Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance under Static and Fatigue Loading of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Carbon Fiber Posts, Glass Fiber Posts, and an Experimental Dentin Post System: An In Vitro Study
Abstract Introduction This investigation sought to compare the fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and experimental dentin posts milled from human root dentin by using computer-aided design/computer-aided...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 2013, Vol.39 (1), p.96-100 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 100 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 96 |
container_title | Journal of endodontics |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS |
description | Abstract Introduction This investigation sought to compare the fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and experimental dentin posts milled from human root dentin by using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing. Methods Seventy maxillary central incisors were obturated and divided into 4 groups: control group without any post (n = 10), carbon fiber post group (n = 20), glass fiber post group (n = 20), and dentin post group (n = 20). Control group teeth were prepared to a height of 5 mm. In all other teeth, post space was prepared; a post was cemented, and a core build-up was provided. Half the samples from each group were statistically loaded until failure, and the remaining half were subjected to cyclic loading, followed by monostatic load until fracture. Results One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons revealed a significant difference among test groups. The control group demonstrated highest fracture resistance (935.03 ± 33.53 N), followed by the dentin post group (793.12 ± 33.69 N), glass fiber post group (603.44 ± 46.67 N), and carbon fiber post group (497.19 ± 19.27 N) under static loading. These values reduced to 786.69 ± 29.64 N, 646.34 ± 26.56 N, 470 ± 36.34 N, and 379.71 ± 13.95 N, respectively, after cyclic loading. Conclusions Results suggest that human dentin can serve as post material under static and fatigue loading. Although at an early stage in research, the use of dentin posts in root-filled teeth looks promising. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237501992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0099239912007273</els_id><sourcerecordid>1237501992</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-719b9a2faee41f4e757bfca398fbe73dbd39adbe9285c3084c8187eaccd52f9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Us1uEzEQXiEQDYUX4IB85ECCf7LdNUKVqpCUSpFAJHC1vPZscdjYwfamzdvwLDwIz8IsKUhw4DQz1vd945lviuIpoxNG2dnLzWQTwE84ZXxCqwml4l4xYnVVj0VZTu8XI0qlHHMh5UnxKKUNpawSonpYnHDBec3PylHxYxa2Ox11dnsg873uekyDJ6Eli6hN7iOQD5BcytobIL23EMkqI8gQ7S1ZYHbdA1kGbZ2_Hnhzb4MNHhG66w5kHUFnsGQNkD8PWjlELG8cVjMdG2y2cA2qvg8ppxfkstMp_f00NNKezG93EN0WfNYdeYPB-V8IsjqkDNtX5MKTK__92yeXY8BP9vbwuHjQ6i7Bk7t4WnxczNezt-Plu8ur2cVybKaM5XHFZCM1bzXAlLVTqMqqaY0Wsm4bqIRtrJDaNiB5XRpB66mpcc-gjbElb6UVp8Xzo-4uhq89zqi2LhnoOu0h9EkxLqqSMik5QvkRamJIKUKrdjiUjgfFqBp8VRs1-KoGXxWtFPqKpGd3-n2zBfuH8ttIBLw-AgCn3DuIKhkHaJl1EUxWNrj_65__Qzed84ODX-AAaRP66HF_iqmEHLUaLms4LMYprThe1U91C862</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1237501992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance under Static and Fatigue Loading of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Carbon Fiber Posts, Glass Fiber Posts, and an Experimental Dentin Post System: An In Vitro Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS ; Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS ; Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS ; Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS ; Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS ; Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</creator><creatorcontrib>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS ; Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS ; Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS ; Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS ; Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS ; Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction This investigation sought to compare the fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and experimental dentin posts milled from human root dentin by using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing. Methods Seventy maxillary central incisors were obturated and divided into 4 groups: control group without any post (n = 10), carbon fiber post group (n = 20), glass fiber post group (n = 20), and dentin post group (n = 20). Control group teeth were prepared to a height of 5 mm. In all other teeth, post space was prepared; a post was cemented, and a core build-up was provided. Half the samples from each group were statistically loaded until failure, and the remaining half were subjected to cyclic loading, followed by monostatic load until fracture. Results One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons revealed a significant difference among test groups. The control group demonstrated highest fracture resistance (935.03 ± 33.53 N), followed by the dentin post group (793.12 ± 33.69 N), glass fiber post group (603.44 ± 46.67 N), and carbon fiber post group (497.19 ± 19.27 N) under static loading. These values reduced to 786.69 ± 29.64 N, 646.34 ± 26.56 N, 470 ± 36.34 N, and 379.71 ± 13.95 N, respectively, after cyclic loading. Conclusions Results suggest that human dentin can serve as post material under static and fatigue loading. Although at an early stage in research, the use of dentin posts in root-filled teeth looks promising.