LER Limitations of Resist Thin Films

This paper describes fundamental studies of the degradation of LER in EUV resists as a function of film thickness. This research focused on the influence of three variables on this LER film thickness problem: ·Substrate interaction (primed silicon vs. organic underlayer) ·Changes in optical density...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology 2012/06/26, Vol.25(5), pp.633-640
Hauptverfasser: Cardineau, Brian, Early, William, Fujisawa, Tomohisa, Maruyama, Ken, Shimizu, Makato, Sharma, Shalini, Petrillo, Karen, Brainard, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 640
container_issue 5
container_start_page 633
container_title Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology
container_volume 25
creator Cardineau, Brian
Early, William
Fujisawa, Tomohisa
Maruyama, Ken
Shimizu, Makato
Sharma, Shalini
Petrillo, Karen
Brainard, Robert
description This paper describes fundamental studies of the degradation of LER in EUV resists as a function of film thickness. This research focused on the influence of three variables on this LER film thickness problem: ·Substrate interaction (primed silicon vs. organic underlayer) ·Changes in optical density (variations in fluorine content) ·PAG attachment (bound and unbound) Our experimental approach struck a balance between using resists prepared by commercial resist vendors and using open-source resists with custom-designed polymers to address specific variables listed above. One key feature of this research was our development of a mathematical method for evaluation of the extent of the LER deviation in thin films, called ψLER. Our results showed that the effect of substrate was not significant for two different resists (one commercial and one open source). Additionally, we found that increasing optical density actually made the LER degradation (ψLER) worse-which was contrary to what was predicted by other researchers. Most significant was our demonstration that PAG attachment plays the most important role in the degradation of LER in thinner resist films; polymer-bound PAGs showed a dramatic 3X improvement in ψLER over a similar blended system.
doi_str_mv 10.2494/photopolymer.25.633
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221885483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1221885483</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8b8b4a897284bb08ad1df0d8f68875309f3282bf4660f784385e9eb4022c56c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkL1OwzAURi0EEqXwBCwZGFhS_Jtcj6hqC1IkpKrMlpPa1FUSB9sd-vYEtaqQmO4dzvmGg9AjwTPKJX8Zdj75wbfHzoQZFbOCsSs0IYzLfHyLazTBkvBcUs5v0V2Me4wZE0JO0FO1WGeV61zSyfk-Zt5maxNdTNlm5_ps6dou3qMbq9toHs53ij6Xi838La8-Vu_z1ypvBMcphxpqrkGWFHhdY9BbsrV4C7YAKAXD0jIKtLa8KLAtgTMQRpqaY0obUTQlm6Ln0-4Q_PfBxKQ6FxvTtro3_hAVoZQACA5sRNkJbYKPMRirhuA6HY6KYPXbRP1toqhQY4jRWp6sfUz6y1wcHZJrWvPPEWfxAjQ7HZTp2Q9dcXEW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1221885483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LER Limitations of Resist Thin Films</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Cardineau, Brian ; Early, William ; Fujisawa, Tomohisa ; Maruyama, Ken ; Shimizu, Makato ; Sharma, Shalini ; Petrillo, Karen ; Brainard, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardineau, Brian ; Early, William ; Fujisawa, Tomohisa ; Maruyama, Ken ; Shimizu, Makato ; Sharma, Shalini ; Petrillo, Karen ; Brainard, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes fundamental studies of the degradation of LER in EUV resists as a function of film thickness. This research focused on the influence of three variables on this LER film thickness problem: ·Substrate interaction (primed silicon vs. organic underlayer) ·Changes in optical density (variations in fluorine content) ·PAG attachment (bound and unbound) Our experimental approach struck a balance between using resists prepared by commercial resist vendors and using open-source resists with custom-designed polymers to address specific variables listed above. One key feature of this research was our development of a mathematical method for evaluation of the extent of the LER deviation in thin films, called ψLER. Our results showed that the effect of substrate was not significant for two different resists (one commercial and one open source). Additionally, we found that increasing optical density actually made the LER degradation (ψLER) worse-which was contrary to what was predicted by other researchers. Most significant was our demonstration that PAG attachment plays the most important role in the degradation of LER in thinner resist films; polymer-bound PAGs showed a dramatic 3X improvement in ψLER over a similar blended system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0914-9244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-6336</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2494/photopolymer.25.633</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Society of Photopolymer Science and Technology(SPST)</publisher><subject>Degradation ; EUV ; Film thickness ; Freeware ; LER degradation ; LER limitation ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; photoresists ; Resists ; Silicon substrates ; Source code ; thin film ; Thin films</subject><ispartof>Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, 2012/06/26, Vol.25(5), pp.633-640</ispartof><rights>2012 The Society of Photopolymer Science and Technology (SPST)</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8b8b4a897284bb08ad1df0d8f68875309f3282bf4660f784385e9eb4022c56c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8b8b4a897284bb08ad1df0d8f68875309f3282bf4660f784385e9eb4022c56c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1883,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardineau, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Early, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujisawa, Tomohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Makato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Shalini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrillo, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brainard, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>LER Limitations of Resist Thin Films</title><title>Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology</title><addtitle>J. Photopol. Sci. Technol.