The environmentalist's dilemma
Las Vegas, Phoenix, San Diego, and the megalopolis that combines Riverside, Orange, and Los Angeles counties. Since more than one million acres of the Mojave have already been excluded from such development by a law sponsored by U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein in 2009, projects like BrightSource's...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Policy review (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2012-08, Vol.174 (174), p.49 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 174 |
| container_start_page | 49 |
| container_title | Policy review (Washington, D.C.) |
| container_volume | 174 |
| creator | Stein, Steve |
| description | Las Vegas, Phoenix, San Diego, and the megalopolis that combines Riverside, Orange, and Los Angeles counties. Since more than one million acres of the Mojave have already been excluded from such development by a law sponsored by U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein in 2009, projects like BrightSource's become an even more important element in fulfilling California's ambitious plan to obtain at least 30 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020. [...]other newly proposed plants have already been dropped. Since the de facto moratorium on new nuclear development is almost entirely the result of lobbying and litigation by environmental groups, it is ironic that the nuclear industry is now using more recent environmentalist arguments to claw its way back into the game. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221410688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A301572456</galeid><sourcerecordid>A301572456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g462t-ccd3c1d24ff7a1fa4f6b4b985efa1eefa5272ce669870e811eebe1119f27c71c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0M1KAzEQAOAgCtbqK0jBg3pYSbL522MtWoViD1avS5qdrCvZrG5S8fFNqQcLBTsDMzB8M4c5QANKRJEJhekhGmDCRMYLxo_RSQjvOAUTdIDOF28wAv_V9J1vwUftmhAvw6hqHLStPkVHVrsAZ799iF7u7xaTh2w2nz5OxrOsTldiZkyVG1JRZq3UxGpmxZItC8XBagKpcCqpASEKJTEokmZLIIQUlkojicmH6Gpz96PvPlcQYtk2wYBz2kO3CiWhlDCChVL_U5zzHCsh1_RiQ2vtoGy87WKvzZqX4xwTLinjIqlsh6rBQ69d58GmV2z7mx0-ZQVtY3YuXG8tJBPhO9Z6FUL5-Py0v52_7m9vp3tbNZ39tT_Qh6u_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035308678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The environmentalist's dilemma</title><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><source>Political Science Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stein, Steve</creator><creatorcontrib>Stein, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>Las Vegas, Phoenix, San Diego, and the megalopolis that combines Riverside, Orange, and Los Angeles counties. Since more than one million acres of the Mojave have already been excluded from such development by a law sponsored by U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein in 2009, projects like BrightSource's become an even more important element in fulfilling California's ambitious plan to obtain at least 30 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020. [...]other newly proposed plants have already been dropped. Since the de facto moratorium on new nuclear development is almost entirely the result of lobbying and litigation by environmental groups, it is ironic that the nuclear industry is now using more recent environmentalist arguments to claw its way back into the game.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-5945</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-6802</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POREDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Hoover Institution Press</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; American Indians ; California ; Census ; Coal-fired power plants ; Competition ; Conservation (Environment) ; Costs ; Developmental Stages ; Dilemmas ; Electricity ; Energy ; Energy policy ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental protection ; Environmentalists ; Federal Legislation ; Fossil fuels ; Fuels ; Land ; Land Acquisition ; Land use planning ; Law ; Management ; Nevada ; Oregon ; Renewable resources ; Site Development ; Social aspects ; Solar energy ; Solar energy industry ; Subsidies ; Websites ; Wildlife conservation ; Wind power ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Policy review (Washington, D.C.), 2012-08, Vol.174 (174), p.49</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Hoover Institution Press</rights><rights>Copyright Hoover Institute Aug/Sep 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,14637</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stein, Steve</creatorcontrib><title>The environmentalist's dilemma</title><title>Policy review (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>Las Vegas, Phoenix, San Diego, and the megalopolis that combines Riverside, Orange, and Los Angeles counties. Since more than one million acres of the Mojave have already been excluded from such development by a law sponsored by U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein in 2009, projects like BrightSource's become an even more important element in fulfilling California's ambitious plan to obtain at least 30 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020. [...]other newly proposed plants have already been dropped. Since the de facto moratorium on new nuclear development is almost entirely the result of lobbying and litigation by environmental groups, it is ironic that the nuclear industry is now using more recent environmentalist arguments to claw its way back into the game.