Frequency and risk factors of fetal malnutrition among liveborn singleton term neonates using a computerised perinatal database, 2000-2006

Aim:  The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, risk factors and anthropometric measurements of fetally malnourished, liveborn singleton term neonates. Methods:  The computed delivery room data of 11.741 liveborn singleton term neonates was used to compare malnourished and nourished newb...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of paediatrics and child health 2012-10, Vol.48 (10), p.926-930
Hauptverfasser: Salihoğlu, Özgül, Karatekin, Güner, Baksu, Başak, Uslu, Sinan, Baksu, Alparslan, Can, Günay, Nuhoğlu, Asiye
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 930
container_issue 10
container_start_page 926
container_title Journal of paediatrics and child health
container_volume 48
creator Salihoğlu, Özgül
Karatekin, Güner
Baksu, Başak
Uslu, Sinan
Baksu, Alparslan
Can, Günay
Nuhoğlu, Asiye
description Aim:  The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, risk factors and anthropometric measurements of fetally malnourished, liveborn singleton term neonates. Methods:  The computed delivery room data of 11.741 liveborn singleton term neonates was used to compare malnourished and nourished newborns. Results:  Of the total subjects, 577 (4.9%) were malnourished. There were no differences between the groups with regard to gender distribution, Apgar scores, maternal parity, smoking during pregnancy and type of delivery. Maternal age and neonatal gestational age (GA) were significantly lower in malnourished newborns (P < 0.001). Birthweight (BW), birth length (BL) and head circumference (HC) were significantly lower in the malnourished group compared with well‐nourished group (P < 0.001). Mean BW (g) was 2724.7 ± 17.0 in the malnourished group versus 3234.3 ± 3.8 in the well‐nourished group; BL (cm) was 47.8 ± 0.1 in malnourished versus 49.5 ± 0.0 in well‐nourished neonates; HC (cm) was 33.25 ± 0.1 in the malnourished versus 34.3 ± 0.0 in the well‐nourished group. Between the groups, there were significant differences in the ratio of small, appropriate and large for GA (P < 0.001). Of the malnourished newborns, 35.5% were small for GA, 63.3% were appropriate for GA and 1.2% were large for GA. Conclusion:  Fetal malnutrition (FM) still exists despite the advances in current obstetric care. Neonates of adolescent mothers and of low GA are particularly at risk for FM. The BW, BL and HC of fetally malnourished neonates are lower than that of well‐nourished neonates. Like term singleton appropriate and small for GA neonates, term singleton large for GA neonates could also have been fetally malnourished.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02520.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221139659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1115527257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4680-ba45dec0bc7327582d5e424b1564ea937e40a5f35c5c40074e493e679f7da9093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhiMEoqXwCsgSGxYk-BrHCxZooOUy4iJxWVqOc1J5mtiDndCZV-hT4zBlFqzqhY-l__uPz9FfFIjgiuTzclMRznFJpOAVxYRWmAqKq9294vQo3M9vzHjJG4JPikcpbTDOmGgeFieUNko2GJ8WN-cRfs3g7R4Z36Ho0hXqjZ1CTCj0qIfJDGg0g5-n6CYXPDJj8JdocL-hDdGj5PzlAFMWJogj8hC8mSCheRGQQTaM2zlLLkGHtrlmObfs8t2aBC8QzWOV-aofFw96MyR4clvPiu_nb7-t3pXrzxfvV6_XpeV1g8vWcNGBxa2VjErR0E4Ap7wlouZgFJPAsRE9E1ZYjrHkwBWDWqpedkZhxc6K54e-2xjy6mnSo0sWhsHk4eekCaWEMFWLO6CECEElFTKjz_5DN2GOPi-yUHlyRTnLVHOgbAwpRej1NrrRxL0meOGI3uglQb0kqJdo9d9o9S5bn95-MLcjdEfjvywz8OoAXLsB9ndurD98WS2v7C8Pfpcm2B39Jl7pWjIp9M9PF1qqN-rrj_VHvWJ_AIMjwDs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1114689243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frequency and risk factors of fetal malnutrition among liveborn singleton term neonates using a computerised perinatal database, 2000-2006</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Salihoğlu, Özgül ; Karatekin, Güner ; Baksu, Başak ; Uslu, Sinan ; Baksu, Alparslan ; Can, Günay ; Nuhoğlu, Asiye</creator><creatorcontrib>Salihoğlu, Özgül ; Karatekin, Güner ; Baksu, Başak ; Uslu, Sinan ; Baksu, Alparslan ; Can, Günay ; Nuhoğlu, Asiye</creatorcontrib><description>Aim:  The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, risk factors and anthropometric measurements of fetally malnourished, liveborn singleton term neonates. Methods:  The computed delivery room data of 11.741 liveborn singleton term neonates was used to compare