Frequency and risk factors of fetal malnutrition among liveborn singleton term neonates using a computerised perinatal database, 2000-2006
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, risk factors and anthropometric measurements of fetally malnourished, liveborn singleton term neonates. Methods: The computed delivery room data of 11.741 liveborn singleton term neonates was used to compare malnourished and nourished newb...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of paediatrics and child health 2012-10, Vol.48 (10), p.926-930 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 930 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 926 |
container_title | Journal of paediatrics and child health |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Salihoğlu, Özgül Karatekin, Güner Baksu, Başak Uslu, Sinan Baksu, Alparslan Can, Günay Nuhoğlu, Asiye |
description | Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, risk factors and anthropometric measurements of fetally malnourished, liveborn singleton term neonates.
Methods: The computed delivery room data of 11.741 liveborn singleton term neonates was used to compare malnourished and nourished newborns.
Results: Of the total subjects, 577 (4.9%) were malnourished. There were no differences between the groups with regard to gender distribution, Apgar scores, maternal parity, smoking during pregnancy and type of delivery. Maternal age and neonatal gestational age (GA) were significantly lower in malnourished newborns (P < 0.001). Birthweight (BW), birth length (BL) and head circumference (HC) were significantly lower in the malnourished group compared with well‐nourished group (P < 0.001). Mean BW (g) was 2724.7 ± 17.0 in the malnourished group versus 3234.3 ± 3.8 in the well‐nourished group; BL (cm) was 47.8 ± 0.1 in malnourished versus 49.5 ± 0.0 in well‐nourished neonates; HC (cm) was 33.25 ± 0.1 in the malnourished versus 34.3 ± 0.0 in the well‐nourished group. Between the groups, there were significant differences in the ratio of small, appropriate and large for GA (P < 0.001). Of the malnourished newborns, 35.5% were small for GA, 63.3% were appropriate for GA and 1.2% were large for GA.
Conclusion: Fetal malnutrition (FM) still exists despite the advances in current obstetric care. Neonates of adolescent mothers and of low GA are particularly at risk for FM. The BW, BL and HC of fetally malnourished neonates are lower than that of well‐nourished neonates. Like term singleton appropriate and small for GA neonates, term singleton large for GA neonates could also have been fetally malnourished. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02520.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221139659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1115527257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4680-ba45dec0bc7327582d5e424b1564ea937e40a5f35c5c40074e493e679f7da9093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhiMEoqXwCsgSGxYk-BrHCxZooOUy4iJxWVqOc1J5mtiDndCZV-hT4zBlFqzqhY-l__uPz9FfFIjgiuTzclMRznFJpOAVxYRWmAqKq9294vQo3M9vzHjJG4JPikcpbTDOmGgeFieUNko2GJ8WN-cRfs3g7R4Z36Ho0hXqjZ1CTCj0qIfJDGg0g5-n6CYXPDJj8JdocL-hDdGj5PzlAFMWJogj8hC8mSCheRGQQTaM2zlLLkGHtrlmObfs8t2aBC8QzWOV-aofFw96MyR4clvPiu_nb7-t3pXrzxfvV6_XpeV1g8vWcNGBxa2VjErR0E4Ap7wlouZgFJPAsRE9E1ZYjrHkwBWDWqpedkZhxc6K54e-2xjy6mnSo0sWhsHk4eekCaWEMFWLO6CECEElFTKjz_5DN2GOPi-yUHlyRTnLVHOgbAwpRej1NrrRxL0meOGI3uglQb0kqJdo9d9o9S5bn95-MLcjdEfjvywz8OoAXLsB9ndurD98WS2v7C8Pfpcm2B39Jl7pWjIp9M9PF1qqN-rrj_VHvWJ_AIMjwDs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1114689243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frequency and risk factors of fetal malnutrition among liveborn singleton term neonates using a computerised perinatal database, 2000-2006</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Salihoğlu, Özgül ; Karatekin, Güner ; Baksu, Başak ; Uslu, Sinan ; Baksu, Alparslan ; Can, Günay ; Nuhoğlu, Asiye</creator><creatorcontrib>Salihoğlu, Özgül ; Karatekin, Güner ; Baksu, Başak ; Uslu, Sinan ; Baksu, Alparslan ; Can, Günay ; Nuhoğlu, Asiye</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, risk factors and anthropometric measurements of fetally malnourished, liveborn singleton term neonates.