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>American Indians</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Census</subject><subject>Coal-fired power plants</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Conservation (Environment)</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Developmental Stages</subject><subject>Dilemmas</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmentalists</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land Acquisition</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Nevada</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Site Development</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar energy industry</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Websites</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0146-5945</issn><issn>2169-6802</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0M1KAzEQAOAgCtbqK0jBg3pYSbL522MtWoViD1avS5qdrCvZrG5S8fFNqQcLBTsDMzB8M4c5QANKRJEJhekhGmDCRMYLxo_RSQjvOAUTdIDOF28wAv_V9J1vwUftmhAvw6hqHLStPkVHVrsAZ799iF7u7xaTh2w2nz5OxrOsTldiZkyVG1JRZq3UxGpmxZItC8XBagKpcCqpASEKJTEokmZLIIQUlkojicmH6Gpz96PvPlcQYtk2wYBz2kO3CiWhlDCChVL_U5zzHCsh1_RiQ2vtoGy87WKvzZqX4xwTLinjIqlsh6rBQ69d58GmV2z7mx0-ZQVtY3YuXG8tJBPhO9Z6FUL5-Py0v52_7m9vp3tbNZ39tT_Qh6u_</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Stein, Steve</creator><general>Hoover Institution Press</general><general>Hoover Institute</general><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>884</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0I</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>The environmentalist's dilemma</title><author>Stein, Steve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g462t-ccd3c1d24ff7a1fa4f6b4b985efa1eefa5272ce669870e811eebe1119f27c71c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>American Indians</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Census</topic><topic>Coal-fired power plants</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Conservation (Environment)</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Developmental Stages</topic><topic>Dilemmas</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmentalists</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land Acquisition</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Nevada</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Site Development</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar energy industry</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Websites</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stein, Steve</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale in Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Alt PressWatch (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Policy review (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stein, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The environmentalist's dilemma</atitle><jtitle>Policy review (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>174</volume><issue>174</issue><spage>49</spage><pages>49-</pages><issn>0146-5945</issn><eissn>2169-6802</eissn><coden>POREDP</coden><abstract>Las Vegas, Phoenix, San Diego, and the megalopolis that combines Riverside, Orange, and Los Angeles counties. Since more than one million acres of the Mojave have already been excluded from such development by a law sponsored by U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein in 2009, projects like BrightSource's become an even more important element in fulfilling California's ambitious plan to obtain at least 30 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020. [...]other newly proposed plants have already been dropped. Since the de facto moratorium on new nuclear development is almost entirely the result of lobbying and litigation by environmental groups, it is ironic that the nuclear industry is now using more recent environmentalist arguments to claw its way back into the game.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Hoover Institution Press</pub><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0146-5945 |
| ispartof | Policy review (Washington, D.C.), 2012-08, Vol.174 (174), p.49 |
| issn | 0146-5945 2169-6802 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221410688 |
| source | Education Source (EBSCOhost); Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3); Political Science Complete (EB_SDU_P3); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Alternative energy sources American Indians California Census Coal-fired power plants Competition Conservation (Environment) Costs Developmental Stages Dilemmas Electricity Energy Energy policy Environmental aspects Environmental protection Environmentalists Federal Legislation Fossil fuels Fuels Land Land Acquisition Land use planning Law Management Nevada Oregon Renewable resources Site Development Social aspects Solar energy Solar energy industry Subsidies Websites Wildlife conservation Wind power Young Children |
| title | The environmentalist's dilemma |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T06%3A40%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20environmentalist's%20dilemma&rft.jtitle=Policy%20review%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Stein,%20Steve&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=174&rft.spage=49&rft.pages=49-&rft.issn=0146-5945&rft.eissn=2169-6802&rft.coden=POREDP&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA301572456%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035308678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A301572456&rfr_iscdi=true |