The role of time and place cues in the detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners
Frequency modulation detection limens (FMDLs) were measured for five hearing-impaired (HI) subjects for carrier frequencies f c =1000, 4000, and 6000 Hz, using modulation frequencies f m =2 and 10 Hz and levels of 20 dB sensation level and 90 dB SPL. FMDLs were smaller for f m =10 than for f m =2 Hz...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2012-06, Vol.131 (6), p.4722-4731 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4731 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 4722 |
container_title | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Ernst, Stephan M. A. Moore, Brian C. J. |
description | Frequency modulation detection limens (FMDLs) were measured for five hearing-impaired (HI) subjects for carrier frequencies
f
c
=1000, 4000, and 6000 Hz, using modulation frequencies
f
m
=2 and 10 Hz and levels of 20 dB sensation level and 90 dB SPL. FMDLs were smaller for
f
m
=10 than for
f
m
=2 Hz for the two higher
f
c
, but not for
f
c
=1000 Hz. FMDLs were also determined with additional random amplitude modulation (AM), to disrupt excitation-pattern cues. The disruptive effect was larger for
f
m
=10 than for
f
m
=2 Hz. The smallest disruption occurred for
f
m
=2 Hz and
f
c
=1000 Hz. AM detection thresholds for normal-hearing and HI subjects were measured for the same
f
c
and
f
m
values. Performance was better for the HI subjects for both
f
m
. AM detection was much better for
f
m
=10 than for
f
m
=2 Hz. Additional tests showed that most HI subjects could discriminate temporal fine structure (TFS) at 800 Hz. The results are consistent with the idea that, for
f
m
=2 Hz and
f
c
=1000 Hz, frequency modulation (FM) detection was partly based on the use of TFS information. For higher carrier frequencies and for all carrier frequencies with
f
m
=10 Hz, FM detection was probably based on place cues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1121/1.3699233 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221440283</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1221440283</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-f17b0f38f5298146fa42f9e89d32b728205a2b9cd246deccc46c937e249761b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1P3DAQBmALFcGycOgfqHypVA4Be-w48aUSQuVDQuKynC3HGRdX-djayWH_PQ67bU8VJ8vWo5nxvIR85uyKc-DX_EoorUGII7LiJbCiLkF-IivGGC-kVuqUnKX0K1_LWugTcgpQcdCyXBG_eUUaxw7p6OkUeqR2aOm2sw6pmzHRMNApkxYndFMYh8X5iL9nHNyO9mM7d_b9vdnRV7QxDD-L0G9tiNjSLqQJB4zpnBx72yW8OJxr8nL3Y3P7UDw93z_e3jwVrmQwFZ5XDfOi9iXomkvlrQSvsdatgKaCGlhpodGuBaladM5J5bSoEKSuFG8qsSbf9nW3ccwjpsn0ITnsOjvgOCfDAbiUDGrxMWWZlkxxyPRyT10cU4rozTaG3sZdRmZJwHBzSCDbL4eyc9Nj-1f-WXkGXw_AJmc7H-3gQvrnFANW8eUr3_cuuTC9r_j_XXOIZgnRjN4sIZocongDYH-hsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1021450612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of time and place cues in the detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Ernst, Stephan M. A. ; Moore, Brian C. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ernst, Stephan M. A. ; Moore, Brian C. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Frequency modulation detection limens (FMDLs) were measured for five hearing-impaired (HI) subjects for carrier frequencies
f
c
=1000, 4000, and 6000 Hz, using modulation frequencies
f
m
=2 and 10 Hz and levels of 20 dB sensation level and 90 dB SPL. FMDLs were smaller for
f
m
=10 than for
f
m
=2 Hz for the two higher
f
c
, but not for
f
c
=1000 Hz. FMDLs were also determined with additional random amplitude modulation (AM), to disrupt excitation-pattern cues. The disruptive effect was larger for
f
m
=10 than for
f
m
=2 Hz. The smallest disruption occurred for
f
m
=2 Hz and
f
c
=1000 Hz. AM detection thresholds for normal-hearing and HI subjects were measured for the same
f
c
and
f
m
values. Performance was better for the HI subjects for both
f
m
. AM detection was much better for
f
m
=10 than for
f
m
=2 Hz. Additional tests showed that most HI subjects could discriminate temporal fine structure (TFS) at 800 Hz. The results are consistent with the idea that, for
f
m
=2 Hz and
f
c
=1000 Hz, frequency modulation (FM) detection was partly based on the use of TFS information. For higher carrier frequencies and for all carrier frequencies with
f
m
=10 Hz, FM detection was probably based on place cues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.3699233</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22712945</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Audition ; Auditory Threshold - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Cues ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hearing Loss - physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Perception ; Persons With Hearing Impairments ; Pitch Discrimination - physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sound Localization - physiology ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012-06, Vol.131 (6), p.4722-4731</ispartof><rights>2012 Acoustical Society of America</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-f17b0f38f5298146fa42f9e89d32b728205a2b9cd246deccc46c937e249761b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-f17b0f38f5298146fa42f9e89d32b728205a2b9cd246deccc46c937e249761b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/1.3699233$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,780,784,794,1565,4512,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26020717$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22712945$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ernst, Stephan M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Brian C. J.</creatorcontrib><title>The role of time and place cues in the detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Frequency modulation detection limens (FMDLs) were measured for five hearing-impaired (HI) subjects for carrier frequencies
