Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance under Static and Fatigue Loading of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Carbon Fiber Posts, Glass Fiber Posts, and an Experimental Dentin Post System: An In Vitro Study

Abstract Introduction This investigation sought to compare the fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and experimental dentin posts milled from human root dentin by using computer-aided design/computer-aided...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endodontics 2013, Vol.39 (1), p.96-100
Hauptverfasser: Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS, Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS, Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS, Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS, Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS, Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100
container_issue 1
container_start_page 96
container_title Journal of endodontics
container_volume 39
creator Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS
Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS
Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS
Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS
Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS
Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS
description Abstract Introduction This investigation sought to compare the fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and experimental dentin posts milled from human root dentin by using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing. Methods Seventy maxillary central incisors were obturated and divided into 4 groups: control group without any post (n = 10), carbon fiber post group (n = 20), glass fiber post group (n = 20), and dentin post group (n = 20). Control group teeth were prepared to a height of 5 mm. In all other teeth, post space was prepared; a post was cemented, and a core build-up was provided. Half the samples from each group were statistically loaded until failure, and the remaining half were subjected to cyclic loading, followed by monostatic load until fracture. Results One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons revealed a significant difference among test groups. The control group demonstrated highest fracture resistance (935.03 ± 33.53 N), followed by the dentin post group (793.12 ± 33.69 N), glass fiber post group (603.44 ± 46.67 N), and carbon fiber post group (497.19 ± 19.27 N) under static loading. These values reduced to 786.69 ± 29.64 N, 646.34 ± 26.56 N, 470 ± 36.34 N, and 379.71 ± 13.95 N, respectively, after cyclic loading. Conclusions Results suggest that human dentin can serve as post material under static and fatigue loading. Although at an early stage in research, the use of dentin posts in root-filled teeth looks promising.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237501992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0099239912007273</els_id><sourcerecordid>1237501992</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-719b9a2faee41f4e757bfca398fbe73dbd39adbe9285c3084c8187eaccd52f9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Us1uEzEQXiEQDYUX4IB85ECCf7LdNUKVqpCUSpFAJHC1vPZscdjYwfamzdvwLDwIz8IsKUhw4DQz1vd945lviuIpoxNG2dnLzWQTwE84ZXxCqwml4l4xYnVVj0VZTu8XI0qlHHMh5UnxKKUNpawSonpYnHDBec3PylHxYxa2Ox11dnsg873uekyDJ6Eli6hN7iOQD5BcytobIL23EMkqI8gQ7S1ZYHbdA1kGbZ2_Hnhzb4MNHhG66w5kHUFnsGQNkD8PWjlELG8cVjMdG2y2cA2qvg8ppxfkstMp_f00NNKezG93EN0WfNYdeYPB-V8IsjqkDNtX5MKTK__92yeXY8BP9vbwuHjQ6i7Bk7t4WnxczNezt-Plu8ur2cVybKaM5XHFZCM1bzXAlLVTqMqqaY0Wsm4bqIRtrJDaNiB5XRpB66mpcc-gjbElb6UVp8Xzo-4uhq89zqi2LhnoOu0h9EkxLqqSMik5QvkRamJIKUKrdjiUjgfFqBp8VRs1-KoGXxWtFPqKpGd3-n2zBfuH8ttIBLw-AgCn3DuIKhkHaJl1EUxWNrj_65__Qzed84ODX-AAaRP66HF_iqmEHLUaLms4LMYprThe1U91C862</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1237501992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance under Static and Fatigue Loading of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Carbon Fiber Posts, Glass Fiber Posts, and an Experimental Dentin Post System: An In Vitro Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS ; Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS ; Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS ; Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS ; Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS ; Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</creator><creatorcontrib>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS ; Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS ; Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS ; Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS ; Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS ; Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction This investigation sought to compare the fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and experimental dentin posts milled from human root dentin by using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing. Methods Seventy maxillary central incisors were obturated and divided into 4 groups: control group without any post (n = 10), carbon fiber post group (n = 20), glass fiber post group (n = 20), and dentin post group (n = 20). Control group teeth were prepared to a height of 5 mm. In all other teeth, post space was prepared; a post was cemented, and a core build-up was provided. Half the samples from each group were statistically loaded until failure, and the remaining half were subjected to cyclic loading, followed by monostatic load until fracture. Results One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons revealed a significant difference among test groups. The control group demonstrated highest fracture resistance (935.03 ± 33.53 N), followed by the dentin post group (793.12 ± 33.69 N), glass fiber post group (603.44 ± 46.67 N), and carbon fiber post group (497.19 ± 19.27 N) under static loading. These values reduced to 786.69 ± 29.64 N, 646.34 ± 26.56 N, 470 ± 36.34 N, and 379.71 ± 13.95 N, respectively, after cyclic loading. Conclusions Results suggest that human dentin can serve as post material under static and fatigue loading. Although at an early stage in research, the use of dentin posts in root-filled teeth looks promising.