Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities

Abstract Background Recently we have shown that transcranial random noise (tRNS) and 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulations (tACS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and using 10 min stimulation duration and 1 mA intensity, significantly increases cortical excitability as meas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain stimulation 2012-10, Vol.5 (4), p.505-511
Hauptverfasser: Moliadze, Vera, Atalay, Deniz, Antal, Andrea, Paulus, Walter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 511
container_issue 4
container_start_page 505
container_title Brain stimulation
container_volume 5
creator Moliadze, Vera
Atalay, Deniz
Antal, Andrea
Paulus, Walter
description Abstract Background Recently we have shown that transcranial random noise (tRNS) and 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulations (tACS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and using 10 min stimulation duration and 1 mA intensity, significantly increases cortical excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials at rest before and after stimulation. Objective/hypothesis Here, by decreasing the stimulation intensity in 0.2 mA steps from 1.0 mA, we investigate to what extent intensity depends on the induced after-effects. Methods All twenty-five subjects participated in two different experimental sessions each. They received tACS using 140 Hz frequency and full spectrum tRNS at five different intensities on separate days. Sham stimulation was used as a control. Results Instead of receiving a simple threshold, unexpectedly, in these two independent data sets at threshold intensities of 0.4 mA we found a switch of the already known excitation achieved with an intensity of 1 mA to inhibition. The intermediate intensity ranges of 0.6 and 0.8 mA had no effect at all. Interestingly, the inhibition produced by 140 Hz tACS was stronger than that induced by tRNS. Conclusions In summary, we have shown here the possibility of selectively controlling the enhancement or reduction of M1 excitability by applying different intensities of high frequency transcranial electrical stimulation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237083832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1935861X11001677</els_id><sourcerecordid>1237083832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-af21315be6073a36e4c6a2d00a159699b8fc1ac1062cfb4b41a07ebb84c9a4713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQbURxP_QHeJEcvfSY6k5_IQgyqCsseFDBW0inq7drticZU-ld56_4a00zqwcPQpEU4b1X5L3KshcgNyChfr3b9IE3hQTYpJJSPcrOoW3qXDWVepz6rqzytobvZ9kF807Kquva5ml2VhRKVVBW59mv7ewZRfQiTgF58vMgYjCObTrIzAJntDGQTS1H2i-zieSdOAQcMaCLCTMfhbGR7kxEFuQm6in6cBQO470Ptyx6HH1AwfcU7UTuZh2HPy3Fk1Z6nsRENxOGRI_omCIhP8uejGZmfP5wX2bfPrz_ur3Krz9__LR9d51bJduYm7GAEqoea9mUpqxR2doUg5QGqq7uur4dLRgLsi7s2KtegZEN9n2rbGdUA-Vl9uqkewj-x4Ic9Z7Y4jwbh35hDUXZyLZsyyJB4QS1wTMnC_Qh0N6Eowap10j0TqdI9BqJTpUiSZyXD_JLv8fhL-NPBgnw5gTA9Mk7wqDZEjqLA4XkvR48_Vf-7T9sO5Nb87rFI_LOL8El9zRoLrTUX9adWFcCQCbBpil_A9Z7tuk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1237083832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Moliadze, Vera ; Atalay, Deniz ; Antal, Andrea ; Paulus, Walter</creator><creatorcontrib>Moliadze, Vera ; Atalay, Deniz ; Antal, Andrea ; Paulus, Walter</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Recently we have shown that transcranial random noise (tRNS) and 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulations (tACS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and using 10 min stimulation duration and 1 mA intensity, significantly increases cortical excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials at rest before and after stimulation. Objective/hypothesis Here, by decreasing the stimulation intensity in 0.2 mA steps from 1.0 mA, we investigate to what extent intensity depends on the induced after-effects. Methods All twenty-five subjects participated in two different experimental sessions each. They received tACS using 140 Hz frequency and full spectrum tRNS at five different intensities on separate days. Sham stimulation was used as a control. Results Instead of receiving a simple threshold, unexpectedly, in these two independent data sets at threshold intensities of 0.4 mA we found a switch of the already known excitation achieved with an intensity of 1 mA to inhibition. The intermediate intensity ranges of 0.6 and 0.8 mA had no effect at all. Interestingly, the inhibition produced by 140 Hz tACS was stronger than that induced by tRNS. Conclusions In summary, we have shown here the possibility of selectively controlling the enhancement or reduction of M1 excitability by applying different intensities of high frequency transcranial electrical stimulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-861X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-4754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22445135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - physiology ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Female ; High frequency oscillation ; Humans ; Male ; Motor Cortex - physiology ; Neural Inhibition - physiology ; Neurology ; Plasticity ; Transcranial alternating current stimulation ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ; Transcranial random noise stimulation</subject><ispartof>Brain stimulation, 2012-10, Vol.5 (4), p.505-511</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-af21315be6073a36e4c6a2d00a159699b8fc1ac1062cfb4b41a07ebb84c9a4713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-af21315be6073a36e4c6a2d00a159699b8fc1ac1062cfb4b41a07ebb84c9a4713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22445135$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moliadze, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atalay, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antal, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulus, Walter</creatorcontrib><title>Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities</title><title>Brain stimulation</title><addtitle>Brain Stimul</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Recently we have shown that transcranial random noise (tRNS) and 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulations (tACS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and using 10 min stimulation duration and 1 mA