Cancer patients’ evaluation of communication: a report from the population-based study ‘The Cancer Patient’s World

Purpose The aims of this study were to assess how communication with health care staff is perceived by Danish cancer patients and to characterise those patients who report problems in communication. Methods In a cross-sectional survey, a nationally representative sample of 2,202 cancer patients who...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2013, Vol.21 (1), p.235-244
Hauptverfasser: Ross, Lone, Petersen, Morten Aagaard, Johnsen, Anna Thit, Lundstrøm, Louise Hyldborg, Groenvold, Mogens
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 244
container_issue 1
container_start_page 235
container_title Supportive care in cancer
container_volume 21
creator Ross, Lone
Petersen, Morten Aagaard
Johnsen, Anna Thit
Lundstrøm, Louise Hyldborg
Groenvold, Mogens
description Purpose The aims of this study were to assess how communication with health care staff is perceived by Danish cancer patients and to characterise those patients who report problems in communication. Methods In a cross-sectional survey, a nationally representative sample of 2,202 cancer patients who had been in contact with a hospital department during the past year was invited to respond to a questionnaire. Communication with doctors and nurses was assessed separately as were their abilities as listeners, doctors’ use of an understandable language, timing of the information, duration of consultations, and whether doctors criticised other doctors. Results A total of 1,490 cancer patients responded to the questionnaire. Of these, 24 % reported one or more problems with the areas of communication measured. The problem most frequently reported (by 12 %) was not having sufficient time for consultations. More patients reported problems with doctors’ communication and abilities as listeners than with nurses’ skills in these areas. There was a general pattern that younger patients and those sampled in Copenhagen reported the highest degree of dissatisfaction with the communication. Those exposed to a high number of different treatment modalities were at especially high risk of experiencing problems. Conclusions A high proportion of patients reported one or more problems in the communication. However, the number reporting each of the specific problems was remarkably low. Special focus should be given to patients exposed to several treatment modalities and their communicative needs.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00520-012-1516-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221859566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A336843891</galeid><sourcerecordid>A336843891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-5640fdeb4474eb1ecf593bd27cdb6731d925eda74d92c70eab4216444089f8593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7BBltiwSfFf7IRddUUBqRIsilhajj0uqRI72ElFd30M-np9Enyby69AXtgz852jsQ5CTyk5ooSol5mQmpGKUFbRmspK3kMbKjivFOftfbQhraCV4HV9gB7lfEEIVapmD9EBY1I1gsgN-ro1wULCk5l7CHO-vb7BcGmGpdQx4OixjeO4hN7eNV5hgxNMMc3Ypzji-TPgKU7LcDetOpPB4Twv7grfXn87K9O9_4fVv9hn_CmmwT1GD7wZMjzZ34fo48nrs-3b6vT9m3fb49PKCt7OVS0F8Q46IZSAjoL1dcs7x5R1nVScupbV4IwS5WEVAdMJRqUQgjStbwp7iF6svlOKXxbIsx77bGEYTIC4ZE0Zo4WrpSzo87_Qi7ikULYrlJSCE96wX9S5GUD3wcc5Gbsz1cecy0bwpqWFOvoHVY6DsbcxgO9L_w8BXQU2xZwTeD2lfjTpSlOid2nrNW1d0ta7tPVu4Wf7hZduBPdT8SPeArAVyGUUziH99qP_un4H0ly2bg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1266430382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cancer patients’ evaluation of communication: a report from the population-based study ‘The Cancer Patient’s World</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Ross, Lone ; Petersen, Morten Aagaard ; Johnsen, Anna Thit ; Lundstrøm, Louise Hyldborg ; Groenvold, Mogens</creator><creatorcontrib>Ross, Lone ; Petersen, Morten Aagaard ; Johnsen, Anna Thit ; Lundstrøm, Louise Hyldborg ; Groenvold, Mogens</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The aims of this study were to assess how communication with health care staff is perceived by Danish cancer patients and to characterise those patients who report problems in communication. Methods In a cross-sectional survey, a nationally representative sample of 2,202 cancer patients who had been in contact with a hospital department during the past year was invited to respond to a questionnaire. Communication with doctors and nurses was assessed separately as were their abilities as listeners, doctors’ use of an understandable language, timing of the information, duration of consultations, and whether doctors criticised other doctors. Results A total of 1,490 cancer patients responded to the questionnaire. Of these, 24 % reported one or more problems with the areas of communication measured. The problem most frequently reported (by 12 %) was not having sufficient time for consultations. More patients reported problems with doctors’ communication and abilities as listeners than with nurses’ skills in these areas. There was a general pattern that younger patients and those sampled in Copenhagen reported the highest degree of dissatisfaction with the communication. Those exposed to a high number of different treatment modalities were at especially high risk of experiencing problems. Conclusions A high proportion of patients reported one or more problems in the communication. However, the number reporting each of the specific problems was remarkably low. Special focus should be given to patients exposed to several treatment modalities and their communicative needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1516-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22678406</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Attitude to Health ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Care and treatment ; Communication ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Denmark ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Nurse-Patient Relations ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Oncology, Experimental ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Patients ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Questionnaires ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2013, Vol.21 (1), p.235-244</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-5640fdeb4474eb1ecf593bd27cdb6731d925eda74d92c70eab4216444089f8593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-5640fdeb4474eb1ecf593bd27cdb6731d925eda74d92c70eab4216444089f8593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-012-1516-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-012-1516-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22678406$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ross, Lone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Morten Aagaard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnsen, Anna Thit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundstrøm, Louise Hyldborg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groenvold, Mogens</creatorcontrib><title>Cancer patients’ evaluation of