f
c
=1000, 4000, and 6000 Hz, using modulation frequencies
f
m
=2 and 10 Hz and levels of 20 dB sensation level and 90 dB SPL. FMDLs were smaller for
f
m
=10 than for
f
m
=2 Hz for the two higher
f
c
, but not for
f
c
=1000 Hz. FMDLs were also determined with additional random amplitude modulation (AM), to disrupt excitation-pattern cues. The disruptive effect was larger for
f
m
=10 than for
f
m
=2 Hz. The smallest disruption occurred for
f
m
=2 Hz and
f
c
=1000 Hz. AM detection thresholds for normal-hearing and HI subjects were measured for the same
f
c
and
f
m
values. Performance was better for the HI subjects for both
f
m
. AM detection was much better for
f
m
=10 than for
f
m
=2 Hz. Additional tests showed that most HI subjects could discriminate temporal fine structure (TFS) at 800 Hz. The results are consistent with the idea that, for
f
m
=2 Hz and
f
c
=1000 Hz, frequency modulation (FM) detection was partly based on the use of TFS information. For higher carrier frequencies and for all carrier frequencies with
f
m
=10 Hz, FM detection was probably based on place cues.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Persons With Hearing Impairments</subject><subject>Pitch Discrimination - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sound Localization - physiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1P3DAQBmALFcGycOgfqHypVA4Be-w48aUSQuVDQuKynC3HGRdX-djayWH_PQ67bU8VJ8vWo5nxvIR85uyKc-DX_EoorUGII7LiJbCiLkF-IivGGC-kVuqUnKX0K1_LWugTcgpQcdCyXBG_eUUaxw7p6OkUeqR2aOm2sw6pmzHRMNApkxYndFMYh8X5iL9nHNyO9mM7d_b9vdnRV7QxDD-L0G9tiNjSLqQJB4zpnBx72yW8OJxr8nL3Y3P7UDw93z_e3jwVrmQwFZ5XDfOi9iXomkvlrQSvsdatgKaCGlhpodGuBaladM5J5bSoEKSuFG8qsSbf9nW3ccwjpsn0ITnsOjvgOCfDAbiUDGrxMWWZlkxxyPRyT10cU4rozTaG3sZdRmZJwHBzSCDbL4eyc9Nj-1f-WXkGXw_AJmc7H-3gQvrnFANW8eUr3_cuuTC9r_j_XXOIZgnRjN4sIZocongDYH-hsQ</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Ernst, Stephan M. A.</creator><creator>Moore, Brian C. J.</creator><general>Acoustical Society of America</general><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>The role of time and place cues in the detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners</title><author>Ernst, Stephan M. A. ; Moore, Brian C. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-f17b0f38f5298146fa42f9e89d32b728205a2b9cd246deccc46c937e249761b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Persons With Hearing Impairments</topic><topic>Pitch Discrimination - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sound Localization - physiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ernst, Stephan M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Brian C. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ernst, Stephan M. A.</au><au>Moore, Brian C. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of time and place cues in the detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>4722</spage><epage>4731</epage><pages>4722-4731</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>Frequency modulation detection limens (FMDLs) were measured for five hearing-impaired (HI) subjects for carrier frequencies
f
c
=1000, 4000, and 6000 Hz, using modulation frequencies
f
m
=2 and 10 Hz and levels of 20 dB sensation level and 90 dB SPL. FMDLs were smaller for
f
m
=10 than for
f
m
=2 Hz for the two higher
f
c
, but not for
f
c
=1000 Hz. FMDLs were also determined with additional random amplitude modulation (AM), to disrupt excitation-pattern cues. The disruptive effect was larger for
f
m
=10 than for
f
m
=2 Hz. The smallest disruption occurred for
f
m
=2 Hz and
f
c
=1000 Hz. AM detection thresholds for normal-hearing and HI subjects were measured for the same
f
c
and
f
m
values. Performance was better for the HI subjects for both
f
m
. AM detection was much better for
f
m
=10 than for
f
m
=2 Hz. Additional tests showed that most HI subjects could discriminate temporal fine structure (TFS) at 800 Hz. The results are consistent with the idea that, for
f
m
=2 Hz and
f
c
=1000 Hz, frequency modulation (FM) detection was partly based on the use of TFS information. For higher carrier frequencies and for all carrier frequencies with
f
m
=10 Hz, FM detection was probably based on place cues.</abstract><cop>Melville, NY</cop><pub>Acoustical Society of America</pub><pmid>22712945</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.3699233</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-4966 |
ispartof | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012-06, Vol.131 (6), p.4722-4731 |
issn | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221440283 |
source | MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Aged Analysis of Variance Audition Auditory Threshold - physiology Biological and medical sciences Case-Control Studies Cues Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hearing Loss - physiopathology Humans Male Middle Aged Perception Persons With Hearing Impairments Pitch Discrimination - physiology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Sound Localization - physiology Time Factors |
title | The role of time and place cues in the detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A42%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20time%20and%20place%20cues%20in%20the%20detection%20of%20frequency%20modulation%20by%20hearing-impaired%20listeners&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Ernst,%20Stephan%20M.%20A.&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=4722&rft.epage=4731&rft.pages=4722-4731&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.3699233&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1221440283%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1021450612&rft_id=info:pmid/22712945&rfr_iscdi=true |