‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about
Argumentation is a key requirement of the essay, which is the most common genre that students have to write. However, how argumentation is realised in disciplinary writing is often poorly understood by academic tutors, and therefore not adequately taught to students. This paper presents research int...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of English for academic purposes 2012-06, Vol.11 (2), p.145-154 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 154 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 145 |
container_title | Journal of English for academic purposes |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Wingate, Ursula |
description | Argumentation is a key requirement of the essay, which is the most common genre that students have to write. However, how argumentation is realised in disciplinary writing is often poorly understood by academic tutors, and therefore not adequately taught to students. This paper presents research into undergraduate students’ concepts of argument when they arrive at university, difficulties they experience with developing arguments in their essays, and the type and quality of instruction they receive. A three-part definition which describes argumentation by what students need to learn was used as the framework for analysis. The findings show that students have only partial or incorrect concepts of argument. Many problems they encounter are caused by their lack of knowledge of what an argumentative essay requires, particularly of the need to develop their own position in an academic debate. The advice they receive does not make the requirements explicit and refers to argumentation inconsistently and vaguely. An ‘essay writing framework’, based on the three-part definition, is proposed for improving the teaching of writing. This approach puts argumentation at the centre of instruction and explains other aspects of writing according to the function they have in the development of argument.
► This study examined students’ problems with argumentation in essay writing. ► The results show academics’ and students’ difficulties with conceptualising argument. ► Consequently, the instruction given to students is vague and inconsistent. ► A framework for teaching writing which puts argumentation at the centre is proposed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221439625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ965937</ericid><els_id>S1475158511000762</els_id><sourcerecordid>1221439625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a377t-a08de9c0892469f234fbb1d06d4424d7e83a3ca7ec33a71fc417989b4d15967b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UM1KAzEQXkTBWn0B8bDevGxNNtlNAl5KqVURvOg5ZJPZNqXdrUnW0lsfQ1-vT2JKi0fhgxnm-4H5kuQaowFGuLyfD-agVoMcYTyIQAifJD3MGc8wFew07pQVGS54cZ5ceD-PAs7LopdMdtvvoZt2S2jC7W77k85gsbLNNPWhM_Hm064x4HxQjUnXMxVS8F5t0rWzYS-zPlVV24XL5KxWCw9Xx9lPPh7H76On7PVt8jwavmaKMBYyhbgBoREXOS1FnRNaVxU2qDSU5tQw4EQRrRhoQhTDtaaYCS4qanAhSlaRfnJ3yF259rMDH-TSeg2LhWqg7bzEeY4pEWVeRGl-kGrXeu-glitnl8ptJEZy35qcy31rct-ajIilRNPNwQTO6j_D-EWUhSAs0g9HOv74ZcFJry00Gox1oIM0rf0v_Rfg7IDI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1221439625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wingate, Ursula</creator><creatorcontrib>Wingate, Ursula</creatorcontrib><description>Argumentation is a key requirement of the essay, which is the most common genre that students have to write. However, how argumentation is realised in disciplinary writing is often poorly understood by academic tutors, and therefore not adequately taught to students. This paper presents research into undergraduate students’ concepts of argument when they arrive at university, difficulties they experience with developing arguments in their essays, and the type and quality of instruction they receive. A three-part definition which describes argumentation by what students need to learn was used as the framework for analysis. The findings show that students have only partial or incorrect concepts of argument. Many problems they encounter are caused by their lack of knowledge of what an argumentative essay requires, particularly of the need to develop their own position in an academic debate. The advice they receive does not make the requirements explicit and refers to argumentation inconsistently and vaguely. An ‘essay writing framework’, based on the three-part definition, is proposed for improving the teaching of writing. This approach puts argumentation at the centre of instruction and explains other aspects of writing according to the function they have in the development of argument.
► This study examined students’ problems with argumentation in essay writing. ► The results show academics’ and students’ difficulties with conceptualising argument. ► Consequently, the instruction given to students is vague and inconsistent. ► A framework for teaching writing which puts argumentation at the centre is proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-1585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic Discourse ; Argumentation ; Debate ; Educational Quality ; English for Academic Purposes ; Essay ; Essays ; Genre ; Guidelines ; Knowledge Level ; Persuasive Discourse ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Teaching Methods ; Teaching writing ; Undergraduate Students ; Writing (Composition) ; Writing Instruction</subject><ispartof>Journal of English for academic purposes, 2012-06, Vol.11 (2), p.145-154</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a377t-a08de9c0892469f234fbb1d06d4424d7e83a3ca7ec33a71fc417989b4d15967b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a377t-a08de9c0892469f234fbb1d06d4424d7e83a3ca7ec33a71fc417989b4d15967b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158511000762$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ965937$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wingate, Ursula</creatorcontrib><title>‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about</title><title>Journal of English for academic purposes</title><description>Argumentation is a key requirement of the essay, which is the most common genre that students have to write. However, how argumentation is realised in disciplinary writing is often poorly understood by academic tutors, and therefore not adequately taught to students. This paper presents research into undergraduate students’ concepts of argument when they arrive at university, difficulties they experience with developing arguments in their essays, and the type and quality of instruction they receive. A three-part definition which describes argumentation by what students need to learn was used as the framework for analysis. The findings show that students have only partial or incorrect concepts of argument. Many problems they encounter are caused by their lack of knowledge of what an argumentative essay requires, particularly of the need to develop their own position in an academic debate. The advice they receive does not make the requirements explicit and refers to argumentation inconsistently and vaguely. An ‘essay writing framework’, based on the three-part definition, is proposed for improving the teaching of writing. This approach puts argumentation at the centre of instruction and explains other aspects of writing according to the function they have in the development of argument.