Methods: The computed delivery room data of 11.741 liveborn singleton term neonates was used to compare malnourished and nourished newborns.
Results: Of the total subjects, 577 (4.9%) were malnourished. There were no differences between the groups with regard to gender distribution, Apgar scores, maternal parity, smoking during pregnancy and type of delivery. Maternal age and neonatal gestational age (GA) were significantly lower in malnourished newborns (P < 0.001). Birthweight (BW), birth length (BL) and head circumference (HC) were significantly lower in the malnourished group compared with well‐nourished group (P < 0.001). Mean BW (g) was 2724.7 ± 17.0 in the malnourished group versus 3234.3 ± 3.8 in the well‐nourished group; BL (cm) was 47.8 ± 0.1 in malnourished versus 49.5 ± 0.0 in well‐nourished neonates; HC (cm) was 33.25 ± 0.1 in the malnourished versus 34.3 ± 0.0 in the well‐nourished group. Between the groups, there were significant differences in the ratio of small, appropriate and large for GA (P < 0.001). Of the malnourished newborns, 35.5% were small for GA, 63.3% were appropriate for GA and 1.2% were large for GA.
Conclusion: Fetal malnutrition (FM) still exists despite the advances in current obstetric care. Neonates of adolescent mothers and of low GA are particularly at risk for FM. The BW, BL and HC of fetally malnourished neonates are lower than that of well‐nourished neonates. Like term singleton appropriate and small for GA neonates, term singleton large for GA neonates could also have been fetally malnourished.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1034-4810</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02520.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22897800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Adult ; Age ; birth length ; Birth Weight ; birthweight ; Body Height ; Case-Control Studies ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; fetal malnutrition ; Fetal Nutrition Disorders - epidemiology ; Fetal Nutrition Disorders - etiology ; Fetal Nutrition Disorders - pathology ; Gender ; Gestational Age ; Head - anatomy & histology ; head circumference ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Small for Gestational Age ; Live Birth ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Malnutrition ; Maternal Age ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Parity ; Pregnancy ; Risk Factors ; Term Birth ; term neonate ; Turkey - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2012-10, Vol.48 (10), p.926-930</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health © 2012 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians)</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health © 2012 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4680-ba45dec0bc7327582d5e424b1564ea937e40a5f35c5c40074e493e679f7da9093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4680-ba45dec0bc7327582d5e424b1564ea937e40a5f35c5c40074e493e679f7da9093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1754.2012.02520.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1754.2012.02520.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22897800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salihoğlu, Özgül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karatekin, Güner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baksu, Başak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uslu, Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baksu, Alparslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Can, Günay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuhoğlu, Asiye</creatorcontrib><title>Frequency and risk factors of fetal malnutrition among liveborn singleton term neonates using a computerised perinatal database, 2000-2006</title><title>Journal of paediatrics and child health</title><addtitle>J Paediatr Child Health</addtitle><description>Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, risk factors and anthropometric measurements of fetally malnourished, liveborn singleton term neonates.
Methods: The computed delivery room data of 11.741 liveborn singleton term neonates was used to compare malnourished and nourished newborns.