communication: a report from the population-based study ‘The Cancer Patient’s World</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose The aims of this study were to assess how communication with health care staff is perceived by Danish cancer patients and to characterise those patients who report problems in communication. Methods In a cross-sectional survey, a nationally representative sample of 2,202 cancer patients who had been in contact with a hospital department during the past year was invited to respond to a questionnaire. Communication with doctors and nurses was assessed separately as were their abilities as listeners, doctors’ use of an understandable language, timing of the information, duration of consultations, and whether doctors criticised other doctors. Results A total of 1,490 cancer patients responded to the questionnaire. Of these, 24 % reported one or more problems with the areas of communication measured. The problem most frequently reported (by 12 %) was not having sufficient time for consultations. More patients reported problems with doctors’ communication and abilities as listeners than with nurses’ skills in these areas. There was a general pattern that younger patients and those sampled in Copenhagen reported the highest degree of dissatisfaction with the communication. Those exposed to a high number of different treatment modalities were at especially high risk of experiencing problems. Conclusions A high proportion of patients reported one or more problems in the communication. However, the number reporting each of the specific problems was remarkably low. Special focus should be given to patients exposed to several treatment modalities and their communicative needs.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Nurse-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7BBltiwSfFf7IRddUUBqRIsilhajj0uqRI72ElFd30M-np9Enyby69AXtgz852jsQ5CTyk5ooSol5mQmpGKUFbRmspK3kMbKjivFOftfbQhraCV4HV9gB7lfEEIVapmD9EBY1I1gsgN-ro1wULCk5l7CHO-vb7BcGmGpdQx4OixjeO4hN7eNV5hgxNMMc3Ypzji-TPgKU7LcDetOpPB4Twv7grfXn87K9O9_4fVv9hn_CmmwT1GD7wZMjzZ34fo48nrs-3b6vT9m3fb49PKCt7OVS0F8Q46IZSAjoL1dcs7x5R1nVScupbV4IwS5WEVAdMJRqUQgjStbwp7iF6svlOKXxbIsx77bGEYTIC4ZE0Zo4WrpSzo87_Qi7ikULYrlJSCE96wX9S5GUD3wcc5Gbsz1cecy0bwpqWFOvoHVY6DsbcxgO9L_w8BXQU2xZwTeD2lfjTpSlOid2nrNW1d0ta7tPVu4Wf7hZduBPdT8SPeArAVyGUUziH99qP_un4H0ly2bg</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Ross, Lone</creator><creator>Petersen, Morten Aagaard</creator><creator>Johnsen, Anna Thit</creator><creator>Lundstrøm, Louise Hyldborg</creator><creator>Groenvold, Mogens</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Cancer patients’ evaluation of communication: a report from the population-based study ‘The Cancer Patient’s World</title><author>Ross, Lone ; Petersen, Morten Aagaard ; Johnsen, Anna Thit ; Lundstrøm, Louise Hyldborg ; Groenvold, Mogens</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-5640fdeb4474eb1ecf593bd27cdb6731d925eda74d92c70eab4216444089f8593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Nurse-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ross, Lone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Morten Aagaard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnsen, Anna Thit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundstrøm, Louise Hyldborg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groenvold, Mogens</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ross, Lone</au><au>Petersen, Morten Aagaard</au><au>Johnsen, Anna Thit</au><au>Lundstrøm, Louise Hyldborg</au><au>Groenvold, Mogens</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cancer patients’ evaluation of communication: a report from the population-based study ‘The Cancer Patient’s World</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>235-244</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose The aims of this study were to assess how communication with health care staff is perceived by Danish cancer patients and to characterise those patients who report problems in communication. Methods In a cross-sectional survey, a nationally representative sample of 2,202 cancer patients who had been in contact with a hospital department during the past year was invited to respond to a questionnaire. Communication with doctors and nurses was assessed separately as were their abilities as listeners, doctors’ use of an understandable language, timing of the information, duration of consultations, and whether doctors criticised other doctors. Results A total of 1,490 cancer patients responded to the questionnaire. Of these, 24 % reported one or more problems with the areas of communication measured. The problem most frequently reported (by 12 %) was not having sufficient time for consultations. More patients reported problems with doctors’ communication and abilities as listeners than with nurses’ skills in these areas. There was a general pattern that younger patients and those sampled in Copenhagen reported the highest degree of dissatisfaction with the communication. Those exposed to a high number of different treatment modalities were at especially high risk of experiencing problems. Conclusions A high proportion of patients reported one or more problems in the communication. However, the number reporting each of the specific problems was remarkably low. Special focus should be given to patients exposed to several treatment modalities and their communicative needs.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22678406</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-012-1516-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-4355
ispartof Supportive care in cancer, 2013, Vol.21 (1), p.235-244
issn 0941-4355
1433-7339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221859566
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Attitude to Health
Cancer
Cancer patients
Care and treatment
Communication
Cross-Sectional Studies
Denmark
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Medical personnel
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasms - therapy
Nurse-Patient Relations
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing Research
Oncology
Oncology, Experimental
Original Article
Pain Medicine
Patients
Physician-Patient Relations
Questionnaires
Rehabilitation Medicine
Surveys
title Cancer patients’ evaluation of communication: a report from the population-based study ‘The Cancer Patient’s World
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T15%3A24%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cancer%20patients%E2%80%99%20evaluation%20of%20communication:%20a%20report%20from%20the%20population-based%20study%20%E2%80%98The%20Cancer%20Patient%E2%80%99s%20World&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Ross,%20Lone&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=235-244&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-012-1516-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA336843891%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1266430382&rft_id=info:pmid/22678406&rft_galeid=A336843891&rfr_iscdi=true