Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain

Abstract Background context Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) are largely unknown. Purpose To study the criterion validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of EQ-5D in patients with CLBP. Study de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The spine journal 2012-11, Vol.12 (11), p.1035-1039
Hauptverfasser: Soer, Remko, PhD, Reneman, Michiel F., PhD, Speijer, Bert L.G.N., MPA, Coppes, Maarten H., MD, PhD, Vroomen, Patrick C.A.J., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1039
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1035
container_title The spine journal
container_volume 12
creator Soer, Remko, PhD
Reneman, Michiel F., PhD
Speijer, Bert L.G.N., MPA
Coppes, Maarten H., MD, PhD
Vroomen, Patrick C.A.J., MD, PhD
description Abstract Background context Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) are largely unknown. Purpose To study the criterion validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of EQ-5D in patients with CLBP. Study design Prospective study design carried out in a multispecialist Spine Center in The Netherlands. Patient sample One hundred fifty-one patients with CLBP. Outcome measures Quality of life (QOL) was measured with EQ-5D, consisting of two scales: one scale measuring QOL with five categorical questions and the other measuring health state on a visual analog scale (0–100). Criterion measures were disability, measured with the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and pain intensity, measured with a numeric rating scale (NRS). Methods Pearson correlation coefficients between the EQ-5D and RMDQ, PDI, and NRS were calculated to test the criterion validity. Correlations were interpreted based on predefined criteria. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D was calculated with area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Minimal clinically important change was calculated with the optimal cutoff point under the ROC curve, and sensitivity and specificity were also calculated. Results Correlations between EQ-5D and criterion measures ranged between 0.39 and 0.59 and were considered moderate to good. Areas under the ROC curve ranged from 0.59 to 0.72 depending on the external criterion and EQ-5D subscale. The MCIC was 0.03 points for the categorical scales of the EQ-5D and 10.5 points for the EQ-5D visual analog scale. Conclusions The EQ-5D is a valid and responsive QOL scale in patients with CLBP.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221858247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S152994301201306X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1221858247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-f5356fbb4a255eb83c219c4a430d220b4b18716e666f96e1e77aca92599821813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wDxDykUsWj-048QUJLYUiVaoQIHGzHO9E6202DnZC1X_PRFs4cOFka-adr-dl7BWIDQgwbw-bMsURcSMFSApthBJP2Dm0TVuBUfIp_WtpK6uVOGMXpRyEEG0D8jk7kwqs1cKes9vtEMd4xDnHwKecJsxzxMJTz-c98qslpy9pqOoPPI588pQb58Lv47znYZ_TSFVDuuedD3eUjuML9qz3Q8GXj-8l-_7x6tv2urq5_fR5-_6mClrLueprVZu-67SXdY1dq4IEG7SnXXdSik53dAcYNMb01iBg0_jgraytbSW0oC7Zm1Nf2vnngmV2x1gCDoMfMS3FgSRZ3UrdkFSfpCGnUjL2bsrx6PODA-FWlO7gTijdinKNEkoqe_04YemOuPtb9IcdCd6dBEh3_oqYXQmEJ-AuZgyz26X4vwn_NgirGcEPd_iA5ZCWPBJDB65IJ9zX1c7VTaAmSpgf6jcWkppN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1221858247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Soer, Remko, PhD ; Reneman, Michiel F., PhD ; Speijer, Bert L.G.N., MPA ; Coppes, Maarten H., MD, PhD ; Vroomen, Patrick C.A.J., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Soer, Remko, PhD ; Reneman, Michiel F., PhD ; Speijer, Bert L.G.N., MPA ; Coppes, Maarten H., MD, PhD ; Vroomen, Patrick C.A.J., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background context Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) are largely unknown. Purpose To study the criterion validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of EQ-5D in patients with CLBP. Study design Prospective study design carried out in a multispecialist Spine Center in The Netherlands. Patient sample One hundred fifty-one patients with CLBP. Outcome measures Quality of life (QOL) was measured with EQ-5D, consisting of two scales: one scale measuring QOL with five categorical questions and the other measuring health state on a visual analog scale (0–100). Criterion measures were disability, measured with the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and pain intensity, measured with a numeric rating scale (NRS). Methods Pearson correlation coefficients between the EQ-5D and RMDQ, PDI, and NRS were calculated to test the criterion validity. Correlations were interpreted based on predefined criteria. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D was calculated with area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Minimal clinically important change was calculated with the optimal cutoff point under the ROC curve, and sensitivity and specificity were also calculated. Results Correlations between EQ-5D and criterion measures ranged between 0.39 and 0.59 and were considered moderate to good. Areas under the ROC curve ranged from 0.59 to 0.72 depending on the external criterion and EQ-5D subscale. The MCIC was 0.03 points for the categorical scales of the EQ-5D and 10.5 points for the EQ-5D visual analog scale. Conclusions The EQ-5D is a valid and responsive QOL scale in patients with CLBP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23199409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Chronic Pain ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Health Status ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - diagnosis ; Low Back Pain - physiopathology ; Low Back Pain - rehabilitation ; Male ; MCIC ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Pain Measurement ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Recovery of Function ; Responsiveness ; ROC Curve ; Validity</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2012-11, Vol.12 (11), p.1035-1039</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-f5356fbb4a255eb83c219c4a430d220b4b18716e666f96e1e77aca92599821813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-f5356fbb4a255eb83c219c4a430d220b4b18716e666f96e1e77aca92599821813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152994301201306X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23199409$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soer, Remko, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reneman, Michiel F., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speijer, Bert L.G.N., MPA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppes, Maarten H., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vroomen, Patrick C.A.J., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Abstract Background context Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) are largely unknown. Purpose To study the criterion validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of EQ-5D in patients with CLBP. Study design Prospective study design carried out in a multispecialist Spine Center in The Netherlands. Patient sample One hundred fifty-one patients with CLBP. Outcome measures Quality of life (QOL) was measured with EQ-5D, consisting of two scales: one scale measuring QOL with five categorical questions and the other measuring health state on a visual analog scale (0–100). Criterion measures were disability, measured with the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and pain intensity, measured with a numeric rating scale (NRS). Methods Pearson correlation coefficients between the EQ-5D and RMDQ, PDI, and NRS were calculated to test the criterion validity. Correlations were interpreted based on predefined criteria. