Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities
Abstract Background Recently we have shown that transcranial random noise (tRNS) and 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulations (tACS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and using 10 min stimulation duration and 1 mA intensity, significantly increases cortical excitability as meas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain stimulation 2012-10, Vol.5 (4), p.505-511 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 511 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 505 |
container_title | Brain stimulation |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Moliadze, Vera Atalay, Deniz Antal, Andrea Paulus, Walter |
description | Abstract Background Recently we have shown that transcranial random noise (tRNS) and 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulations (tACS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and using 10 min stimulation duration and 1 mA intensity, significantly increases cortical excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials at rest before and after stimulation. Objective/hypothesis Here, by decreasing the stimulation intensity in 0.2 mA steps from 1.0 mA, we investigate to what extent intensity depends on the induced after-effects. Methods All twenty-five subjects participated in two different experimental sessions each. They received tACS using 140 Hz frequency and full spectrum tRNS at five different intensities on separate days. Sham stimulation was used as a control. Results Instead of receiving a simple threshold, unexpectedly, in these two independent data sets at threshold intensities of 0.4 mA we found a switch of the already known excitation achieved with an intensity of 1 mA to inhibition. The intermediate intensity ranges of 0.6 and 0.8 mA had no effect at all. Interestingly, the inhibition produced by 140 Hz tACS was stronger than that induced by tRNS. Conclusions In summary, we have shown here the possibility of selectively controlling the enhancement or reduction of M1 excitability by applying different intensities of high frequency transcranial electrical stimulation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237083832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1935861X11001677</els_id><sourcerecordid>1237083832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-af21315be6073a36e4c6a2d00a159699b8fc1ac1062cfb4b41a07ebb84c9a4713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQbURxP_QHeJEcvfSY6k5_IQgyqCsseFDBW0inq7drticZU-ld56_4a00zqwcPQpEU4b1X5L3KshcgNyChfr3b9IE3hQTYpJJSPcrOoW3qXDWVepz6rqzytobvZ9kF807Kquva5ml2VhRKVVBW59mv7ewZRfQiTgF58vMgYjCObTrIzAJntDGQTS1H2i-zieSdOAQcMaCLCTMfhbGR7kxEFuQm6in6cBQO470Ptyx6HH1AwfcU7UTuZh2HPy3Fk1Z6nsRENxOGRI_omCIhP8uejGZmfP5wX2bfPrz_ur3Krz9__LR9d51bJduYm7GAEqoea9mUpqxR2doUg5QGqq7uur4dLRgLsi7s2KtegZEN9n2rbGdUA-Vl9uqkewj-x4Ic9Z7Y4jwbh35hDUXZyLZsyyJB4QS1wTMnC_Qh0N6Eowap10j0TqdI9BqJTpUiSZyXD_JLv8fhL-NPBgnw5gTA9Mk7wqDZEjqLA4XkvR48_Vf-7T9sO5Nb87rFI_LOL8El9zRoLrTUX9adWFcCQCbBpil_A9Z7tuk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1237083832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Moliadze, Vera ; Atalay, Deniz ; Antal, Andrea ; Paulus, Walter</creator><creatorcontrib>Moliadze, Vera ; Atalay, Deniz ; Antal, Andrea ; Paulus, Walter</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Recently we have shown that transcranial random noise (tRNS) and 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulations (tACS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and using 10 min stimulation duration and 1 mA intensity, significantly increases cortical excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials at rest before and after stimulation. Objective/hypothesis Here, by decreasing the stimulation intensity in 0.2 mA steps from 1.0 mA, we investigate to what extent intensity depends on the induced after-effects. Methods All twenty-five subjects participated in two different experimental sessions each. They received tACS using 140 Hz frequency and full spectrum tRNS at five different intensities on separate days. Sham stimulation was used as a control. Results Instead of receiving a simple threshold, unexpectedly, in these two independent data sets at threshold intensities of 0.4 mA we found a switch of the already known excitation achieved with an intensity of 1 mA to inhibition. The intermediate intensity ranges of 0.6 and 0.8 mA had no effect at all. Interestingly, the inhibition produced by 140 Hz tACS was stronger than that induced by tRNS. Conclusions In summary, we have shown here the possibility of selectively controlling the enhancement or reduction of M1 excitability by applying different intensities of high frequency transcranial electrical stimulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-861X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-4754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22445135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - physiology ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Female ; High frequency oscillation ; Humans ; Male ; Motor Cortex - physiology ; Neural Inhibition - physiology ; Neurology ; Plasticity ; Transcranial alternating current stimulation ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ; Transcranial random noise stimulation</subject><ispartof>Brain stimulation, 2012-10, Vol.5 (4), p.505-511</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-af21315be6073a36e4c6a2d00a159699b8fc1ac1062cfb4b41a07ebb84c9a4713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-af21315be6073a36e4c6a2d00a159699b8fc1ac1062cfb4b41a07ebb84c9a4713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22445135$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moliadze, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atalay, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antal, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulus, Walter</creatorcontrib><title>Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities</title><title>Brain stimulation</title><addtitle>Brain Stimul</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Recently we have shown that transcranial random noise (tRNS) and 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulations (tACS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and using 10 min stimulation duration and 1 mA intensity, significantly