intensity, significantly increases cortical excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials at rest before and after stimulation. Objective/hypothesis Here, by decreasing the stimulation intensity in 0.2 mA steps from 1.0 mA, we investigate to what extent intensity depends on the induced after-effects. Methods All twenty-five subjects participated in two different experimental sessions each. They received tACS using 140 Hz frequency and full spectrum tRNS at five different intensities on separate days. Sham stimulation was used as a control. Results Instead of receiving a simple threshold, unexpectedly, in these two independent data sets at threshold intensities of 0.4 mA we found a switch of the already known excitation achieved with an intensity of 1 mA to inhibition. The intermediate intensity ranges of 0.6 and 0.8 mA had no effect at all. Interestingly, the inhibition produced by 140 Hz tACS was stronger than that induced by tRNS. Conclusions In summary, we have shown here the possibility of selectively controlling the enhancement or reduction of M1 excitability by applying different intensities of high frequency transcranial electrical stimulation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>High frequency oscillation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Neural Inhibition - physiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Transcranial alternating current stimulation</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</subject><subject>Transcranial random noise stimulation</subject><issn>1935-861X</issn><issn>1876-4754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQbURxP_QHeJEcvfSY6k5_IQgyqCsseFDBW0inq7drticZU-ld56_4a00zqwcPQpEU4b1X5L3KshcgNyChfr3b9IE3hQTYpJJSPcrOoW3qXDWVepz6rqzytobvZ9kF807Kquva5ml2VhRKVVBW59mv7ewZRfQiTgF58vMgYjCObTrIzAJntDGQTS1H2i-zieSdOAQcMaCLCTMfhbGR7kxEFuQm6in6cBQO470Ptyx6HH1AwfcU7UTuZh2HPy3Fk1Z6nsRENxOGRI_omCIhP8uejGZmfP5wX2bfPrz_ur3Krz9__LR9d51bJduYm7GAEqoea9mUpqxR2doUg5QGqq7uur4dLRgLsi7s2KtegZEN9n2rbGdUA-Vl9uqkewj-x4Ic9Z7Y4jwbh35hDUXZyLZsyyJB4QS1wTMnC_Qh0N6Eowap10j0TqdI9BqJTpUiSZyXD_JLv8fhL-NPBgnw5gTA9Mk7wqDZEjqLA4XkvR48_Vf-7T9sO5Nb87rFI_LOL8El9zRoLrTUX9adWFcCQCbBpil_A9Z7tuk</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Moliadze, Vera</creator><creator>Atalay, Deniz</creator><creator>Antal, Andrea</creator><creator>Paulus, Walter</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities</title><author>Moliadze, Vera ; Atalay, Deniz ; Antal, Andrea ; Paulus, Walter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-af21315be6073a36e4c6a2d00a159699b8fc1ac1062cfb4b41a07ebb84c9a4713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>High frequency oscillation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Neural Inhibition - physiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Transcranial alternating current stimulation</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</topic><topic>Transcranial random noise stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moliadze, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atalay, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antal, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulus, Walter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain stimulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moliadze, Vera</au><au>Atalay, Deniz</au><au>Antal, Andrea</au><au>Paulus, Walter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities</atitle><jtitle>Brain stimulation</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Stimul</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>511</epage><pages>505-511</pages><issn>1935-861X</issn><eissn>1876-4754</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Recently we have shown that transcranial random noise (tRNS) and 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulations (tACS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and using 10 min stimulation duration and 1 mA intensity, significantly increases cortical excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials at rest before and after stimulation. Objective/hypothesis Here, by decreasing the stimulation intensity in 0.2 mA steps from 1.0 mA, we investigate to what extent intensity depends on the induced after-effects. Methods All twenty-five subjects participated in two different experimental sessions each. They received tACS using 140 Hz frequency and full spectrum tRNS at five different intensities on separate days. Sham stimulation was used as a control. Results Instead of receiving a simple threshold, unexpectedly, in these two independent data sets at threshold intensities of 0.4 mA we found a switch of the already known excitation achieved with an intensity of 1 mA to inhibition. The intermediate intensity ranges of 0.6 and 0.8 mA had no effect at all. Interestingly, the inhibition produced by 140 Hz tACS was stronger than that induced by tRNS. Conclusions In summary, we have shown here the possibility of selectively controlling the enhancement or reduction of M1 excitability by applying different intensities of high frequency transcranial electrical stimulation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22445135</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-861X
ispartof Brain stimulation, 2012-10, Vol.5 (4), p.505-511
issn 1935-861X
1876-4754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237083832
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Brain - physiology
Electric Stimulation - methods
Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology
Female
High frequency oscillation
Humans
Male
Motor Cortex - physiology
Neural Inhibition - physiology
Neurology
Plasticity
Transcranial alternating current stimulation
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Transcranial random noise stimulation
title Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Close%20to%20threshold%20transcranial%20electrical%20stimulation%20preferentially%20activates%20inhibitory%20networks%20before%20switching%20to%20excitation%20with%20higher%20intensities&rft.jtitle=Brain%20stimulation&rft.au=Moliadze,%20Vera&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=511&rft.pages=505-511&rft.issn=1935-861X&rft.eissn=1876-4754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1237083832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1237083832&rft_id=info:pmid/22445135&rft_els_id=S1935861X11001677&rfr_iscdi=true