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23228265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acid Etching, Dental - methods ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry ; Bite Force ; Carbon - chemistry ; Cementation - methods ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Computer aided designing-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) ; Computer-Aided Design ; cyclic loading ; Dental Materials - chemistry ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dentin ; dentin post ; Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry ; Dentistry ; Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism ; Epoxy Resins - therapeutic use ; fiber-reinforced composite post ; fracture resistance ; Glass - chemistry ; Gutta-Percha - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Incisor - pathology ; Materials Testing ; Post and Core Technique - instrumentation ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use ; Root Canal Preparation - methods ; Stress, Mechanical ; Temperature ; Time Factors ; Tooth Fractures - physiopathology ; Tooth, Nonvital - pathology ; Tooth, Nonvital - therapy ; Water - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2013, Vol.39 (1), p.96-100</ispartof><rights>American Association of Endodontists</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Endodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-719b9a2faee41f4e757bfca398fbe73dbd39adbe9285c3084c8187eaccd52f9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-719b9a2faee41f4e757bfca398fbe73dbd39adbe9285c3084c8187eaccd52f9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23228265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance under Static and Fatigue Loading of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Carbon Fiber Posts, Glass Fiber Posts, and an Experimental Dentin Post System: An In Vitro Study</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction This investigation sought to compare the fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and experimental dentin posts milled from human root dentin by using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing. Methods Seventy maxillary central incisors were obturated and divided into 4 groups: control group without any post (n = 10), carbon fiber post group (n = 20), glass fiber post group (n = 20), and dentin post group (n = 20). Control group teeth were prepared to a height of 5 mm. In all other teeth, post space was prepared; a post was cemented, and a core build-up was provided. Half the samples from each group were statistically loaded until failure, and the remaining half were subjected to cyclic loading, followed by monostatic load until fracture. Results One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons revealed a significant difference among test groups. The control group demonstrated highest fracture resistance (935.03 ± 33.53 N), followed by the dentin post group (793.12 ± 33.69 N), glass fiber post group (603.44 ± 46.67 N), and carbon fiber post group (497.19 ± 19.27 N) under static loading. These values reduced to 786.69 ± 29.64 N, 646.34 ± 26.56 N, 470 ± 36.34 N, and 379.71 ± 13.95 N, respectively, after cyclic loading. Conclusions Results suggest that human dentin can serve as post material under static and fatigue loading. Although at an early stage in research, the use of dentin posts in root-filled teeth looks promising.</description><subject>Acid Etching, Dental - methods</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry</subject><subject>Bite Force</subject><subject>Carbon - chemistry</subject><subject>Cementation - methods</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Computer aided designing-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM)</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>cyclic loading</subject><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>dentin post</subject><subject>Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</subject><subject>Epoxy Resins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>fiber-reinforced composite post</subject><subject>fracture resistance</subject><subject>Glass - chemistry</subject><subject>Gutta-Percha - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incisor - pathology</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Post and Core Technique - instrumentation</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - methods</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tooth Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tooth, Nonvital - pathology</subject><subject>Tooth, Nonvital - therapy</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Us1uEzEQXiEQDYUX4IB85ECCf7LdNUKVqpCUSpFAJHC1vPZscdjYwfamzdvwLDwIz8IsKUhw4DQz1vd945lviuIpoxNG2dnLzWQTwE84ZXxCqwml4l4xYnVVj0VZTu8XI0qlHHMh5UnxKKUNpawSonpYnHDBec3PylHxYxa2Ox11dnsg873uekyDJ6Eli6hN7iOQD5BcytobIL23EMkqI8gQ7S1ZYHbdA1kGbZ2_Hnhzb4MNHhG66w5kHUFnsGQNkD8PWjlELG8cVjMdG2y2cA2qvg8ppxfkstMp_f00NNKezG93EN0WfNYdeYPB-V8IsjqkDNtX5MKTK__92yeXY8BP9vbwuHjQ6i7Bk7t4WnxczNezt-Plu8ur2cVybKaM5XHFZCM1bzXAlLVTqMqqaY0Wsm4bqIRtrJDaNiB5XRpB66mpcc-gjbElb6UVp8Xzo-4uhq89zqi2LhnoOu0h9EkxLqqSMik5QvkRamJIKUKrdjiUjgfFqBp8VRs1-KoGXxWtFPqKpGd3-n2zBfuH8ttIBLw-AgCn3DuIKhkHaJl1EUxWNrj_65__Qzed84ODX-AAaRP66HF_iqmEHLUaLms4LMYprThe1U91C862</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS</creator><creator>Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS</creator><creator>Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS</creator><creator>Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS</creator><creator>Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS</creator><creator>Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance under Static and Fatigue Loading of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Carbon Fiber Posts, Glass Fiber Posts, and an Experimental Dentin Post System: An In Vitro