A Cloak for Proliferators? The Suspicions That Impede a Nuclear Weapons Convention
The idea of a nuclear weapons convention -- a global prohibition treaty banning the development, testing, stock-piling, and use of nuclear weapons -- enjoys legal support in the form of a July 1996 advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice. Entitled the "Legality of the Threat or U...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global dialogue (Nicosia, Cyprus) Cyprus), 2006-01, Vol.8 (1/2), p.32 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1/2 |
container_start_page | 32 |
container_title | Global dialogue (Nicosia, Cyprus) |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Ogilvie-White, Tanya |
description | The idea of a nuclear weapons convention -- a global prohibition treaty banning the development, testing, stock-piling, and use of nuclear weapons -- enjoys legal support in the form of a July 1996 advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice. Entitled the "Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons", the advisory opinion declares that states are obligated "to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control". The next few years are likely to be crucial in the realignment of groupings in disarmament forums. People may witness the collapse of the New Agenda Coalition and a splintering of the Non-Aligned Movement along moderate and more fundamentalist lines. This may well be a positive development if the result is that new, cohesive alliances adopt credible disarmament agendas that have more sway over the nuclear-weapon states. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221411315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1921743721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p605-16fc988234c1b52d66c087d6e867c8c16986de82502557f3adb4753fd46bf3803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdjk1LxDAYhHNQcFn3PwRPXgr5bvYkS_FjYVHRgseSJm-wa7apSevvN6In5zIM8zDMGVpRIUlF5JZcoE3OR1IkFFOCrtDLDjchmg_sY8LPKYbBQzJzTPkGt--AX5c8DXaIYy7RzHh_msABNvhxsQFMwm9gpp-2ieMXjHMhL9G5NyHD5s_XqL27bZuH6vB0v292h2pSRFZUebvVmnFhaS-ZU8oSXTsFWtVWW6q2WjnQTBImZe25cb2oJfdOqN5zTfgaXf_OTil-LpDn7jRkCyGYEeKSO8oYFZRyKgt69Q89xiWN5VzHKJVElCP8G9gAVzM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211504988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Cloak for Proliferators? The Suspicions That Impede a Nuclear Weapons Convention</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Ogilvie-White, Tanya</creator><creatorcontrib>Ogilvie-White, Tanya</creatorcontrib><description>The idea of a nuclear weapons convention -- a global prohibition treaty banning the development, testing, stock-piling, and use of nuclear weapons -- enjoys legal support in the form of a July 1996 advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice. Entitled the "Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons", the advisory opinion declares that states are obligated "to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control". The next few years are likely to be crucial in the realignment of groupings in disarmament forums. People may witness the collapse of the New Agenda Coalition and a splintering of the Non-Aligned Movement along moderate and more fundamentalist lines. This may well be a positive development if the result is that new, cohesive alliances adopt credible disarmament agendas that have more sway over the nuclear-weapon states.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1450-0590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nicosia: Centre for World Dialogue</publisher><subject>Arms control & disarmament ; Biological & chemical weapons ; Coalitions ; Cold War ; Congresses and Conventions ; Conventions ; Diplomacy ; Disarmament ; International Court ; International relations ; Morality ; Negotiation ; Negotiations ; Nuclear tests ; Nuclear Weapons ; Realignment ; Treaties ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Global dialogue (Nicosia, Cyprus), 2006-01, Vol.8 (1/2), p.32</ispartof><rights>Copyright Centre for World Dialogue Winter 2006</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ogilvie-White, Tanya</creatorcontrib><title>A Cloak for Proliferators? The Suspicions That Impede a Nuclear Weapons Convention</title><title>Global dialogue (Nicosia, Cyprus)</title><description>The idea of a nuclear weapons convention -- a global prohibition treaty banning the development, testing, stock-piling, and use of nuclear weapons -- enjoys legal support in the form of a July 1996 advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice. Entitled the "Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons", the advisory opinion declares that states are obligated "to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control". The next few years are likely to be crucial in the realignment of groupings in disarmament forums. People may witness the collapse of the New Agenda Coalition and a splintering of the Non-Aligned Movement along moderate and more fundamentalist lines. This may well be a positive development if the result is that new, cohesive alliances adopt credible disarmament agendas that have more sway over the nuclear-weapon states.