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D was calculated with area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Minimal clinically important change was calculated with the optimal cutoff point under the ROC curve, and sensitivity and specificity were also calculated. Results Correlations between EQ-5D and criterion measures ranged between 0.39 and 0.59 and were considered moderate to good. Areas under the ROC curve ranged from 0.59 to 0.72 depending on the external criterion and EQ-5D subscale. The MCIC was 0.03 points for the categorical scales of the EQ-5D and 10.5 points for the EQ-5D visual analog scale. Conclusions The EQ-5D is a valid and responsive QOL scale in patients with CLBP.</description><subject>Chronic Pain</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MCIC</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Responsiveness</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wDxDykUsWj-048QUJLYUiVaoQIHGzHO9E6202DnZC1X_PRFs4cOFka-adr-dl7BWIDQgwbw-bMsURcSMFSApthBJP2Dm0TVuBUfIp_WtpK6uVOGMXpRyEEG0D8jk7kwqs1cKes9vtEMd4xDnHwKecJsxzxMJTz-c98qslpy9pqOoPPI588pQb58Lv47znYZ_TSFVDuuedD3eUjuML9qz3Q8GXj-8l-_7x6tv2urq5_fR5-_6mClrLueprVZu-67SXdY1dq4IEG7SnXXdSik53dAcYNMb01iBg0_jgraytbSW0oC7Zm1Nf2vnngmV2x1gCDoMfMS3FgSRZ3UrdkFSfpCGnUjL2bsrx6PODA-FWlO7gTijdinKNEkoqe_04YemOuPtb9IcdCd6dBEh3_oqYXQmEJ-AuZgyz26X4vwn_NgirGcEPd_iA5ZCWPBJDB65IJ9zX1c7VTaAmSpgf6jcWkppN</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Soer, Remko, PhD</creator><creator>Reneman, Michiel F., PhD</creator><creator>Speijer, Bert L.G.N., MPA</creator><creator>Coppes, Maarten H., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Vroomen, Patrick C.A.J., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain</title><author>Soer, Remko, PhD ; Reneman, Michiel F., PhD ; Speijer, Bert L.G.N., MPA ; Coppes, Maarten H., MD, PhD ; Vroomen, Patrick C.A.J., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-f5356fbb4a255eb83c219c4a430d220b4b18716e666f96e1e77aca92599821813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Chronic Pain</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MCIC</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Responsiveness</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soer, Remko, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reneman, Michiel F., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speijer, Bert L.G.N., MPA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppes, Maarten H., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vroomen, Patrick C.A.J., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soer, Remko, PhD</au><au>Reneman, Michiel F., PhD</au><au>Speijer, Bert L.G.N., MPA</au><au>Coppes, Maarten H., MD, PhD</au><au>Vroomen, Patrick C.A.J., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1035</spage><epage>1039</epage><pages>1035-1039</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background context Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) are largely unknown. Purpose To study the criterion validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of EQ-5D in patients with CLBP. Study design Prospective study design carried out in a multispecialist Spine Center in The Netherlands. Patient sample One hundred fifty-one patients with CLBP. Outcome measures Quality of life (QOL) was measured with EQ-5D, consisting of two scales: one scale measuring QOL with five categorical questions and the other measuring health state on a visual analog scale (0–100). Criterion measures were disability, measured with the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and pain intensity, measured with a numeric rating scale (NRS). Methods Pearson correlation coefficients between the EQ-5D and RMDQ, PDI, and NRS were calculated to test the criterion validity. Correlations were interpreted based on predefined criteria. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D was calculated with area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Minimal clinically important change was calculated with the optimal cutoff point under the ROC curve, and sensitivity and specificity were also calculated. Results Correlations between EQ-5D and criterion measures ranged between 0.39 and 0.59 and were considered moderate to good. Areas under the ROC curve ranged from 0.59 to 0.72 depending on the external criterion and EQ-5D subscale. The MCIC was 0.03 points for the categorical scales of the EQ-5D and 10.5 points for the EQ-5D visual analog scale. Conclusions The EQ-5D is a valid and responsive QOL scale in patients with CLBP.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23199409</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.030</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-9430
ispartof The spine journal, 2012-11, Vol.12 (11), p.1035-1039
issn 1529-9430
1878-1632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221858247
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Chronic Pain
Disability Evaluation
Female
Health Status
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Low Back Pain - diagnosis
Low Back Pain - physiopathology
Low Back Pain - rehabilitation
Male
MCIC
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Pain Measurement
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Recovery of Function
Responsiveness
ROC Curve
Validity
title Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A09%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinimetric%20properties%20of%20the%20EuroQol-5D%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20low%20back%20pain&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Soer,%20Remko,%20PhD&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1035&rft.epage=1039&rft.pages=1035-1039&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1221858247%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1221858247&rft_id=info:pmid/23199409&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S152994301201306X&rfr_iscdi=true