</addtitle><description>This paper describes fundamental studies of the degradation of LER in EUV resists as a function of film thickness. This research focused on the influence of three variables on this LER film thickness problem: ·Substrate interaction (primed silicon vs. organic underlayer) ·Changes in optical density (variations in fluorine content) ·PAG attachment (bound and unbound) Our experimental approach struck a balance between using resists prepared by commercial resist vendors and using open-source resists with custom-designed polymers to address specific variables listed above. One key feature of this research was our development of a mathematical method for evaluation of the extent of the LER deviation in thin films, called ψLER. Our results showed that the effect of substrate was not significant for two different resists (one commercial and one open source). Additionally, we found that increasing optical density actually made the LER degradation (ψLER) worse-which was contrary to what was predicted by other researchers. Most significant was our demonstration that PAG attachment plays the most important role in the degradation of LER in thinner resist films; polymer-bound PAGs showed a dramatic 3X improvement in ψLER over a similar blended system.</description><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>EUV</subject><subject>Film thickness</subject><subject>Freeware</subject><subject>LER degradation</subject><subject>LER limitation</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>photoresists</subject><subject>Resists</subject><subject>Silicon substrates</subject><subject>Source code</subject><subject>thin film</subject><subject>Thin films</subject><issn>0914-9244</issn><issn>1349-6336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkL1OwzAURi0EEqXwBCwZGFhS_Jtcj6hqC1IkpKrMlpPa1FUSB9sd-vYEtaqQmO4dzvmGg9AjwTPKJX8Zdj75wbfHzoQZFbOCsSs0IYzLfHyLazTBkvBcUs5v0V2Me4wZE0JO0FO1WGeV61zSyfk-Zt5maxNdTNlm5_ps6dou3qMbq9toHs53ij6Xi838La8-Vu_z1ypvBMcphxpqrkGWFHhdY9BbsrV4C7YAKAXD0jIKtLa8KLAtgTMQRpqaY0obUTQlm6Ln0-4Q_PfBxKQ6FxvTtro3_hAVoZQACA5sRNkJbYKPMRirhuA6HY6KYPXbRP1toqhQY4jRWp6sfUz6y1wcHZJrWvPPEWfxAjQ7HZTp2Q9dcXEW</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Cardineau, Brian</creator><creator>Early, William</creator><creator>Fujisawa, Tomohisa</creator><creator>Maruyama, Ken</creator><creator>Shimizu, Makato</creator><creator>Sharma, Shalini</creator><creator>Petrillo, Karen</creator><creator>Brainard, Robert</creator><general>The Society of Photopolymer Science and Technology(SPST)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>LER Limitations of Resist Thin Films</title><author>Cardineau, Brian ; Early, William ; Fujisawa, Tomohisa ; Maruyama, Ken ; Shimizu, Makato ; Sharma, Shalini ; Petrillo, Karen ; Brainard, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8b8b4a897284bb08ad1df0d8f68875309f3282bf4660f784385e9eb4022c56c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>EUV</topic><topic>Film thickness</topic><topic>Freeware</topic><topic>LER degradation</topic><topic>LER limitation</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>photoresists</topic><topic>Resists</topic><topic>Silicon substrates</topic><topic>Source code</topic><topic>thin film</topic><topic>Thin films</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardineau, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Early, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujisawa, Tomohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Makato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Shalini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrillo, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brainard, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardineau, Brian</au><au>Early, William</au><au>Fujisawa, Tomohisa</au><au>Maruyama, Ken</au><au>Shimizu, Makato</au><au>Sharma, Shalini</au><au>Petrillo, Karen</au><au>Brainard, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LER Limitations of Resist Thin Films</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Photopol. Sci. Technol.</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>633</spage><epage>640</epage><pages>633-640</pages><issn>0914-9244</issn><eissn>1349-6336</eissn><abstract>This paper describes fundamental studies of the degradation of LER in EUV resists as a function of film thickness. This research focused on the influence of three variables on this LER film thickness problem: ·Substrate interaction (primed silicon vs. organic underlayer) ·Changes in optical density (variations in fluorine content) ·PAG attachment (bound and unbound) Our experimental approach struck a balance between using resists prepared by commercial resist vendors and using open-source resists with custom-designed polymers to address specific variables listed above. One key feature of this research was our development of a mathematical method for evaluation of the extent of the LER deviation in thin films, called ψLER. Our results showed that the effect of substrate was not significant for two different resists (one commercial and one open source). Additionally, we found that increasing optical density actually made the LER degradation (ψLER) worse-which was contrary to what was predicted by other researchers. Most significant was our demonstration that PAG attachment plays the most important role in the degradation of LER in thinner resist films; polymer-bound PAGs showed a dramatic 3X improvement in ψLER over a similar blended system.</abstract><pub>The Society of Photopolymer Science and Technology(SPST)</pub><doi>10.2494/photopolymer.25.633</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0914-9244
ispartof Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, 2012/06/26, Vol.25(5), pp.633-640
issn 0914-9244
1349-6336
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221885483
source J-STAGE Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Degradation
EUV
Film thickness
Freeware
LER degradation
LER limitation
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
photoresists
Resists
Silicon substrates
Source code
thin film
Thin films
title LER Limitations of Resist Thin Films
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A41%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LER%20Limitations%20of%20Resist%20Thin%20Films&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Photopolymer%20Science%20and%20Technology&rft.au=Cardineau,%20Brian&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=633&rft.epage=640&rft.pages=633-640&rft.issn=0914-9244&rft.eissn=1349-6336&rft_id=info:doi/10.2494/photopolymer.25.633&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1221885483%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1221885483&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true