</description><subject>Arms control & disarmament</subject><subject>Biological & chemical weapons</subject><subject>Coalitions</subject><subject>Cold War</subject><subject>Congresses and Conventions</subject><subject>Conventions</subject><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>Disarmament</subject><subject>International Court</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Nuclear tests</subject><subject>Nuclear Weapons</subject><subject>Realignment</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>1450-0590</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNpdjk1LxDAYhHNQcFn3PwRPXgr5bvYkS_FjYVHRgseSJm-wa7apSevvN6In5zIM8zDMGVpRIUlF5JZcoE3OR1IkFFOCrtDLDjchmg_sY8LPKYbBQzJzTPkGt--AX5c8DXaIYy7RzHh_msABNvhxsQFMwm9gpp-2ieMXjHMhL9G5NyHD5s_XqL27bZuH6vB0v292h2pSRFZUebvVmnFhaS-ZU8oSXTsFWtVWW6q2WjnQTBImZe25cb2oJfdOqN5zTfgaXf_OTil-LpDn7jRkCyGYEeKSO8oYFZRyKgt69Q89xiWN5VzHKJVElCP8G9gAVzM</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Ogilvie-White, Tanya</creator><general>Centre for World Dialogue</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>A Cloak for Proliferators? The Suspicions That Impede a Nuclear Weapons Convention</title><author>Ogilvie-White, Tanya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p605-16fc988234c1b52d66c087d6e867c8c16986de82502557f3adb4753fd46bf3803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Arms control & disarmament</topic><topic>Biological & chemical weapons</topic><topic>Coalitions</topic><topic>Cold War</topic><topic>Congresses and Conventions</topic><topic>Conventions</topic><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>Disarmament</topic><topic>International Court</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Nuclear tests</topic><topic>Nuclear Weapons</topic><topic>Realignment</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogilvie-White, Tanya</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Global dialogue (Nicosia, Cyprus)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogilvie-White, Tanya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Cloak for Proliferators? The Suspicions That Impede a Nuclear Weapons Convention</atitle><jtitle>Global dialogue (Nicosia, Cyprus)</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>32</spage><pages>32-</pages><issn>1450-0590</issn><abstract>The idea of a nuclear weapons convention -- a global prohibition treaty banning the development, testing, stock-piling, and use of nuclear weapons -- enjoys legal support in the form of a July 1996 advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice. Entitled the "Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons", the advisory opinion declares that states are obligated "to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control". The next few years are likely to be crucial in the realignment of groupings in disarmament forums. People may witness the collapse of the New Agenda Coalition and a splintering of the Non-Aligned Movement along moderate and more fundamentalist lines. This may well be a positive development if the result is that new, cohesive alliances adopt credible disarmament agendas that have more sway over the nuclear-weapon states.</abstract><cop>Nicosia</cop><pub>Centre for World Dialogue</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1450-0590 |
ispartof | Global dialogue (Nicosia, Cyprus), 2006-01, Vol.8 (1/2), p.32 |
issn | 1450-0590 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221411315 |
source | Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Arms control & disarmament Biological & chemical weapons Coalitions Cold War Congresses and Conventions Conventions Diplomacy Disarmament International Court International relations Morality Negotiation Negotiations Nuclear tests Nuclear Weapons Realignment Treaties Trust |
title | A Cloak for Proliferators? The Suspicions That Impede a Nuclear Weapons Convention |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A16%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Cloak%20for%20Proliferators?%20The%20Suspicions%20That%20Impede%20a%20Nuclear%20Weapons%20Convention&rft.jtitle=Global%20dialogue%20(Nicosia,%20Cyprus)&rft.au=Ogilvie-White,%20Tanya&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=32&rft.pages=32-&rft.issn=1450-0590&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1921743721%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211504988&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |