Gender differences in social cognitive learning at a technological project design
This study aims to investigate the differences between male and female students in technology project design. The major gender differences discussed in this study include the problem discovering and solving abilities, maneuverability, and inquiry attitude among middle grade students. In the project...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of technology and design education 2012-11, Vol.22 (4), p.451-472 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 472 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 451 |
| container_title | International journal of technology and design education |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Hong, Jon-Chao Hwang, Ming-Yueh Wong, Wan-Tzu Lin, Hung-Chang Yau, Che-Ming |
| description | This study aims to investigate the differences between male and female students in technology project design. The major gender differences discussed in this study include the problem discovering and solving abilities, maneuverability, and inquiry attitude among middle grade students. In the project design, students were required to design and complete a wooden robot with limited materials in a restricted timeframe. Data was collected through field study during the project making. The results of this study indicated that some differences existed between male and female students. For example, power tool manupulation was more appealing to boys than girls. On the other hand, girls were better at resource management than boys. Through social learning, female students have an overtime improvement. Pedagogical considerations are suggested to strengthen gender-specific problem solving skills, so that all students can realize their design potential. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10798-011-9152-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221881317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ984181</ericid><sourcerecordid>1221881317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-97b9df72256e4a26bf2366f70253b710ba854cbc32410e6678932a032c9d4f933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFL7DAUhYMoOI7-AMFFwI2bam7SNMlSREdFEEHXIU1va4aa-pLOQ_-9HfqQh-DqLs53zrkcQo6BnQNj6iIDU0YXDKAwIHnxsUMWIJUoQLNylyyYkapQUvF9cpDzmjGouJYL8rTC2GCiTWhbTBg9ZhoizYMPrqd-6GIYw1-kPboUQ-yoG6mjI_rXOPRDF_xEvadhjX6kDebQxUOy17o-49G_uyQvN9fPV7fFw-Pq7uryofAlE2NhVG2aVnEuKywdr-qWi6pqFeNS1ApY7bQsfe0FL4FhVSltBHdMcG-asjVCLMnZnDvV_9lgHu1byB773kUcNtkC56A1CFATevoDXQ-bFKfvLACUlVZSbwNhpnwack7Y2vcU3lz6tMDsdmQ7j2ynke12ZPsxeU5mD6bgv_nre6NLmLqXhM9ynqTYYfqv-NfML9Vrh6M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1114687583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender differences in social cognitive learning at a technological project design</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hong, Jon-Chao ; Hwang, Ming-Yueh ; Wong, Wan-Tzu ; Lin, Hung-Chang ; Yau, Che-Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jon-Chao ; Hwang, Ming-Yueh ; Wong, Wan-Tzu ; Lin, Hung-Chang ; Yau, Che-Ming</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to investigate the differences between male and female students in technology project design. The major gender differences discussed in this study include the problem discovering and solving abilities, maneuverability, and inquiry attitude among middle grade students. In the project design, students were required to design and complete a wooden robot with limited materials in a restricted timeframe. Data was collected through field study during the project making. The results of this study indicated that some differences existed between male and female students. For example, power tool manupulation was more appealing to boys than girls. On the other hand, girls were better at resource management than boys. Through social learning, female students have an overtime improvement. Pedagogical considerations are suggested to strengthen gender-specific problem solving skills, so that all students can realize their design potential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-7572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10798-011-9152-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive Tests ; Comparative Analysis ; Design ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Females ; Field Studies ; Gender Differences ; Girls ; Individualized Instruction ; Junior High School Students ; Learning ; Learning Activities ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning Processes ; Males ; Maneuverability ; Problem Solving ; Project design ; Project evaluation ; Robotics ; Robots ; Science Education ; Skill Development ; Social Cognition ; Social psychology ; Socialization ; Student Projects ; Students ; Teaching Methods ; Technology ; Thinking Skills</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology and design education, 2012-11, Vol.22 (4), p.451-472</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-97b9df72256e4a26bf2366f70253b710ba854cbc32410e6678932a032c9d4f933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-97b9df72256e4a26bf2366f70253b710ba854cbc32410e6678932a032c9d4f933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10798-011-9152-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10798-011-9152-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ984181$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jon-Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Ming-Yueh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Wan-Tzu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Hung-Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yau, Che-Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Gender differences in social cognitive learning at a technological project design</title><title>International journal of technology and design education</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Des Educ</addtitle><description>This study aims to investigate the differences between male and female students in technology project design. The major gender differences discussed in this study include the problem discovering and solving abilities, maneuverability, and inquiry attitude among middle grade students. In the project design, students were required to design and complete a wooden robot with limited materials in a restricted timeframe. Data was collected through field study during the project making. The results of this study indicated that some differences existed between male and female students. For example, power tool manupulation was more appealing to boys than girls. On the other hand, girls were better at resource management than boys. Through social learning, female students have an overtime improvement. Pedagogical considerations are suggested to strengthen gender-specific problem solving skills, so that all students can realize their design potential.</description><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Tests</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Field Studies</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Girls</subject><subject>Individualized Instruction</subject><subject>Junior High School Students</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Activities</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Maneuverability</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Project design</subject><subject>Project evaluation</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Social Cognition</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Student Projects</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><issn>0957-7572</issn><issn>1573-1804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFL7DAUhYMoOI7-AMFFwI2bam7SNMlSREdFEEHXIU1va4aa-pLOQ_-9HfqQh-DqLs53zrkcQo6BnQNj6iIDU0YXDKAwIHnxsUMWIJUoQLNylyyYkapQUvF9cpDzmjGouJYL8rTC2GCiTWhbTBg9ZhoizYMPrqd-6GIYw1-kPboUQ-yoG6mjI_rXOPRDF_xEvadhjX6kDebQxUOy17o-49G_uyQvN9fPV7fFw-Pq7uryofAlE2NhVG2aVnEuKywdr-qWi6pqFeNS1ApY7bQsfe0FL4FhVSltBHdMcG-asjVCLMnZnDvV_9lgHu1byB773kUcNtkC56A1CFATevoDXQ-bFKfvLACUlVZSbwNhpnwack7Y2vcU3lz6tMDsdmQ7j2ynke12ZPsxeU5mD6bgv_nre6NLmLqXhM9ynqTYYfqv-NfML9Vrh6M</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Hong, Jon-Chao</creator><creator>Hwang, Ming-Yueh</creator><creator>Wong, Wan-Tzu</creator><creator>Lin, Hung-Chang</creator><creator>Yau, Che-Ming</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F29</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Gender differences in social cognitive learning at a technological project design</title><author>Hong, Jon-Chao ; Hwang, Ming-Yueh ; Wong, Wan-Tzu ; Lin, Hung-Chang ; Yau, Che-Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-97b9df72256e4a26bf2366f70253b710ba854cbc32410e6678932a032c9d4f933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Tests</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Field Studies</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Girls</topic><topic>Individualized Instruction</topic><topic>Junior High School Students</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Activities</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Maneuverability</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Project design</topic><topic>Project evaluation</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Social Cognition</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Student Projects</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jon-Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Ming-Yueh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Wan-Tzu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Hung-Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yau, Che-Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology and design education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hong, Jon-Chao</au><au>Hwang, Ming-Yueh</au><au>Wong, Wan-Tzu</au><au>Lin, Hung-Chang</au><au>Yau, Che-Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ984181</ericid><atitle>Gender differences in social cognitive learning at a technological project design</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology and design education</jtitle><stitle>Int J Technol Des Educ</stitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>472</epage><pages>451-472</pages><issn>0957-7572</issn><eissn>1573-1804</eissn><abstract>This study aims to investigate the differences between male and female students in technology project design. The major gender differences discussed in this study include the problem discovering and solving abilities, maneuverability, and inquiry attitude among middle grade students. In the project design, students were required to design and complete a wooden robot with limited materials in a restricted timeframe. Data was collected through field study during the project making. The results of this study indicated that some differences existed between male and female students. For example, power tool manupulation was more appealing to boys than girls. On the other hand, girls were better at resource management than boys. Through social learning, female students have an overtime improvement. Pedagogical considerations are suggested to strengthen gender-specific problem solving skills, so that all students can realize their design potential.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10798-011-9152-x</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0957-7572 |
| ispartof | International journal of technology and design education, 2012-11, Vol.22 (4), p.451-472 |
| issn | 0957-7572 1573-1804 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221881317 |
| source | Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Cognition & reasoning Cognitive Tests Comparative Analysis Design Education Educational Technology Females Field Studies Gender Differences Girls Individualized Instruction Junior High School Students Learning Learning Activities Learning and Instruction Learning Processes Males Maneuverability Problem Solving Project design Project evaluation Robotics Robots Science Education Skill Development Social Cognition Social psychology Socialization Student Projects Students Teaching Methods Technology Thinking Skills |
| title | Gender differences in social cognitive learning at a technological project design |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T03%3A55%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20differences%20in%20social%20cognitive%20learning%20at%20a%20technological%20project%20design&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20and%20design%20education&rft.au=Hong,%20Jon-Chao&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=472&rft.pages=451-472&rft.issn=0957-7572&rft.eissn=1573-1804&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10798-011-9152-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1221881317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1114687583&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ984181&rfr_iscdi=true |