and separated into five groups based on robotic surgery experience. In regards to construct validity, both simulators were able to differentiate differences among the five robotic surgery experience groups in the tubes suturing task (p≤0.00). Sixty-seven percent (4/6) robotic experts thought that surgical simulation should be implemented in residency training. The overall cohort considered both platforms easy to learn and use. Although performance scores were less in the dVT compared with the dVSSS, both simulators demonstrate good content and construct validity. The simulators appear to be equivalent for assessing surgeon proficiency and either can be used for robotic skills training with self-assessment feedback.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22845173</pmid><doi>10.1089/end.2012.0328</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1557-900X
ispartof Journal of endourology, 2012-12, Vol.26 (12), p.1629-1634
issn 1557-900X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1238106113
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Clinical Competence
Computer Simulation
Demography
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Robotics - education
Software
Sutures
Urologic Surgical Procedures - education
title Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T07%3A15%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation,%20correlation,%20and%20comparison%20of%20the%20da%20Vinci%20trainer(%E2%84%A2)%20and%20the%20daVinci%20surgical%20skills%20simulator(%E2%84%A2)%20using%20the%20Mimic(%E2%84%A2)%20software%20for%20urologic%20robotic%20surgical%20education&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endourology&rft.au=Liss,%20Michael%20A&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1629&rft.epage=1634&rft.pages=1629-1634&rft.eissn=1557-900X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/end.2012.0328&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1238106113%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1238106113&rft_id=info:pmid/22845173&rfr_iscdi=true