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23228265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acid Etching, Dental - methods ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry ; Bite Force ; Carbon - chemistry ; Cementation - methods ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Computer aided designing-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) ; Computer-Aided Design ; cyclic loading ; Dental Materials - chemistry ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dentin ; dentin post ; Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry ; Dentistry ; Endocrinology & Metabolism ; Epoxy Resins - therapeutic use ; fiber-reinforced composite post ; fracture resistance ; Glass - chemistry ; Gutta-Percha - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Incisor - pathology ; Materials Testing ; Post and Core Technique - instrumentation ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use ; Root Canal Preparation - methods ; Stress, Mechanical ; Temperature ; Time Factors ; Tooth Fractures - physiopathology ; Tooth, Nonvital - pathology ; Tooth, Nonvital - therapy ; Water - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2013, Vol.39 (1), p.96-100</ispartof><rights>American Association of Endodontists</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Endodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-719b9a2faee41f4e757bfca398fbe73dbd39adbe9285c3084c8187eaccd52f9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-719b9a2faee41f4e757bfca398fbe73dbd39adbe9285c3084c8187eaccd52f9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23228265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance under Static and Fatigue Loading of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Carbon Fiber Posts, Glass Fiber Posts, and an Experimental Dentin Post System: An In Vitro Study</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction This investigation sought to compare the fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and experimental dentin posts milled from human root dentin by using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing. Methods Seventy maxillary central incisors were obturated and divided into 4 groups: control group without any post (n = 10), carbon fiber post group (n = 20), glass fiber post group (n = 20), and dentin post group (n = 20). Control group teeth were prepared to a height of 5 mm. In all other teeth, post space was prepared; a post was cemented, and a core build-up was provided. Half the samples from each group were statistically loaded until failure, and the remaining half were subjected to cyclic loading, followed by monostatic load until fracture. Results One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons revealed a significant difference among test groups. The control group demonstrated highest fracture resistance (935.03 ± 33.53 N), followed by the dentin post group (793.12 ± 33.69 N), glass fiber post group (603.44 ± 46.67 N), and carbon fiber post group (497.19 ± 19.27 N) under static loading. These values reduced to 786.69 ± 29.64 N, 646.34 ± 26.56 N, 470 ± 36.34 N, and 379.71 ± 13.95 N, respectively, after cyclic loading. Conclusions Results suggest that human dentin can serve as post material under static and fatigue loading. Although at an early stage in research, the use of dentin posts in root-filled teeth looks promising.</description><subject>Acid Etching, Dental - methods</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry</subject><subject>Bite Force</subject><subject>Carbon - chemistry</subject><subject>Cementation - methods</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Computer aided designing-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM)</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>cyclic loading</subject><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>dentin post</subject><subject>Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Endocrinology & Metabolism</subject><subject>Epoxy Resins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>fiber-reinforced composite post</subject><subject>fracture resistance</subject><subject>Glass - chemistry</subject><subject>Gutta-Percha - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incisor - pathology</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Post and Core Technique - instrumentation</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - methods</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tooth Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tooth, Nonvital - pathology</subject><subject>Tooth, Nonvital - therapy</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Us1uEzEQXiEQDYUX4IB85ECCf7LdNUKVqpCUSpFAJHC1vPZscdjYwfamzdvwLDwIz8IsKUhw4DQz1vd945lviuIpoxNG2dnLzWQTwE84ZXxCqwml4l4xYnVVj0VZTu8XI0qlHHMh5UnxKKUNpawSonpYnHDBec3PylHxYxa2Ox11dnsg873uekyDJ6Eli6hN7iOQD5BcytobIL23EMkqI8gQ7S1ZYHbdA1kGbZ2_Hnhzb4MNHhG66w5kHUFnsGQNkD8PWjlELG8cVjMdG2y2cA2qvg8ppxfkstMp_f00NNKezG93EN0WfNYdeYPB-V8IsjqkDNtX5MKTK__92yeXY8BP9vbwuHjQ6i7Bk7t4WnxczNezt-Plu8ur2cVybKaM5XHFZCM1bzXAlLVTqMqqaY0Wsm4bqIRtrJDaNiB5XRpB66mpcc-gjbElb6UVp8Xzo-4uhq89zqi2LhnoOu0h9EkxLqqSMik5QvkRamJIKUKrdjiUjgfFqBp8VRs1-KoGXxWtFPqKpGd3-n2zBfuH8ttIBLw-AgCn3DuIKhkHaJl1EUxWNrj_65__Qzed84ODX-AAaRP66HF_iqmEHLUaLms4LMYprThe1U91C862</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS</creator><creator>Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS</creator><creator>Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS</creator><creator>Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS</creator><creator>Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS</creator><creator>Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance under Static and Fatigue Loading of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Carbon Fiber Posts, Glass Fiber Posts, and an Experimental Dentin Post System: An In Vitro Study</title><author>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS ; Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS ; Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS ; Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS ; Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS ; Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-719b9a2faee41f4e757bfca398fbe73dbd39adbe9285c3084c8187eaccd52f9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acid Etching, Dental - methods</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry</topic><topic>Bite Force</topic><topic>Carbon - chemistry</topic><topic>Cementation - methods</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Computer aided designing-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM)</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>cyclic loading</topic><topic>Dental Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>dentin post</topic><topic>Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Endocrinology & Metabolism</topic><topic>Epoxy Resins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>fiber-reinforced composite post</topic><topic>fracture resistance</topic><topic>Glass - chemistry</topic><topic>Gutta-Percha - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incisor - pathology</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Post and Core Technique - instrumentation</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - methods</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tooth Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tooth, Nonvital - pathology</topic><topic>Tooth, Nonvital - therapy</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS</au><au>Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS</au><au>Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS</au><au>Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS</au><au>Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS</au><au>Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance under Static and Fatigue Loading of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Carbon Fiber Posts, Glass Fiber Posts, and an Experimental Dentin Post System: An In Vitro Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>96-100</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction This investigation sought to compare the fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and experimental dentin posts milled from human root dentin by using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing. Methods Seventy maxillary central incisors were obturated and divided into 4 groups: control group without any post (n = 10), carbon fiber post group (n = 20), glass fiber post group (n = 20), and dentin post group (n = 20). Control group teeth were prepared to a height of 5 mm. In all other teeth, post space was prepared; a post was cemented, and a core build-up was provided. Half the samples from each group were statistically loaded until failure, and the remaining half were subjected to cyclic loading, followed by monostatic load until fracture. Results One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons revealed a significant difference among test groups. The control group demonstrated highest fracture resistance (935.03 ± 33.53 N), followed by the dentin post group (793.12 ± 33.69 N), glass fiber post group (603.44 ± 46.67 N), and carbon fiber post group (497.19 ± 19.27 N) under static loading. These values reduced to 786.69 ± 29.64 N, 646.34 ± 26.56 N, 470 ± 36.34 N, and 379.71 ± 13.95 N, respectively, after cyclic loading. Conclusions Results suggest that human dentin can serve as post material under static and fatigue loading. Although at an early stage in research, the use of dentin posts in root-filled teeth looks promising.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23228265</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.003</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0099-2399 |
ispartof | Journal of endodontics, 2013, Vol.39 (1), p.96-100 |
issn | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237501992 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Acid Etching, Dental - methods Biomechanical Phenomena Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry Bite Force Carbon - chemistry Cementation - methods Composite Resins - chemistry Computer aided designing-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) Computer-Aided Design cyclic loading Dental Materials - chemistry Dental Prosthesis Design Dentin dentin post Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry Dentistry Endocrinology & Metabolism Epoxy Resins - therapeutic use fiber-reinforced composite post fracture resistance Glass - chemistry Gutta-Percha - therapeutic use Humans Incisor - pathology Materials Testing Post and Core Technique - instrumentation Resin Cements - chemistry Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use Root Canal Preparation - methods Stress, Mechanical Temperature Time Factors Tooth Fractures - physiopathology Tooth, Nonvital - pathology Tooth, Nonvital - therapy Water - chemistry |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance under Static and Fatigue Loading of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Carbon Fiber Posts, Glass Fiber Posts, and an Experimental Dentin Post System: An In Vitro Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A23%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Evaluation%20of%20Fracture%20Resistance%20under%20Static%20and%20Fatigue%20Loading%20of%20Endodontically%20Treated%20Teeth%20Restored%20with%20Carbon%20Fiber%20Posts,%20Glass%20Fiber%20Posts,%20and%20an%20Experimental%20Dentin%20Post%20System:%20An%20In%C2%A0Vitro%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Ambica,%20Khetarpal,%20BDS,%20MDS&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=96-100&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1237501992%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1237501992&rft_id=info:pmid/23228265&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0099239912007273&rfr_iscdi=true |