Study</title><author>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS ; Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS ; Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS ; Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS ; Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS ; Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-719b9a2faee41f4e757bfca398fbe73dbd39adbe9285c3084c8187eaccd52f9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acid Etching, Dental - methods</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry</topic><topic>Bite Force</topic><topic>Carbon - chemistry</topic><topic>Cementation - methods</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Computer aided designing-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM)</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>cyclic loading</topic><topic>Dental Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>dentin post</topic><topic>Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</topic><topic>Epoxy Resins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>fiber-reinforced composite post</topic><topic>fracture resistance</topic><topic>Glass - chemistry</topic><topic>Gutta-Percha - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incisor - pathology</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Post and Core Technique - instrumentation</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - methods</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tooth Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tooth, Nonvital - pathology</topic><topic>Tooth, Nonvital - therapy</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ambica, Khetarpal, BDS, MDS</au><au>Mahendran, Kavitha, BDS, MDS</au><au>Talwar, Sangeeta, BDS, MDS</au><au>Verma, Mahesh, BDS, MDS</au><au>Padmini, Govindaswamy, BDS, MDS</au><au>Periasamy, Ravishankar, BDS, MDS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance under Static and Fatigue Loading of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Carbon Fiber Posts, Glass Fiber Posts, and an Experimental Dentin Post System: An In Vitro Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>96-100</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction This investigation sought to compare the fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and experimental dentin posts milled from human root dentin by using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing. Methods Seventy maxillary central incisors were obturated and divided into 4 groups: control group without any post (n = 10), carbon fiber post group (n = 20), glass fiber post group (n = 20), and dentin post group (n = 20). Control group teeth were prepared to a height of 5 mm. In all other teeth, post space was prepared; a post was cemented, and a core build-up was provided. Half the samples from each group were statistically loaded until failure, and the remaining half were subjected to cyclic loading, followed by monostatic load until fracture. Results One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons revealed a significant difference among test groups. The control group demonstrated highest fracture resistance (935.03 ± 33.53 N), followed by the dentin post group (793.12 ± 33.69 N), glass fiber post group (603.44 ± 46.67 N), and carbon fiber post group (497.19 ± 19.27 N) under static loading. These values reduced to 786.69 ± 29.64 N, 646.34 ± 26.56 N, 470 ± 36.34 N, and 379.71 ± 13.95 N, respectively, after cyclic loading. Conclusions Results suggest that human dentin can serve as post material under static and fatigue loading. Although at an early stage in research, the use of dentin posts in root-filled teeth looks promising.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23228265</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.003</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0099-2399
ispartof Journal of endodontics, 2013, Vol.39 (1), p.96-100
issn 0099-2399
1878-3554
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237501992
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Acid Etching, Dental - methods
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry
Bite Force
Carbon - chemistry
Cementation - methods
Composite Resins - chemistry
Computer aided designing-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM)
Computer-Aided Design
cyclic loading
Dental Materials - chemistry
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dentin
dentin post
Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry
Dentistry
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Epoxy Resins - therapeutic use
fiber-reinforced composite post
fracture resistance
Glass - chemistry
Gutta-Percha - therapeutic use
Humans
Incisor - pathology
Materials Testing
Post and Core Technique - instrumentation
Resin Cements - chemistry
Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use
Root Canal Preparation - methods
Stress, Mechanical
Temperature
Time Factors
Tooth Fractures - physiopathology
Tooth, Nonvital - pathology
Tooth, Nonvital - therapy
Water - chemistry
title Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance under Static and Fatigue Loading of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Carbon Fiber Posts, Glass Fiber Posts, and an Experimental Dentin Post System: An In Vitro Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A23%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Evaluation%20of%20Fracture%20Resistance%20under%20Static%20and%20Fatigue%20Loading%20of%20Endodontically%20Treated%20Teeth%20Restored%20with%20Carbon%20Fiber%20Posts,%20Glass%20Fiber%20Posts,%20and%20an%20Experimental%20Dentin%20Post%20System:%20An%20In%C2%A0Vitro%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Ambica,%20Khetarpal,%20BDS,%20MDS&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=96-100&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1237501992%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1237501992&rft_id=info:pmid/23228265&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0099239912007273&rfr_iscdi=true