malnourished and nourished newborns. Results:  Of the total subjects, 577 (4.9%) were malnourished. There were no differences between the groups with regard to gender distribution, Apgar scores, maternal parity, smoking during pregnancy and type of delivery. Maternal age and neonatal gestational age (GA) were significantly lower in malnourished newborns (P &lt; 0.001). Birthweight (BW), birth length (BL) and head circumference (HC) were significantly lower in the malnourished group compared with well‐nourished group (P &lt; 0.001). Mean BW (g) was 2724.7 ± 17.0 in the malnourished group versus 3234.3 ± 3.8 in the well‐nourished group; BL (cm) was 47.8 ± 0.1 in malnourished versus 49.5 ± 0.0 in well‐nourished neonates; HC (cm) was 33.25 ± 0.1 in the malnourished versus 34.3 ± 0.0 in the well‐nourished group. Between the groups, there were significant differences in the ratio of small, appropriate and large for GA (P &lt; 0.001). Of the malnourished newborns, 35.5% were small for GA, 63.3% were appropriate for GA and 1.2% were large for GA. Conclusion:  Fetal malnutrition (FM) still exists despite the advances in current obstetric care. Neonates of adolescent mothers and of low GA are particularly at risk for FM. The BW, BL and HC of fetally malnourished neonates are lower than that of well‐nourished neonates. Like term singleton appropriate and small for GA neonates, term singleton large for GA neonates could also have been fetally malnourished.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1034-4810</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02520.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22897800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Adult ; Age ; birth length ; Birth Weight ; birthweight ; Body Height ; Case-Control Studies ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; fetal malnutrition ; Fetal Nutrition Disorders - epidemiology ; Fetal Nutrition Disorders - etiology ; Fetal Nutrition Disorders - pathology ; Gender ; Gestational Age ; Head - anatomy &amp; histology ; head circumference ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Small for Gestational Age ; Live Birth ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Malnutrition ; Maternal Age ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Parity ; Pregnancy ; Risk Factors ; Term Birth ; term neonate ; Turkey - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2012-10, Vol.48 (10), p.926-930</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health © 2012 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians)</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health © 2012 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4680-ba45dec0bc7327582d5e424b1564ea937e40a5f35c5c40074e493e679f7da9093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4680-ba45dec0bc7327582d5e424b1564ea937e40a5f35c5c40074e493e679f7da9093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1754.2012.02520.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1754.2012.02520.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22897800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salihoğlu, Özgül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karatekin, Güner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baksu, Başak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uslu, Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baksu, Alparslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Can, Günay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuhoğlu, Asiye</creatorcontrib><title>Frequency and risk factors of fetal malnutrition among liveborn singleton term neonates using a computerised perinatal database, 2000-2006</title><title>Journal of paediatrics and child health</title><addtitle>J Paediatr Child Health</addtitle><description>Aim:  The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, risk factors and anthropometric measurements of fetally malnourished, liveborn singleton term neonates. Methods:  The computed delivery room data of 11.741 liveborn singleton term neonates was used to compare malnourished and nourished newborns. Results:  Of the total subjects, 577 (4.9%) were malnourished. There were no differences between the groups with regard to gender distribution, Apgar scores, maternal parity, smoking during pregnancy and type of delivery. Maternal age and neonatal gestational age (GA) were significantly lower in malnourished newborns (P &lt; 0.001). Birthweight (BW), birth length (BL) and head circumference (HC) were significantly lower in the malnourished group compared with well‐nourished group (P &lt; 0.001). Mean BW (g) was 2724.7 ± 17.0 in the malnourished group versus 3234.3 ± 3.8 in the well‐nourished group; BL (cm) was 47.8 ± 0.1 in malnourished versus 49.5 ± 0.0 in well‐nourished neonates; HC (cm) was 33.25 ± 0.1 in the malnourished versus 34.3 ± 0.0 in the well‐nourished group. Between the groups, there were significant differences in the ratio of small, appropriate and large for GA (P &lt; 0.001). Of the malnourished newborns, 35.5% were small for GA, 63.3% were appropriate for GA and 1.2% were large for GA. Conclusion:  Fetal malnutrition (FM) still exists despite the advances in current obstetric care. Neonates of adolescent mothers and of low GA are particularly at risk for FM. The BW, BL and HC of fetally malnourished neonates are lower than that of well‐nourished neonates. Like term singleton appropriate and small for GA neonates, term singleton large for GA neonates could also have been fetally malnourished.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>birth length</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>birthweight</subject><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fetal malnutrition</subject><subject>Fetal Nutrition Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Fetal Nutrition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Fetal Nutrition Disorders - pathology</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Head - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>head circumference</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Small for Gestational Age</subject><subject>Live Birth</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malnutrition</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Term Birth</subject><subject>term neonate</subject><subject>Turkey - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1034-4810</issn><issn>1440-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhiMEoqXwCsgSGxYk-BrHCxZooOUy4iJxWVqOc1J5mtiDndCZV-hT4zBlFqzqhY-l__uPz9FfFIjgiuTzclMRznFJpOAVxYRWmAqKq9294vQo3M9vzHjJG4JPikcpbTDOmGgeFieUNko2GJ8WN-cRfs3g7R4Z36Ho0hXqjZ1CTCj0qIfJDGg0g5-n6CYXPDJj8JdocL-hDdGj5PzlAFMWJogj8hC8mSCheRGQQTaM2zlLLkGHtrlmObfs8t2aBC8QzWOV-aofFw96MyR4clvPiu_nb7-t3pXrzxfvV6_XpeV1g8vWcNGBxa2VjErR0E4Ap7wlouZgFJPAsRE9E1ZYjrHkwBWDWqpedkZhxc6K54e-2xjy6mnSo0sWhsHk4eekCaWEMFWLO6CECEElFTKjz_5DN2GOPi-yUHlyRTnLVHOgbAwpRej1NrrRxL0meOGI3uglQb0kqJdo9d9o9S5bn95-MLcjdEfjvywz8OoAXLsB9ndurD98WS2v7C8Pfpcm2B39Jl7pWjIp9M9PF1qqN-rrj_VHvWJ_AIMjwDs</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Salihoğlu, Özgül</creator><creator>Karatekin, Güner</creator><creator>Baksu, Başak</creator><creator>Uslu, Sinan</creator><creator>Baksu, Alparslan</creator><creator>Can, Günay</creator><creator>Nuhoğlu, Asiye</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Frequency and risk factors of fetal malnutrition among liveborn singleton term neonates using a computerised perinatal database, 2000-2006</title><author>Salihoğlu, Özgül ; Karatekin, Güner ; Baksu, Başak ; Uslu, Sinan ; Baksu, Alparslan ; Can, Günay ; Nuhoğlu, Asiye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4680-ba45dec0bc7327582d5e424b1564ea937e40a5f35c5c40074e493e679f7da9093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>birth length</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>birthweight</topic><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fetal malnutrition</topic><topic>Fetal Nutrition Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Fetal Nutrition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Fetal Nutrition Disorders - pathology</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Head - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>head circumference</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Small for Gestational Age</topic><topic>Live Birth</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malnutrition</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Term Birth</topic><topic>term neonate</topic><topic>Turkey - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salihoğlu, Özgül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karatekin, Güner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baksu, Başak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uslu, Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baksu, Alparslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Can, Günay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuhoğlu, Asiye</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of