Are fetuses with isolated echogenic bowel at higher risk for an adverse pregnancy outcome? Experiences from a tertiary referral center
ABSTRACT Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of poor perinatal outcome in normal karyotype second‐trimester fetuses with the sonographic finding of isolated echogenic bowel. Method Medical records, ultrasonographic findings and outcome details were reviewed for 97 cases of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Prenatal diagnosis 2012-12, Vol.32 (13), p.1295-1299 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1299 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 13 |
| container_start_page | 1295 |
| container_title | Prenatal diagnosis |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Mailath-Pokorny, Mariella Klein, Katharina Klebermass-Schrehof, Katrin Hachemian, Nilouparak Bettelheim, Dieter |
| description | ABSTRACT
Objective
The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of poor perinatal outcome in normal karyotype second‐trimester fetuses with the sonographic finding of isolated echogenic bowel.
Method
Medical records, ultrasonographic findings and outcome details were reviewed for 97 cases of isolated fetal echogenic bowel, after excluding cases of aneuploidy and major congenital anomalies, and compared with a cohort of 400 fetuses without pathologic intra‐abdominal findings.
Results
The incidence of echogenic bowel during the 14‐year study period was 0.8%. Eighty (82.5%) pregnancies resulted in healthy, live‐born infants. Congenital infection and cystic fibrosis was reported in 6.2% and 4.4%, respectively. The incidence of intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine fetal demise was significantly higher in the group of isolated echogenic bowels compared with the control group (9.9% versus 1.3%, p ≤0.001; 8.9% versus 0.5% p ≤0.001).
Conclusion
Echogenic bowel is a risk factor for an adverse pregnancy outcome, even in normal karyotype fetuses without congenital anomalies. This information should be considered when counseling patients after midtrimester echogenic bowel is diagnosed. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pd.3999 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237503605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1237503605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3559-408b8e288d3bf1e1a19ee234bfc4576d0a2d08ee9e324af44562f020346e7cdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MuKFDEUBuAgitOO4hvI2SlIjbnULSsZ56YweAHFZUilTrrjVFVqkpQ9_QI-txm6nZ2rHMLHz89PyEtGTxil_N3cnwgp5SOyYlQ2BeVcPCYryvIt2oodkWcx_sqw5bJ5So64yIrX9Yr8OQ0IFtMSMcLWpQ246AedsAc0G7_GyRno_BYH0Ak2br3BAMHFG7A-gJ5A978xRIQ54HrSk9mBX5LxI76Hi7sZg8PJ5Ggb_AgaEobkdNhBQIsh6AEMTvnzOXli9RDxxeE9Jj8uL76ffSyuv1x9Oju9LoyoKlmUtO1a5G3bi84yZJpJRC7Kzpqyauqeat7TFlGi4KW2ZVnV3FJORVljY3ojjsmbfe4c_O2CManRRYPDoCf0S1SMi6aioqZVpq_31AQfY-6r5uDG3F0xqu5HV3Ov7kfP8tUhdOlG7B_cv5UzeLsHWzfg7n856uv5Ia7YaxcT3j1oHW5U3eR66ufnKyXph_r8kn5TUvwF2M6bBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1237503605</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are fetuses with isolated echogenic bowel at higher risk for an adverse pregnancy outcome? Experiences from a tertiary referral center</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mailath-Pokorny, Mariella ; Klein, Katharina ; Klebermass-Schrehof, Katrin ; Hachemian, Nilouparak ; Bettelheim, Dieter</creator><creatorcontrib>Mailath-Pokorny, Mariella ; Klein, Katharina ; Klebermass-Schrehof, Katrin ; Hachemian, Nilouparak ; Bettelheim, Dieter</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Objective
The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of poor perinatal outcome in normal karyotype second‐trimester fetuses with the sonographic finding of isolated echogenic bowel.
Method
Medical records, ultrasonographic findings and outcome details were reviewed for 97 cases of isolated fetal echogenic bowel, after excluding cases of aneuploidy and major congenital anomalies, and compared with a cohort of 400 fetuses without pathologic intra‐abdominal findings.
Results
The incidence of echogenic bowel during the 14‐year study period was 0.8%. Eighty (82.5%) pregnancies resulted in healthy, live‐born infants. Congenital infection and cystic fibrosis was reported in 6.2% and 4.4%, respectively. The incidence of intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine fetal demise was significantly higher in the group of isolated echogenic bowels compared with the control group (9.9% versus 1.3%, p ≤0.001; 8.9% versus 0.5% p ≤0.001).
Conclusion
Echogenic bowel is a risk factor for an adverse pregnancy outcome, even in normal karyotype fetuses without congenital anomalies. This information should be considered when counseling patients after midtrimester echogenic bowel is diagnosed. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-3851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pd.3999</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23097266</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Austria - epidemiology ; Echogenic Bowel - epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Retrospective Studies ; Tertiary Care Centers - statistics & numerical data ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><ispartof>Prenatal diagnosis, 2012-12, Vol.32 (13), p.1295-1299</ispartof><rights>2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3559-408b8e288d3bf1e1a19ee234bfc4576d0a2d08ee9e324af44562f020346e7cdc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3559-408b8e288d3bf1e1a19ee234bfc4576d0a2d08ee9e324af44562f020346e7cdc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpd.3999$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpd.3999$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23097266$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mailath-Pokorny, Mariella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klebermass-Schrehof, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hachemian, Nilouparak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettelheim, Dieter</creatorcontrib><title>Are fetuses with isolated echogenic bowel at higher risk for an adverse pregnancy outcome? Experiences from a tertiary referral center</title><title>Prenatal diagnosis</title><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Objective
The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of poor perinatal outcome in normal karyotype second‐trimester fetuses with the sonographic finding of isolated echogenic bowel.
