Clinical Efficacy of Subgingivally Delivered 1.2‐mg Simvastatin in the Treatment of Individuals With Class II Furcation Defects: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: Simvastatin (SMV) assists in bone regeneration and has an anti‐inflammatory effect when delivered or applied locally. The present clinical trial is designed to investigate the effectiveness of 1.2‐mg SMV as a local drug delivery system as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of periodontology (1970) 2012-12, Vol.83 (12), p.1472-1479
Hauptverfasser: Pradeep, A.R., Priyanka, N., Kalra, Nitish, Naik, Savitha B., Singh, Sonender P., Martande, Santosh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Simvastatin (SMV) assists in bone regeneration and has an anti‐inflammatory effect when delivered or applied locally. The present clinical trial is designed to investigate the effectiveness of 1.2‐mg SMV as a local drug delivery system as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) for the treatment of Class II furcation defects. Methods: Seventy‐two patients with mandibular buccal Class II furcation defects were randomized and categorized into two treatment groups: SRP plus placebo (group 1) and SRP plus 1.2‐mg SMV (group 2). Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline before SRP and at 3 and 6 months; they included modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI), probing depth (PD), and relative vertical (RVAL) and horizontal (RHAL) attachment levels. At baseline and after 6 months, radiologic assessment of bone defect fill was performed. Results: Both therapies resulted in significant improvements. The decrease in mSBI score at 6 months was greater in group 2 (2.02 ± 0.23) compared with group 1 (1.80 ± 0.22). The mean decrease in PD at 6 months was 1.30 ± 1.0 and 4.05 ± 1.31 mm in groups 1 and 2, respectively. A significantly greater gain in mean RVAL and RHAL was found in group 2 than in group 1 (P
ISSN:0022-3492
1943-3670
DOI:10.1902/jop.2012.110716