Results: Of the total subjects, 577 (4.9%) were malnourished. There were no differences between the groups with regard to gender distribution, Apgar scores, maternal parity, smoking during pregnancy and type of delivery. Maternal age and neonatal gestational age (GA) were significantly lower in malnourished newborns (P < 0.001). Birthweight (BW), birth length (BL) and head circumference (HC) were significantly lower in the malnourished group compared with well‐nourished group (P < 0.001). Mean BW (g) was 2724.7 ± 17.0 in the malnourished group versus 3234.3 ± 3.8 in the well‐nourished group; BL (cm) was 47.8 ± 0.1 in malnourished versus 49.5 ± 0.0 in well‐nourished neonates; HC (cm) was 33.25 ± 0.1 in the malnourished versus 34.3 ± 0.0 in the well‐nourished group. Between the groups, there were significant differences in the ratio of small, appropriate and large for GA (P < 0.001). Of the malnourished newborns, 35.5% were small for GA, 63.3% were appropriate for GA and 1.2% were large for GA.
Conclusion: Fetal malnutrition (FM) still exists despite the advances in current obstetric care. Neonates of adolescent mothers and of low GA are particularly at risk for FM. The BW, BL and HC of fetally malnourished neonates are lower than that of well‐nourished neonates. Like term singleton appropriate and small for GA neonates, term singleton large for GA neonates could also have been fetally malnourished.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>birth length</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>birthweight</subject><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fetal malnutrition</subject><subject>Fetal Nutrition Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Fetal Nutrition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Fetal Nutrition Disorders - pathology</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Head - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>head circumference</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Small for Gestational Age</subject><subject>Live Birth</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malnutrition</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Term Birth</subject><subject>term neonate</subject><subject>Turkey - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1034-4810</issn><issn>1440-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhiMEoqXwCsgSGxYk-BrHCxZooOUy4iJxWVqOc1J5mtiDndCZV-hT4zBlFqzqhY-l__uPz9FfFIjgiuTzclMRznFJpOAVxYRWmAqKq9294vQo3M9vzHjJG4JPikcpbTDOmGgeFieUNko2GJ8WN-cRfs3g7R4Z36Ho0hXqjZ1CTCj0qIfJDGg0g5-n6CYXPDJj8JdocL-hDdGj5PzlAFMWJogj8hC8mSCheRGQQTaM2zlLLkGHtrlmObfs8t2aBC8QzWOV-aofFw96MyR4clvPiu_nb7-t3pXrzxfvV6_XpeV1g8vWcNGBxa2VjErR0E4Ap7wlouZgFJPAsRE9E1ZYjrHkwBWDWqpedkZhxc6K54e-2xjy6mnSo0sWhsHk4eekCaWEMFWLO6CECEElFTKjz_5DN2GOPi-yUHlyRTnLVHOgbAwpRej1NrrRxL0meOGI3uglQb0kqJdo9d9o9S5bn95-MLcjdEfjvywz8OoAXLsB9ndurD98WS2v7C8Pfpcm2B39Jl7pWjIp9M9PF1qqN-rrj_VHvWJ_AIMjwDs</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Salihoğlu, Özgül</creator><creator>Karatekin, Güner</creator><creator>Baksu, Başak</creator><creator>Uslu, Sinan</creator><creator>Baksu, Alparslan</creator><creator>Can, Günay</creator><creator>Nuhoğlu, Asiye</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Frequency and risk factors of fetal malnutrition among liveborn singleton term neonates using a computerised perinatal database, 2000-2006</title><author>Salihoğlu, Özgül ; Karatekin, Güner ; Baksu, Başak ; Uslu, Sinan ; Baksu, Alparslan ; Can, Günay ; Nuhoğlu, Asiye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4680-ba45dec0bc7327582d5e424b1564ea937e40a5f35c5c40074e493e679f7da9093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>birth length</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>birthweight</topic><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fetal malnutrition</topic><topic>Fetal Nutrition Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Fetal Nutrition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Fetal Nutrition Disorders - pathology</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Head - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>head circumference</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Small for Gestational Age</topic><topic>Live Birth</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malnutrition</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Term Birth</topic><topic>term neonate</topic><topic>Turkey - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salihoğlu, Özgül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karatekin, Güner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baksu, Başak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uslu, Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baksu, Alparslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Can, Günay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuhoğlu, Asiye</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of paediatrics and child health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salihoğlu, Özgül</au><au>Karatekin, Güner</au><au>Baksu, Başak</au><au>Uslu, Sinan</au><au>Baksu, Alparslan</au><au>Can, Günay</au><au>Nuhoğlu, Asiye</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frequency and risk factors of fetal malnutrition among liveborn singleton term neonates using a computerised perinatal database, 2000-2006</atitle><jtitle>Journal of paediatrics and child health</jtitle><addtitle>J Paediatr Child Health</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>926</spage><epage>930</epage><pages>926-930</pages><issn>1034-4810</issn><eissn>1440-1754</eissn><abstract>Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, risk factors and anthropometric measurements of fetally malnourished, liveborn singleton term neonates.