Method
Medical records, ultrasonographic findings and outcome details were reviewed for 97 cases of isolated fetal echogenic bowel, after excluding cases of aneuploidy and major congenital anomalies, and compared with a cohort of 400 fetuses without pathologic intra‐abdominal findings.
Results
The incidence of echogenic bowel during the 14‐year study period was 0.8%. Eighty (82.5%) pregnancies resulted in healthy, live‐born infants. Congenital infection and cystic fibrosis was reported in 6.2% and 4.4%, respectively. The incidence of intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine fetal demise was significantly higher in the group of isolated echogenic bowels compared with the control group (9.9% versus 1.3%, p ≤0.001; 8.9% versus 0.5% p ≤0.001).
Conclusion
Echogenic bowel is a risk factor for an adverse pregnancy outcome, even in normal karyotype fetuses without congenital anomalies. This information should be considered when counseling patients after midtrimester echogenic bowel is diagnosed. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Austria - epidemiology</subject><subject>Echogenic Bowel - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MuKFDEUBuAgitOO4hvI2SlIjbnULSsZ56YweAHFZUilTrrjVFVqkpQ9_QI-txm6nZ2rHMLHz89PyEtGTxil_N3cnwgp5SOyYlQ2BeVcPCYryvIt2oodkWcx_sqw5bJ5So64yIrX9Yr8OQ0IFtMSMcLWpQ246AedsAc0G7_GyRno_BYH0Ak2br3BAMHFG7A-gJ5A978xRIQ54HrSk9mBX5LxI76Hi7sZg8PJ5Ggb_AgaEobkdNhBQIsh6AEMTvnzOXli9RDxxeE9Jj8uL76ffSyuv1x9Oju9LoyoKlmUtO1a5G3bi84yZJpJRC7Kzpqyauqeat7TFlGi4KW2ZVnV3FJORVljY3ojjsmbfe4c_O2CManRRYPDoCf0S1SMi6aioqZVpq_31AQfY-6r5uDG3F0xqu5HV3Ov7kfP8tUhdOlG7B_cv5UzeLsHWzfg7n856uv5Ia7YaxcT3j1oHW5U3eR66ufnKyXph_r8kn5TUvwF2M6bBg</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Mailath-Pokorny, Mariella</creator><creator>Klein, Katharina</creator><creator>Klebermass-Schrehof, Katrin</creator><creator>Hachemian, Nilouparak</creator><creator>Bettelheim, Dieter</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Are fetuses with isolated echogenic bowel at higher risk for an adverse pregnancy outcome? Experiences from a tertiary referral center</title><author>Mailath-Pokorny, Mariella ; Klein, Katharina ; Klebermass-Schrehof, Katrin ; Hachemian, Nilouparak ; Bettelheim, Dieter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3559-408b8e288d3bf1e1a19ee234bfc4576d0a2d08ee9e324af44562f020346e7cdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Austria - epidemiology</topic><topic>Echogenic Bowel - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mailath-Pokorny, Mariella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klebermass-Schrehof, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hachemian, Nilouparak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettelheim, Dieter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mailath-Pokorny, Mariella</au><au>Klein, Katharina</au><au>Klebermass-Schrehof, Katrin</au><au>Hachemian, Nilouparak</au><au>Bettelheim, Dieter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are fetuses with isolated echogenic bowel at higher risk for an adverse pregnancy outcome? Experiences from a tertiary referral center</atitle><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1295</spage><epage>1299</epage><pages>1295-1299</pages><issn>0197-3851</issn><eissn>1097-0223</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Objective
The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of poor perinatal outcome in normal karyotype second‐trimester fetuses with the sonographic finding of isolated echogenic bowel.
Method
Medical records, ultrasonographic findings and outcome details were reviewed for 97 cases of isolated fetal echogenic bowel, after excluding cases of aneuploidy and major congenital anomalies, and compared with a cohort of 400 fetuses without pathologic intra‐abdominal findings.
Results
The incidence of echogenic bowel during the 14‐year study period was 0.8%. Eighty (82.5%) pregnancies resulted in healthy, live‐born infants. Congenital infection and cystic fibrosis was reported in 6.2% and 4.4%, respectively. The incidence of intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine fetal demise was significantly higher in the group of isolated echogenic bowels compared with the control group (9.9% versus 1.3%, p ≤0.001; 8.9% versus 0.5% p ≤0.001).
Conclusion
Echogenic bowel is a risk factor for an adverse pregnancy outcome, even in normal karyotype fetuses without congenital anomalies. This information should be considered when counseling patients after midtrimester echogenic bowel is diagnosed. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23097266</pmid><doi>10.1002/pd.3999</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0197-3851 |
| ispartof | Prenatal diagnosis, 2012-12, Vol.32 (13), p.1295-1299 |
| issn | 0197-3851 1097-0223 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237503605 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Adult Austria - epidemiology Echogenic Bowel - epidemiology Female Humans Infant, Newborn Male Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Retrospective Studies Tertiary Care Centers - statistics & numerical data Ultrasonography, Prenatal |
| title | Are fetuses with isolated echogenic bowel at higher risk for an adverse pregnancy outcome? Experiences from a tertiary referral center |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T02%3A45%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20fetuses%20with%20isolated%20echogenic%20bowel%20at%20higher%20risk%20for%20an%20adverse%20pregnancy%20outcome?%20Experiences%20from%20a%20tertiary%20referral%20center&rft.jtitle=Prenatal%20diagnosis&rft.au=Mailath-Pokorny,%20Mariella&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1295&rft.epage=1299&rft.pages=1295-1299&rft.issn=0197-3851&rft.eissn=1097-0223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pd.3999&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1237503605%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1237503605&rft_id=info:pmid/23097266&rfr_iscdi=true |