increases cortical excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials at rest before and after stimulation. Objective/hypothesis Here, by decreasing the stimulation intensity in 0.2 mA steps from 1.0 mA, we investigate to what extent intensity depends on the induced after-effects. Methods All twenty-five subjects participated in two different experimental sessions each. They received tACS using 140 Hz frequency and full spectrum tRNS at five different intensities on separate days. Sham stimulation was used as a control. Results Instead of receiving a simple threshold, unexpectedly, in these two independent data sets at threshold intensities of 0.4 mA we found a switch of the already known excitation achieved with an intensity of 1 mA to inhibition. The intermediate intensity ranges of 0.6 and 0.8 mA had no effect at all. Interestingly, the inhibition produced by 140 Hz tACS was stronger than that induced by tRNS. Conclusions In summary, we have shown here the possibility of selectively controlling the enhancement or reduction of M1 excitability by applying different intensities of high frequency transcranial electrical stimulation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>High frequency oscillation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Neural Inhibition - physiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Transcranial alternating current stimulation</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</subject><subject>Transcranial random noise stimulation</subject><issn>1935-861X</issn><issn>1876-4754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQbURxP_QHeJEcvfSY6k5_IQgyqCsseFDBW0inq7drticZU-ld56_4a00zqwcPQpEU4b1X5L3KshcgNyChfr3b9IE3hQTYpJJSPcrOoW3qXDWVepz6rqzytobvZ9kF807Kquva5ml2VhRKVVBW59mv7ewZRfQiTgF58vMgYjCObTrIzAJntDGQTS1H2i-zieSdOAQcMaCLCTMfhbGR7kxEFuQm6in6cBQO470Ptyx6HH1AwfcU7UTuZh2HPy3Fk1Z6nsRENxOGRI_omCIhP8uejGZmfP5wX2bfPrz_ur3Krz9__LR9d51bJduYm7GAEqoea9mUpqxR2doUg5QGqq7uur4dLRgLsi7s2KtegZEN9n2rbGdUA-Vl9uqkewj-x4Ic9Z7Y4jwbh35hDUXZyLZsyyJB4QS1wTMnC_Qh0N6Eowap10j0TqdI9BqJTpUiSZyXD_JLv8fhL-NPBgnw5gTA9Mk7wqDZEjqLA4XkvR48_Vf-7T9sO5Nb87rFI_LOL8El9zRoLrTUX9adWFcCQCbBpil_A9Z7tuk</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Moliadze, Vera</creator><creator>Atalay, Deniz</creator><creator>Antal, Andrea</creator><creator>Paulus, Walter</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities</title><author>Moliadze, Vera ; Atalay, Deniz ; Antal, Andrea ; Paulus, Walter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-af21315be6073a36e4c6a2d00a159699b8fc1ac1062cfb4b41a07ebb84c9a4713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>High frequency oscillation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Neural Inhibition - physiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Transcranial alternating current stimulation</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</topic><topic>Transcranial random noise stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moliadze, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atalay, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antal, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulus, Walter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain stimulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moliadze, Vera</au><au>Atalay, Deniz</au><au>Antal, Andrea</au><au>Paulus, Walter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities</atitle><jtitle>Brain stimulation</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Stimul</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>511</epage><pages>505-511</pages><issn>1935-861X</issn><eissn>1876-4754</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Recently we have shown that transcranial random noise (tRNS) and 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulations (tACS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and using 10 min stimulation duration and 1 mA intensity, significantly increases cortical excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials at rest before and after stimulation. Objective/hypothesis Here, by decreasing the stimulation intensity in 0.2 mA steps from 1.0 mA, we investigate to what extent intensity depends on the induced after-effects. Methods All twenty-five subjects participated in two different experimental sessions each. They received tACS using 140 Hz frequency and full spectrum tRNS at five different intensities on separate days. Sham stimulation was used as a control. Results Instead of receiving a simple threshold, unexpectedly, in these two independent data sets at threshold intensities of 0.4 mA we found a switch of the already known excitation achieved with an intensity of 1 mA to inhibition. The intermediate intensity ranges of 0.6 and 0.8 mA had no effect at all. Interestingly, the inhibition produced by 140 Hz tACS was stronger than that induced by tRNS. Conclusions In summary, we have shown here the possibility of selectively controlling the enhancement or reduction of M1 excitability by applying different intensities of high frequency transcranial electrical stimulation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22445135</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1935-861X |
ispartof | Brain stimulation, 2012-10, Vol.5 (4), p.505-511 |
issn | 1935-861X 1876-4754 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237083832 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Brain - physiology Electric Stimulation - methods Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology Female High frequency oscillation Humans Male Motor Cortex - physiology Neural Inhibition - physiology Neurology Plasticity Transcranial alternating current stimulation Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Transcranial random noise stimulation |
title | Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Close%20to%20threshold%20transcranial%20electrical%20stimulation%20preferentially%20activates%20inhibitory%20networks%20before%20switching%20to%20excitation%20with%20higher%20intensities&rft.jtitle=Brain%20stimulation&rft.au=Moliadze,%20Vera&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=511&rft.pages=505-511&rft.issn=1935-861X&rft.eissn=1876-4754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1237083832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1237083832&rft_id=info:pmid/22445135&rft_els_id=S1935861X11001677&rfr_iscdi=true |