What Are Orthognathic Patients' Expectations of Treatment Outcome—A Qualitative Study
Purpose Patient's expectations of treatment outcome are one of the key determinants of satisfaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate orthognathic patients' expectations of the outcome of orthognathic treatment. Methods This study was a cross-sectional qualitative study involving in-d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2012-11, Vol.70 (11), p.2648-2655 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2655 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2648 |
container_title | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Ryan, Fiona S., BDS(Hons), MFDS RCS, MSC, MOrth RCS, FDS(Orth) RCS Barnard, Matthew, MA Cunningham, Susan J., PhD, BChD, MSc, MOrth |
description | Purpose Patient's expectations of treatment outcome are one of the key determinants of satisfaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate orthognathic patients' expectations of the outcome of orthognathic treatment. Methods This study was a cross-sectional qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with patients with dentofacial deformities. Patients who were about to commence orthognathic treatment were recruited from new-patient clinics. Inclusion criterion were patients of any ethnicity 16 years or older who were about to commence orthognathic treatment to correct a dentofacial deformity. Exclusion criteria were patients who had previously received orthognathic treatment, who were younger than 16 years, and those with congenital craniofacial anomalies or acquired defects. The data were analyzed using a framework approach to management and critical qualitative theory, which involved identifying the main themes and subthemes. Results Eighteen adult patients 18 to 40 years old were interviewed; 9 were women and 9 were men. Most were Caucasian and 6 were from the black and minority ethnic group. Participants' expectations could be divided broadly into 2 main categories: expectations of actual physical changes and expectations of the effects that these physical changes would indirectly have on them (nonphysical changes). In addition, a typology of patients, based on expectations, was identified, whereby patients could be classified as metamorphosizers, pragmatists, shedders, or evolvers, together with implications and suggestions for practice. Conclusions These findings represent a new insight into the complex issues of managing patient expectations and satisfaction. The clinical relevance of identifying expectations is not just to ration treatment or identify those who will make good or bad candidates for treatment, but to be able to offer them additional support to enhance satisfaction with the outcome. This highlights the need for a qualitative methodology to complete the full circle of evidence-based practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237084061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0278239112000651</els_id><sourcerecordid>1237084061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-58cef0a2e3438115ea66520da13a8f31046dc2a746402eeec618adef2b4b76bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuKFDEUhoMoTjv6Ai6kNqKbKs9JKqkaEKEZxgsMtDIjswzp1Ck7bV16ktRg73wIn9AnMUW3Ci5chZDvP_n5DmNPEQoEVK-2xXbsQ8EBeQFYAPB7bIFSYC5BivtsAbyqcy7O8IQ9CmELgCgr9ZCdcC5UWcuzBbu52ZiYLT1lKx8345fBxI2z2UcTHQ0xvMguvu3IxnQdh5CNbXbtycQ-vWWrKdqxp5_ffyyzT5Pp3EzdUXYVp2b_mD1oTRfoyfE8ZZ_fXlyfv88vV-8-nC8vc1uWGHNZW2rBcBKlqFM7MkpJDo1BYepWIJSqsdxUpSqBE5FVWJuGWr4u15VaW3HKXh7m7vx4O1GIunfBUteZgcYpaOSigroEhQnlB9T6MQRPrd551xu_1wh6Fqq3ehaqZ6EaUCehKfTsOH9a99T8ifw2mIDnR8AEa7rWm8G68JdTEqWsqsS9PnCUbNw58jrYpNhS43wSrJvR_b_Hm3_itnODSz9-pT2F7Tj5IXnWqEPK6Kt59fPmkQNA6iB-AdgIqbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1237084061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Are Orthognathic Patients' Expectations of Treatment Outcome—A Qualitative Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ryan, Fiona S., BDS(Hons), MFDS RCS, MSC, MOrth RCS, FDS(Orth) RCS ; Barnard, Matthew, MA ; Cunningham, Susan J., PhD, BChD, MSc, MOrth</creator><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Fiona S., BDS(Hons), MFDS RCS, MSC, MOrth RCS, FDS(Orth) RCS ; Barnard, Matthew, MA ; Cunningham, Susan J., PhD, BChD, MSc, MOrth</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Patient's expectations of treatment outcome are one of the key determinants of satisfaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate orthognathic patients' expectations of the outcome of orthognathic treatment. Methods This study was a cross-sectional qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with patients with dentofacial deformities. Patients who were about to commence orthognathic treatment were recruited from new-patient clinics. Inclusion criterion were patients of any ethnicity 16 years or older who were about to commence orthognathic treatment to correct a dentofacial deformity. Exclusion criteria were patients who had previously received orthognathic treatment, who were younger than 16 years, and those with congenital craniofacial anomalies or acquired defects. The data were analyzed using a framework approach to management and critical qualitative theory, which involved identifying the main themes and subthemes. Results Eighteen adult patients 18 to 40 years old were interviewed; 9 were women and 9 were men. Most were Caucasian and 6 were from the black and minority ethnic group. Participants' expectations could be divided broadly into 2 main categories: expectations of actual physical changes and expectations of the effects that these physical changes would indirectly have on them (nonphysical