► This study examined students’ problems with argumentation in essay writing. ► The results show academics’ and students’ difficulties with conceptualising argument. ► Consequently, the instruction given to students is vague and inconsistent. ► A framework for teaching writing which puts argumentation at the centre is proposed.</description><subject>Academic Discourse</subject><subject>Argumentation</subject><subject>Debate</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>English for Academic Purposes</subject><subject>Essay</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Genre</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Persuasive Discourse</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teaching writing</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><issn>1475-1585</issn><issn>1878-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UM1KAzEQXkTBWn0B8bDevGxNNtlNAl5KqVURvOg5ZJPZNqXdrUnW0lsfQ1-vT2JKi0fhgxnm-4H5kuQaowFGuLyfD-agVoMcYTyIQAifJD3MGc8wFew07pQVGS54cZ5ceD-PAs7LopdMdtvvoZt2S2jC7W77k85gsbLNNPWhM_Hm064x4HxQjUnXMxVS8F5t0rWzYS-zPlVV24XL5KxWCw9Xx9lPPh7H76On7PVt8jwavmaKMBYyhbgBoREXOS1FnRNaVxU2qDSU5tQw4EQRrRhoQhTDtaaYCS4qanAhSlaRfnJ3yF259rMDH-TSeg2LhWqg7bzEeY4pEWVeRGl-kGrXeu-glitnl8ptJEZy35qcy31rct-ajIilRNPNwQTO6j_D-EWUhSAs0g9HOv74ZcFJry00Gox1oIM0rf0v_Rfg7IDI</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Wingate, Ursula</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about</title><author>Wingate, Ursula</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a377t-a08de9c0892469f234fbb1d06d4424d7e83a3ca7ec33a71fc417989b4d15967b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Academic Discourse</topic><topic>Argumentation</topic><topic>Debate</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>English for Academic Purposes</topic><topic>Essay</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Genre</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Persuasive Discourse</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teaching writing</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wingate, Ursula</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of English for academic purposes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wingate, Ursula</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ965937</ericid><atitle>‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about</atitle><jtitle>Journal of English for academic purposes</jtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>145-154</pages><issn>1475-1585</issn><eissn>1878-1497</eissn><abstract>Argumentation is a key requirement of the essay, which is the most common genre that students have to write. However, how argumentation is realised in disciplinary writing is often poorly understood by academic tutors, and therefore not adequately taught to students. This paper presents research into undergraduate students’ concepts of argument when they arrive at university, difficulties they experience with developing arguments in their essays, and the type and quality of instruction they receive. A three-part definition which describes argumentation by what students need to learn was used as the framework for analysis. The findings show that students have only partial or incorrect concepts of argument. Many problems they encounter are caused by their lack of knowledge of what an argumentative essay requires, particularly of the need to develop their own position in an academic debate. The advice they receive does not make the requirements explicit and refers to argumentation inconsistently and vaguely. An ‘essay writing framework’, based on the three-part definition, is proposed for improving the teaching of writing. This approach puts argumentation at the centre of instruction and explains other aspects of writing according to the function they have in the development of argument.
► This study examined students’ problems with argumentation in essay writing. ► The results show academics’ and students’ difficulties with conceptualising argument. ► Consequently, the instruction given to students is vague and inconsistent. ► A framework for teaching writing which puts argumentation at the centre is proposed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1475-1585 |
ispartof | Journal of English for academic purposes, 2012-06, Vol.11 (2), p.145-154 |
issn | 1475-1585 1878-1497 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221439625 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Academic Discourse Argumentation Debate Educational Quality English for Academic Purposes Essay Essays Genre Guidelines Knowledge Level Persuasive Discourse Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Teaching Methods Teaching writing Undergraduate Students Writing (Composition) Writing Instruction |
title | ‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T07%3A23%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98Argument!%E2%80%99%20helping%20students%20understand%20what%20essay%20writing%20is%20about&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20English%20for%20academic%20purposes&rft.au=Wingate,%20Ursula&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=145-154&rft.issn=1475-1585&rft.eissn=1878-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1221439625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1221439625&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ965937&rft_els_id=S1475158511000762&rfr_iscdi=true |