CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction

Objectives Comparison of coronary artery stent assessment with cardiac CT angiography (cCTA) using traditional filtered back projection (FBP) and sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE), in both full- and half-radiation dose image data. Methods Dual-source cCTA studies of 37 implanted st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2013, Vol.23 (1), p.125-132
Hauptverfasser: Ebersberger, Ullrich, Tricarico, Francesco, Schoepf, U. Joseph, Blanke, Philipp, Spears, J. Reid, Rowe, Garrett W., Halligan, William T., Henzler, Thomas, Bamberg, Fabian, Leber, Alexander W., Hoffmann, Ellen, Apfaltrer, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Comparison of coronary artery stent assessment with cardiac CT angiography (cCTA) using traditional filtered back projection (FBP) and sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE), in both full- and half-radiation dose image data. Methods Dual-source cCTA studies of 37 implanted stents were reconstructed at full- and half-radiation dose with FBP and SAFIRE. Half-dose data were based on projections from one DSCT detector. In-stent noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and stent-lumen attenuation increase ratio (SAIR) were measured and image quality graded. Stent volumes were measured to gauge severity of beam hardening artefacts. Results Full-dose SAFIRE reconstructions were superior to full-dose FBP vis-à-vis in-stent noise (21.2 ± 6.6 vs. 35.7 ± 17.5; P  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-012-2580-5