changes). In addition, a typology of patients, based on expectations, was identified, whereby patients could be classified as metamorphosizers, pragmatists, shedders, or evolvers, together with implications and suggestions for practice. Conclusions These findings represent a new insight into the complex issues of managing patient expectations and satisfaction. The clinical relevance of identifying expectations is not just to ration treatment or identify those who will make good or bad candidates for treatment, but to be able to offer them additional support to enhance satisfaction with the outcome. This highlights the need for a qualitative methodology to complete the full circle of evidence-based practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22364859</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMSDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dentistry ; Dentofacial Deformities - psychology ; Dentofacial Deformities - surgery ; Esthetics, Dental - psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II - psychology ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II - surgery ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III - psychology ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - psychology ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Qualitative Research ; Research Design ; Self Efficacy ; Social Desirability ; Surgery ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2012-11, Vol.70 (11), p.2648-2655</ispartof><rights>American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-58cef0a2e3438115ea66520da13a8f31046dc2a746402eeec618adef2b4b76bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-58cef0a2e3438115ea66520da13a8f31046dc2a746402eeec618adef2b4b76bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26515577$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22364859$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Fiona S., BDS(Hons), MFDS RCS, MSC, MOrth RCS, FDS(Orth) RCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnard, Matthew, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Susan J., PhD, BChD, MSc, MOrth</creatorcontrib><title>What Are Orthognathic Patients' Expectations of Treatment Outcome—A Qualitative Study</title><title>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose Patient's expectations of treatment outcome are one of the key determinants of satisfaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate orthognathic patients' expectations of the outcome of orthognathic treatment. Methods This study was a cross-sectional qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with patients with dentofacial deformities. Patients who were about to commence orthognathic treatment were recruited from new-patient clinics. Inclusion criterion were patients of any ethnicity 16 years or older who were about to commence orthognathic treatment to correct a dentofacial deformity. Exclusion criteria were patients who had previously received orthognathic treatment, who were younger than 16 years, and those with congenital craniofacial anomalies or acquired defects. The data were analyzed using a framework approach to management and critical qualitative theory, which involved identifying the main themes and subthemes. Results Eighteen adult patients 18 to 40 years old were interviewed; 9 were women and 9 were men. Most were Caucasian and 6 were from the black and minority ethnic group. Participants' expectations could be divided broadly into 2 main categories: expectations of actual physical changes and expectations of the effects that these physical changes would indirectly have on them (nonphysical changes). In addition, a typology of patients, based on expectations, was identified, whereby patients could be classified as metamorphosizers, pragmatists, shedders, or evolvers, together with implications and suggestions for practice. Conclusions These findings represent a new insight into the complex issues of managing patient expectations and satisfaction. The clinical relevance of identifying expectations is not just to ration treatment or identify those who will make good or bad candidates for treatment, but to be able to offer them additional support to enhance satisfaction with the outcome. This highlights the need for a qualitative methodology to complete the full circle of evidence-based practice.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentofacial Deformities - psychology</subject><subject>Dentofacial Deformities - surgery</subject><subject>Esthetics, Dental - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - psychology</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - surgery</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class III - psychology</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class III - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - psychology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Social Desirability</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0278-2391</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuKFDEUhoMoTjv6Ai6kNqKbKs9JKqkaEKEZxgsMtDIjswzp1Ck7bV16ktRg73wIn9AnMUW3Ci5chZDvP_n5DmNPEQoEVK-2xXbsQ8EBeQFYAPB7bIFSYC5BivtsAbyqcy7O8IQ9CmELgCgr9ZCdcC5UWcuzBbu52ZiYLT1lKx8345fBxI2z2UcTHQ0xvMguvu3IxnQdh5CNbXbtycQ-vWWrKdqxp5_ffyyzT5Pp3EzdUXYVp2b_mD1oTRfoyfE8ZZ_fXlyfv88vV-8-nC8vc1uWGHNZW2rBcBKlqFM7MkpJDo1BYepWIJSqsdxUpSqBE5FVWJuGWr4u15VaW3HKXh7m7vx4O1GIunfBUteZgcYpaOSigroEhQnlB9T6MQRPrd551xu_1wh6Fqq3ehaqZ6EaUCehKfTsOH9a99T8ifw2mIDnR8AEa7rWm8G68JdTEqWsqsS9PnCUbNw58jrYpNhS43wSrJvR_b_Hm3_itnODSz9-pT2F7Tj5IXnWqEPK6Kt59fPmkQNA6iB-AdgIqbg</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Ryan, Fiona S., BDS(Hons), MFDS RCS, MSC, MOrth