paediatrics and child health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salihoğlu, Özgül</au><au>Karatekin, Güner</au><au>Baksu, Başak</au><au>Uslu, Sinan</au><au>Baksu, Alparslan</au><au>Can, Günay</au><au>Nuhoğlu, Asiye</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frequency and risk factors of fetal malnutrition among liveborn singleton term neonates using a computerised perinatal database, 2000-2006</atitle><jtitle>Journal of paediatrics and child health</jtitle><addtitle>J Paediatr Child Health</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>926</spage><epage>930</epage><pages>926-930</pages><issn>1034-4810</issn><eissn>1440-1754</eissn><abstract>Aim:  The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, risk factors and anthropometric measurements of fetally malnourished, liveborn singleton term neonates. Methods:  The computed delivery room data of 11.741 liveborn singleton term neonates was used to compare malnourished and nourished newborns. Results:  Of the total subjects, 577 (4.9%) were malnourished. There were no differences between the groups with regard to gender distribution, Apgar scores, maternal parity, smoking during pregnancy and type of delivery. Maternal age and neonatal gestational age (GA) were significantly lower in malnourished newborns (P &lt; 0.001). Birthweight (BW), birth length (BL) and head circumference (HC) were significantly lower in the malnourished group compared with well‐nourished group (P &lt; 0.001). Mean BW (g) was 2724.7 ± 17.0 in the malnourished group versus 3234.3 ± 3.8 in the well‐nourished group; BL (cm) was 47.8 ± 0.1 in malnourished versus 49.5 ± 0.0 in well‐nourished neonates; HC (cm) was 33.25 ± 0.1 in the malnourished versus 34.3 ± 0.0 in the well‐nourished group. Between the groups, there were significant differences in the ratio of small, appropriate and large for GA (P &lt; 0.001). Of the malnourished newborns, 35.5% were small for GA, 63.3% were appropriate for GA and 1.2% were large for GA. Conclusion:  Fetal malnutrition (FM) still exists despite the advances in current obstetric care. Neonates of adolescent mothers and of low GA are particularly at risk for FM. The BW, BL and HC of fetally malnourished neonates are lower than that of well‐nourished neonates. Like term singleton appropriate and small for GA neonates, term singleton large for GA neonates could also have been fetally malnourished.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>22897800</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02520.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1034-4810
ispartof Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2012-10, Vol.48 (10), p.926-930
issn 1034-4810
1440-1754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221139659
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adolescent
Adolescents
Adult
Age
birth length
Birth Weight
birthweight
Body Height
Case-Control Studies
Databases, Factual
Female
fetal malnutrition
Fetal Nutrition Disorders - epidemiology
Fetal Nutrition Disorders - etiology
Fetal Nutrition Disorders - pathology
Gender
Gestational Age
Head - anatomy & histology
head circumference
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Small for Gestational Age
Live Birth
Logistic Models
Male
Malnutrition
Maternal Age
Neonates
Newborn babies
Parity
Pregnancy
Risk Factors
Term Birth
term neonate
Turkey - epidemiology
Young Adult
title Frequency and risk factors of fetal malnutrition among liveborn singleton term neonates using a computerised perinatal database, 2000-2006
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T04%3A02%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frequency%20and%20risk%20factors%20of%20fetal%20malnutrition%20among%20liveborn%20singleton%20term%20neonates%20using%20a%20computerised%20perinatal%20database,%202000-2006&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20paediatrics%20and%20child%20health&rft.au=Saliho%C4%9Flu,%20%C3%96zg%C3%BCl&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=926&rft.epage=930&rft.pages=926-930&rft.issn=1034-4810&rft.eissn=1440-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02520.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1115527257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1114689243&rft_id=info:pmid/22897800&rfr_iscdi=true