Methods: The computed delivery room data of 11.741 liveborn singleton term neonates was used to compare malnourished and nourished newborns.
Results: Of the total subjects, 577 (4.9%) were malnourished. There were no differences between the groups with regard to gender distribution, Apgar scores, maternal parity, smoking during pregnancy and type of delivery. Maternal age and neonatal gestational age (GA) were significantly lower in malnourished newborns (P < 0.001). Birthweight (BW), birth length (BL) and head circumference (HC) were significantly lower in the malnourished group compared with well‐nourished group (P < 0.001). Mean BW (g) was 2724.7 ± 17.0 in the malnourished group versus 3234.3 ± 3.8 in the well‐nourished group; BL (cm) was 47.8 ± 0.1 in malnourished versus 49.5 ± 0.0 in well‐nourished neonates; HC (cm) was 33.25 ± 0.1 in the malnourished versus 34.3 ± 0.0 in the well‐nourished group. Between the groups, there were significant differences in the ratio of small, appropriate and large for GA (P < 0.001). Of the malnourished newborns, 35.5% were small for GA, 63.3% were appropriate for GA and 1.2% were large for GA.
Conclusion: Fetal malnutrition (FM) still exists despite the advances in current obstetric care. Neonates of adolescent mothers and of low GA are particularly at risk for FM. The BW, BL and HC of fetally malnourished neonates are lower than that of well‐nourished neonates. Like term singleton appropriate and small for GA neonates, term singleton large for GA neonates could also have been fetally malnourished.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>22897800</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02520.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1034-4810 |
ispartof | Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2012-10, Vol.48 (10), p.926-930 |
issn | 1034-4810 1440-1754 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221139659 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adolescent Adolescents Adult Age birth length Birth Weight birthweight Body Height Case-Control Studies Databases, Factual Female fetal malnutrition Fetal Nutrition Disorders - epidemiology Fetal Nutrition Disorders - etiology Fetal Nutrition Disorders - pathology Gender Gestational Age Head - anatomy & histology head circumference Humans Infant, Newborn Infant, Small for Gestational Age Live Birth Logistic Models Male Malnutrition Maternal Age Neonates Newborn babies Parity Pregnancy Risk Factors Term Birth term neonate Turkey - epidemiology Young Adult |
title | Frequency and risk factors of fetal malnutrition among liveborn singleton term neonates using a computerised perinatal database, 2000-2006 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T04%3A02%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frequency%20and%20risk%20factors%20of%20fetal%20malnutrition%20among%20liveborn%20singleton%20term%20neonates%20using%20a%20computerised%20perinatal%20database,%202000-2006&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20paediatrics%20and%20child%20health&rft.au=Saliho%C4%9Flu,%20%C3%96zg%C3%BCl&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=926&rft.epage=930&rft.pages=926-930&rft.issn=1034-4810&rft.eissn=1440-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02520.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1115527257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1114689243&rft_id=info:pmid/22897800&rfr_iscdi=true |