RCS, FDS(Orth) RCS</creator><creator>Barnard, Matthew, MA</creator><creator>Cunningham, Susan J., PhD, BChD, MSc, MOrth</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>What Are Orthognathic Patients' Expectations of Treatment Outcome—A Qualitative Study</title><author>Ryan, Fiona S., BDS(Hons), MFDS RCS, MSC, MOrth RCS, FDS(Orth) RCS ; Barnard, Matthew, MA ; Cunningham, Susan J., PhD, BChD, MSc, MOrth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-58cef0a2e3438115ea66520da13a8f31046dc2a746402eeec618adef2b4b76bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentofacial Deformities - psychology</topic><topic>Dentofacial Deformities - surgery</topic><topic>Esthetics, Dental - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - psychology</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - surgery</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class III - psychology</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class III - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - psychology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Social Desirability</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Fiona S., BDS(Hons), MFDS RCS, MSC, MOrth RCS, FDS(Orth) RCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnard, Matthew, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Susan J., PhD, BChD, MSc, MOrth</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ryan, Fiona S., BDS(Hons), MFDS RCS, MSC, MOrth RCS, FDS(Orth) RCS</au><au>Barnard, Matthew, MA</au><au>Cunningham, Susan J., PhD, BChD, MSc, MOrth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Are Orthognathic Patients' Expectations of Treatment Outcome—A Qualitative Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2648</spage><epage>2655</epage><pages>2648-2655</pages><issn>0278-2391</issn><eissn>1531-5053</eissn><coden>JOMSDA</coden><abstract>Purpose Patient's expectations of treatment outcome are one of the key determinants of satisfaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate orthognathic patients' expectations of the outcome of orthognathic treatment. Methods This study was a cross-sectional qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with patients with dentofacial deformities. Patients who were about to commence orthognathic treatment were recruited from new-patient clinics. Inclusion criterion were patients of any ethnicity 16 years or older who were about to commence orthognathic treatment to correct a dentofacial deformity. Exclusion criteria were patients who had previously received orthognathic treatment, who were younger than 16 years, and those with congenital craniofacial anomalies or acquired defects. The data were analyzed using a framework approach to management and critical qualitative theory, which involved identifying the main themes and subthemes. Results Eighteen adult patients 18 to 40 years old were interviewed; 9 were women and 9 were men. Most were Caucasian and 6 were from the black and minority ethnic group. Participants' expectations could be divided broadly into 2 main categories: expectations of actual physical changes and expectations of the effects that these physical changes would indirectly have on them (nonphysical changes). In addition, a typology of patients, based on expectations, was identified, whereby patients could be classified as metamorphosizers, pragmatists, shedders, or evolvers, together with implications and suggestions for practice. Conclusions These findings represent a new insight into the complex issues of managing patient expectations and satisfaction. The clinical relevance of identifying expectations is not just to ration treatment or identify those who will make good or bad candidates for treatment, but to be able to offer them additional support to enhance satisfaction with the outcome. This highlights the need for a qualitative methodology to complete the full circle of evidence-based practice.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22364859</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-2391 |
ispartof | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2012-11, Vol.70 (11), p.2648-2655 |
issn | 0278-2391 1531-5053 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237084061 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences Cross-Sectional Studies Dentistry Dentofacial Deformities - psychology Dentofacial Deformities - surgery Esthetics, Dental - psychology Female Humans Male Malocclusion, Angle Class II - psychology Malocclusion, Angle Class II - surgery Malocclusion, Angle Class III - psychology Malocclusion, Angle Class III - surgery Medical sciences Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - psychology Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Patient Satisfaction Qualitative Research Research Design Self Efficacy Social Desirability Surgery Young Adult |
title | What Are Orthognathic Patients' Expectations of Treatment Outcome—A Qualitative Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A38%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Are%20Orthognathic%20Patients'%20Expectations%20of%20Treatment%20Outcome%E2%80%94A%20Qualitative%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Ryan,%20Fiona%20S.,%20BDS(Hons),%20MFDS%20RCS,%20MSC,%20MOrth%20RCS,%20FDS(Orth)%20RCS&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2648&rft.epage=2655&rft.pages=2648-2655&rft.issn=0278-2391&rft.eissn=1531-5053&rft.coden=JOMSDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1237084061%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1237084061&rft_id=info:pmid/22364859&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0278239112000651&rfr_iscdi=true |